Single layer suturing in intracapsular myomectomy of intramural myomas is sufficient for a normal wound healing.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate surgical outcomes of intracapsular single-layer myomectomy in terms of efficacy and safety as well as examine potential alterations based on kind of surgical approach. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed between January 2010 and December 2018. Women in reproductive age, affected by intramural or subserous myomas (FIGO type 3-6) of 4-14 cm diameter were enrolled. Primary outcomes included initial and final uterine incision length, time to wound healing and uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies. Furthermore, a sub-analysis was also performed regarding surgical approach, namely laparoscopical or laparoscopically-assisted myomectomy, in order to confirm whether overall observations are similar for both potential surgical approaches. RESULTS: There were finally 273 patients included in the present study. Overall mean uterine incision was initially 3.1 cm and was shortened to 2.2 cm at the end of operation, indicating a reduction of 29.1 %. Mean estimated blood loss was 154.2 mL and mean operative time was 82.1 min. No severe intraoperative and postoperative complications were presented. 121 of the studied women had pregnancy 3-36 months after myomectomy, without reporting any uterine rupture. When comparing LIM vs. LAIM, all outcomes were also favorable in the total of patients. CONCLUSION: Intracapsular myomectomy either by LIM or LAIM is a safe and attractive alternative to abdominal myomectomy in setting of premenopausal patients with myomas up to 14 cm. A single-layer continuous suturing in intracapsular myomectomies is enough for a successful wound healing.

Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Review of 3 National Guidelines.

IMPORTANCE: Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a major cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare recommendations from published national guidelines for pregnancies complicated with PPROM. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A descriptive review of 3 national guidelines on PPROM was performed: the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists on "Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membranes," the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists on "Premature Rupture of Membranes," and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada on "Antibiotic Therapy in Preterm Premature Rupture of the Membranes." Guidelines were compared in the diagnosis and management of PPROM. Recommendations and strength of evidence were reviewed based on each guideline's method of reporting. The references were compared with regard to their total number, total number of randomized controlled trials, Cochrane reviews, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses cited. RESULTS: The variations stated on the guidelines reflect the heterogeneity of the literature contributing to the guidelines and challenges of diagnosing and managing cases of PPROM. CONCLUSIONS: An improved international guideline may improve safety and outcomes in pregnant women with PPROM.