RNA based gene therapy for dominantly inherited diseases.

There are numerous examples in the literature of gene therapy applications for recessive disorders. There are precious few instances, however, of studies conducted to treat dominantly inherited pathologies. The reasons are simple: there are fewer cases of dominantly inherited diseases on one hand, but mostly it is far easier to correct recessive mutations than dominant ones. Typically recessive mutations cause a loss of (or reduced) gene function which can be compensated for by introduction of a replacement allele into the cell. In contrast, dominant negative mutations not only display impaired function, but also exhibit a novel one that is pathologic to the cell. Treating these conditions by gene therapy implies silencing the dominant allele without altering the expression of the wild-type gene. We describe here different strategies aimed at silencing dominant mutations through mRNA destruction and provide examples of their application to known autosomal dominant diseases. An overview of the most common molecular tools (antisense DNA and RNA, ribozymes and RNA interference) suitable to utilize these strategies is also presented and we discuss the relevant aspects involved in the choice of a particular approach in a gene therapy experiment.

Testing for triallelism: analysis of six BBS genes in a Bardet-Biedl syndrome family cohort.

The phenotype of Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is defined by the association of retinitis pigmentosa, obesity, polydactyly, hypogenitalism, renal disease and cognitive impairement. The significant genetic heterogeneity of this condition is supported by the identification, to date, of eight genes (BBS1-8) implied with cilia assembly or function. Triallelic inheritance has recently been suggested on the basis of the identification of three mutated alleles in two different genes for the same patient. In a cohort of 27 families, six BBS genes (namely BBS1, BBS2, BBS4, BBS6, BBS7 and BBS8) have been studied. Mutations were identified in 14 families. Two mutations within the same gene have been identified in seven families. BBS1 is most frequently implied with the common M390R substitution at the homozygous state (n=2), or associated with another mutation at BBS1 (n=3). Compound heterozygous mutations have been found in BBS2 (one family) and BBS6 (one family). In seven other families, only one heterozygous mutation has been identified (once in BBS1, twice for BBS2 and three times in BBS6). Although our study did not reveal any families with bona fide mutations in two BBS genes, consistent with a triallelic hypothesis, we have found an excess of heterozygous single mutations. This study underlines the genetic heterogeneity of the BBS and the involvement of possibly unidentified genes.