RESUMEN
Plasma measurements of levodopa and its major metabolites including dopamine and 3-O-methyldopa have been limited by cumbersome methods and poor sensitivity within relatively narrow ranges of plasma levels. We now report a modification of an HPLC method that permits concomitant measurements of a wide range of concentrations of levodopa, dopamine (DA), carbidopa, 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC) from one HPLC injection. The recoveries ranged from 77 to 107% with an intra-day precision around 5% (CV) and inter-day CV's about 10-20%. This validated method will simplify pharmacokinetic studies of levodopa and its metabolites for mechanistic studies or therapeutic clinical monitoring which play a crucial role in development of strategies to prolong motor benefits from individual doses and reduce involuntary movements called dykinesias.
Asunto(s)
Ácido 3,4-Dihidroxifenilacético/sangre , Carbidopa/sangre , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Dopamina/sangre , Electroquímica/métodos , Levodopa/sangre , Tirosina/análogos & derivados , Calibración , Levodopa/farmacocinética , Tirosina/sangreRESUMEN
Some patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) develop dose-related fluctuations in mood. This may reflect alterations in dopamine-influenced brain circuits that mediate emotion. However, there is no available information to localize which dopamine-influenced neurons may be most affected. Eight patients with PD and clinically significant levodopa-related mood fluctuations (mania, depression, or anxiety) were compared to 13 patients with similarly severe PD and fluctuations of motor function but not of mood. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured with positron emission tomography before and after levodopa (in the presence of carbidopa). The rCBF response to levodopa in medial frontal gyrus and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) significantly differed between mood fluctuators and control patients (corrected p<0.02). Other regions with uncorrected p<0.001 in this comparison were cortical Brodmann areas 22, 40, 13, 11, and 28, hippocampus, and claustrum. The levodopa activation paradigm detected group differences not evident in a comparison of resting rCBF. Abnormalities of dopamine innervation may produce mood fluctuations via effects on PCC, an area strongly linked to mood and anxiety and with known rCBF responsiveness to levodopa or D2-like dopamine receptor agonists. We speculate that mood fluctuations may arise in parkinsonian patients who have abnormal dopaminergic modulation of caudate nucleus, anterior cingulate cortex, or orbital frontal cortex, all of which innervate PCC. The findings require confirmation in larger and better-matched groups.
Asunto(s)
Afecto/fisiología , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/psicología , Afecto/efectos de los fármacos , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Lateralidad Funcional , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Actividad Motora/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Dopamine has been hypothesized to modulate response inhibition. To test this hypothesis, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure the effects of the dopamine prodrug levodopa on the brain responses to a well-validated response inhibition task (go/no-go, or GNG). Since abnormalities of response inhibition and dopamine have been thought to underlie tics and other symptoms of Tourette syndrome, we studied 8 neuroleptic-naive adults with tic disorders as well as 10 well-matched healthy controls. Subjects were pretreated with the peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor carbidopa, then scanned during GNG and control blocks, both before and during i.v. levodopa infusion. Both groups had similar task performance and task-related regional brain activity before and during levodopa infusion. Levodopa did not affect reaction times or accuracy, so fMRI findings can be interpreted without concern that they simply reflect a performance difference between conditions. Levodopa did affect the magnitude of GNG-related fMRI responses in the right cerebellum and right parietal cortex, significantly reducing both. Pre-levodopa activity in the right cerebellum correlated with reaction times (higher magnitudes associated with faster reaction times), and pre-levodopa activity in the right parietal cortex correlated with false alarm rate (higher magnitudes associated with higher error). In summary, right parietal and cerebellar regions important in mediating specific aspects of the GNG task were modulated by levodopa, suggesting a region-specific role for dopamine in response inhibition.
Asunto(s)
Dopaminérgicos , Dopamina/fisiología , Levodopa , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Inhibición Neural/efectos de los fármacos , Síndrome de Tourette/fisiopatología , Adulto , Carbidopa/efectos adversos , Carbidopa/sangre , Cerebelo/efectos de los fármacos , Cerebelo/fisiología , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Cognición/fisiología , Dopaminérgicos/efectos adversos , Dopaminérgicos/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Levodopa/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibición Neural/fisiología , Lóbulo Parietal/efectos de los fármacos , Lóbulo Parietal/fisiología , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Síndrome de Tourette/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Levodopa has several advantages as a pharmacological challenge agent for human neuroscience research. Exogenous levodopa changes striatal neuronal activity and increases extracellular dopamine concentrations, and with adequate inhibition of peripheral metabolism levodopa does not change mean cerebral blood flow. For neuroimaging studies of Parkinson disease (PD) and Tourette syndrome, we sought to rapidly produce a biologically relevant steady-state levodopa concentration and then maintain that concentration for at least an hour. We also wished to minimize side effects, even in individuals without prior levodopa treatment. We designed a two-stage intravenous infusion protocol based on published levodopa pharmacokinetic data. We report results of 125 infusions in 106 subjects, including healthy volunteers, PD patients, and people with chronic tics. At higher doses (target steady-state levodopa concentrations of 2,169 and 1,200 ng/ml), treatment-naive volunteers had unacceptably frequent side effects. The final infusion protocol, with a target steady-state concentration of 600 ng/ml, was well-tolerated (mild nausea in 11% of subjects was the only side effect occurring significantly more than in single-blind saline infusions), produced the desired plasma levodopa concentration (612+/-187 ng/ml, mean+/-S.D.), and produced statistically significant antiparkinsonian benefit (16% mean reduction in a standard rating of parkinsonian motor signs, P<0.0005).
Asunto(s)
Levodopa/administración & dosificación , Levodopa/sangre , Enfermedad de Parkinson/sangre , Síndrome de Tourette/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carbidopa/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas/métodos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Tourette/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dopamine agonists and antagonists can reduce abnormal movements and vocalizations (tics) in Tourette syndrome (TS); however, dopamine-responsive abnormal function in specific brain regions has not been directly demonstrated in TS. We sought to identify dopamine-modulated brain regions that function abnormally in TS by combining functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), a working memory (WM) task, and infusion of the dopamine prodrug levodopa (while blocking dopamine production outside the brain). METHODS: We obtained complete fMRI data in 8 neuroleptic-naive adults with a chronic tic disorder and in 10 well-matched tic-free control subjects. RESULTS: Different task-sensitive brain regions responded differently to the WM task depending on levodopa status and diagnostic group (analysis of variance [ANOVA], p <.001). Four regions showed interactions with diagnosis (ANOVA, p <.001). In TS subjects, the task induced excessive brain activity in parietal cortex, medial frontal gyrus, and thalamus. Levodopa normalized the excess activity. In left parietal cortex, the degree of normalization was greater in patients with higher levodopa plasma concentrations (n = 6; Spearman's r = -.84, p =.04) and a greater degree of diagnostic confidence of TS (r = -.71, p =.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with a dopamine-influenced functional abnormality of brain response in TS and suggest testable hypotheses about the mechanism by which dopamine antagonists and agonists alleviate tics.