Evaluation of Provider Preferences in First-Line Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparison Between Dual Immunotherapy vs. Immunotherapy/Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Dual immunotherapy (ipilimumab/nivolumab, IO/IO) and immunotherapy/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO/TKI) combinations (e.g. pembrolizumab/axitinib) are approved for the first-line treatment of intermediate/poor risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but there is limited comparative data between these two options. We sought to understand how oncologists decide between IO/IO vs. IO/TKI. METHODS: We sent a 10-question electronic survey centered on a patient scenario of intermediate/poor risk metastatic RCC to 294 academic/disease-focused and general oncologists in the US. RESULTS: We received 105 responses (36% response rate): 61% (64) of providers chose IO/IO, 39% (41) chose IO/TKI. 78% (82) of oncologists were academic or disease-focused, 22% (23) were general. Academic/disease-focused oncologists were significantly more likely to choose IO/IO (56/82, 68%) than general oncologists (8/23, 35%), P = .004. Among those who chose IO/IO, the perceived main issue with IO/TKI was: long-term toxicities - 31% (20), short-term toxicities - 28% (18), less effective - 28% (18), less convenient - 8% (5). Among those who chose IO/TKI, the perceived main issue with IO/IO was: short-term toxicities - 43% (17), less effective - 28% (11), long-term toxicities - 15% (6), and risk of death - 10% (4). 88% (92) of providers would be comfortable enrolling patients into a phase III trial comparing IO/IO vs. IO/TKI. We found no associations between therapy chosen by a provider and participation as PI in a trial of IO/IO or IO/TKI, or receipt of outside funding from an IO/IO or IO/TKI company. CONCLUSION: In response to a patient scenario of intermediate/poor risk metastatic RCC, 61% of providers chose IO/IO, 39% chose IO/TKI. There was a significant association between type of practice and choice of therapy, with academic/disease-focused oncologists more likely to choose IO/IO. The majority of oncologists would be comfortable enrolling patients into a phase III trial comparing IO/IO vs. IO/TKI.

BRAF mutation correlates with worse local-regional control following radiation therapy in patients with stage III melanoma.

BACKGROUND: In patients with stage III melanoma, the use of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) after lymph node dissection (LND) may be currently considered in selected high-risk patients to improve tumor control. Melanomas harbor BRAF mutations (BRAF+) in 40-50% of cases, the majority of which are on the V600E residue. This study sought to compare the clinical outcomes after RT between patients with BRAF+ and BRAF- melanoma. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 105 Stage III melanoma patients treated at our institution with LND followed by adjuvant RT from 2006 to 2019. BRAF mutational status was determined on the primary skin or nodal tissue samples from all patients. We compared characteristics of the BRAF+ and BRAF- groups using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test and performed univariate and multivariate analysis using Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards modeling with the clinical outcomes of local-regional lymph node control, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Fifty-three (50%) patients harbored a BRAF mutation (92%, pV600E). BRAF+ patients were younger and had primary tumors more commonly found in the trunk vs head and neck compared to BRAF- patients (p < 0.05). The 5 year local-regional control in the BRAF + patients was 60% compared to 81% in the BRAF- patients (HR 4.5, 95% CI 1.3-15.5, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in 5-year DMFS, RFS, and OS rates between the two BRAF patient groups. The presence of 4 or more positive LNs remained a significant prognostic factor for local-regional lymph node control, RFS, and OS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Stage III melanoma patients with BRAF mutation treated with adjuvant RT had > 4 times increased risk of local recurrence or regional lymph node recurrence. These results could be useful for adjuvant RT consideration in lymph node positive melanoma patients and supports other data that BRAF mutation confers radiation resistance.

Do Not Forget About the Importance of Loco-Regional Therapy in Melanoma Management.

Immunotherapy agents have significantly changed the landscape of melanoma treatment over the past decade. Paradigm shifts in treatment require reanalysis of the treatment algorithms in melanoma. Despite surgical excision, certain high risk patients with desmoplastic melanoma remain at high risk for local recurrence and retrospective data suggests improvement in local control with adjuvant radiation therapy. Likewise, despite surgical excision and effective systemic therapy agents, patients with extracapsular extension and other high risk features are at substantial risk of nodal basin (regional) recurrence. Adjuvant radiation therapy has been demonstrated to reduce the local recurrence risk. Despite these benefits, adjuvant radiation therapy in melanoma remains controversial in part because its use has not been definitively demonstrated to improve overall or disease-free survival in a randomized prospective study.

Does Delaying Surgical Resection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Impact Clinical Outcomes in Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma?: A Single-Institution Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical resection for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma commonly occurs 6 to 10 weeks after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). We sought to determine the optimal timing of surgery related to the pathologic complete response rate and survival endpoints. METHODS: The study is a retrospective analysis of 92 patients treated with nCRT followed by surgery from 2004 to 2011 at our institution. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the impact of timing of surgery on locoregional control, distant failure (DF), disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Time-to-surgery was ≤8 weeks (group A) in 72% (median 6.1 wk) and >8 weeks (group B) in 28% (median 8.9 wk) of patients. No significant differences in patient characteristics, locoregional control, or pathologic complete response rates were noted between the groups. Univariate analysis revealed that group B had significantly shorter time to DF (group B, median 33 mo; group A, median not reached, P=0.047) and shorter OS compared with group A (group B, median 52 mo; group A, median not reached, P=0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that increased time-to-surgery showed a significant increase in DF (HR=2.96, P=0.02) and trends toward worse OS (HR=2.81, P=0.108) and disease-free survival (HR=2.08, P=0.098). CONCLUSIONS: We found that delaying surgical resection longer than 8 weeks after nCRT was associated with an increased risk of DF. This study, in combination with a recent larger study, questions the recent trend in promoting surgical delay beyond the traditional 6 to 10 weeks. Larger, prospective databases or randomized studies may better clarify surgical timing following nCRT in rectal adenocarcinoma.

Perineural Invasion Predicts for Distant Metastasis in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery is controversial. We examined the association of perineural invasion (PNI) with outcomes to determine whether PNI could be used to risk-stratify patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 110 patients treated with nCRT and surgery for LARC at our institution from 2004 to 2011. Eighty-seven patients were identified in our final analysis. We evaluated the association of PNI with locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival, using log-rank and Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (16%) were PNI+ and 73 patients (84%) were PNI-. The median follow-up was 27 months (range, 0.9 to 84 mo). The median DMFS was 13.5 months for PNI+ and median not reached (>40 mo) for PNI- (P<0.0001). The median DFS was 13.5 months for PNI+ and 39.8 months for PNI- (P<0.0001). In a multivariate model including 7 pathologic variables, type of surgery, time to surgery from end of nCRT, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy, PNI remained a significant independent predictor of DMFS (hazard ratio 9.79; 95% confidence interval, 3.48-27.53; P<0.0001) and DFS (hazard ratio 5.72; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-14.9; P=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with LARC treated with nCRT, PNI found at the time of surgery is significantly associated with worse DMFS and DFS. Our data support testing the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with PNI and perhaps other high-risk features.

Aspirin Response Test role in platelet transfusion following intracerebral hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) results in high morbidity and mortality. A target for therapy might be hematoma expansion, which occurs in a significant proportion of patients, and can be exacerbated by antiplatelet medications, such as aspirin. It is not clear whether platelet transfusion neutralizes aspirin. The Aspirin Response Test (ART) is commonly ordered in this patient population, but it is not clear whether the results of this test can help select patients for transfusion of platelets. The aim of our study is to investigate whether a selected group of ICH patients, those with reduced platelet activity ("aspirin responders"), will benefit from platelet transfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 63 patients who were taking aspirin but no other antithrombotic medication prior to the ICH. For each patient, we measured hematoma size by head CT on admission and compared with follow-up head CT 1 day later. RESULTS: In the general cohort, 41% of transfused patients and 29% of non-transfused patients had a hematoma expansion. In the "aspirin responders" group, 46% of transfused patients and 22% of non-transfused patients had an expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that platelet transfusion following an ICH in "aspirin responders" does not reduce hematoma expansion rates in those patients. A larger prospective study is needed.