Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 2024 Oct 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39427725

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in advanced CKD are controversial. More intensive BP lowering in the setting of advanced CKD is thought to be associated with risk of acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, and ESKD. We aimed to conduct a pilot trial of intensive BP control to determine if lower SBP targets can be safely achieved for patients with CKD through titration of BP medications using in-home measured BP. STUDY DESIGN: Non-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 108 patients with advanced CKD (eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and hypertension. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized either to a target home SBP goal of <120 mmHg (N=66) or a less intensive SBP goal (N=42). Antihypertensive medications were titrated to achieve the target home SBP range in the first 4 months of the study and maintained until the end of the study. Home BP was measured using a wireless Bluetooth-enabled monitor that transmitted readings to providers in real-time. OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in achieved clinic SBP between the two study arms from months 4-12. Safety outcomes included hyperkalemia, a composite outcome of falls or syncope, and onset of need for dialysis or kidney transplantation. RESULTS: The mean clinic SBP at month 12 was 124.7 mmHg in the intensive SBP group vs. 138.2 mmHg in the less intensive SBP group. Averaged over months 4-12, the achieved mean clinic SBP in the intensive SBP arm was 11.7 mmHg (95% CI 7.5 to 16 mmHg, p<0.001) lower than the mean SBP achieved in the less intensive SBP arm. Primary safety outcomes were not statistically significantly different between the two arms (all p>0.05). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size which may limit our ability to detect clinically significant differences in rates of adverse outcomes; single-center design. CONCLUSIONS: A clinic SBP goal of <120 mmHg is feasible to achieve with the help of real-time home BP monitoring and appears to be safe in this study population with advanced CKD. Larger trials to determine optimal BP targets in advanced CKD and the risks and benefits associated with more intensive BP control are warranted.

2.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(11): 4335-4343, 2022 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35212719

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Delayed detection of LN associates with worse outcomes. There are conflicting recommendations regarding a threshold level of proteinuria at which biopsy will likely yield actionable management. This study addressed the association of urine protein:creatinine ratios (UPCR) with clinical characteristics and investigated the incidence of proliferative and membranous histology in patients with a UPCR between 0.5 and 1. METHODS: A total of 275 SLE patients (113 first biopsy, 162 repeat) were enrolled in the multicentre multi-ethnic/racial Accelerating Medicines Partnership across 15 US sites at the time of a clinically indicated renal biopsy. Patients were followed for 1 year. RESULTS: At biopsy, 54 patients had UPCR <1 and 221 had UPCR ≥1. Independent of UPCR or biopsy number, a majority (92%) of patients had class III, IV, V or mixed histology. Moreover, patients with UPCR <1 and class III, IV, V, or mixed had a median activity index of 4.5 and chronicity index of 3, yet 39% of these patients had an inactive sediment. Neither anti-dsDNA nor low complement distinguished class I or II from III, IV, V or mixed in patients with UPCR <1. Of 29 patients with baseline UPCR <1 and class III, IV, V or mixed, 23 (79%) had a UPCR <0.5 at 1 year. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, three-quarters of patients with UPCR <1 had histology showing class III, IV, V or mixed with accompanying activity and chronicity despite an inactive sediment or normal serologies. These data support renal biopsy at thresholds lower than a UPCR of 1.


Asunto(s)
Nefritis Lúpica , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Incidencia , Proteinuria/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Función Renal , Riñón/patología
4.
Nephron Clin Pract ; 119 Suppl 1: c19-24, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21832852

RESUMEN

There have been considerable advances in the past few years in our understanding of how chronic kidney disease (CKD) predisposes to acute kidney injury (AKI) and vice versa. This review shows, however, that few studies have focused on the elderly or conducted stratified analysis by age. It does appear that elderly patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m(2) are at higher risk for AKI compared with their counterparts with eGFR >60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). This is a similar relationship to that seen in younger patients, although effect size appears smaller. As the incidence of AKI has been increasing over the past several years, the proportion of elderly patients surviving after AKI has also been increasing. Since AKI heightens the risk for the development and acceleration of CKD, this implies significant public health concerns with regard to the absolute number of elderly persons developing incident CKD.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Factores de Edad , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Hipertensión/etiología , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Enfermedades Renales/epidemiología , Dinámica Poblacional , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Acad Med ; 96(8): 1137-1145, 2021 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298691

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the nation's health care system, including on graduate medical education (GME) training programs. Traditionally, residency and fellowship training program applications involve in-person interviews conducted on-site, with only a minority of programs offering interviews remotely via a virtual platform. However, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is anticipated that most interviews will be conducted virtually for the 2021 application cycle and possibly beyond. Therefore, GME training programs need to prepare for the transition to virtual interviews using evidence-based practices. At the University of California, San Francisco, a multidisciplinary task force was convened to review existing literature about virtual interviews and determine best practices. This article summarizes these findings, first discussing the advantages and disadvantages of the virtual interview format and then providing evidence-based best practices for GME training programs. Specifically, the authors make the following recommendations: develop a detailed plan for the interview process, consider using standardized interview questions, recognize and respond to potential biases that may be amplified with the virtual interview format, prepare your own trainees for virtual interviews, develop electronic materials and virtual social events to approximate the interview day, and collect data about virtual interviews at your own institution. With adequate preparation, the virtual interview experience can be high yield, positive, and equitable for both applicants and GME training programs.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Internado y Residencia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Becas , Humanos , Pandemias
6.
Lupus Sci Med ; 8(1)2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34389634

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In lupus nephritis the pathological diagnosis from tissue retrieved during kidney biopsy drives treatment and management. Despite recent approval of new drugs, complete remission rates remain well under aspirational levels, necessitating identification of new therapeutic targets by greater dissection of the pathways to tissue inflammation and injury. This study assessed the safety of kidney biopsies in patients with SLE enrolled in the Accelerating Medicines Partnership, a consortium formed to molecularly deconstruct nephritis. METHODS: 475 patients with SLE across 15 clinical sites in the USA consented to obtain tissue for research purposes during a clinically indicated kidney biopsy. Adverse events (AEs) were documented for 30 days following the procedure and were determined to be related or unrelated by all site investigators. Serious AEs were defined according to the National Institutes of Health reporting guidelines. RESULTS: 34 patients (7.2%) experienced a procedure-related AE: 30 with haematoma, 2 with jets, 1 with pain and 1 with an arteriovenous fistula. Eighteen (3.8%) experienced a serious AE requiring hospitalisation; four patients (0.8%) required a blood transfusion related to the kidney biopsy. At one site where the number of cores retrieved during the biopsy was recorded, the mean was 3.4 for those who experienced a related AE (n=9) and 3.07 for those who did not experience any AE (n=140). All related AEs resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Procurement of research tissue should be considered feasible, accompanied by a complication risk likely no greater than that incurred for standard clinical purposes. In the quest for targeted treatments personalised based on molecular findings, enhanced diagnostics beyond histology will likely be required.


Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa , Nefritis Lúpica , Biopsia , Hematoma , Humanos , Riñón , Nefritis Lúpica/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
8.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 86(7): 649-57, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21719621

RESUMEN

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is characterized by a heterogeneous group of pathophysiologic entities, of which fibromuscular dysplasia and atherosclerotic RAS (ARAS) are the most common. Whether and which patients should undergo revascularization for ARAS is controversial. The general consensus is that all patients with ARAS should receive intensive medical treatment. The latest randomized clinical trials have increased confusion regarding recommendations for revascularization for ARAS. Although revascularization is not indicated in all patients with ARAS, experts agree that it should be considered in some patients, especially those with unstable angina, unexplained pulmonary edema, and hemodynamically significant ARAS with either worsening renal function or with difficult to control hypertension. A search of the literature was performed using PubMed and entering the search terms renal artery stenosis, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, and renal artery stenosis AND hypertension to retrieve the most recent publications on diagnosis and treatment of ARAS. In this review, we analyze the pathways related to hypertension in ARAS, the optimal invasive and noninvasive modalities for evaluating the renal arteries, and the available therapies for ARAS and assess future tools and algorithms that may prove useful in evaluating patients for renal revascularization therapy.


Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis/terapia , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/terapia , Angioplastia de Balón , Aterosclerosis/patología , Humanos , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/complicaciones , Stents
10.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 17(11): 3132-8, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17021268

RESUMEN

Among critically ill patients, acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring dialysis is associated with mortality rates generally in excess of 50%. Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) often are recommended and widely used, although data to support its superiority over intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) are lacking. Data from the Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease (PICARD), a multicenter observational study of AKI, were analyzed. Among 398 patients who required dialysis, the risk for death within 60 d was examined by assigned initial dialysis modality (CRRT [n = 206] versus IHD [n = 192]) using standard Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates, proportional hazards ("Cox") regression methods, and a propensity score approach to account for selection effects. Crude survival rates were lower for patients who were treated with CRRT than IHD (survival at 30 d 45 versus 58%; P = 0.006). Adjusted for age, hepatic failure, sepsis, thrombocytopenia, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine and stratified by site, the relative risk for death associated with CRRT was 1.82 (95% confidence interval 1.26 to 2.62). Further adjustment for the propensity score did not materially alter the association (relative risk 1.92; 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 2.89). Among critically ill patients with AKI, CRRT was associated with increased mortality. Although the results could reflect residual confounding by severity of illness, these data provide no evidence for a survival benefit afforded by CRRT. Larger, prospective, randomized clinical trials to compare CRRT and IHD in severe AKI are needed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales/mortalidad , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA