Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 43(10): 5376-9, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16208023

RESUMEN

Actinomycetes are increasingly recognized as pathogenic in the immunocompromised host. We isolated an asporogenous, nonmotile, aerobic gram-positive rod from a transplant recipient with a fatal pulmonary infection. The pathology was similar to that associated with Rhodococcus equi, including intra-histiocytic localization. The organism was relatively inert in standard biochemical tests. 16S rRNA gene sequencing indicated a potentially unique organism most closely related to the genus Streptomyces, for which we propose the name "Para-streptomyces abscessus."


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Actinomycetales/microbiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares/microbiología , Streptomycetaceae/clasificación , Streptomycetaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , ADN Ribosómico/análisis , Resultado Fatal , Genes de ARNr , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Filogenia , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Streptomycetaceae/genética
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(2): 667-70, 2003 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12574264

RESUMEN

Clostridium difficile is one of the most frequent causes of nosocomial gastrointestinal disease. Risk factors include prior antibiotic therapy, bowel surgery, and the immunocompromised state. Direct fecal analysis for C. difficile toxin B by tissue culture cytotoxin B assay (CBA), while only 60 to 85% sensitive overall, is a common laboratory method. We have used 1,003 consecutive, nonduplicate fecal samples to compare six commercially available immunoassays (IA) for C. difficile detection with CBA: Prima System Clostridium difficile Tox A and VIDAS Clostridium difficile Tox A II, which detect C. difficile toxin A; Premier Cytoclone A/B and Techlab Clostridium difficile Tox A/B, which detect toxins A and B; and ImmunoCard Clostridium difficile and Triage Micro C. difficile panels, which detect toxin A and a species-specific antigen. For all tests, Triage antigen was most sensitive (89.1%; negative predictive value [NPV] = 98.7%) while ImmunoCard was most specific (99.7%; positive predictive value [PPV] = 95.0%). For toxin tests only, Prima System had the highest sensitivity (82.2%; NPV = 98.0%) while ImmunoCard had the highest specificity (99.7%; PPV = 95.0%). Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients contributed 44.7% of all samples tested, and no significant differences in sensitivity or specificity were noted between HSCT and non-HSCT patients. IAs, while not as sensitive as direct fecal CBA, produce reasonable predictive values, especially when both antigen and toxin are detected. They also offer significant advantages over CBA in terms of turnaround time and ease of use.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Bacterianas/análisis , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Heces/microbiología , Fibroblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Heces/química , Humanos , Inmunoensayo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA