Impact of Illness Severity Tools on Adolescent Psychiatric Managed Care in California.

Youth with mental illness struggle to receive essential behavioral health care. One obstacle is denial of coverage by insurance. In California, managed care consumers may apply for independent medical review (IMR) which potentially overturns an insurance denial through the California Department of Managed Healthcare (CDMHC). The authors aim to analyze IMR appeals for psychiatric treatment among adolescents and elucidate factors associated with obtaining coverage of care. We performed an analysis to identify factors that are associated with depression and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment claim denials in 11-20-year-olds from 2001 to 2022 using CDMHC data. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify specific factors related to claim characteristics and medical society instruments that are significantly associated with overturning a denial by IMR. Behavioral health IMRs are overturned at a higher rate than non-behavioral health claims. 54.5% of those with depression and 36.3% of those with SUD initially denied care coverage were overturned by IMR. For those seeking depression treatment, we found a significantly greater odds of overturn by IMR if there was a reference of CALOCUS [1.64, 95%CI (1.06-2.5)]. The odds of a SUD treatment denial being overturned was significantly greater if referencing CALOCUS [3.85 (1.54-9.62)] or ASAM [2.47, [4.3 (1.77-10.47)]. After the standardized implementation of illness severity tools in IMRs, the odds of a medically necessary claim being overturned was 2.5 times higher than before the standards. With a high percentage of claims being overturned after IMR, the findings suggest that health plans inappropriately deny medically necessary behavioral health treatment. The use of medical society instruments was associated with higher odds of overturning a denial. The recent decision of CDMHC to implement standard use of CALOCUS and similar illness severity criteria is supported by our findings and may facilitate more equitable care.

The role of parental genotype in the intergenerational transmission of externalizing behavior: Evidence for genetic nurturance.

The purpose of this study was to examine possible pathways by which genetic risk associated with externalizing is transmitted in families. We used molecular data to disentangle the genetic and environmental pathways contributing to adolescent externalizing behavior in a sample of 1,111 adolescents (50% female; 719 European and 392 African ancestry) and their parents from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. We found evidence for genetic nurture such that parental externalizing polygenic scores were associated with adolescent externalizing behavior, over and above the effect of adolescents' own externalizing polygenic scores. Mediation analysis indicated that parental externalizing psychopathology partly explained the effect of parental genotype on children's externalizing behavior. We also found evidence for evocative gene-environment correlation, whereby adolescent externalizing polygenic scores were associated with lower parent-child communication, less parent-child closeness, and lower parental knowledge, controlling for parental genotype. These effects were observed among participants of European ancestry but not African ancestry, likely due to the limited predictive power of polygenic scores across ancestral background. These results demonstrate that in addition to genetic transmission, genes influence offspring behavior through the influence of parental genotypes on their children's environmental experiences, and the role of children's genotypes in shaping parent-child relationships.

Maternal Childhood Maltreatment, Internal Working Models, and Perinatal Substance Use: Is There a Role for Hyperkatifeia? A Systematic Review.

The parent-infant relationship is critical for socioemotional development and is adversely impacted by perinatal substance use. This systematic review posits that the mechanisms underlying these risks to mother-infant relationships center on 3 primary processes: (1) mothers' childhood maltreatment experiences; (2) attachment styles and consequent internal working models of interpersonal relationships; and (3) perinatal substance use. Further, the review considers the role of hyperkatifeia, or hypersensitivity to negative affect which occurs when people with substance use disorders are not using substances, and which drives the negative reinforcement in addiction. The authors performed a systematic review of articles (published 2000-2022) related to these constructs and their impact on mother-infant relationships and offspring outcomes, including original clinical research articles addressing relationships between these constructs, and excluding case studies, reviews, non-human animal studies, intervention studies, studies with fewer than 30% female-sex participants, clinical guidelines, studies limited to obstetric outcomes, mechanistic/biological studies, and studies with methodological issues precluding interpretation. Overall 1844 articles were screened, 377 were selected for full text review, and data were extracted from 157 articles. Results revealed strong relationships between mothers' childhood maltreatment experiences, less optimal internal working models, and increased risk for perinatal substance use, and importantly, all of these predictors interacted with hyperkatifeia and exerted a marked impact on mother-infant relationships with less data available on offspring outcomes. These data strongly support the need for future studies addressing the additive impact of maternal childhood maltreatment experiences, suboptimal internal working models, and perinatal substance use, with hyperkatifeia as a potential moderator, and their interacting effects on mother-infant socioemotional outcomes.