An uncommon cause of gastrointestinal bleeding: the calm before the storm.

A 69-year-old male presented with a 5-day history of backache, asthenia, and fever. At admission, hemoglobin was 6.4 g/dL and there was no gastrointestinal bleeding. His medical history was remarkable for an endovascular aneurysm repair performed 10 years before, with implantation of a bilateral aorto-iliac graft.

Small bowel enteroscopy - A joint clinical guideline by the Spanish and Portuguese small-bowel study groups.

The present evidence-based guidelines are focused on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in the management of small-bowel diseases. A panel of experts selected by the Spanish and Portuguese small-bowel study groups reviewed the available evidence focusing on the main indications of this technique, its role in the management algorithm of each indication, and its diagnostic and therapeutic yield. A set of recommendations was issued accordingly.

Comparison of different histological indexes in the assessment of UC activity and their accuracy regarding endoscopic outcomes and faecal calprotectin levels.

OBJECTIVE: Histological remission is being increasingly acknowledged as a therapeutic endpoint in patients with UC. The work hereafter described aimed to evaluate the concordance between three histological classification systems-Geboes Score (GS), Nancy Index (NI) and RobartsHistopathologyIndex (RHI), as well as to evaluate their association with the endoscopic outcomes and the faecal calprotectin (FC) levels. DESIGN: Biopsy samples from 377 patients with UC were blindly evaluated using GS, NI and RHI. The results were compared with the patients' Mayo Endoscopic Score and FC levels. RESULT: GS, NI and RHI have a good concordance concerning the distinction between patients in histological remission or activity. RHI was particularly close to NI, with 100% of all patients classified as being in remission with NI being identified as such with RHI and 100% of all patients classified as having activity with RHI being identified as such with NI. These scores could also predict the Mayo Endoscopic Score and the FC levels, with their sensitivity and specificity levels depending on the chosen cut-offs. Moreover, higher FC levels were statistically associated with the presence of neutrophils in the epithelium, as well as with ulceration or erosion of the intestinal mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: GS, NI and RHI histopathological scoring systems are comparable in what concerns patients' stratification into histological remission/activity. Additionally, FC levels are increased when neutrophils are present in the epithelium and the intestinal mucosa has erosions or ulcers. The presence of neutrophils in the epithelium is, indeed, the main marker of histological activity.

Superiority of the Split-dose PEG Regimen for Small-Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

GOALS: We aimed to evaluate the small-bowel cleansing quality, the diagnostic yield (DY), the transit time, and the patients' tolerability, by comparing the 2 different polyethylene glycol (PEG) administration schedules. BACKGROUND: The use of bowel purgatives before small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is recommended by the ESGE guidelines. Whether this regimen can be further refined by changing the timing of administration is unknown. STUDY: Fifty-seven patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized into 2 groups: group 1 (G1, n=29) received 2 L of PEG in the day before SBCE (time between PEG and SBCE=10 h); and group 2 (G2, n=28) received 1 L of PEG in the day before SBCE and 1 L of PEG in the morning before SBCE (time between PEG and SBCE=4 h). The primary outcome measure was small-bowel cleansing quality. Small-bowel cleansing quality was evaluated according to a previously validated grading scale. RESULTS: The entire and distal half small-bowel cleansing scores were significantly higher among G2 (median score: 8 vs. 10 points, P=0.012; median score: 6 vs. 8 points, P=0.05, respectively). The DY did not differ significantly between groups. There were no significant differences in transit times between the 2 PEG regimens. Both schedules were well tolerated, showing no differences regarding symptoms while ingesting the preparation or after SBCE ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: Split-dose PEG regimen for SBCE preparation improved the small-bowel cleanliness, did not interfere with transit times and was equally well tolerated by the patients. No differences were observed regarding DY. ClinicalTrial.gov registration: NCT02396017.

Fanconi syndrome and chronic renal failure in a chronic hepatitis B monoinfected patient treated with tenofovir.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is one of the first-line treatment options in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Despite its efficacy in suppressing viral load and a high resistance barrier, long life maintenance therapy is required. Registration studies demonstrated TDF to be a safe drug. However, post-marketing experience reported cases of serious nephrotoxicity associated with hypophosphatemia, osteomalacia and, even more recently, Fanconi syndrome associated with TDF therapy in CHB monoinfected patients.Here the authors report a case of a 40 year-old male, with a CHB monoinfection, that, three years after TDF therapy, developed a progressive chronic kidney disease with a serious hypophosphatemia and a secondary osteomalacia that was manifested by bone pain and multiple bone fractures. Further investigational analyses unveiled a proximal renal tubular dysfunction, which fulfilled most of the diagnostic criteria for a Fanconi syndrome. After TDF withdrawal and oral supplementation with phosphate and calcitriol, his renal function stabilized (despite not returning to normal), proximal renal tubular dysfunction abnormalities resolved as well as osteomalacia. In conclusion, physicians should be aware that, in CHB monoinfected patients under TDF therapy, serious renal damage is possible and preventable by timely monitoring serum creatinine and phosphate.

Epstein-Barr virus associated colitis in kidney transplant patients: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal complications are common in kidney transplant (KT) patients and can be a consequence of the chronic use of immunosuppression. The differential diagnosis of colitis in KT patients includes intolerance to immunosuppressive agents, namely mycophenolate mofetil, de novo inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and opportunistic infections. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection may cause post-transplant colitis or trigger de novo IBD, although is seldom thought as the causative pathogen. OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical characteristics, endoscopic and histological findings, treatment and outcome of three patients that developed EBV associated colitis following kidney transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed three patients with EBV associated colitis; clinical data including transplantation, gastrointestinal symptoms, endoscopy findings, and follow-up data was obtained. RESULTS: We present a case series of three patients with EBV colitis following KT, with an average age at clinical presentation of 59 years and elapsed time since the KT ranging from five to 22 years. Clinical manifestations included bloody diarrhoea, abdominal pain, weight loss and/or fever. Cytomegalovirus colitis, mycophenolate mofetil-related colitis, lymphoproliferative disease and graft versus host disease were excluded. One patient had a prior diagnosis of IBD. Two of the three patients had an unfavourable outcome with death despite reduction and/or switching of immunosuppressants, optimal medical treatment (including antiviral and intravenous immunoglobulin therapies) and salvage surgical therapy. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to allow an expeditious diagnosis of a rare entity such as EBV associated colitis in KT. Long-term surveillance of these patients and the development of effective and safe therapies is essential.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Resections Larger than 10 cm: Outcomes from a Portuguese Center.

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive technique for en bloc resection of superficial neoplastic lesions, independent of their size. However, for giant gastrointestinal superficial neoplasia, the risk of invasive cancer is higher, and ESD is typically challenging. Despite the increasing literature on giant resections, data on their efficacy and safety are still lacking. Objective: The aim of this study was to describe ESD outcomes from a Portuguese center, compare them with other international studies, and analyze the possible risk factors influencing outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center review using a prospectively collected database, including patients with rectal ESD resections larger than 10 cm, between January 2016 and December 2021. Clinical, procedural, and pathological data were collected and analyzed. Revision of the literature for comparison with international results was done through PubMed. Data were analyzed and statistical analysis performed, using Microsoft Excel and SPSS, to identify significant risk factors. Results: The study included 15 rectal resections, with a mean diameter of 140.9 mm (range 105-270), corresponding to lesions of 125.9 mm (87-238). The overall en bloc resection rate was 100% (n = 15). According to ESGE criteria, procedure was considered curative in 53.3% (n = 8), non-curative with high risk in 13.3% (n = 2), and local-risk recurrence in 33.3% (n = 5). Adverse events occurred in 26.7% (n = 4): 1 minor perforation and 3 stenosis, most endoscopically managed. For non-curative resections with local-risk recurrence, surveillance without adjuvant therapy was performed in all cases. For high-risk non-curative resections, surgery was performed in 1 patient and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy in another. Follow-up (mean 16 months) demonstrated a recurrence rate of 0%. Statistical analysis revealed resection size ≥20 cm as a risk factor for perforation (p value 0.067), and involvement of ≥90% of the circumference and procedural time ≥4 h as risk factors for stenosis (p value 0.029 and 0.009, respectively). Conclusions: Although challenging, ESD for giant lesions seems effective and safe, with a still relevant rate of complications, which were mostly endoscopically treated. Rigorous characterization of lesions is crucial to predict and avoid complications or the need for therapy escalation.

Background: A dissecao endoscopica da submucosa (DES) e uma tecnica minimamente invasiva para ressecao em bloco de tumores superficiais, independentemente do seu tamanho. No entanto, nas neoplasias superficiais gastrointestinais gigantes, o risco de cancro invasivo esta aumentado e a DES e tipicamente desafiante. Apesar do incremento da literatura acerca de ressecoes gigantes, dados da sua eficacia e seguranca sao ainda escassos. Objetivo: Descricao de outcomes de DES de um centro portugues e comparacao com estudos internacionais. Analise de eventuais fatores de risco influenciando os outcomes. Métodos: Revisao retrospetiva de um centro, usando a sua base de dados prospectivamente colhida, incluindo pacientes com ressecoes rectais por DES maiores que 10 cm, entre janeiro 2016 e dezembro 2021. Dados clinicos, endoscopicos e patologicos foram colhidos e analisados. A literatura foi revista atraves do PubMed, para comparacao com resultados internacionais. A analise dos resultados e estatistica foi realizada, utilizando o Microsoft Excel e SPSS, para a identificacao de fatores de risco com impacto significativo nos outcomes. Resultados: O estudo incluiu um total de 15 ressecoes retais, com uma media de diametros de 140,9 mm (intervalo 105­270), correspondendo a lesoes 125,9 mm (intervalo 87­238). A taxa de ressecao em bloco foi de 100% (n = 15). Segundo os criterios da ESGE, o procedimento foi curativo em 53,3% (n = 8), nao curativo com alto risco em 13,3% (n = 2) e com risco de recorrencia local em 33,3% (n = 5). Eventos adversos ocorreram em 26,7% (n = 4): 1 microperfuracao e 3 estenoses, a maioria geridas endoscopicamente. Os 5 casos nao curativos com risco de recorrencia local ficaram apenas sob vigilancia. Nas resseccoes nao curativas de alto risco, um paciente foi submetido a cirurgia e outro a quimioradioterapia adjuvante. O follow-up (media de 16 meses) demonstrou uma taxa de recorrencia de 0%. A analise estatistica demonstrou o tamanho da resseccao ≥20 cm como fator de risco significativo para perfuracao (p value 0.067); e envolvimento de ≥ 90% da circunferencia do lumen e tempo de procedimento ≥4h como fatores de risco significativos para estenose (p value 0.029 e 0.009, respetivamente). Conclusão: Apesar de desafiante, a DES para lesoes gigantes parece eficaz e segura, com uma taxa de complicacoes importante, possiveis de tratamento endoscopico. A caracterizacao rigorosa destas lesoes e crucial para predizer e evitar complicacoes ou a necessidade de escalada terapeutica.

Pan-Enteric Capsule Endoscopy: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.

Background: The role of capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of the small bowel is well established, and current guidelines position it as a first-line test in a variety of clinical scenarios. The advent of double-headed capsules further enabled the endoscopic assessment of colonic mucosa and the opportunity for a one-step noninvasive examination of the entire bowel (pan-enteric capsule endoscopy [PCE]). Summary: We reviewed the technical procedure and preparation of patients for PCE, as well as its current clinical applications and future perspectives. In non-stricturing and non-penetrating Crohn's disease affecting the small bowel and colon, PCE monitors disease activity by assessing mucosal healing, a major treatment outcome, with a higher diagnostic yield than cross-sectional imaging or conventional colonoscopy. Also in ulcerative colitis, double-headed capsules have been used to monitor disease activity noninvasively. Currently, validated scoring systems have been specifically devised for these double-headed capsules and permit a standardized assessment of the inflammatory burden. In suspected mid-lower digestive bleeding, some exploratory studies have demonstrated the feasibility and high diagnostic yield of PCE, which may work as a filter indicating which patients may benefit of further invasive procedures, namely, for planned hemostatic procedures. The possibility of using PCE is also discussed in the context of polyposis syndromes with simultaneous involvement of the small intestine and colon. Key Messages: PCE is a feasible, effective, and safe diagnostic procedure to evaluate the small bowel and colon. It has been increasingly explored in the setting of inflammatory bowel diseases and, more recently, in suspected mid-lower digestive bleeding. PCE is expected to reduce the demand for invasive procedures and expand the scope of noninvasive intestinal evaluation in the coming future.

Introdução: O papel da endoscopia por cápsula na avaliação do intestino delgado encontra-se bem estabelecido, e as orientações atuais posicionam-na como um teste de primeira linha numa variedade de cenários clínicos. O advento das cápsulas de dupla câmara permitiu expandir a sua aplicação para a avaliação endoscópica da mucosa do cólon, oferecendo a oportunidade de um exame não invasivo de todo o intestino (endoscopia pan-entérica por cápsula, PCE). Sumário: Procedemos a uma revisão de vários aspectos do procedimento e preparação dos doentes para a PCE, bem como as aplicações clínicas atuais e as perspetivas futuras das cápsulas de dupla câmara. Na doença de Crohn não estenosante e não penetrante localizada ao intestino delgado e cólon, a PCE permite monitorizar a atividade da doença e avaliar a cicatrização da mucosa, um indicador importante da eficácia da terapêutica, com um rendimento de diagnóstico superior aos métodos convencionais, nomeadamente os exames imagiológicos ou a colonoscopia invasiva. Também na colite ulcerosa, as cápsulas de dupla câmara têm sido utilizadas para monitorizar a atividade da doença de forma não invasiva. Existem índices endoscópicos validados e especificamente concebidos para as cápsulas de dupla câmara, que permitem uma avaliação sistematizada e quantificação objetiva da atividade inflamatória. Na suspeita de hemorragia digestiva média ou baixa, alguns estudos exploratórios demonstraram a aplicabilidade e o elevado rendimento diagnóstico da PCE, podendo funcionar como um filtro de modo a permitir indicar quais os doentes que mais irão beneficiar de um procedimento invasivo subsequente, nomeadamente para a realização de procedimentos hemostáticos dirigidos. A possibilidade de utilização da PCE é também discutida no contexto das síndromes de polipose com envolvimento simultâneo do intestino delgado e do cólon. Mensagens-chave: A PCE é um procedimento diagnóstico eficaz e seguro para avaliar diretamente a mucosa do intestino delgado e cólon. A sua aplicação tem vindo a expandir-se no contexto das Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais e, mais recentemente, na suspeita de hemorragia digestiva média ou baixa. Existe a expectativa de que no futuro próximo possamos assistir a uma redução substancial da demanda por procedimentos endoscópicos invasivos, face à utilização crescente da PCE enquanto método de diagnóstico pan-intestinal não invasivo.

Outcomes and Learning Curve in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Rectal Neoplasms with Severe Fibrosis: Experience of a Western Center.

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of lesions with severe submucosal fibrosis has been associated with worse outcomes, such as lower curative resection rate and higher incidence of adverse events. This study aims to investigate its true impact on rectal ESD performed in the West and to assess predictive factors of severe fibrosis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all rectal ESDs performed at our tertiary center from January 2013 to January 2021. Lesions were grouped as nonsevere fibrosis or severe fibrosis. ESD outcomes, predictors of severe fibrosis, and the learning curve were evaluated. Results: ESD was performed in 195 lesions, 45 with severe fibrosis. Three resections were interrupted (one due to severe fibrosis). The presence of severe fibrosis was related to a significantly lower resection speed (16.93 mm2/min vs. 24.66 mm2/min, p = 0.007), en bloc (86.4% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.019), R0 (61.4% vs. 79.7%, p = 0.013), and curative (54.5% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.003) resection rates and a higher rate of hybrid ESD required to complete resection (13.6% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.005). No significant difference was noted regarding adverse events rate (18.2% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.09). Male sex, ulcerative colitis, pelvic radiotherapy, a lesion on the anastomotic site, previous manipulation, and deep submucosal invasion were independent predictors for severe fibrosis. En bloc resection rate improved during time (60.0% vs. 94.1%, p = 0.018). Conclusions: Severe submucosal fibrosis is an important factor related to noncurative resections and challenging rectal ESD. Factors predicting its severity are extremely important and could allow more experienced endoscopists to be assigned to more difficult cases, allowing safer procedures.

Introdução: A disseção endoscópica da submucosa (DES) de lesões com fibrose severa tem sido associada a piores resultados, nomeadamente uma menor taxa de ressecção curativa e maior taxa de complicações. Este estudo tem como objetivo investigar o impacto da fibrose severa na DES de lesões do reto realizada no ocidente e avaliar fatores preditivos de fibrose severa. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo retrospetivo incluindo todas as DES de lesões do reto realizadas no nosso centro entre janeiro de 2013 e janeiro de 2021. As lesões foram agrupadas em lesões sem fibrose severa ou com fibrose severa. Foram analisados os resultados da DES, preditores de fibrose severa e a curva de aprendizagem. Resultados: Foi realizada DES em 195 lesões: 45 com fibrose severa. Três resseções foram interrompidas (uma devido a fibrose severa). A presença de fibrose severa associou-se a uma significativa menor velocidade de resseção (16.93 mm2/min vs. 24.66 mm2/min, p = 0.007) e significativas menores taxas de excisão em bloco (86.4% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.019), R0 (61.4% vs. 79.7%, p = 0.013) e curativa (54.5% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.003), bem como uma maior taxa de resseção híbrida necessária para completar a excisão (13.6% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.005). Não se verificou uma diferença estatisticamente significativa em relação aos efeitos adversos nos dois grupos (18.2% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.09). O sexo masculino, a presença de colite ulcerosa, radioterapia pélvica prévia, localização em anastomose, manipulação prévia ou invasão profunda da submucosa foram identificados como fatores preditores de fibrose severa. A taxa de excisão em bloco aumentou ao longo do tempo (60.0% vs. 94.1%, p = 0.018). Conclusão: A fibrose severa é um importante fator relacionado com excisões não curativas e mais complexas. A identificação de fatores proditores da sua gravidade é de extrema importância e pode permitir a alocação de endoscopistas mais experientes para casos mais difíceis, permitindo procedimentos mais seguros.

Critical Analysis of the Applicability of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Performance Measures among 2 Portuguese Centers with Different Capsule Endoscopy Platforms.

Introduction: The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) identified the need to benchmark the quality of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and produced a set of performance measures (PM). The aim of this study is to critically evaluate the accordance of the PM for SBCE in two Portuguese centers with different SBCE platforms. Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of consecutive SBCE performed in an 18-month period in 2 Portuguese centers that used two different SBCE platforms Mirocam® (IntroMedic, Seoul, South Korea) and PillCam® (Medtronic, Yokneam, Israel). A total of 10 PM (6 key, 4 minor) were evaluated and compared between the 2 centers. Results: A total of 493 SBCE were included. The minimum standard established by ESGE was reached in 3/6 key PM (complete visualization, lesion detection rate, and capsule retention rate), and none of the 4 minor PM. PM compliance significantly differed between the 2 centers: complete small bowel visualization 95.9 and 90% (p = 0.01), diagnostic yield 50.6 and 63% (p = 0.005), adequate small bowel cleansing level according to Brotz scale 69.54 and 84.6% (p ≤ 0.001), patients with high risk of capsule retention offered a patency capsule 4.2 and 73% (p ≤ 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: This study highlights and critically discusses technical and organizational issues that should be considered in defining more realistic PM thresholds, aiming to improve SBCE quality.

Introdução: A Sociedade Europeia de Endoscopia Digestiva (ESGE) identificou a necessidade de avaliar a qualidade da enteroscopia por videocápsula (EVC) e produziu um conjunto de medidas de desempenho (MD). O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar criticamente a concordância das medidas de desempenho de EVC em dois centros portugueses com diferentes plataformas de EVC. Métodos: Análise transversal de EVC consecutivas realizadas em 2 centros portugueses, com diferentes plataformas de EVC Mirocam® (IntroMedic, Seul, Coreia) e PillCam® (Medtronic, Yokneam, Israel), respetivamente. Um total de 10 medidas de desempenho (6 principais, 4 minor) foram avaliadas e comparadas entre os 2 centros. Resultados: Foram incluídas 493 EVC. O standard mínimo estabelecido pela ESGE foi alcançado em 3/6 MD principais (visualização completa, taxa de detecção de lesões e taxa de cápsula retida), e nenhum nas quatro MD minor. O cumprimento das MD diferiu significativamente entre os 2 centros: visualização completa do intestino delgado 95,9 e 90% (p = 0,01), taxa de deteção de lesões 50,6% e 63% (p = 0,005), adequada preparação do intestino delgado de acordo com a escala de Brotz 69,54 e 84,6% (p ≤ 0,001), doentes com alto risco de retenção da cápsula a quem foi oferecida cápsula de patência 4,2 e 73% (p ≤ 0,001), respectivamente. Introdução: Este estudo destaca e discute criticamente questões técnicas e organizacionais que devem ser consideradas na definição de limiares de MD mais realistas, com o objetivo de melhorar a qualidade da EVC.

Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of "PROMIS GI - Disrupted Swallowing" Scale for the Portuguese Language.

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia is a prevalent condition (20%), and occurs more frequently in women and in older people. It negatively impacts innumerous aspects of patient's personal and professional lives. Patient-reported outcomes allow patients to directly quantify their experience regarding dysphagia and evaluate its true impact on quality of life. Among the scales available, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Gastrointestinal (PROMIS GI) Disrupted Swallowing stands out because it is a robust instrument that can be applied regardless of the type and etiology of dysphagia. The aim of this study was to translate, culturally adapt and validate PROMIS GI Disrupted Swallowing scale for the Portuguese-speaking population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Firstly, the seven items of the scale were translated and transculturally reviewed following the systematic method proposed by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT). Afterwards, the pre-test version of the questionnaire was administered to a convenience sample (n = 6) for semantic evaluation, with the aim of detection and subsequent correction of possible problems in the translation. The final translated and certified version of the scale was administered to 200 voluntary adult participants (n = 123 healthy; n = 77 dysphagia) in Portugal, for evaluation of reliability and validity. RESULTS: The Portuguese version of PROMIS GI Disrupted Swallowing presented acceptable internal consistency (coefficient of Cronbach's α of 0.919) and adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.941). The translated version of the scale revealed a strong correlation with both Eckardt score (p < 0.001; ρ = 0.782) and the quality-of-life questionnaire EuroQol-5D (p < 0.001; ρ = -0.551), demonstrating evidence of convergent validity. CONCLUSION: The Portuguese version of PROMIS GI Disrupted Swallowing scale presented conceptual, semantic, cultural and measurement equivalence relatively to the original items. The results attained demonstrated that the translation of this scale to Portuguese is reliable and valid for use both in clinical practice and for research purposes.

Burden of Disease and Cost of Illness of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Portugal.

Background: Inflammatory bowel diseases' (IBD) increasing incidence and prevalence place a heavy health and economic burden on society. Objectives: This study assesses the burden and cost of IBD in Portugal to support the definition of health policies, resource allocation, and patient care. Methods: The burden of disease was expressed using disability-adjusted life years (DALY). Costs were estimated considering the societal perspective, using a prevalence-based model and prices established by law. An expert panel composed of 5 expert Portuguese gastroenterologists and a patient-reported study were conducted to support the cost analysis and fill in information gaps. Results: In Portugal, with a prevalence of 24,069 IBD patients and an incidence of 15/100,000, the burden of disease was estimated at 6,067 DALYs: 507 resulting from premature deaths and 5,560 from disability. Total cost was estimated at EUR 146 million per year, with direct costs representing 59%. Average yearly cost per IBD patient is EUR 6,075, where 60% is related to Crohn's disease and 40% to ulcerative colitis (UC). Conclusion: This study estimates the annual health burden and cost of IBD in Portugal, thus generating information with the intent to raise awareness of the need to advance health policies as well as better clinical and economic decisions in this pathology.

Contexto: A crescente incidência e prevalência das Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais (DII) representam um pesado fardo para a saúde e economia na sociedade. Objetivos: Este estudo avalia o custo e a carga da DII em Portugal, com o objetivo de suportar a definição de políticas de saúde, alocação de recursos e cuidados com o doente. Métodos: A carga da doença foi calculada utilizando anos de vida ajustados à incapacidade (DALY). Os custos foram estimados tendo em conta a perspetiva da sociedade, utilizando um modelo baseado na prevalência e preços estabelecidos por lei. Foi realizado um painel de peritos, composto por 5 gastroenterologistas portugueses, assim como um estudo de mercado a doentes, de forma a suportar a análise de custos e colmatar lacunas de informação. Resultados: Em Portugal, com uma prevalência de 24,069 doentes e uma incidência de 15/100,000, o peso das DII foi estimado em 6.067 DALYs: 507 dos quais resultantes de mortes prematuras e 5.560 de incapacidade. O custo total foi estimado em 146 milhões de euros por ano, com os custos diretos a representarem 59% do total. O custo médio anual por doente de DII é de 6.075 EUR, onde 60% está relacionado com Doença de Crohn (DC) e 40% com Colite Ulcerosa. Conclusão: Este estudo estima os encargos anuais para a saúde e o custo da DII em Portugal, gerando informação relevante, com o intuito de alertar para a necessidade de uma evolução nas políticas de saúde, assim como como suportar melhores decisões clínicas e económicas nesta patologia.

Early intervention with biologic therapy in Crohn´s disease: how early is early?

BACKGROUND: Early biologic therapy within the first 18-24 months after diagnosis is associated with improved clinical outcomes in Crohn's disease [CD]. However, the definition of the best time to initiate biologic therapy remains unclear. We aimed to assess if there is an optimal timing for early biologic therapy initiation. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study including newly diagnosed CD patients who started anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy within 24 months from diagnosis. The timing of initiation of biologic therapy was categorised as ≤6, 7-12, 13-18, and 19-24 months. The primary outcome was CD-related complications defined as a composite of progression of Montreal disease behaviour, CD-related hospitalisations, or CD-related intestinal surgeries. Secondary outcomes included clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and transmural remission. RESULTS: We included 141 patients where 54%, 26%, 11%, and 9% started biologic therapy at ≤6, 7-12, 13-18, and 19-24 months after diagnosis, respectively. A total of 34 patients [24%] reached the primary outcome: 8% had progression of disease behaviour, 15% were hospitalised, and 9% required surgery. There was no difference in the time to a CD-related complication according to the time of initiation of biologic therapy within the first 24 months. Clinical, endoscopic, and transmural remission was achieved in 85%, 50%, and 29%, respectively, but no differences were found according to the time of initiation of biologic therapy. CONCLUSION: Starting anti-TNF therapy within the first 24 months after diagnosis was associated with a low rate of CD-related complications and high rates of clinical and endoscopic remission, although we found no differences with earlier initiation within this window of opportunity.