Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
BMC Neurol ; 20(1): 401, 2020 Nov 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33143640

RESUMEN

ASBTRACT: BACKGROUND: There are limited neuroprotective treatment options for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Cerebrolysin, a brain-specific proposed pleiotropic neuroprotective agent, has been suggested to improve global functional outcomes in ischemic stroke. We investigated the efficacy, safety and feasibility of administering Cerebrolysin for SAH patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, parallel-group pilot study. Fifty patients received either daily Cerebrolysin (30 ml/day) or a placebo (saline) for 14 days (25 patients per study group). The primary endpoint was a favorable Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) of 5 to 8 (moderate disability to good recovery) at six-months. Secondary endpoints included the modified Ranking Scale (mRS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score, occurrence of adverse effects and the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). RESULTS: No severe adverse effects or mortality attributable to Cerebrolysin were observed. No significant difference was detected in the proportion of patients with favorable six-month GOSE in either study group (odds ratio (OR): 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-5.17). Secondary functional outcome measures for favorable six-month recovery i.e. a mRS of 0 to 3 (OR: 3.45; 95% CI 0.79-15.01) were comparable for both groups. Similarly, there was no difference in MOCA neurocognitive performance (p-value: 0.75) and in the incidence of DCI (OR: 0.85 95% CI: 0.28-2.59). CONCLUSIONS: Use of Cerebrolysin in addition to standard-of-care management of aneurysmal SAH is safe, well tolerated and feasible. However, the neutral results of this trial suggest that it does not improve the six-month global functional performance of patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name of Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Trial Registration Number: NCT01787123 . Date of Registration: 8th February 2013.


Asunto(s)
Aminoácidos/uso terapéutico , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Escala de Consecuencias de Glasgow , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
World Neurosurg ; 144: e597-e604, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32916358

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sodium valproate (VPA) is a commonly prescribed antiepileptic drug (AED) in daily neurosurgical practice. However, the incidence of VPA-associated hyperammonemia (VAH) and its life-threatening consequence, VPA-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy (VHE), in neurosurgical patients is unknown. We determined the incidence, clinical presentation, and risk factors for VAH. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was performed on adult neurosurgical patients prescribed VPA for at least a week over a 22-month period. Blood tests for ammonia, VPA, and liver function were performed at the time of recruitment. The primary end point was VAH. Secondary end points were VHE and liver dysfunction. RESULTS: In total, 252 patients were recruited. The commonest disease etiology was brain tumors (27%, 69), followed by aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH; 26%, 65). VPA was prescribed for primary seizure prophylaxis in 110 patients (44%). The mean daily dose was 1148 mg for a mean duration of 48 months. The mean serum VPA level was 417 µmol/L. In total, 92 patients (37%) were prescribed an additional AED, the most common being phenytoin (65%, 60/92). The mean serum ammonia level was 47 µmol/L. In total, 28% (71/252) of patients had VAH and only 0.7% had VHE. Independent factors were aneurysmal SAH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.2), concomitant phenytoin (aOR 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.5), and phenobarbital (aOR 4.6; 95% CI 1.1-20.0). No associations with VPA dose, duration, serum levels, and liver function were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although VAH is common among neurosurgical patients, VHE is rare. Patients with aneurysmal SAH or on concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs are at risk. Clinicians should be vigilant for VHE symptoms in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Hiperamonemia/inducido químicamente , Hiperamonemia/epidemiología , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA