Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 90
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(1): 104047, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37738881

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether subjects who have recovered from COVID-19 smell and taste disturbance perform similarly to their COVID-naïve baseline, on gold-standard smell and taste tests. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: University of Miami Department of Otolaryngology in Miami, FL between September 2021, and August 2022. METHODS: Those previously COVID-19 positive composed the experimental group, those who reported being COVID-naïve composed the control group. Mean total score for the UPSIT Smell Test, and the Burghart Taste Strip test were the primary outcome measures. RESULTS: 70 adult subjects (35 former COVID-positive, 35 COVID-naïve) were enrolled, with 21 females and 14 males in each group. 87 % of all subjects were white and were almost distributed evenly between Hispanic and non-Hispanic. Mean UPSIT total score for the experimental group was 30.6 (95 % CI 28.9-32.3), mean UPSIT total score for the control group was 31.2 (95 % CI 29.7-32.8). Mean Burghart total score for the experimental group was 11.3 (95 % CI 10.6-12.0), mean Burghart total score for the control group was 10.7 (95 % CI 9.7-11.8). These showed a significant overlap of the 95 % CI of the mean total score between the control group and the experimental group, suggesting no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that COVID-19 patients who experience smell and taste disturbance and recover, regain sensory ability similar to their pre-COVID ability. Further study is needed to validate these findings, but the results are promising in the long-term recovery of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos del Olfato , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Olfato , Disgeusia
2.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 43(1): 103214, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34607277

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Research indicates that most providers give opiates after endoscopic sinonasal surgery. The effectiveness of non-opiate medications after sinonasal surgery is poorly understood and most studies do not assess medication failure. This study compares oral opiate, oral opiate and topical steroid, and oral non-opiate pain control. Patient call-backs are used as a proxy for pain medication failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compares three medication regiments after sinonasal surgery for 180 adults with chronic rhinosinusitis. Patients were instructed to take acetaminophen for mild pain. For moderate/severe pain, patients used: 1) oxycodone-acetaminophen, 2) oxycodone-acetaminophen + budesonide nasal rinses, or 3) meloxicam + acetaminophen. Patients were instructed to call clinic if pain was not controlled. Descriptive statistics compared cohorts. Chi-square tests compared call-backs between cohorts. Logistic regression adjusted for baseline differences in covariates, comorbidities, and operative sites. RESULTS: Cohorts had similar age, sex distribution, disease features, and extent of surgery. The meloxicam cohort had less subjects with pain disorders. The oxycodone cohort had less subjects with diabetes, septoplasty, and turbinate reduction. After adjusting for baseline differences and using oxycodone as the reference group (n = 50), the odds of calling clinic for poorly controlled pain was 0.18 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.05-0.6) in the meloxicam cohort (n = 45) and 0.19 (95% CI:0.07-0.5) in the oxycodone + budesonide rinses cohort (n = 85). CONCLUSION: In this study, both meloxicam and oxycodone + budesonide rinses were more effective at controlling pain after sinonasal surgery than oxycodone alone.


Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Endoscopía/métodos , Meloxicam/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales/métodos , Oxicodona/administración & dosificación , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis/cirugía , Sinusitis/cirugía , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Combinación de Medicamentos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales/efectos adversos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 40(2): 306-311, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30473169

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment of rhinosinusitis (RS) is one of the leading reasons for prescriptions of antibiotics, although they often fail to provide symptomatic relief. Appropriately diagnosing and treating patients presenting with RS for whom antibiotic therapy has failed or who have normal CT findings is a controversial topic. One explanation is that what these patients are experiencing is misinformation from the trigeminal nerve and autonomic nervous system. Midfacial pain and pressure with rhinorrhea and nasal congestion do not represent an infectious, or even inflammatory, condition within the sinus or nasal cavities, but a mirage that is best treated as a migraine variant. Observations Although there is not enough research to definitively prove this alternate etiology, we are reaching a tipping point where the clinical implications, real-world experience, and evolving literature support this possible alternate etiology. Four key factors support a midfacial migraine that mimics RS: 1) Pathophysiology: current pathophysiology literature offers a model of how migraine attacks could replicate clinical presentations of RS; 2) Clinical presentation: patients with infectious RS and midfacial migraine have similar symptomatic presentation, similar demographics, but poorly correlated radiological information; 3) Diagnosis: clinical studies support the proposition that there are alternative diagnostic tools for distinguishing patients with midfacial migraine; and 4) Prognosis: Select RS patients show significant improvement with migraine treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We encourage medical professionals to consider migraine disease as a form of sensory misinformation and as a possible etiology of RS complaints. Clinicians can ask validated questions to determine if possible migraine could be an underlying cause, and there are standard preventative treatments for migraine that could alleviate patient symptoms. Dysfunctional vasomotor activity may be the root of the disturbances, particularly when antibiotic therapy fails and CT findings are discordant with symptoms. Until there is a diagnostic test for migraine, clinicians need to question a patient's self-diagnosis of rhinosinusitis. More research is needed to definitively answer this important question.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/etiología , Sinusitis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Senos Paranasales , Sinusitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sinusitis/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
4.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 35(1): 1-4, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23529136

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We compare estimated blood loss (EBL) during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) between patients receiving transoral greater palatine canal (GPC) and transnasal infiltration (combined group) to patients receiving only transnasal infiltration (control group). CT stage, endoscopic stage, revision surgery, presence of polyps, degree of resident involvement, and operative time (OT) are also evaluated. METHODS: Injection with 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was performed through the GPC and transnasally in the "combined" study group (20 patients) and only transnasally in the control group (22 patients). Charts, operative reports, and CT scans were reviewed and demographic data as well as pertinent information collected. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). RESULTS: Twelve females and 8 males underwent combined injections and 16 males and 6 females received transnasal injections only. Average ratio of EBL to OT was 2.9 mL/min for the combined group and 4.1 mL/min for the control group (p=0.05). Presence of polyps and revision surgery lead to a statistically significantly higher EBL (p<0.05). Increased EBL and OT were noted with higher endoscopic and CT stages. No complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Increased endoscopic and CT stages, presence of polyps, and revision surgery may all lead to greater EBL in ESS. Although there was a trend towards decreased EBL in the combined group, this however did not reach statistical significance. Combined injection through the GPC and nasal cavity appears to be a safe method to decrease EBL during ESS.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Endoscopía , Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesia Local , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pólipos Nasales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 14(2): 149-608, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37658764

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS: In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS: The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION: As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Hipersensibilidad , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/terapia , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/patología
6.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 34(2): 99-102, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23102967

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Identification and exposure of the frontal sinus recess (FSR) during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) are challenging due to the variable anatomy, the narrow opening of the frontal sinus ostium (FSO), and the proximity of vital anatomic structures. Hence, a strong understanding of frontal sinus anatomy is required to prevent intracranial entry. Consistent and easily identifiable landmarks and measurements could assist safe entry into the FSO. In this study, we determine the distances from the columella and anterior nasal spine (ANS) to the nasofrontal beak (NFB) and anterior skull base (ASB) using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans. METHODS: A radiographic analysis was performed at a tertiary care medical center. Measurements from the ANS to the NFB and ASB, and from the columella to the NFB and ASB were made using sagittal HRCT. Thirty-two HRCT scans were analyzed by three observers, and the mean distances and standard deviations were calculated. RESULTS: The mean distance from the ANS to the NFB was 52.3±3.4mm in men and 47.7±3.5mm in women (p<0.0001). Mean distance from the ANS to the ASB was 61.8±4.1mm in men and 56.5±4.1mm in women (p<0.0001). Mean distance from the columella to the NFB was 58.9±2.3mm in men and 53.0±3.3mm in women (p<0.0001), and from the columella to the ASB was 67.9±3.7 mm in men and 61.3±4.1mm in women (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: While performing FSR exposure in ESS, it is recommended to stay a distance of less than 66.9 mm in men and 60.6mm in women from the columella to minimize intracranial complications.


Asunto(s)
Seno Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cavidad Nasal/diagnóstico por imagen , Senos Paranasales/diagnóstico por imagen , Proyectos Piloto , Base del Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto Joven
7.
Neurosurg Focus ; 32(6): E5, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22655694

RESUMEN

Lateral sphenoid encephaloceles of the Sternberg canal are rare entities and usually present with spontaneous CSF rhinorrhea. Traditionally, these were treated via transcranial approaches, which can be challenging given the deep location of these lesions. However, with advancements in endoscopic skull base surgery, including improved surgical exposures, angled endoscopes and instruments, and novel repair techniques, these encephaloceles can be resected and successfully repaired with purely endoscopic endonasal approaches. In this report, the authors review the endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach to the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus for repair of temporal lobe encephaloceles, including an overview of the surgical anatomy from an endoscopic perspective, and describe the technical operative nuances and surgical pearls for these cases. The authors also present 4 new cases of lateral sphenoid recess encephaloceles that were successfully treated using this approach.


Asunto(s)
Encefalocele/cirugía , Endoscopía/métodos , Cavidad Nasal/cirugía , Seno Esfenoidal/cirugía , Encefalocele/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seno Esfenoidal/patología
8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35619936

RESUMEN

Objective: Endoscopic repair of large anterior skull base (ASB) defects has excellent results when using multilayered repairs with a nasoseptal flap. However, in extensive intranasal tumors, a nasoseptal flap may not always be available. One alternative option is a flexible single-layer ASB repair. Initial studies indicate low cerebrospinal fluid leak rates with a single-layer repair. However, the level of frontal lobe support, particularly the propensity for a significant inferior displacement of the frontal lobe, is not known. The goal of this study is to determine the frontal lobe position after single-layer acellular dermal allograft repair in large ASB defects. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary care medical center. Subjects and Methods: This cohort study compares the frontal lobe position in adults who underwent endoscopic endonasal ASB tumor resection and single-layer cadaveric dermal matrix repair (ASB cohort) with control subjects without intracranial abnormalities (control cohort). The ASB cohort includes subjects with an ASB defect of ≥5 cm anterior/posterior and ≥1.5 cm wide and who had imaging at least 2 months after surgery. The frontal lobe position is measured on sagittal CT/MRI using a reference line from the base of the sella to the nasion. A value of zero indicates that the inferior-most aspect of the frontal lobe is at the level of the nasion-sellar line. A positive value indicates that the frontal lobe is inferior to the nasion-sellar line. The ASB cohort frontal lobe position is compared with the control cohort using the Mann-Whitney U test. A priori we set an absolute difference of 5 mm as a clinically significant difference. Results: The ASB cohort includes 47 subjects who are 57% male with an average age of 60 years (range: 31-89 years). The most common ASB pathology is esthesioneuroblastoma (n = 21) and 81% of the ASB cohort had postoperative radiation. The control cohort includes 20 subjects who are 60% male, with a mean age of 45 years (range: 19-74 years). The majority of controls underwent imaging for head trauma (n = 13). The ASB mean frontal lobe position is -0.2 mm superior to the nasion-sellar line (range: -9.2 to 10.4 mm), while the control's mean frontal lobe position is 1.1 mm inferior to the nasion-sellar line. This difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.13) and does not reach our a priori definition of clinical significance. The frontal lobe position of ASB subjects who had radiation is closer to the nasion-sellar line as compared with those who did not undergo radiation. Conclusions: Single-layer acellular dermal graft repair maintains frontal lobe support and position in large ASB defects.

9.
Laryngoscope ; 131(1): 41-47, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32401375

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A higher incidence of recurrent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks has been reported with idiopathic CSF leaks. A growing number of institutions advocate for routine use of intracranial pressure-lowering adjunct treatments after endoscopic repair. We report our results in a patient cohort in which only symptomatic patients are subjected to further testing and treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent endoscopic transnasal repair of idiopathic CSF rhinorrhea was performed at the University of Miami, Florida, from July 2010 to July 2017. The database was queried for demographical data, surgical details, radiological findings, and postoperative outcomes. Only patients with greater than a 12-month follow-up were included. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent endoscopic repair of an idiopathic CSF leak. Twenty-six (79%) were females, with an average age of entire study population being 48 years. The average body mass index (BMI) of the cohort was 33 kg/m2 , with 89% being overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m2 ). The skull base defect was found to be mainly at the cribriform plate (64%) and sphenoid sinus (30%). Endoscopic repair was performed successfully as a single repair in 32 patients (97%). The average follow-up was 47 months. Postoperative adjunct medications were used on four patients (12%) with symptomatic idiopathic intracranial hypertension. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic repair of idiopathic CSF leaks was found to have a high rate of success in our study. Postoperatively, only four patients required additional measures to medically reduce symptomatic intracranial hypertension. Routine postoperative adjunct treatments are unnecessary and may expose patients to adverse long-term side effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:41-47, 2021.


Asunto(s)
Rinorrea de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/cirugía , Endoscopía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Laryngoscope ; 131(12): 2659-2665, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34254684

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The role of social determinants of health in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is poorly characterized. Limited research examining CRS health disparities indicates that minority status is associated with worse CRS. However, many of these studies are retrospective or performed in populations without substantial ethnic minorities. Rhinologists need to characterize existing CRS disease disparities to develop targeted strategies for improving care in these populations. This prospective study assesses preoperative CRS disease burden in South Florida (SFL) Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients and examines potential factors contributing CRS disease disparities. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: The prospective cohort study included consecutive patients having primary endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for CRS between September 2019 and February 2020 with complete preoperative data. Data were collected in clinic and surgery. Descriptive statistics compare Hispanic and non-Hispanic cohorts. Linear regression adjusts for confounders. Relative risk (RR) compared CRS severity markers. RESULTS: Thirty-eight Hispanic and 56 non-Hispanic patients met inclusion criteria. Age, sex, CT scores, insurance payer, and comorbidities were similar between cohorts. Hispanics presented with worse 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) (55; SD = 18) compared to non-Hispanics (37; SD = 22) (P < .001). Hispanics tended to have a higher risk of severe CRS markers, including nasal polyps RR = 2.5 (95% CI: 1.0-5.9), neo-osteogenesis RR = 1.6 (95% CI: 0.5-4.7), extended procedures (i.e., draft III) RR = 2.97 (95% CI: 1.0-9.1), and tissue eosinophilia RR = 1.46 (95% CI: 0.6-3.5). Hispanics reported longer sinonasal symptom duration. CONCLUSIONS: SFL hispanic patients presenting for primary ESS have worse sinonasal disease burden. SFL Hispanics have markers of greater CRS severity and report longer delays before receiving CRS care. These factors may contribute to increased sinonasal disease burden in Hispanic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:2659-2665, 2021.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Rinitis/epidemiología , Sinusitis/epidemiología , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Florida/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Rinitis/complicaciones , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Sinusitis/complicaciones , Sinusitis/diagnóstico
11.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 6(4): 634-640, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34401483

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: After internal carotid artery (ICA) injury during endoscopic skull base surgery, the majority of patients undergo ICA embolization or stenting to treat active extravasation or pseudoaneurysm development. However, management practices when embolization or stenting is not required have not been well described. The objective of this study was to determine how patients with ICA injury but no embolization, stenting, or ligation do long-term and ascertain the reconstruction methods utilized. METHODS: Twenty-nine cases of ICA injury were identified in an international multi-institutional retrospective review. Of these, we identified six cases that were not treated with embolization, stenting, or ICA sacrifice. Information was available for five cases. RESULTS: A muscle patch was used in the immediate repair of each case. A nasoseptal flap was used in one case. Prefabricated nasal tampons were used in all cases. Nasal packing was initially left in for a median of 7 days prior to removal. The initial muscle patch was reinforced with a second muscle graft in one case. One case demonstrated ICA bleeding at the time of packing removal and was repacked an additional week. Follow-up for each of these cases was at least 2 years. No cases of subsequent carotid rupture were found and none of these cases ultimately underwent endovascular stenting. Radiation or proton therapy has not been subsequently used in any of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study details the reconstruction, lessons learned, and long-term follow-up for five cases of ICA injury not treated with embolization, stenting, or ligation.

12.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 162(6): 809-810, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32286913

RESUMEN

More than half of COVID-19 patients are afebrile early in the disease course, yet mildly ill or asymptomatic patients can still spread SARS-CoV-2 with high efficiency. Atypically presenting patients may be seen in noninfectious disease settings such as otolaryngology, which is a specialty prone to occupational exposure. Otolaryngologists have been infected with COVID-19 at higher rates than other specialties in China and other countries. Otolaryngology providers should maintain high clinical suspicion for mild and asymptomatic COVID-19 patients. Protective strategies should be implemented including preappointment screening, triaging, restriction of nonurgent visits and surgeries, telemedicine, and appropriate personal protective equipment use.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Asintomáticas/terapia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Salud Laboral , Otolaringología/organización & administración , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Enfermedades Asintomáticas/epidemiología , COVID-19 , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Salud Global , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Otorrinolaringólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Precauciones Universales/métodos
13.
Head Neck ; 42(7): 1423-1447, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32357378

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus has serially overtaken our metropolitan hospitals. At peak, patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome may outnumber mechanical ventilators. In our Miami Hospital System, COVID-19 cases have multiplied for 4 weeks and elective surgery has been suspended. METHODS: An Otolaryngologic Triage Committee was created to appropriately allocate resources to patients. Hospital ethicists provided support. Our tumor conference screened patients for nonsurgical options. Patients were tested twice for coronavirus before performing urgent contaminated operations. N95 masks and protective equipment were conserved when possible. Patients with low-grade cancers were advised to delay surgery, and other difficult decisions were made. RESULTS: Hundreds of surgeries were canceled. Sixty-five cases screened over 3 weeks are tabulated. Physicians and patients expressed discomfort regarding perceived deviations from standards, but risk of COVID-19 exposure tempered these discussions. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the use of actively managed surgical triage to fairly balance our patient's health with public health concerns.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/ética , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Selección de Paciente/ética , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Triaje/ética , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/epidemiología , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Salud Laboral , Otolaringología/organización & administración , Pandemias/prevención & control , Seguridad del Paciente , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
14.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 146(4): 364-372, 2020 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32105301

RESUMEN

Importance: Injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery does not typically occur as an isolated circumstance but often is the result of multiple factors. Objective: To assess the factors associated with ICA injury in an effort to reduce its occurrence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study used a multicenter root cause analysis of ICA injuries sustained during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery performed at 11 tertiary care centers across 4 continents (North America, South America, Europe, and Asia) from January 1, 1993, to December 31, 2018. A fishbone model was built to facilitate the root cause analysis. Patients who underwent an expanded endoscopic endonasal approach that carried a substantial potential risk of an ICA injury were included in the analysis. A questionnaire was completed by surgeons at the centers to assess relevant human, patient, process, technique, instrument, and environmental factors associated with the injury. Main Outcomes and Measures: Root cause analysis of demographic, human, patient, process, technique, instrument, and environmental factors as well as mortality and morbidity data. Results: Twenty-eight cases of ICA injury occurred during 7160 expanded endoscopic endonasal approach procedures (incidence of 0.4%). The mean age of the patients was 49 years, with a female to male predominance ratio of 1.8:1 (18 women to 10 men). Anatomical (23 [82%]), pathological (15 [54%]), and surgical resection (26 [93%]) factors were most frequently reported. The surgeon's mental or physical well-being was reported as inadequate in 4 cases (14%). Suboptimal imaging was reported in 6 cases (21%). The surgeon's experience level was not associated with ICA injury. The ICA injury was associated with use of powered or sharp instruments in 20 cases (71%), and use of new instruments or technology in 7 cases (25%). Two patients (7%) died in the operating room, and 3 (11%) were alive with neurological deficits. Overall, patient-related factors were the most frequently reported risk factors (in 27 of 28 cases [96%]). Factors associated with ICA injury catalyzed a list of preventive recommendations. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that human factors were associated with intraoperative ICA injuries; however, they were usually accompanied by other deficiencies. These findings suggest that identifying risk factors is crucial for preventing such injuries. Preoperative planning and minimizing the potential for ICA injury also appear to be essential.


Asunto(s)
Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna/etiología , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Arteria Carótida Interna/anatomía & histología , Competencia Clínica , Endoscopía/instrumentación , Endoscopía/métodos , Arquitectura y Construcción de Instituciones de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Quirófanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Base del Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/cirugía
15.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 163(1): 121-131, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32396445

RESUMEN

Objective. To describe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patient presentations requiring otolaryngology consultation and provide recommendations for protective measures based on the experience of ear, nose, and throat (ENT) departments in 4 Chinese hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study Design. Retrospective case series. Setting. Multicenter. Subjects and Methods. Twenty hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring ENT consultation from 3 designated COVID-19 hospitals in Wuhan, Shanghai, and Shenzhen were identified. Data on demographics, comorbidities, COVID-19 symptoms and severity, consult reason, treatment, and personal protective equipment (PPE) use were collected and analyzed. Infection control strategies implemented for ENT outpatients and emergency room visits at the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University were reported. Results. Median age was 63 years, 55% were male, and 95% were in severe or critical condition. Six tracheotomies were performed. Posttracheotomy outcomes were mixed (2 deaths, 2 patients comatose, all living patients still hospitalized). Other consults included epistaxis, pharyngitis, nasal congestion, hyposmia, rhinitis, otitis externa, dizziness, and tinnitus. At all hospitals, powered air-supply filter respirators (PAPRs) were used for tracheotomy or bleeding control. PAPR or N95-equivalent masks plus full protective clothing were used for other complaints. No inpatient ENT providers were infected. After implementation of infection control strategies for outpatient clinics, emergency visits, and surgeries, no providers were infected at the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University. Conclusions and Relevance. COVID-19 patients require ENT consultation for many reasons, including tracheotomy. Otolaryngologists play an indispensable role in the treatment of COVID-19 patients but, due to their work, are at high risk of exposure. Appropriate protective strategies can prevent infection of otolaryngologists.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Otolaringología/normas , Enfermedades Otorrinolaringológicas/terapia , Pandemias , Equipo de Protección Personal/normas , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19 , China/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Otorrinolaringológicas/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
16.
medRxiv ; 2020 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32511546

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of olfactory or gustatory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients Study Design: Multicenter Case Series Setting: 5 tertiary care hospitals (3 in China, 1 in France, 1 in Germany) Subjects and Methods: 394 PCR confirmed COVID-19 positive patients were screened, and those with olfactory or gustatory dysfunction were included. Data including demographics, COVID-19 severity, patient outcome, and the incidence and degree of olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction were collected and analyzed. The Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to quantify olfactory and gustatory dysfunction respectively. All subjects at one hospital (Shanghai) without subjective olfactory complaints underwent objective testing. RESULTS: Of 394 screened subjects, 161 (41%) reported olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction and were included. Incidence of olfactory and/or gustatory disorders in Chinese (n=239), German (n=39) and French (n=116) cohorts were 32%, 69%, and 49% 138 respectively. The median age of included subjects was 39 years old, 92/161 (57%) were male, and 10/161 (6%) were children. Of included subjects, 10% had only olfactory or gustatory symptoms, and 19% had olfactory and/or gustatory complaints prior to any other COVID-19 symptom. Of subjects with objective olfactory testing, 10/90 demonstrated abnormal chemosensory function despite reporting normal subjective olfaction. 43% (44/102) of subjects with follow-up showed symptomatic improvement in olfaction or gustation. CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory and/or gustatory disorders may represent early or isolated symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. They may serve as a useful additional screening criterion, particularly for the identification of patients in the early stages of infection.

17.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 163(4): 714-721, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32539586

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of olfactory or gustatory dysfunction in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter case series. SETTING: Five tertiary care hospitals (3 in China, 1 in France, 1 in Germany). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In total, 394 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19-positive patients were screened, and those with olfactory or gustatory dysfunction were included. Data including demographics, COVID-19 severity, patient outcome, and the incidence and degree of olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction were collected and analyzed. The Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to quantify olfactory and gustatory dysfunction, respectively. All subjects at 1 hospital (Shanghai) without subjective olfactory complaints underwent objective testing. RESULTS: Of 394 screened subjects, 161 (41%) reported olfactory and/or gustatory dysfunction and were included. Incidence of olfactory and/or gustatory disorders in Chinese (n = 239), German (n = 39), and French (n = 116) cohorts was 32%, 69%, and 49%, respectively. The median age of included subjects was 39 years, 92 of 161 (57%) were male, and 10 of 161 (6%) were children. Of included subjects, 10% had only olfactory or gustatory symptoms, and 19% had olfactory and/or gustatory complaints prior to any other COVID-19 symptom. Of subjects with objective olfactory testing, 10 of 90 demonstrated abnormal chemosensory function despite reporting normal subjective olfaction. Forty-three percent (44/102) of subjects with follow-up showed symptomatic improvement in olfaction or gustation. CONCLUSIONS: Olfactory and/or gustatory disorders may represent early or isolated symptoms of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. They may serve as a useful additional screening criterion, particularly for the identification of patients in the early stages of infection.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Diagnóstico Precoz , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Olfato/fisiología , Trastornos del Gusto/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19 , Niño , China/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos del Olfato/epidemiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Trastornos del Gusto/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
18.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 140(6): 861-5, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19467404

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The medial portion of the infratemporal fossa (ITF) is not infrequently involved in sinonasal and skull base pathologies. However, endoscopic view of the ITF remains unclear with lack of studies addressing this region from the endoscopic perspective. METHODS: Using an extended endoscopic approach, the pterygopalatine and infratemporal fossae were dissected in 10 sides of five adult cadaver heads. A plane of dissection along the pterygoid base and the infratemporal surface of the greater sphenoid wing was developed. High-quality images were produced by coupling the video camera to a digital recording system. RESULTS: The foramen rotundum, ovale, and spinosum were accessed and new landmarks were described from the endoscopic point of view. The sphenomandibularis muscle was also highlighted. Maxillary and mandibular nerves and middle meningeal artery were all identified. Columellar measurements to the foramen rotundum and ovale ranged from 6.1 to 8.0 cm for the former and 7.0 to 9.1 cm for the latter, with a mean of 6.75 cm and 7.78 cm respectively. CONCLUSION: The current study provides a novel endoscopic orientation to the medial ITF. Such knowledge should provide an anatomical basis for experienced surgeons to endoscopically address this region with more safety and efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía , Base del Cráneo/anatomía & histología , Cadáver , Humanos , Nariz
19.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 9(5): 562-566, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30609302

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frontal sinusotomy can be challenging when significant scarring or distorted anatomy is present. Identifying a reliable anatomic structure, when traditional landmarks or navigation are absent, may assist the surgeon in revision and complicated frontal sinusotomies via a midline approach. We aimed to characterize the anatomic relationship of the nasal branch of the anterior ethmoid artery (NBAEA) to the frontal infundibulum, specifically the first olfactory fili, posterior frontal infundibulum, and anterior cribriform plate. METHODS: Dissection of the NBAEA was carried out in 11 cadaveric heads, resulting in a total of 21 dissections (1 aplastic frontal). Mean with standard deviation and a range were established for 7 relative measurements. RESULTS: The total length of NBAEA cleft when present (mean 2.43 mm), the anterior edge of NBAEA cleft to anterior infundibulum coronal plane (mean 1.71 mm), the posterior edge of NBAEA cleft to posterior infundibulum coronal plane (mean 3.33 mm), the posterior edge of NBAEA cleft to 1st olfactory fili (mean 2.86 mm), and the first olfactory fili to posterior infundibulum coronal plane (mean 0.48 mm) were consistent measurements supporting the use of the NBAEA as a consistent anatomical landmark for the correct surgical coronal trajectory into the midline frontal sinus. CONCLUSION: The NBAEA is a consistent anatomic landmark with minimal intercadaveric and intracadaveric variation. It can be used reliably as a "sentinel artery" notifying the surgeon when one is approaching the first olfactory fili, to determine the correct trajectory into the midline frontal sinus.


Asunto(s)
Arterias , Senos Etmoidales/irrigación sanguínea , Seno Frontal , Endoscopía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales
20.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 128(10): 932-937, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31088142

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates of epiphora after transection and marsupialization of the nasolacrimal duct (NLD) during endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery. INTRODUCTION: The nasolacrimal canal forms part of the medial wall of the maxillary sinus. Transecting the NLD is sometimes necessary for tumor resection or surgical access to maxillary sinus and infratemporal fossa pathology. There is no consensus for the endoscopic management of the NLD when only the duct is transected without involving the nasolacrimal sac. METHODS: Medical records of 29 patients from 2 academic institutions who underwent endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery with transection of the NLD were retrospectively reviewed. Whether the duct was marsupialized or simply transected was recorded, and the postoperative rate of epiphora was calculated. RESULTS: Mean age was 59 years (range, 14-86 years). Mean follow-up was 10.5 months (range, 1-33 months). The NLD was marsupialized in 16 (55%) and simply transected in 13 (45%) patients. Six patients underwent postoperative radiation. No patients in the marsupialization group had epiphora postoperatively, all with Munk score of 0. One patient in the transection group developed postoperative epiphora with Munk score of 1. Pathology included inverted papilloma (8), acute on chronic inflammation (6), B-cell lymphoma (3), juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (2), squamous cell carcinoma (2), Schneiderian papilloma (2), metastatic melanoma (1), HPV-related carcinoma (1), adenocarcinoma (1), benign epithelial cyst (1), adenoid cystic carcinoma (1), and erosive chronic sinusitis without nasal polyposis (1). CONCLUSION: Management after transection of the NLD varies widely. The duct may be simply transected or marsupialized, or a formal dacryocystorhinostomy can be performed. The surgeon must also choose whether to place a stent. Based on our small series and review of the literature, marsupialization or simple transection of the NLD results in a low rate of postoperative epiphora in the setting of endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/métodos , Enfermedades del Aparato Lagrimal/etiología , Neoplasias del Seno Maxilar/cirugía , Conducto Nasolagrimal/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA