RESUMEN
Age-related differences in the ability to perform two tasks simultaneously (or dual-task) have become a major concern in aging neurosciences and have often been assessed with two distinct paradigms; the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) and the Dual-Task (DT) paradigms. PRP studies assess participants when they give Priority to one task over the other (complete A then B), whereas in DT studies participants give Equal priority to both tasks (complete A and B). The Equal condition could be viewed as adding an executive control component to the task since the participants must spontaneously monitor attention between tasks. In the current study, we assessed the effect of priority instructions (Priority vs. Equal) on the dual-task performance and brain activity of younger (n = 16) and older adults (n = 19) with functional near infra-red spectroscopy (fNIRS). In younger adults, the Priority condition showed right-sided activation in the prefrontal cortex during DT execution. Older adults showed bilateral frontal activation, yet restrained to specific areas. They showed increased activation in DT vs. single task condition in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC). In the Equal condition, the DT condition showed isolated left DLPFC and VLPFC activation in younger adults and widespread bilateral DLPFC activation in older adults. These results suggest that for both older and younger adults, priority effects are associated with distinct patterns of prefrontal activation. Age-related differences also exist in these patterns such that prefrontal activation seems to be more spread out at different sites in older adults when they are instructed to give Equal priority to both tasks.
Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/fisiología , Función Ejecutiva/fisiología , Neuroimagen Funcional/métodos , Corteza Prefrontal/fisiología , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to assess sex differences in older adults (55-65 years old) in executive functions and to examine the influence of hormone therapy (HT) in postmenopausal women. METHOD: We have assessed task performance in memory, visuospatial, and executive functions in 29 women using HT, 29 women who never used HT, and 30 men. RESULTS: Men outperformed never users in task switching and updating. HT users outperformed never users in updating. HT users outperformed never users and men in visual divided attention. DISCUSSION: The present study support previous findings that sex and HT impact cognition and bring new insights on sex and HT-related differences in executive functions.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Función Ejecutiva/fisiología , Posmenopausia/fisiología , Caracteres Sexuales , Anciano , Atención/efectos de los fármacos , Atención/fisiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia de Reemplazo de Estrógeno , Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Memoria/efectos de los fármacos , Memoria/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estimulación Luminosa , Posmenopausia/efectos de los fármacos , Posmenopausia/psicología , Procesamiento Espacial/efectos de los fármacos , Procesamiento Espacial/fisiología , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Aprendizaje Verbal/efectos de los fármacos , Aprendizaje Verbal/fisiologíaRESUMEN
The goal of this study was to assess the impact of individual neuropsychological differences on the ability to share attention between concurrent tasks. Participants (n = 20) were trained on six single task practice sessions and dual-task was assessed with reaction time performance on a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm. Neuropsychological test scores were also acquired. Furthermore, one of the known variables that can influence performances on neuropsychological tests is gender, which was added as a potential predictor. Results show that the small PRP group was associated with better performances in processing speed, inhibition, flexibility and working memory on neuropsychological tests. Gender also had an impact on the PRP, males having a lower PRP than females. A multiple regression was performed to determine which variables explained the most PRP duration, which showed that 49.1% of the variance of the PRP length could be explained by gender, reaction times of the PRP practice trials at the sixth session, the denomination and flexibility conditions of the Modified Stroop Task as well as results on the Symbol Search Test. Gender was the variable that explained the PRP variance the most (23%). Processing speed also seemed to be a great determinant of the PRP as well as the ability to alternate between task-sets as assessed by the Flexibility condition of the Modified Stroop Task. Thus, this study reveals that good performances on certain neuropsychological tests could predict one's ease to manage two tasks simultaneously with a higher chance for males to perform better.