Surveillance imaging modality does not affect detection rate of asymptomatic secondary interventions following EVAR.

OBJECTIVES: Literature reports that surveillance imaging following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) gives rise to asymptomatic secondary interventions (SI) in 1.4-9% of cases. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether the modality of surveillance imaging influences the detection rate of asymptomatic SI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two EVAR surveillance protocols were compared at the same vascular centre. Protocol I, performed from January 2003 to December 2006, consisted of colour duplex ultrasound scan (CDU) plus CT angiography (CTA) 1 month after procedure and every 6 months thereafter. Protocol II, performed from January 2007 to June 2010, consisted of CDU plus CTA 1 month after operation and CDU plus plain abdominal films (XR) every 6 months thereafter. In the second protocol, CTA was carried out only during follow-up in specific conditions. The term 'asymptomatic SI' was used when the necessity for SI was detected by imaging alone on an elective basis, prior to development of any symptoms. RESULTS: Enrolment included 376 and 341 consecutive patients with a mean follow-up of 1148 days (range 1-3204 days) and 942 days (range1-1512 days) in Protocols I and II, respectively (p < 0.001). Freedom rates from aneurysmal rupture, freedom from SI and detection rate for asymptomatic SI at 3 years were 98.3% and 98.7% (p = 0.456), 82% and 83.5%(p = 0.876) and 8.8% (n = 33/376) and 8.5%(n = 25/341) (p = 0.49) in Protocols I and II, respectively. Estimated comparison of the costs, radiation exposure and contrast used at 3 years in Protocol I versus Protocol II showed that Protocol II allowed for a three-, four- and six fold reduction in overall costs, radiation exposure and contrast used, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of asymptomatic SI following EVAR is not affected by the type of surveillance imaging. A surveillance schedule based primarily on CDU and XR appears to be justified.

Benefit of revascularisation to critical limb ischaemia patients evaluated by a patient-oriented scoring system.

OBJECTIVES: The concept of patency and limb salvage are physician-oriented endpoints in critical limb ischaemia (CLI). These endpoints have failed to enhance function after revascularisation. The aim of this study was to create a scoring system to predict 1-year functional status and to assess the benefit to patients possible by revascularisation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period 2007-2009, 480 consecutive patients (mean age ± SD, 83.2 ± 8.7 years) underwent repair for CLI. Preoperative, operative and functional status characteristics and post-operative outcomes were recorded. The following patient-oriented outcomes were investigated pre- and postoperatively: basic and instrumental activities of daily living (BADL and IADL) and ambulatory and living status. Statistical analysis was performed to assess predictors of functional benefit from revascularisation. The variables significant on multivariable analysis were used to generate a scoring system to pre and postoperatively grade individual patient risk of losing baseline functional status at 1 year (CLI functional score). RESULTS: Ninety-three of 480 patients (19.3%) were in Rutherford class IV, 208 (43.3%) in class V and 179 (37.4%) in class VI. Surgical, endovascular and hybrid operations were performed in 108 (22.5%), 319 (66.5%) and 53 (11%) patients, respectively; mean follow-up was 408 ± 363 days. Improved or unchanged functional status was observed in 276 patients (57.5%). Preoperative mean ± SD BADL and IADL (4.26 ± 1.98 and 3.92 ± 2.69, respectively) were modified from mean values at 1-year follow-up (4.19 ± 2.06 and 4.12 ± 3, respectively) (p = 0.401 and p < 0.05, respectively). In the same time interval, mortality was 50%, limb salvage 50.4%, CLI-related new hospitalisations 50.8%, relief of symptoms 18.5% and tissue healing 14.5%. A CLI functional score of >80% indicates that patients are likely to lose functional abilities and require assistance for ambulation or ADL, as well as risking outcomes such as major amputation, new CLI-related hospitalisation or re-operation (p < 0.001). Preoperative poor living status, dependence in daily activities, advanced local disease (lesion >2 cm, infection and poor tibial runoff), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score > II, previous cerebrovascular event and heart disease were the strongest pre-operative negative predictors of losing baseline functional status. Major amputation was the only negative post-operative predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Considering patient-oriented outcomes, our study showed that revascularisation could be worthwhile in nearly 60% of CLI patients. A non-revascularisation strategy such as primary amputation or palliation could be indicated in patients with a poor pre-operative living status, dependence for daily activities, advanced local disease, extensive comorbid conditions and a score >80%. To make our findings generalisable, the score needs to be validated in independent cohorts at different centres before it can be recommended for application.

AAA with a challenging neck: early outcomes using the Endurant stent-graft system.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and safety of endovascular aneurysm repair is disputable in aneurysms with a short, angulated, wide, conical, or thrombus-lined neck making a reliable seal difficult to achieve. The influence of a challenging neck on early results using the Endurant stent-graft system in high risk patients was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study conducted on a prospectively compiled database of 72 elective patients with challenging neck treated with the Endurant system (Endurant Stent Graft, Medtronic AVE, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). These patients were compared to a control group (n = 65) without significant neck problems. Endpoints were early technical and clinical success, deployment accuracy and differences in operative details at one month follow-up. Data are reported as mean and standard deviation or as absolute frequency and percentage (%). Normality distribution and homogeneity of variances were tested by Shapiro-Wilks and Levene tests, respectively. Inter-group comparisons for each variable were made by t-test or χ2-test or Fisher exact test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Mean age was 76.12 years; 76.6% were males. Risk factors and pre-operative variables did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean neck length was 10.56 mm in patients with challenging anatomies and 22.85 mm in controls. Patients with a challenging neck differed significantly (p < 0.001) from controls in terms of mean infrarenal (37.67° vs. 20.12°) and suprarenal angle (19.63° vs. 15.57°); 82% of patients with a challenging neck were ASA III/IV (vs. 86%). Technical success was 100%, with four unplanned proximal extension in challenging group. No type I endoleaks or aneurysm-related deaths occurred in either group; major complications were 1.54% vs. 1.39% (p = 0.942). Operative details were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with the Endurant stent-graft is technically feasible and safe, yielding satisfactory results even in challenging anatomies. Medium- and long-term data are needed to verify durability, but early results are promising.

Open vascular surgery as a starting point for endovascular surgery.

What distinguishes vascular surgeons from other specialists who treat patients with vascular disease is their ability to combine skills in both open and endovascular treatments. Open vascular surgery should be considered the "starting point" for endovascular surgery, since training and practice in vascular surgery require extensive knowledge of the basic science and a thorough education in general surgical techniques. In addition, surgeons must possess detailed specialized knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of arteries, veins and lymphatics and of the pathological processes which may affect them. This scientific and technical background is also imperative for endovascular surgery. Open vascular surgery can also be considered as a potential finishing point of endovascular surgery. In fact, open surgery is still often the only solution for complex cases considered unsuitable for an endovascular approach, or for different types of complications following endovascular treatments. As endovascular surgery is increasingly considered as the initial treatment option for many patients with vascular disease, it is crucial that vascular surgery training programs develop methods to maintain the open surgical skills of their trainees. The only way for vascular surgeons to remain the premier specialists to care for patients with vascular disease is for them to combine skills in both open and endovascular treatments.

Renal aneurysms: surgical vs. endovascular treatment.

Renal artery aneurysms (RAA) are rare (general population incidence is 0.09%). At this time, the appropriateness of the type of intervention ­ surgical or endovascular ­ is based on single center experiences rather than large randomized trials. Endovascular therapy offers less morbidity but surgery has excellent long-term results. In reality, the choice of the treatment relies on the operative risk. A patient with a RAA and good surgical risk should be offered open surgery. If the patient is deemed to be at high risk from surgery then the choice of the type of endovascular treatment (stent grafting, coil/glue embolization, multilayer stenting) should be based on the location and shape of the RAA. RAA should be treated by surgeons/interventionalists who have demonstrated expertise in renal artery procedures.

Proctorship for CAS training: a pilot study of safety and reproducibility.

AIM: The literature continues reporting a high complication rate for carotid artery stenting (CAS) during the learning-curve phase (LCP). The aim of this study was to report a simple and reproducible method designed to improve CAS results during the LCP. METHODS: Between February 2007 and December 2009, a qualified vascular surgeon ran a proctorship program for CAS. The program was divided into four practical phases: in the teaching phase (a) the first 20 CAS were performed by the proctor assisted by a trainee surgeon; in the training phase (b) for the 21st to the 50th CAS the trainee surgeon was supervised by the proctor; in the skilled phase (c), between the 51st and the 80th procedure, a trainee surgeon performed CAS while the proctor was scrubbed-in but operating only on demand; in the final phase (d), following the 81st CAS, the procedure was performed without the proctor's presence. The inclusion criterion was carotid stenosis ≥70% and patient selection was performed for the first 40 cases based on patient and lesion characteristics. The procedure for CAS was standardized. RESULTS: Four trainees performed 604 CASs in two centers. The procedural success rate of CAS was 98.8% (N.=594/604) without any differences among the four trainees (P=0.902). The overall TIA, myocardial infarction, minor, major and fatal stroke rate at 30 days was respectively 1.7% (N.=10), 0.8% (N.=5), 1.2% (N.=7), 0.64% (N.=4) and 0.3% (N.=2). The effectiveness of this program was demonstrated by a significant decrease in the proctor's intervention between phase b and phase c (P<0.001) and by a similar trend in the complication rate achieved by the four trainees, in all phases and centers (P=0.075 and 0.788, respectively). CONCLUSION: This preliminary experience of a proctorship program in the LCP, together with patient selection and standardization of the procedure and materials used, seems to be safe and reproducible. Moreover, possibly randomized, studies comparing different CAS training techniques are needed in order to validate our findings.

Ischemic foot: definition, etiology and angiosome concept.

Ischemic foot is a condition of decreased arterial perfusion. It has several etiologies, atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease, including that secondary to diabetes mellitus, being the most common. Other potential causes of ischemic foot are acute embolism from cardiac, arterial or paradoxical sources, and thrombosis secondary to arterial blood clots due to procoagulative states (e.g. vasculitis and hematologic disorders), arterial spasms or injury resulting from drug use or from external or iatrogenic trauma. Prompt diagnosis and revascularization of the affected limb play a crucial role in the treatment of ischemic foot. The angiosome principle, defined by Ian Taylor's landmark anatomic study in 1987, divides the body into three-dimensional anatomic units of tissue fed by a source artery (the angiosome). Detailed knowledge of the vascular anatomy of the leg, and in particular of angiosomes in the foot, helps the clinician make better decisions when dealing with ischemic foot. The physician can better estimate the possibility of wound healing, and decide which type of revascularization has the most chance of success, given the existing blood supply. If surgical or endovascular revascularization is successful, the foot should no longer appear ischemic and painful, and the wounds should granulate. Newly granulating wounds should be carefully protected, and meticulous daily local wound care should be performed to promote healing and prevent infection. The quality of subsequent wound care is also a critical component in promoting healing and avoiding further tissue loss.

Acute aortic dissection: natural history and classification.

Acute aortic dissection is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic pathology with high mortality and morbidity. Significant advances in the understanding, diagnosis and management of aortic dissection have been made since the first case was reported 3 centuries ago. This article aims to review our current understanding of the natural history and classification of acute aortic dissection.

Endovascular approach for ruptured abdominal aortic aneursyms.

The rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) causes about 15000 deaths/year in the USA alone. Even though over the last 50 years progress in surgical techniques and in postoperative intensive care have been outstanding, the analysis of registries has shown either no decrease in the mortality rate for surgically treated rAAAs. Some reports asserted better out come for endovascular repair (EVAR) compared with surgery in case of rAAA. Despite this evidence, EVAR for rAAA remains prerogative of few centers worldwide. In conclusion only larger study or registry could assest the real role of EVAR in the management of rAAA.

Management of abdominal endograft infection.

Incidence, clinical presentation and management of aortic grafts infection after open surgical repair are well described in the literature. Infective complications involving endografts after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) have been scarcely investigated, since more attention has been given to the technical aspects of the procedure, including endoleaks, device migration, neck dilatation, endotension and aneurysm rupture. Nevertheless, that is a rare but severe complication occurring after EVAR; potentially difficult to diagnose and treat. Since 1991 only 102 cases of abdominal endograft infections have been reported in the literature. Treatment of infected abdominal endografts is controversial. Although reports have shown that high-risk patients with infected stent grafts treated conservatively with antimicrobial therapy and percutaneous drainage can still survive, most authors agree that an infected endograft should be removed if patient's conditions allow intervention. Standard treatment for infected abdominal endografts includes complete graft excision and local debridement followed by extra-anatomical bypass revascularization or in situ reconstruction with an aortic-bisiliac or bifemoral graft (Dacron or PTFE) or with a homograft. Lower overall mortality was observed for surgical management by explantation of infected endograft followed by in situ replacement as compared to other surgical solutions, but no definitive conclusions can be drawn about the optimal treatment strategy for aortic reconstruction.

Endovascular thoracic aortic repair and risk of spinal cord ischemia: the role of previous or concomitant treatment for aortic aneurysm.

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is one of the most devastating complications undergoing surgical or endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. The incidence of SCI after thoracic aorta open repair varies from 2% to 21%, depending on the extent of the descending thoracic aorta replacement compared with as high as 12% of cases after endovascular aortic repair. Endoluminal repair allows the avoidance of aortic cross clamping and its sequelae; however, the intercostal arteries covered by the stent graft cannot be reimplanted. Perioperative risk factors contributing to SCI have been reported to include length of aortic coverage, prior abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, hypotension, and left subclavian artery coverage. Although the putative mechanism of loss of lumbar collateral perfusion in those who had prior aortic repairs appears reasonable, occurrence of SCI in this subset of patients has not been consistent. Spinal cord perfusion is dependent on the net pressure of the mean arterial pressure minus the mean intrathecal pressure. Systemic pressure can be maximized by volume resuscitation and vasopressors. Intrathecal spinal pressure can be minimized by drainage of the spinal cord, although this is not without its potential risks. More recently, there have been attempts at attenuating the cellular damage caused by SCI, either with systemic or intrathecal administration of pharmacologic agents, which attempt to mitigate the inflammatory response of cellular reperfusion. This is a review of the risk factors for SCI during TEVAR in patients with previous or concomitant treatment for aortic aneurysm.

Subintimal angioplasty with the aid of a re-entry device for TASC C and D lesions of the SFA.

AIM: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the clinical effectiveness and related midterm patency of subintimal angioplasty (SAP) in patients suffering from critical limb ischaemia (CLI) in a single tertiary care university centre. The secondary aim was to evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of using a re-entry device when re-canalisation by SAP was unsuccessful. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2007, consecutive patients suffering from CLI (Rutherford clinical categories: 4-6) were treated with SAP. All patients included in the study had occluded SFA (TASC C and D) and underwent clinical and ultrasound follow-up examinations at day 30 and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and then yearly. A re-entry device (Outback, Cordis Corporation, Miami Lakes, Florida, USA in all cases) was only used when re-canalisation by simple SAP was unsuccessful, and stenting was used when residual stenosis was >30% or there was a flow-limiting dissection. Factors that could modify the outcome were analysed. RESULTS: In this study, 145 patients were treated, with a technical success rate of 83.5% (121 of 145) for simple SAP. Stenting was performed in 43% (n=62) of successful SAP procedures. No death occurred in the perioperative period, while the 30-day mortality was 4.8% (7 of 145). The re-entry device (Outback) was used in 24 cases (16.5%). The technical success of the re-entry device was 79% (19 of 24), with a 90% success rate of stent placement at the site of re-entry. Complications occurred in 6.2% of all procedures (n=9) (three arterial perforations (2.1%), three distal embolisations (2.1%), two femoral artery pseudo-aneurysms (1.4%) and one arterio-venous fistula (0.7%)). Factors capable of independently affecting the patency were renal insufficiency (p=0.03), current smoking (p=0.01) and diabetes (p=0.04). The primary patency at 1 and 3 years was 70% and 34% and the secondary patency at 1 and 3 years was 77% and 43%, respectively. At the same time intervals, the limb-salvage rate was 88% and 49%. CONCLUSIONS: SAP with the aid of a re-entry device for TASC C and D lesions of the SFA seems to be safe and clinically effective in patients suffering from CLI, according to the experience at our centre. Further follow-up and more data are necessary to confirm these findings.

Diabetic patients: epidemiology and global impact.

Definition of the exact epidemiology and the global impact of diabetes is not easy, being strictly related to the availability of data in developing countries and to the use in the existing population-based investigations of common criteria for the diagnosis and definition of diabetes. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) the total number of people with diabetes was 171 million in 2000, and is projected to rise up to 366 million in 2030. The true prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in people with diabetes has been difficult to determine, as most patients are asymptomatic, many do not report their symptoms, screening modalities have not been uniformly agreed upon, and pain perception may be blunted by the presence of peripheral neuropathy. Population-based studies, using a validated and reproducible test, have revealed a prevalence of PAD in people with diabetes to be up to 30%. Among people with diabetes, the annual incidence of developing a foot ulcer ranges from 1% to 4.1% and the prevalence ranges from 4% to 10%, which suggests that the lifetime incidence may be as high as 25%. Foot ulcer associated to PAD requires revascularization, although it is generally considered that the outcome in those people is inferior to that in non-diabetic patients. In summary, the increasing worldwide diabetes prevalence will inevitably result in increasing proportions of deaths from cardiovascular disease, as well as in increased prevalence and associated consequences of other complications of diabetes. As suggested by WHO, a concerted, global initiative is required to address the diabetes epidemic.

An unusual late complication after SFA stenting: the artery rupture.

Peripheral artery rupture as a late complication of an endovascular stenting, due to the protrusion of a stent, has never been described in the literature in thigh arteries. Here we describe two anecdotic cases of artery rupture after superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting. In both cases the endovascular procedure was performed as a reintervention at 2 and 27 months after a failed surgical or hybrid procedure for limb revascularization. The stent had been delivered in the first part of the SFA and the rupture occurred at the junction between the common femoral artery and SFA, which is one of the most flexible parts of the femoral artery. The cause of rupture was probably caused by an ulcer of the stent against the artery wall concomitant with a status of local or systemic infection. A huge pseudoaneurysm developed in both cases. The massive bleeding was stopped by an emergency surgical bypass, with the removal of the stented artery. These two cases show the possibility of SFA rupture after stenting. Previous surgical treatment, the site of stenting (first part of the SFA) and an active infection could predispose patients to this life-threatening complication.

Carotid highly-calcified de novo stenosis and cutting-balloon angioplasty: a tool to prevent haemodynamic depression?

AIM: Severe highly-calcified de-novo lesions of carotid arteries are important predictors of haemodynamic depression (HD) after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Cutting-balloon angioplasty (CBA) using low-inflation pressures has been described as an effective method to achieve important luminal gain and avoid HD. METHODS: from January 2005 to December 2007 102 consecutive patients (mean age 76.36+/-7.54 years) with severe highly-calcified de novo lesions of carotid artery undergoing CAS were prospectively observed and randomized in two groups: group 1 (N=50) underwent standard CAS, group 2 (N=52) underwent CAS with CBA. Patients with prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy (CEA), betablockers therapy or arrhytmias were excluded. HD was defined as periprocedural hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) or bradycardia (heart rate <60 beats/min). CBA angioplasty was carried out using CB coronary device, 0.014 inch compatible, from 3 to 4 mm or CB peripheral device, 0.018 inch compatible, from 5 to 6 mm in diameter, inflated at a mean-maximum value of 8.6 atmospheres; the average number of cuts per lesion was 2.7. RESULTS: Demographic and clinical characteristic of both groups at the basal conditions were comparable. HD occurred in 18/50 (36%) procedures in group 1, and in 3/52 (5.76%) in group 2. The difference between the two groups concerning HD incidence was statistically significant (P<0.001). There was a strong (P<0.001) association between HD and CBA and the OR=0.109 (95%CI 0.019-0.425) confirmed the protective role of CBA. No major intraprocedural complications were observed in this series. Postprocedural Doppler ultrasound scan showed one case (2%) of in-stent restenosis in group 1 representing early failure due to recoil, and only 1 (1.92%) neurological adverse event (transient ischemic attack, TIA) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: HD is a common occurrence after CAS, especially in patients with both long and calcified plaque. Only a tailored procedure with a correct remodelling of the plaque allows to avoid both HD and elastic recoil of the target lesion.

Deferred urgency carotid artery stenting in symptomatic patients: clinical lessons and biomarker patterns from a prospective registry.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective observational registry was to study the outcome of symptomatic patients presenting with recent TIA or minor stroke and severe carotid stenosis, submitted to early percutaneous treatment by stenting. A secondary aim was to evaluate the biological activity of the symptomatic carotid plaques by serial serum and urinary markers (PAPP-A, hs-CRP, MMP-2/MMP-9, IL-6/IL-8, TNF alpha, CD40L) measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before and after treatment. METHODS: From May 2005 to June 2006, 57 patients were enrolled in this prospective registry. All patients underwent carotid stenting using a concentric filter for cerebral protection. The procedure was performed within 24-48hrs of the last attack in patients with TIA (n=24, 42%) and between 14 and 30 days in patients with stroke (n=33, 58%). RESULTS: Successful stent implantation was achieved in all cases (100%). Adverse events at 1 month were 1 death (1.7%) and 2 TIAs (3.5%). Some of the vulnerability markers, in particular those reflecting an active systemic inflammatory process of the plaque (PAPP-A, hs-CR, and IL-6), were significantly elevated at the time of enrolment, increased after stenting and decreased after 30 days. CONCLUSION: Deferred CAS is feasible and safe in selected patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. This preliminary study in a limited series of patients with unstable carotid plaques revealed that endovascular treatment has a satisfactory outcome considering the very high risk profile of the patient population. The evaluation of some biomarkers suggested an inflammatory role in the process of an unstable carotid plaque generating an acute cerebral event.

Rationale and design of emergent/urgent carotid artery stenting (EUCAS) registry.

EUCAS is a multicenter Registry of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with acute cerebral ischemia (TIA or minor stroke), designed to determine the role of early endovascular intervention in a selected population with a vulnerable lesion of carotid bifurcation. The aim of the registry is to study the safety and efficacy of emergent/urgent CAS and to improve patient selection and consequently reduce the time loss between the index event and the intervention. Secondary aim is to study the plasma levels of plaque vulnerability biomarkers before and after carotid intervention in high risk patients to compare these value with a control group of patients with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis, and to test the hypothesis that carotid stenting stabilizes the plaque at 1 month. The Registry is open to expert interventionists performing carotid stenting with a documented experience of at least 100 CAS, and the participants are free to apply the preferred endovascular techniques and devices, remembering to include the use of the cerebral protection device. All changes in the neurological status and all new cerebral ischemic events following the procedure will be reported. Follow-up surveillance to 1 month will include Duplex scanning, neurological examinations and blood collections for inflammatory biomarkers determination.

Advential cystic disease of the popliteal artery: experience of a single vascular and endovascular center.

Adventitial cystic disease (ACD) is an uncommon condition with only around 300 cases reported in the literature. ACD consists of a collection of gelatinous material within a cyst, that is adjacent or surrounding a vessel. In the last five years three cases of ACD have been observed: the first case was a 48-year-old man, ex nicotine abuser, with a four-month history of progressive claudication; the second case was a 55-year-old man, ex nicotine abuser, with ischemic heart failure and a one-year history of progressive claudication; the third case was a 70-year-old man, with diabetes, dislipidemia and current nicotine abuser with a few-day history of acute pain in the right leg. In two cases the cysts were incised and the contents evacuated. The adventitia was repaired and the wound closed. The first patient is currently asymptomatic after four years from surgery. The second one, at 21 months, follow-up, presented newly severe claudication. Duplex ultrasound scan and computed tomography angiography demonstrated a cranial progression of the lesions. This lesion was treated with bare stent, with complete regression of the symptoms. The third patient was treated with interposition of an autogenous saphenous vein. The patient is asymptomatic at the three-month follow-up. Even if ACD is quite rare, it should be taken in consideration in young patients with severe claudication and no- or poor comorbidities. The best treatment is the incision of the cysts and the advential reconstruction. Short lesions can be treated with endovascular therapy.

A rare vascular tumour with distinctive clinical findings.

Subungual glomus tumours are rare benign hamartomas arising from the arterial end of the glomus body (an arteriovenous shunt related to thermoregulation). A combination of clinical examination, Color-Doppler ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to support the diagnosis confirmed by histology. A 45 year old male patient with a three-year-old swelling of the proximal thumbnail presented himself at the Surgery Department. A slightly bluish nail plate and tenderness under the thumbnail were evident at clinical examination. He suffered the classic trilogy of sensitivity to pain, pressure and temperature of the thumb lesion. Ultrasound and MRI revealed the presence of a small oval-shaped mass with hypervascularisation. All these elements reinforced the assumed diagnosis of a glomic tumour. The patient underwent excisional surgery under local anaesthesia. Histological examination confirmed a typical glomus tumour. Postoperative follow-up was uneventful and all symptoms disappeared immediately after surgery. Whenever a patient presents suffering from a reddish-purple, tender lesion, usually located at the extremities and especially in the nail bed, with paroxysmal pain and cold-sensitivity, a glomus tumour should be investigated. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice and is commonly resolutive.

Carotid artery stenting in a single center: are six years of experience enough to achieve the standard of care?

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine safety, short and mid-term outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) and Endarterectomy (CEA) during the last 6 years in a single vascular surgery center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2624 consecutive carotid revascularizations performed between December 2000 and December 2006 in 2176 patients with severe carotid artery stenosis (symptomatic > or = 70%, asymptomatic > or = 80%), of which 1589 were CEA and 1035 CAS. Patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure and then yearly. RESULTS: The percutaneous procedure was successful in 99.2% of the cases. No intra-procedural death occurred. The overall death and stroke rates at 30 days, 1 year and 3 years were 1.54%, 2.86%, 7.43% in the CAS group and 2.07%, 3.55%, 6.95% in the CEA group, respectively (p value not significant in any case). CONCLUSIONS: At our vascular surgery centre the results of CEA and CAS are similar. CAS has become our standard of care in preventing strokes and is an effective alternative to CEA for low-risk patients as well.