Examining health care access disparities in Hispanic populations with peripheral artery disease and diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated disparities in health care access for Hispanic adults with diabetes and peripheral artery disease (PAD) who are at risk of lower-extremity amputation and other cardiovascular morbidities and mortalities. METHODS: We utilized the health care access survey data from the All of Us research program to examine adults (⩾ 18 years) with either diabetes and/or PAD. The primary associations evaluated were: could not afford medical care and delayed getting medical care in the past 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association of Hispanic ethnicity and survey responses, adjusting for age, sex, income, health insurance, and employment status. RESULTS: Among 24,104 participants, the mean age was 54.9 years and 67% were women. Of these, 8.2% were Hispanic adults. In multivariable analysis, Hispanic adults were more likely to be unable to afford seeing a health care provider, and receiving emergency care, follow-up care, and prescription medications (p < 0.05) than non-Hispanic adults. Furthermore, Hispanic adults were more likely to report being unable to afford medical care due to cost (odds ratios [OR] 1.72, 95% CI 1.50-1.99), more likely to purchase prescription drugs from another country (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.69-2.86), and more likely to delay getting medical care due to work (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.22-1.74) and child care (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.35-2.39) issues than non-Hispanic White adults. CONCLUSION: The Hispanic population with diabetes and PAD faces substantial barriers in health care access, including a higher likelihood of delaying medical care and being unable to afford it.

NIH Funding of Researchers in Surgery: Decreased Career Development Awards Over Time.

BACKGROUND: Over time, NIH funding has become increasingly competitive. In addition, academic surgeons' research competes with time required for patient care, operating, and administrative work. Due to these competing interests for surgeons, we hypothesize that the percentage of NIH grants awarded to researchers from departments of surgery is decreasing. METHODS: The NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tool was queried for the number and value of new and renewal R01 grants, and career development awards noting which surgery departments received awards from 1998 to -2018. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The number of career development awards granted to researchers from departments of surgery decreased significantly over time (P = 0.007) while new R01's and R01 renewal awards were stable. The number of grants awarded to researchers from all procedural departments were compared to non-procedural departments and again, career development awards decreased significantly (P = 0.005) over time but new R01's and R01 renewals stayed stable. Looking at the difference in average dollar amount received for new R01, renewal R01, or career development awards between department of surgery awardees and non-surgery over time, there was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: NIH funding is becoming increasingly competitive and surgeons have many competing interests. Our study found that there has been a significant decrease in career development awards to department of surgery awardees and procedural specialists. The decrease in receipt of these awards is particularly concerning given that they are meant to provide protected time for developing researchers and thus have potential consequences for future research.