Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 56(7): 2403-2409, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38441870

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Immediate-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) has emerged as a strategy for patients in need of urgent dialysis. However, the ideal timing for initiating this procedure remains uncertain. In this study, we aimed to compare complications and outcomes between immediate-start PD and conventional-start PD. METHODS: We performed a two-center retrospective cohort study between 1 January 2015 and 31 May 2020. Patients who underwent PD were divided into immediate-start PD (without break-in period) and conventional-start PD group (break-in period within at least 14 days). The primary outcomes were the incidence of the mechanical complications and infectious complication. The secondary outcomes were technique failure and patient survival. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients (106 in the immediate-start PD group and 103 in the conventional-start PD group) were included. Immediate-start PD had significantly lower catheter malfunction or migration rate compare with conventional-start PD (2.8% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.003) but comparable rates of dialysate leaks, pleuroperitoneal leaks, and hemoperitoneum. Infectious complications (exit-site infection and peritonitis) were similar between groups. Technique survival was comparable (7.5% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.22), while immediate-start PD exhibited lower mortality rates (0.9% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Immediate-start PD appears to be a viable option for patients in need of urgent dialysis, with reduced catheter complications and comparable infectious complications and technique survival when compared to conventional-start PD.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Tiempo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Auditoría Médica
2.
Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes ; 10: 1179551417705122, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28469506

RESUMEN

Mutations in the VHL, RET, SDHB, and SDHD genes are responsible for von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2), and familial paraganglioma, respectively. However, genotype-phenotype correlation data are lacking in Southeast Asia. A retrospective medical chart review was performed on patients referred to the genetics service. We found 35 patients diagnosed with clinical syndromes (16 VHL, 9 MEN2, 9 paragangliomas, and 1 neurofibromatosis type 1). In patients with VHL, 5 known VHL mutations were identified: p.Trp88X, p.Ile151Thr, p.Arg161X, p.Arg167Gln, and p.Leu178Arg. The most frequent RET mutations in patients with MEN2A occurred at codon 634 on exon 11: p.Cys634Tyr, p.Cys634Trp, and p.Cys634Arg. A patient with MEN2B had p.Met918Thr RET mutation. Approximately, 90% of patients with MEN2 had medullary thyroid carcinoma. Pheochromocytoma was found in 55.6% of patients with MEN2, and 60% of them had bilateral lesions. One patient with malignant thoracic paraganglioma had p.Arg46X mutation of SDHB. This study provides mutation phenotypes that offer a useful tool for clinicians and patients to stratify disease risks and tailor screening programs.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA