Exploring the Optimal Factor Structure of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: Associations Between Mindfulness Facets and Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Recent studies of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) and its condensed version (FFMQ-SF) fail to replicate the initially proposed five-factor structure in clinical samples. Failure to adequately understand the dimensionality of common mindfulness measures within clinical samples, therefore, represents an important gap in the current literature. The increasing popularity of mindfulness-based interventions warrants further investigation of differential associations between facets of mindfulness and different forms of psychopathology. We examined (a) the underlying structure of the FFMQ and FFMQ-SF, and (b) associations between FFMQ and FFMQ-SF facets and dimensions of psychopathology (i.e., internalizing and substance use disorders) in two large clinical samples (N = 2,779). Results from bass-ackwards analyses suggested similarly defensible five- and six-factor model solutions in terms of fit. The five-factor model was optimal when factoring in parsimony. Exploratory structural equation modeling revealed that all FFMQ facets with the exception of observe were negatively associated with the internalizing factor. Associations with substance use disorders were more complex. In both samples, five-factor FFMQ and FFMQ-SF models were determined to best represent these data. Whereas deficits in all FFMQ facets with the exception of observe correspond with lower internalizing psychopathology, a more nuanced association was observed with substance use disorders.

Judgment towards emotions as a mediator of the relationship between emotional eating and depression symptoms in bariatric surgery candidates.

PURPOSE: Emotional eating is common in bariatric surgery candidates, and often is associated with depression and poorer weight loss outcomes following surgery. However, less is known about other modifiable risk factors that may link depression and emotional eating. The aim of the current study was to examine facets of mindfulness as potential mediators of the relationship between emotional eating and depression severity in bariatric surgery candidates. METHODS: Bariatric surgery candidates (n = 743) were referred by their surgeons for a comprehensive psychiatric pre-surgical evaluation that included self-report questionnaires assessing depression severity, emotional overeating, and facets of mindfulness. Mediation effects were examined for each mindfulness facet based on prior research. RESULTS: Only the nonjudging mindfulness facet significantly mediated the relationship between emotional eating and depression, suggesting that greater emotional eating may be associated with greater depression severity through higher levels of judgement towards thoughts and emotions. A reverse mediation analysis showed that depression severity was not a significant mediator of the relationship between nonjudging and emotional eating. CONCLUSION: Fostering a nonjudgmental stance towards thoughts and feelings may be helpful in improving eating habits that would support greater post-surgical success. Other clinical and research implications are discussed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, descriptive study.

Patients with borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder: a descriptive and comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are each significant public health problems. It has been frequently noted that distinguishing BPD from bipolar disorder is challenging. Consequently, reviews and commentaries have focused on differential diagnosis and identifying clinical features to distinguish the two disorders. While there is a burgeoning literature comparing patients with BPD and bipolar disorder, much less research has characterized patients with both disorders. In the current report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, we compare psychiatric outpatients with both BPD and bipolar disorder to patients with BPD without bipolar disorder and patients with bipolar disorder without BPD. METHODS: Psychiatric outpatients presenting for treatment were evaluated with semi-structured interviews. The focus of the current study is the 517 patients with both BPD and bipolar disorder (n = 59), BPD without bipolar disorder (n = 330), and bipolar disorder without BPD (n = 128). RESULTS: Compared to patients with bipolar disorder, the patients with bipolar disorder and BPD had more comorbid disorders, psychopathology in their first-degree relatives, childhood trauma, suicidality, hospitalizations, time unemployed, and likelihood of receiving disability payments. The added presence of bipolar disorder in patients with BPD was associated with more posttraumatic stress disorder in the patients as well as their family, more bipolar disorder and substance use disorders in their relatives, more childhood trauma, unemployment, disability, suicide attempts, and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with both bipolar disorder and BPD have more severe psychosocial morbidity than patients with only one of these disorders.

Emotion regulation accounts for associations between mindfulness and depression across and within diagnostic categories.

BACKGROUND: Previous research shows that mindfulness and emotion regulation (ER) are highly related to each other. Preliminary evidence in small clinical populations show that ER may partially account for the relationship between mindfulness and depressive symptoms. The present study aimed to investigate which diagnostic categories were associated with depressive symptoms after controlling for ER in a heterogeneous sample of treatment-seeking patients. METHODS: A large sample of psychiatric outpatients (N = 911) completed the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), and Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS). Partial correlations were conducted to evaluate to what degree the relationship between depression scores and facets of mindfulness were accounted for by ER scores. RESULTS: When controlling for baseline mindfulness, the relationship between emotion dysregulation and depression symptoms remained significant for all data points; however, when controlling for baseline emotion dysregulation, the association between mindfulness and depression was not significant in the majority of cases. Nonjudging was most resistant to this result. CONCLUSIONS: Although mindfulness is negatively associated with depressive symptoms, this association may be better accounted for by emotion dysregulation.

Understanding the severity of depression: do nondepressive symptoms influence global ratings of depression severity?

OBJECTIVE: Almost all depression measures have been developed without discussing how to best conceptualize and assess the severity of depression. It is therefore not surprising that measures differ in both how items are rated and item content. The question that we address in the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project is whether a measure of depression severity should include symptoms that are frequent in depressed patients but are defining features of other disorders (eg, anxiety, irritability). METHODS: Patients were evaluated with a semi-structured interview and severity ratings were made of each symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as anxiety, irritability, and somatization. Patients were also rated on the Clinical Global Index of severity (CGI). RESULTS: Three of the 5 nondepressive symptoms (psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, and subjective anger) were significantly correlated with the CGI. The correlation between the sum of all 5 nondepressive symptoms and the CGI was significantly lower than the correlation between the sum of the depressive symptom severity ratings (0.12 vs 0.52, z = 11.0, p < .001). The partial correlation between the CGI and the nondepressive symptom severity ratings (after controlling for the total depressive symptom ratings) was nonsignificant. DISCUSSION: After accounting for the severity of depressive symptoms, the severity of the nondepressive symptoms was not associated with global ratings of depressive severity. These findings raise questions regarding the appropriateness of including ratings of anxiety, irritability, and somatization on a measure that purportedly assesses the severity of depression.

Principal Diagnoses in Psychiatric Outpatients With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Implications for Screening Recommendations.

In this study, we examined the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in 3800 psychiatric outpatients with different principal diagnoses. For all disorders identified as a principal diagnosis, we compared patients' odds ratios of PTSD to all other patients in the sample. Approximately one-sixth of the sample (n = 663, 17.4%) was diagnosed with PTSD, including 417 patients with current PTSD and 246 with PTSD in partial remission. Patients with principal bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder (MDD) demonstrated higher rates of PTSD compared with those without principal bipolar and MDD. For most psychiatric outpatients with PTSD, the principal diagnosis for which they seek treatment is not PTSD, but rather a mood disorder. This highlights the importance of screening for PTSD, particularly in patients with a principal diagnosis for which the prevalence of PTSD is relatively high, namely, MDD, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, and borderline personality disorder.

Have Treatment Studies of Depression Become Even Less Generalizable? Applying the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Placebo-Controlled Antidepressant Efficacy Trials Published over 20 Years to a Clinical Sample.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants are amongst the most frequently prescribed medications. More than a decade ago, our clinical research group applied a prototypic set of inclusion/exclusion criteria used in an antidepressant efficacy trial (AET) to patients presenting for treatment in our outpatient practice and found that most patients would not qualify for the trial. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, we apply the psychiatric inclusion/exclusion criteria used in 158 placebo-controlled studies to a large sample of depressed patients who presented for outpatient treatment to determine the range and extent of the representativeness of samples treated in AETs and whether this has changed over time. METHOD: We applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in 158 AETs to 1,271 patients presenting to an outpatient practice who received a principal diagnosis of major depressive disorder. The patients underwent a thorough diagnostic evaluation. RESULTS: Across all 158 studies, the percentage of patients that would have been excluded ranged from 44.4 to 99.8% (mean = 86.1%). The percentage of patients that would have been excluded was significantly higher in the studies published in 2010 through 2014 compared to the studies published from 1995 to 2009 (91.4 vs. 83.8%, t(156) = 3.74, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of depressed patients seen in clinical practice are likely to be eligible for most AETs. The generalizability of AETs has decreased over time. It is unclear how generalizable the results of AETs are to patients treated in real-world clinical practice.

Should childhood conduct disorder be necessary to diagnose antisocial personality disorder in adults?

BACKGROUND: Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is the only DSM personality disorder that requires a diagnosis of conduct disorder (CD) during childhood. Previous research comparing adults diagnosed with ASPD with adults who meet all ASPD criteria except for a history of CD (referred to in this study as adult antisocial syndrome [AAS]) have reported mixed results. This study sought to clarify the differences among adults with ASPD, adults with AAS, and a large psychiatric outpatient control group. METHODS: A series of semi-structured interviews were conducted with 2,691 psychiatric outpatients. We compared groups on demographic variables, psychiatric comorbidity, symptom presentation, parental history, and psychosocial morbidity. RESULTS: Significant differences were found among ASPD, AAS, and controls in regard to demographic variables, comorbidity, symptom presentation, and parental history. The ASPD and AAS groups were similarly impaired with respect to global functioning, occupational and social functioning, and suicidality. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that by including a history of CD in ASPD criteria, our diagnostic system excludes an important group of later-onset patients who also require attention and resources. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.

Differentiating borderline personality from bipolar disorder with the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ): A replication and extension of the International Mood Network (IMN) Nosology Project.

INTRODUCTION: Vöhringer et al. identified a triad of items on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) that best discriminated between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and bipolar disorder (BD) in a tertiary mood clinic setting [23]. The present study aimed to replicate and extend these findings by examining the performance of the triad across a range of cut-off scores and comparing the operating characteristics of the triad to the full MDQ. METHODS: Patients presenting for treatment were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) and the BPD module of the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV). The present report is based on 476 depressed patients who had a principal diagnosis of major depressive disorder or BD and who completed the MDQ. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were diagnosed with BD and fifty-four patients were diagnosed with BPD. Both the triad and full MDQ significantly predicted BD diagnosis (p < .001), but the triad had optimal operating characteristics, particularly at a cut-off of two. CONCLUSION: Within a sample of depressed patients, the MDQ triad is a better screener for BD than the full MDQ, particularly if a positive triad screen is indicated by the presence of any two items. The triad is particularly good for differentiating between BD and BPD, whereas the full MDQ does a poorer job of differential diagnosis. Future studies should administer the triad as a stand-alone scale.

Depression and substance use disorders in the offspring of depressed parents as a function of the parent's borderline personality disorder symptomatology.

BACKGROUND: Parental major depressive disorder (MDD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are associated with increased risk of offspring psychopathology. It is unclear whether BPD in depressed parents infers greater risk than depression alone. We hypothesized that BPD features in depressed parents would be associated with higher morbid risk of offspring MDD and substance use disorders (SUDs). METHODS: Participants included 912 psychiatric outpatients with a principal diagnosis of MDD. Semi-structured interviews determined diagnoses of parents and their 2,011 reported offspring. We compared the offspring's morbid risk of MDD and SUDs based on whether their parents had BPD, ≥1 BPD criteria, and by each criterion. RESULTS: Offspring of parents with ≥1 BPD criteria had higher morbid risk of MDD and SUDs. Differences were insignificant when comparing by BPD diagnosis. Anger and impulsivity were associated with increased risk of MDD, and emptiness was associated with increased risk of SUDs. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that BPD features confer additional risk to offspring beyond that of parental depression alone. Parental anger and impulsivity may be particularly important in determining risk of MDD, and parental feelings of emptiness may be particularly important for risk of SUDs. Limitations, future directions, and treatment implications are discussed.

Understanding the severity of depression: Which symptoms of depression are the best indicators of depression severity?

BACKGROUND: In DSM-5, all symptoms of depression are considered equal representations of severity. In ICD-10, the type of symptom is considered in classifying severity. It is important to better understand if the defining symptoms of depression are differentially associated with overall severity so that severity categorization in diagnostic systems is most valid. In the present study from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project we examined the association between the individual diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) and global ratings of depression severity. We thus examined whether there is support for the ICD-10 approach in which some symptoms are better indicators of severity than are other symptoms. METHODS: Patients were evaluated with a semi-structured interview and the presence of each symptom of MDD was recorded. Patients were also rated on the Clinical Global Index of severity (CGI-S). RESULTS: All 9 DSM-5 criteria were significantly correlated with the CGI with suicidality having the highest correlation. A regression analysis found that all 9 criteria were significant predictors of the CGI. At the symptom level, 15 of the 17 symptoms were significantly correlated with the CGI (all except increased appetite and increased weight). DISCUSSION: There were differences between the symptoms of depression in their association with severity with suicidal ideation, depressed mood, and anhedonia having the highest correlations with severity whereas some symptoms were not significantly associated with severity distinctions. Future descriptions of the severity of depression should not consider all criteria as equal representations of severity.

Clinically useful screen for borderline personality disorder in psychiatric out-patients.

A total of 3674 psychiatric out-patients were evaluated with a semi-structured diagnostic interview for DSM-IV borderline personality disorder (BPD). The affective instability criterion had a sensitivity of 92.8%, higher than the sensitivities of the other eight BPD criteria. The negative predictive value of the affective instability criterion was 99%. We recommend that clinicians screen for BPD in the same way that they screen for other psychiatric disorders: by enquiring about a single feature of the disorder (i.e. affective instability), the presence of which identifies most patients with the disorder and the absence of which rules out the disorder.

Principal diagnoses in psychiatric outpatients with borderline personality disorder: Implications for screening recommendations.

BACKGROUND: In the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project, we examined how often borderline personality disorder (BPD) is the principal diagnosis in patients presenting for outpatient psychiatric treatment. To inform clinicians when it is most productive to screen for BPD, we examined the prevalence of BPD in psychiatric outpatients with different principal diagnoses. METHODS: In this study, 3,674 psychiatric outpatients were evaluated with a semi-structured diagnostic interview for DSM-IV BPD. RESULTS: Slightly ≥10% of the sample was diagnosed with BPD (n = 390, 10.6%). For 80 (20.5%) patients with BPD, the chief concern was related to a feature of BPD; therefore, BPD was designated as a comorbid diagnosis. The highest rate of BPD as a principal diagnosis was found among patients with bipolar disorder. The rate of BPD in patients with principal diagnoses of adjustment disorder, dysthymic disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder was significantly lower than in patients without these principal diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of psychiatric outpatients with BPD, the principal diagnosis for which they seek treatment is not BPD but, rather, a mood or anxiety disorder. This highlights the importance of screening for BPD.

Subjective anger and overt aggression in psychiatric outpatients.

BACKGROUND: The attention given to anger and aggression in psychiatric patients pales in comparison to the attention given to depression and anxiety. Most studies have focused on a limited number of psychiatric disorders, and results have been inconsistent. The present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project sought to replicate and extend prior findings examining which psychiatric disorders and demographic characteristics were independently associated with elevated levels of anger and aggression. METHOD: 3800 individuals presenting to the Rhode Island Hospital Department of Psychiatry outpatient practice underwent a semi-structured interview to determine current Axis I (N=3800) and Axis II (N=2151) pathology. Severity of subjective anger and overt aggression within the past week were also assessed for each patient, and odds ratios were determined for each disorder. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to determine which diagnoses independently contributed to increased levels of anger and aggression. RESULTS: Almost half of the sample reported moderate-to-severe levels of current subjective anger, and more than 20% endorsed moderate-to-severe levels of current overt aggression. The frequency of anger was similar to the frequencies of depressed mood and psychic anxiety. Anger and aggression were elevated across all diagnoses except adjustment disorder. Anger and aggression were most elevated in patients with major depressive disorder, panic disorder with agoraphobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, and cluster B personality disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Anger is as common as depressed mood and psychic anxiety amongst psychiatric outpatients, and problems with anger cut across diagnostic categories. Given the high prevalence of problems with anger in psychiatric patients, more research should be directed towards its effective treatment.

The Importance of Assessing for Childhood Abuse and Lifetime PTSD in Bariatric Surgery Candidates.

For bariatric surgery candidates, history of child abuse and PTSD may be under-recognized or under-reported at pre-surgical evaluation. On a range of clinically relevant factors, we studied 3045 candidates for bariatric surgery: (1) those with a history of childhood abuse compared to those without such history; and (2) among candidates with a history of abuse, those with a lifetime diagnosis of PTSD compared to those without that diagnosis. We compared them on current and lifetime eating disorders, physical health problems, health behaviors, physical functioning, psychosocial functioning, psychiatric disorders, emotional wellness, body satisfaction, and self-esteem. We hypothesized that patients with a history of childhood abuse, and within that group, those with a lifetime PTSD diagnosis, would display greater overall impairment. Patients were interviewed with semi-structured interviews and completed self-report questionnaires. Results showed that (1) patients with a history of childhood abuse exhibited significantly greater impairment than those without abuse; and (2) among candidates with a history of abuse, those with a lifetime history of PTSD displayed significantly greater impairment than those without a PTSD diagnosis. The findings suggest that a history of both childhood abuse and lifetime PTSD should be thoroughly assessed for at pre-surgical evaluation, and that greater attention be paid to the experience of PTSD symptoms in abuse survivors presenting for bariatric surgery.

Diagnostic profiles of adult psychiatric outpatients with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Despite growing recognition that attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a highly prevalent, impairing, and comorbid disorder that persists into adulthood, reports on the nature and extent of its psychiatric comorbidities have been mixed to date. This study compared the prevalence rates of all major Axis I disorders as well as borderline personality disorder in an unselected sample of adult psychiatric outpatients with and without ADHD. METHODS: As part of the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, we administered a DSM-IV-based semi-structured diagnostic interview assessing ADHD and other psychiatric disorders to 1134 patients presenting for initial evaluation at an outpatient psychiatric practice. Logistic regression analyses were used to compare the rates of each disorder in patients with versus without an ADHD diagnosis (both overall and by Combined and Inattentive type). RESULTS: Patients with (versus without) any ADHD diagnosis had significantly higher rates of bipolar disorder, social phobia, impulse control disorders, eating disorders, and BPD, and significantly lower rates of major depressive disorder and adjustment disorder (all p<.05). Patients with (versus without) ADHD-Inattentive type had significantly higher rates of social phobia and eating disorders, whereas those with (versus without) the ADHD-Combined type had significantly higher rates of bipolar disorder, alcohol dependence, and BPD (all p<.05). CONCLUSION: In this novel investigation of the psychiatric profiles of an unselected sample of treatment-seeking adult outpatients with versus without ADHD, a distinct pattern of comorbidities emerged across subtypes, with implications for the accurate assessment and treatment of patients presenting for psychiatric care.

Psychosocial morbidity associated with bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder in psychiatric out-patients: comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The morbidity associated with bipolar disorder is, in part, responsible for repeated calls for improved detection and recognition. No such commentary exists for the improved detection of borderline personality disorder. Clinical experience suggests that it is as disabling as bipolar disorder, but no study has directly compared the two disorders. AIMS: To compare the levels of psychosocial morbidity in patients with bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. METHOD: Patients were assessed with semi-structured interviews. We compared 307 patients with DSM-IV borderline personality disorder but without bipolar disorder and 236 patients with bipolar disorder but without borderline personality disorder. RESULTS: The patients with borderline personality disorder less frequently were college graduates, were diagnosed with more comorbid disorders, more frequently had a history of substance use disorder, reported more suicidal ideation at the time of the evaluation, more frequently had attempted suicide, reported poorer social functioning and were rated lower on the Global Assessment of Functioning. There was no difference between the two patient groups in history of admission to psychiatric hospital or time missed from work during the past 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The level of psychosocial morbidity associated with borderline personality disorder was as great as (or greater than) that experienced by patients with bipolar disorder. From a public health perspective, efforts to improve the detection and treatment of borderline personality disorder might be as important as efforts to improve the recognition and treatment of bipolar disorder.

How many different ways do patients meet the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder?

There are 227 possible ways to meet the symptom criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, symptom occurrence is not random, and some symptoms co-occur significantly beyond chance. This raises the questions of whether all of the theoretically possible different ways of meeting the MDD criteria actually occur in patients, and whether some combinations of criteria are much more common than others. More than 1500 patients who met DSM-IV criteria for MDD at the time of the evaluation were interviewed with semi-structured interviews. The patients met the MDD symptom criteria in 170 different ways. Put another way, one-quarter (57/227) of the criteria combinations did not occur. The most frequent combination was the presence of all 9 criteria (10.1%, n=157). Nine combinations (all 9 criteria, 3 of the 8-criterion combinations, 4 of the 7-criterion combinations, and one 6-criterion combination) were present in more than 2% of the patients, together accounting for more than 40% of the diagnoses. The polythetic definition of MDD, which requires a minimum number of criteria from a list, results in significant diagnostic heterogeneity because there are many different ways to meet criteria. While there is significant heterogeneity amongst patients meeting the MDD diagnostic criteria, a relatively small number of combinations could be considered as diagnostic prototypes as they account for more than 40% of the patients diagnosed with MDD.

Defining Subthreshold PTSD in the DSM-IV Literature: A Look Toward DSM-5.

Subthreshold posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), whether due to absence of symptom development or partial remission, is the subject of research and clinical work despite being absent from the DSM. A problem with the literature is that subthreshold definitions are inconsistent across studies and therefore aggregating results is difficult. This study compared the diagnostic hit rates and validity of commonly used definitions of Subthreshold PTSD in a single sample. Three definitions of Subthreshold PTSD were extracted from the literature and two were formed, including a model of DSM-5 PTSD-criterion sets, and a definition that requires six or more PTSD symptoms, but no particular criterion set. Participants (N = 654) with a criterion A stressor, but without full PTSD diagnosis, were included. Most individuals did not meet any definition of Subthreshold PTSD. Findings are discussed in light of previous research and need for increased understanding of the diagnostic implications of Subthreshold PTSD.

A brief, clinically useful, clinician-rated dimensional rating system for psychiatric diagnoses: reliability and validity in psychiatric outpatients.

BACKGROUND: In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project, we describe the development of a dimensional rating system for Axis I disorders. METHODS: We evaluated 1,600 psychiatric outpatients with a semi-structured diagnostic interview for Axis I disorders and completed a self-report measure of psychosocial morbidity. A Standardized Clinical Outcome Rating (SCOR), a 7-point dimensional rating, was made for 17 Axis I disorders and 1 symptom construct. RESULTS: The dimensional ratings were highly reliable. After controlling for the number of Axis I disorders, each of the partial correlations between the dimensional rating and the measures of psychosocial morbidity was significant (mean partial r = 0.21). However, when the dimensional score was controlled, none of the partial correlations between the sum of the number of Axis I disorders and measures of psychosocial morbidity were significant (mean partial r = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The SCORs are brief standardized outcome ratings that clinicians can incorporate into routine clinical practice without incurring undue burden. These ratings could make it more feasible to conduct effectiveness studies in clinical practice and to extend measurement-based care recommendations to include clinical ratings as well as self-report assessments.