Usefulness of the PERFORM questionnaire to measure fatigue in cancer patients with anemia: a prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: The PERFORM Questionnaire is a 12-item scale developed for assessing fatigue in cancer patients in the clinical practice. It has advantages over other tools in that it is short and includes beliefs and attitudes of patients about fatigue. It was psychometrically validated in cancer patients with and without anemia. PURPOSE: We evaluated the usefulness of the PERFORM scale to measure fatigue in a large study focusing exclusively on anemic patients. METHODS: This was an observational, multicenter, prospective, 3-month study in cancer patients with hemoglobin (Hb)≤11 g/dl. Fatigue was assessed using the PERFORM questionnaire. The overall score ranges from 12 (no fatigue) to 60 (maximum fatigue). RESULTS: We included 667 patients: 54.1 % women, mean age 60 (standard deviation, 12) years. A highly significant, but mild correlation was observed between low baseline Hb and high patient perception of fatigue (r with PERFORM score=-0.215, p < 0.0001). Of the patients, 65.8 % improved Hb level during follow-up (increase of ≥1 g/dL and/or achieving >11 g/dL), which translated into a significant improvement in the PERFORM score [mean (95 % confidence interval (CI)] change, -1.2 (-0.04 to -2.4), whereas more fatigue was observed in patients without improvement in Hb [change (95 % CI) in PERFORM, +3.3 (1.5 to 5)]. In a multivariate linear regression analysis, the independent factors associated to fatigue at 3 months were a low Hb level, a low Karnofsky index, active chemotherapy, cancer treatment with palliative intention, and transfusion need in the last 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal increases or decreases in Hb of ≥1 g/dL were associated with meaningful changes in patient-perceived fatigue as measured with the PERFORM questionnaire. In addition to anemia severity, other factors such as active chemotherapy and advanced disease contribute to perception of fatigue by cancer patients.

Psychometric properties of the Perform Questionnaire: a brief scale for assessing patient perceptions of fatigue in cancer.

PURPOSE: Fatigue is a symptom with a relevant impact on the daily lives of cancer patients and is gaining importance as an outcome measure. The Perform Questionnaire (PQ) is a new scale originally developed among Spanish-speaking patients for the assessment of perception and beliefs about fatigue in cancer patients. METHODS: An observational longitudinal multicenter study was carried out on cancer patients with fatigue. Fatigue-specific measures (FACT-F), generic health-related quality-of-life measures (NHP), and PQ were gathered at baseline and 3 months later. Feasibility, reliability (internal consistency and test-retest), validity, sensitivity to change, and minimally important differences were analysed. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-seven patients were included in the study: 60.5% were women, the mean age was 59.1 years, the mean time from diagnosis was 2.2 years, 33.6% of patients had breast cancer, and 29.1% had anaemia (haemoglobin (Hb) <11 g/dL). Low levels of missing items and ceiling/floor effects (<10%) were found. The overall Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient were 0.94 and 0.83, respectively. The PQ score was associated with fatigue intensity, the need for a caregiver, and the Hb level. Its association was stronger with the FACT-F than with non-specific health measures (NHP). The PQ showed good sensitivity to change for improved and worsening health status. A minimally important difference of 3.5 was estimated in patients whose Hb level had improved by at least 1 g/dL. CONCLUSIONS: The PQ measured the attitudes and beliefs about fatigue among cancer patients in clinical practice and showed good psychometric properties among Spanish-speaking patients.

Development of a new questionnaire to assess patient perceptions of cancer-related fatigue: item generation and item reduction.

OBJECTIVES: Existing instruments that measure the impact of cancer-related fatigue on health-related quality of life do not usually incorporate the attitudes, beliefs and perspectives of patients. This study aimed to develop an instrument to measure the impact of cancer-related fatigue on the health-related quality of life of cancer patients. METHODS: Items were generated from a literature review, focus groups of cancer patients and meetings with oncologists. Potential items were administered to cancer patients to facilitate item reduction, which was based on clinimetric and psychometric analyses and qualitative criteria. A preliminary assessment of feasibility, reliability and validity of the retained items was performed. RESULTS: An initial pool of 75 items was administered to 238 cancer patients. Fifty items were eliminated after statistical analysis and 13 in response to expert opinion, resulting in a provisional instrument with 12 items in 3 dimensions. These displayed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.78-0.92) and their overall score was associated with fatigue intensity, extent of disease, intention of treatment and need of caregivers. CONCLUSION: The newly developed questionnaire, which measures the impact of cancer-related fatigue on oncology patients, has shown satisfactory feasibility, reliability and validity.

Patients' perception of cancer-related fatigue: results of a survey to assess the impact on their everyday life.

PURPOSE: Fatigue is a cancer-related symptom with great impact on patients' daily lives, but often not discussed with their oncologists. This survey explored functional and psychological fatigue impact among different cancer symptoms according to patient's perception (pp). METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was conducted in 10 oncologist services throughout Spain. Demographical data and tumour diagnoses were collected. Fatigue impact on functional and social activities (Likert scale) and on emotional well-being (visual analogue scale) was measured. The pp of oncologist's response to fatigue report was recorded. RESULTS: 505 surveyed cancer patients were analysed (55.2% women, aged 58.8 years +/-11.7), 97.8% remembered experiencing fatigue during treatment. 27.1% did not discuss their fatigue with their oncologist. Fatigue affected patient's daily routine (> or = 50% of times) included self-care (58.26%), entertainment activities (69.8%), and relationships (71.4%). Fatigue was the most bothersome symptom of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients perceive fatigue as the symptom with highest impact on their daily living and that substantially affects their emotional and social areas.

Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of weekly 1-hour and 24-hour infusion BMS-214662, a farnesyltransferase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: BMS-214662 is a potent, nonpeptide, small molecule inhibitor of human farnesyltransferase (FT). We have conducted a phase I pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic study of BMS-214662 administered intravenously weekly with 1- and 24-hour infusions. The objectives were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities and the recommended dose (RD), to describe PKs, and to evaluate the relationships between BMS-214662 exposure, FT inhibition, downstream signaling, and induction of apoptosis in tumor samples. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors and adequate organ function were eligible. The dose was escalated according to a modified Fibonacci schedule. RESULTS: high (> 80%) but short-lived (< or = 6 hours) in the 1-hour infusion and moderate (> 40%) but long-lived (24 hours) in the 24-hour infusion. BMS-214662 induced apoptosis in tumors but did not inhibit MAPK signaling. CONCLUSION: BMS-214662 can be safely delivered in both the 1-hour and 24-hour infusions at biologically active doses, with the preclinical, PK, and pharmacodynamic profiles favoring the 24-hour schedule.

An epidemiological evaluation of the prevalence of malnutrition in Spanish patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Malnutrition is frequent in cancer. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, in Spain, of malnutrition in cancer patients with advanced disease and to assess the therapeutic focus. METHODS: A total of 781 patients were evaluated to determine individual nutritional status using the Scored Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment (Scored PG-SGA) questionnaire. Almost 60% of the patients included were receiving cancer treatment. RESULTS: Patients with the highest weight loss were those with tumours of oesophagus (57%), stomach (50%) and larynx (47%). Serious eating problems were encountered by 68% of the patients; the principal problem being anorexia (42.2%). The median number of symptoms impeding food intake was 2. According to the Scored PG-SGA, 52% of the patients were moderately or severely malnourished and 97.6% required some form of nutritional intervention/recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: (a) the majority of patients in the study needed nutritional intervention; (b) more than 50% had moderate or severe malnutrition; (c) the Scored PG-SGA is a useful and simple tool for evaluating nutritional status and contains additional information on nutritional recommendations; (d) nutritional evaluation of the cancer patients needs to be improved so as to offer better treatment of symptoms and to improve the patient's quality of life.

[Validation of the Spanish version of the Brief Pain Inventory in patients with oncological pain]. / Validación española del cuestionario Brief Pain Inventory en pacientes con dolor de causa neoplásica.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to validate the Spanish version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questionnaire used to measure the intensity of oncological pain and its impact on activities of daily living in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients with oncological pain were consecutively included in the study. These patients filled up the Spanish version of the BPI questionnaire (CBD) and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RCSL) during the inclusion visit and again after 3-5 days (patients with clinically stable oncological pain) or after one month (patients with unstable oncological pain). RESULTS: 126 patients were assessed; 85.1% of them had suffered some episode of irruptive pain 24 hours prior to their inclusion in the study. 86.5% of patients fully completed the questionnaire. The CBD showed mild to moderate correlations with the patients perception of pain severity and with the presence of tumor dissemination. The <> dimension of the RCSL displayed the highest correlation with the dimensions of the BPI (<> and <>). The internal consistency and the test-retest reliability between dimensions were good (0.87 and 0.89) and low to moderate (0.53 and 0.77), respectively. The CBD questionnaire was found to be a tool capable of detecting changes in pain intensity. The changes observed in the two CBD dimensions between study visits fairly reflected the patients perceived changes in pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of BPI is valid for measuring the intensity of oncological pain and its impact on activities of daily living in conditions of usual clinical practice.

Validación española del cuestionario Brief Pain Inventory en pacientes con dolor de causa neoplásica / Validation of the spanish version of the brief pain inventory in patients with oncological pain

FUNDAMENTO Y OBJETIVO: Validar la versión española del cuestionario Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) para medir la intensidad del dolor de causa neoplásica y su impacto en las actividades de la vida diaria en pacientes con cáncer. PACIENTES Y MÉTODO: Se incluyó consecutivamente a pacientes con dolor de origen neoplásico. Los pacientes cumplimentaron los cuestionarios BPI (Cuestionario Breve del Dolor o CBD en español) y el Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) en la visita de inclusión. El CBD se repitió a los 3-5 días en los pacientes clínicamente estables de su dolor de origen neoplásico y ambos cuestionarios se repitieron al mes en los pacientes no estables de su dolor. RESULTADOS: Se evaluó a 126 pacientes, el 85,1 per cent había sufrido algún episodio de dolor irruptivo en las 24 h previas al inicio del estudio. El 86,5 per cent de los pacientes completó el CBD en su totalidad. Las puntuaciones del CBD se correlacionaron con la percepción del paciente de la intensidad máxima del dolor y con la presencia de tumor diseminado. La dimensión 'síntomas psicológicos' del RSCL fue la que presentó mayor correlación con las dimensiones del CBD ('intensidad del dolor' e 'interferencia en las actividades'). La consistencia interna de las dimensiones fue buena (0,87 y 0,89), y la fiabilidad test-retest entre baja y moderada (0,53 y 0,77). El CBD ha demostrado ser un instrumento capaz de detectar cambios en el nivel de dolor. Los cambios observados en las dos dimensiones del CBD entre las dos visitas de estudio reflejan los cambios percibidos por el propio paciente en la intensidad del dolor. CONCLUSIONES: La versión española del CBD se mostró válida para medir la intensidad del dolor de causa neoplásica y su impacto en las actividades de la vida diaria, en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual (AU)