Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pain Med ; 23(8): 1366-1375, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35043949

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Large-scale procedural safety data on pterygopalatine fossa nerve blocks (PPFBs) performed via a suprazygomatic, ultrasound-guided approach are lacking, leading to hesitancy surrounding this technique. The aim of this study was to characterize the safety of PPFB. METHODS: This retrospective chart review examined the records of adults who received an ultrasound-guided PPFB between January 1, 2016, and August 30, 2020, at the University of Florida. Indications included surgical procedures and nonsurgical pain. Clinical data describing PPFB were extracted from medical records. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables, and quantitative variables were analyzed with the paired t test to detect differences between before and after the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 833 distinct PPFBs were performed on 411 subjects (59% female, mean age 48.5 years). Minor oozing from the injection site was the only reported side effect, in a single subject. Although systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were significantly different before and after the procedure (132.3 vs 136.4 mm Hg, P < 0.0001; 78.2 vs 80.8, P = 0.0003; and 97.8% vs 96.3%, P < 0.0001; respectively), mean arterial pressure and diastolic blood pressure were not significantly different (96.2 vs 97.1 mm Hg, P = 0.1545, and 78.2 vs 77.4 mm Hg, P = 0.1314, respectively). Similar results were found within subgroups, including subgroups by sex, race, and indication for PPFB. DISCUSSION: We have not identified clinically significant adverse effects from PPFB performed with an ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic approach in a large cohort in the hospital setting. PPFBs are a safe and well-tolerated pain management strategy; however, prospective multicenter studies are needed.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso , Fosa Pterigopalatina , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Fosa Pterigopalatina/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(1): e053304, 2022 Jan 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34980619

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac arrest remains a common and devastating cause of death and disability worldwide. While targeted temperature management has become standard of care to improve functional neurologic outcome, few pharmacologic interventions have shown similar promise. METHODS/ANALYSIS: This systematic review will focus on prospective human studies from 2015 to 2020 available in PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE with a primary focus on impact on functional neurologic outcome. Prospective studies that include pharmacologic agents given during or after cardiac arrest will be included. Study selection will be in keeping with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. If sufficient data involving a given agent are available, a meta-analysis will be conducted and compared with current evidence for therapies recommended in international practice guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval will not be required as primary data will not be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentation and lay press. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (CRD42021230216).


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco , Paro Cardíaco/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Proyectos de Investigación , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA