Comparison of post-operative outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between patients with vs. without elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance.

PURPOSE: It is unclear if an elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance is a risk factor for poor outcomes following ACLR. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with an elevated TT-TG have an increased risk of retear following primary ACLR compared to controls with a normal TT-TG. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary ACLR between July 2018 and June 2019 with an available preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were eligible for inclusion. TT-TG distance was measured on preoperative MRI scans by two independent investigators. Clinical outcomes, return-to-sport rates, and Lysholm scores were compared between patients with a TT-TG < 12.5 mm (normal) and those with a TT-TG ≥ 12.5 mm (elevated). RESULTS: Overall, 159 patients were included, 98 with normal TT-TG distance and 61 with elevated TT-TG distance. Patients with an elevated TT-TG distance had worse post-operative Lysholm scores than patients with a normal TT-TG distance (83.0 vs. 95.0, p = 0.010). In patients who received a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft, an elevated TT-TG distance was associated with higher rates of subjective instability (13.0% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.041), reoperation (13.0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.012), and post-operative complications (25.0% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.026), as well as lower ACL psychological readiness scores (324.1 vs. 446.7, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Patients with an elevated pre-operative TT-TG distance have worse Lysholm scores than patients with normal TT-TG distance. Patients with an elevated pre-operative TT-TG distance who underwent ACLR with BTB grafts had significantly higher rates of subjective instability, reoperation, and post-operative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Outcomes following arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection and risk of future ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Despite successful return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes after posteromedial osteophyte resection, one possible consequence of osteophyte removal is increased stress on the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL), leading to a UCL injury. It is currently unknown how often overhead athletes who undergo isolated posteromedial osteophyte resection subsequently require UCL reconstruction (UCLR). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to report outcomes following arthroscopic resection of posteromedial osteophytes in overhead athletes and determine whether overhead athletes who underwent arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection for posteromedial impingement went on to require UCL surgery. We hypothesized that there would be a high rate of RTS following osteophyte resection and that players who underwent arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection would have a >10% risk of requiring subsequent UCLR or UCL repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy from 2010-2020 at a single institution were reviewed. Patients were included if they underwent isolated arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection without concomitant UCL surgery, were overhead athletes at the onset of posteromedial impingement symptoms, and had no history of elbow surgery. Primary outcomes included RTS rate, complications, and subsequent shoulder and/or elbow injury and surgery, as well as several patient-reported outcome measures (Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score, Timmerman-Andrews elbow score, and Conway-Jobe score). RESULTS: Overall, 36 overhead athletes were evaluated at 5.1 ± 3.4 years postoperatively, including 28 baseball pitchers, 3 baseball catchers, 3 softball players, 1 tennis player, and 1 volleyball player. Of the overhead athletes, 77% were able to RTS; the mean Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic and satisfaction scores were 70 and 75, respectively; and 89% of athletes had either excellent (73%) or good (16%) Conway-Jobe scores at long-term follow-up. Subsequent UCLR was required in 18% of baseball pitchers (n = 5) at a median of 13 months postoperatively. Of the 5 UCLRs, 3 were performed shortly after posteromedial osteophyte resection (6, 7, and 13 months postoperatively) whereas the other 2 were performed at 6.2 and 7.5 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Following arthroscopic posteromedial osteophyte resection, 77% of athletes were able to RTS. Baseball pitchers who undergo arthroscopic resection of posteromedial osteophytes for posteromedial impingement have an 18% risk of subsequent UCLR.

Mark Coventry Award: Human Knee Has a Distinct Microbiome: Implications for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Pathogens causing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are thought to gain access to the knee during surgery or from a remote site in the body. Recent studies have shown that there is a distinct microbiome in various sites of the body. This prospective study, and first of its kind, was set up to investigate the presence of possible microbiome in human knee and compare the profile in different knee conditions. METHODS: We obtained synovial fluid from 65 knees (55 patients) with various conditions that included normal knee, osteoarthritis (OA), aseptic revision, and those undergoing revision for PJI. The contralateral knee of patients who had a PJI were also aspirated for comparison. A minimum of 3 milliliters of synovial fluid was collected per joint. All samples were aliquoted for culture and next-generation sequencing analysis. RESULTS: The highest number of species was found in native osteoarthritic knees (P ≤ .035). Cutibacterium, Staphylococcus, and Paracoccus species were dominant in native nonosteoarthritic knees, and meanwhile a markedly high abundance of Proteobacteria was observed in the osteoarthritic joints. Moreover, the contralateral and aseptic revision knees showed a similar trend in bacterial composition (P = .75). The sequencing analysis of patients who had PJI diagnosis, confirmed the culture results. CONCLUSION: Distinct knee microbiome profiles can be detected in patients who have OA and other knee conditions. The distinct microbiome in the knee joint and the close host-microbe relationships within the knee joint may play a decisive role in the development of OA and PJI.

Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in javelin throwers: an analysis of return to play rates and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although results after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) in baseball players have been well documented, the literature is replete regarding the outcomes after UCLR in javelin throwers. PURPOSE: To report outcomes after UCLR in javelin throwers. HYPOTHESIS: UCLR in javelin throwers will result in a high rate of return to play similar to that of previously published studies from athletes of other sports. METHODS: All patients who were identified preoperatively as javelin throwers and underwent UCLR between 2011 and 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were eligible for inclusion. Patients were assessed with the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow score, Timmerman-Andrews Elbow score, Conway-Jobe score, patient satisfaction, return to sport rate questionnaire, and the occurrence of any postoperative complications. RESULTS: Eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Complete follow-up was available in 16 (88.9%) patients. The average age at surgery was 21.2 ± 2.0 (range, 18.6-24.9) years. At the final follow-up, the average Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic Shoulder and Elbow score and Timmerman-Andrews Elbow score were 77.3 (range, 18.7-98.4) and 91.8 (range, 70.0-100.0), respectively. Outcomes on the Conway-Jobe scale were as follows: excellent (n = 6; 37.5%), good (n = 4; 25%), fair (n = 6; 37.5%). Ten (62.5%) patients returned to play at an average of 12.2 ± 3.6 (range, 6.0-18.0) months after surgery. Two (12.5%) patients sustained a shoulder injury postoperatively; however, neither required surgery. CONCLUSION: UCLR in javelin throwers results in good outcomes with a low rate of reinjury/reoperation. However, the return to play rate (62.5%) and good/excellent outcomes per the Conway-Jobe scale (68.8%) are lower than what has been previously reported in baseball players and javelin throwers. Further investigation regarding outcomes in javelin throwers after UCLR is warranted.

A Prospective Evaluation of Early Postoperative Complications After Distal Biceps Tendon Repairs.

PURPOSE: The reported incidence of postoperative complications after distal biceps tendon repairs (DBTRs) has been determined largely by retrospective studies. We hypothesized that a large prospective cohort study of DBTRs would demonstrate increased complication rates relative to existing literature values. Secondarily, we hypothesized that most complications would be transient and self-limiting, regardless of the surgical technique employed for the repair. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing acute, primary DBTR from July 2016 to December 2017 were enrolled. The repair technique, postoperative protocol, and follow-up intervals were determined by the individual surgeons' protocols. Demographic information, surgical data, and complications were tabulated prospectively. Exclusion criteria included chronic DBTRs, secondary DBTRs requiring allograft, DBTRs of partial tears, and postoperative follow-up of less than 12 weeks. We included 212 repairs performed by 37 orthopedic surgeons in 3 different subspecialties. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (30.7%) had 73 complications. Fifty patients (44.6%) in the 1-incision group experienced complications compared with 15 (15.0%) in the 2-incision group. Sixty patients (28.3%) developed a minor complication. Fifty-seven patients (26.9%) had sensory neurapraxias, 47 after a 1-incision procedure and 10 after a 2-incision procedure, a statistically significant difference. Of the patients with neurapraxias, 94.7% were resolved or improving at the time of the latest follow-up. Five patients (2.4%) developed a major complication, defined as a return to the operating room in the postoperative period due to deep infection or rerupture. CONCLUSIONS: The complication rate after DBTR appears to be higher than 2 other retrospective studies and is predominantly in the form of transient neurapraxias. This study confirms that there is a higher complication rate in 1-incision techniques as compared with 2-incision techniques. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Return to Play Criteria Following Surgical Stabilization for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To identify and describe in the existing literature any criteria used for return to play following surgical stabilization for traumatic, anterior shoulder instability. METHODS: We performed a systematic review evaluating surgical stabilization for primary traumatic anterior shoulder instability in skeletally mature patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up using Level I to IV studies in PubMed and EMBASE from January 1994 to January 2017. RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies with at least 1 explicitly stated criterion for return to play were identified from a review of more than 5,100 published articles. Seven different categories of return to play criteria were identified, the most common of which were time from surgery (89.6%), strength (18.9%), and range of motion (13.8%). Pain, stability, proprioception, and postoperative radiographic evaluation were also used. As hypothesized, in 75.8% of the included studies (44/58), time was the only criterion explicitly used. The most commonly used time for return to play was 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identifies 7 criteria that have been used in the available literature to determine when patients are ready to return to play; however, consistent with our hypothesis, 75% of studies used time from surgery as the sole listed criterion, with the most commonly used time point of 6 months postoperative. All of these criteria can be used in future research to develop a comprehensive checklist of functional criteria in hopes of reducing recurrent injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review.

Contact Versus Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Is Mechanism of Injury Predictive of Concomitant Knee Pathology?

PURPOSE: To determine if mechanism of injury is predictive of concomitant knee pathology found at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: All patients aged 16 to 35 who underwent ACL reconstruction at our institution between January 2009 and December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Mechanism of injury was determined from patient history. The presence of meniscal or chondral damage was determined from operative records, while collateral ligament injuries were determined by the treating surgeon's diagnosis after physical examination and their review of magnetic resonance imaging findings. Patients with inadequate documentation, history of a subsequent instability episode following the initial injury, or prior history of knee pathology were excluded. RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-seven patients (169 contact and 518 noncontact) were included. A 2-fold increase in the incidence of collateral ligament injury was identified between the 2 groups with 114 (67.5%) in the contact group and 175 (33.8%) in the noncontact group (P < .001). Twenty-six patients (15.4%) in the contact group compared with 9 (1.7%) in the noncontact group had a grade III collateral ligament injury (P < .001). Chondral injury was identified in 41 (24.3%) patients in the contact group and 87 (16.8%) in the noncontact group (P = .05) with 9 (5.3%) grade IV lesions in the contact group and 4 (0.8%) in the noncontact group (P < .001). Eleven patients in the contact group (6.5%) and 15 in the noncontact group (2.9%) had a chondral injury to the lateral femoral condyle (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Although we found no difference in the incidence or type of meniscal tears, we found a significant increase in the incidence of grade IV chondral injury, chondral injury to the lateral femoral condyle, and grade III collateral ligament damage in the setting of contact ACL injuries. This knowledge can aid surgeons in preoperative planning and patient counseling. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Editorial Commentary: The Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Tendon-The Shoulder Surgeon's Conundrum.

The long head of the biceps tendon can be a significant pain generator in the setting of rotator cuff tearing. Surgeons who encounter long head of biceps tendon pathology at the time of rotator cuff repair can be confident in a high likelihood of statistically significant clinical improvement with concomitant long head of biceps surgery. Patients can be reliably counseled preoperatively that if they have both clinically apparent long head of biceps tendon pathology and rotator cuff tearing, and if they undergo long head of biceps tendon surgery with rotator cuff repair, they can expect comparable or better outcomes than isolated rotator cuff repair.

Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction via Independent Tunnel Drilling: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Autografts.

PURPOSE: To collect the highest level of evidence comparing anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via independent tunnel drilling using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts in terms of clinical outcome and failure rate. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of clinical trials that randomized patients to ACL reconstruction with either BTB or HT autografts with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Only trials using independent tunnel drilling, including outside-in and anteromedial portal techniques, for both autografts were eligible for inclusion, whereas all transtibial studies were excluded. Study design, demographics, surgical technique, rehabilitation protocol, and clinical outcomes were compiled. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Quality assessment was performed using the Coleman Methodological Scale (CMS). RESULTS: Six published studies reporting on 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. No study reported a difference in rerupture rate between BTB and HT. BTB-reconstructed knees experienced a greater incidence of anterior knee pain or crepitus in 2/7 trials and radiographic evidence of degenerative change in 3/7 trials. HT-reconstructed knees had increased instrumented laxity in 2/7 trials and less knee flexion strength postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study collects all available Level I and II evidence for anatomic ACL reconstruction using BTB and HT grafts. According to the data presented in these studies, clinical outcome scores and failure rates showed no differences for anatomic reconstruction using either autograft. However, in some studies, BTB-reconstructed knees experienced a greater incidence of anterior knee pain and radiographic evidence of degenerative change, and in others, HT-reconstructed knees had increased laxity and less knee flexion strength. In our opinion, both BTB and HT autografts remain valid options for ACL reconstruction when using anatomic drilling techniques, providing a stable knee with reliable return to activity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Potential Utility of a Combined Approach with US and MR Arthrography to Image Medial Elbow Pain in Baseball Players.

Purpose To evaluate a combined imaging approach with both ultrasonography (US; conventional US and valgus stress US) and magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in baseball players with medial elbow pain. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained and the requirement for informed consent was waived. The study is compliant with HIPAA. Baseball players with medial elbow pain underwent US in addition to MR arthrography. Findings were assessed with each modality alone and both combined in this retrospective investigation. For the evaluation of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears with stress US, the interval gapping of the medial elbow joint was measured between rest and valgus stress both at the injured and at the uninjured (contralateral) elbow. Surgical or arthroscopic correlation was available as the so-called gold standard. McNemar tests compared the accuracies of the imaging modalities. Results In this study, 144 baseball players had 191 findings of medial elbow pain, including 53 UCL tears. With stress US, joint gapping at the injured elbow greater than 1.0 mm compared with the contralateral elbow yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 96%, 81%, and 87%, respectively, for diagnosing UCL tears. With MR arthrography, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for UCL tears were 81%, 91%, and 88%, respectively, and increased to 96% (P = .013, McNemar test), 99% (P = .023), and 98% (P < .001), respectively, when combined with US to a dual modality MR and US approach. For 31 patients with ulnar neuritis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy increased from 74%, 92%, and 88%, respectively, with MR arthrography alone to 90% (P = .07, McNemar test), 100% (P < .001), and 98% (P < .001) combined with US. For the 59 myotendinous and the 48 osteochondral diagnoses, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with MR arthrography alone were 93%, 93%, and 93%, and 94%, 98%, and 97%, respectively, with no additional diagnostic value from US. Conclusion The combined approach with both MR arthrography and US shows higher accuracy than each modality alone for the assessment of medial elbow pain. (©) RSNA, 2016.

Distal clavicular osteolysis in adults: association with bench pressing intensity.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between distal clavicular osteolysis (DCO) and bench pressing intensity. METHODS: From a retrospective review of MRI shoulder reports of individuals between 20 and 40 years of age, 262 male patients with DCO and 227 age-matched male patients without DCO were selected. All patients had completed a bench pressing questionnaire. The patients' bench pressing frequency (times per week), duration (years of bench pressing), bench pressing weight (maximum bench pressing weight with one repetition = 1RM) and the ratio of bench pressing weight to body weight were compared between both groups using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: The results showed that 56 % (146/262) of patients with DCO were high-intensity bench pressers (1RM more than 1.5 times the body weight) compared to 6 % (14/227) in patients without DCO. High-intensity bench pressing was a risk factor for DCO (OR = 19; 95 %CI = 11-35; p < 0.001). Low-intensity bench pressing (1RM less than 1.5 times the body weight) was not a risk factor for DCO (OR = 0.6; 95 % CI = 0.4-0.8). High frequency (>1×/week) and duration (>5 years) of bench pressing were risk factors. In bench pressers who suffered from DCO, the mean 1RM was 283 lbs (±SD 57) compared to 209 lbs (±SD 60) in bench pressers not affected by DCO (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney). CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity, but not low-intensity bench pressing is a risk factor for DCO.

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Our National Pastime.

Baseball players are most likely to incur an anterior cruciate ligament injury while fielding or base running. Infielders and outfielders are most at risk, followed by pitchers. Return to play at the preinjury level after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is highly likely for these athletes.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in skeletally mature patients aged 25 years or younger.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and revision rates of skeletally mature patients aged 25 years or younger who have undergone either BPTB autograft or deep-frozen, non-irradiated BPTB allograft ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-four patients aged 25 or younger at the time of surgery were identified as having a transtibial ACL reconstruction with either a BPTB autograft or deep-frozen, non-irradiated BPTB allograft by one senior surgeon (101 autografts vs. 123 allografts) over the study time period. Primary outcome measure included the need for ACL revision. One hundred and nineteen patients with at least 2-year clinical follow-up agreed to participate in secondary outcome measurement arm of the study and were administered the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form. RESULTS: The median Lysholm scores were 95 (40-100) and 95 (68-100) and the median IKDC scores were 95.4 (54.0-100) and 95.4 (72.4-100) in the allograft and autograft groups, respectively. The differences in the Lysholm scores and the IKDC scores were not statistically significant (P = n.s.). There were 13 patients requiring ACL revision, 12 allograft versus one autograft (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Although there is no significant difference in patient-rated outcome between ACL reconstructions using BPTB autografts versus BPTB allografts, a significantly higher rate of ACL revision was found in allograft patients. The results of our study support a growing body of literature that BPTB autograft reconstruction leads to lower retear rates in younger individuals, an important factor in the graft selection process for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Acromial apophysiolysis: superior shoulder pain and acromial nonfusion in the young throwing athlete.

PURPOSE: To describe the frequency of acromial apophysiolysis and its association with incomplete fusion and superior shoulder pain, to determine risk factors of acromial apophysiolysis, and to assess whether acromial apophysiolysis is associated with the development of an os acromiale and rotator cuff tears. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study; requirement for informed consent was waived. A retrospective report review of 2372 consecutive patients between 15 and 25 years of age who underwent shoulder magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for shoulder pain was performed. Individuals with edema at the acromial apophyses and no other abnormalities on MR images were included in the study group. Association of acromial edema with incomplete fusion, pitching, and clinical findings was determined in the study group and in an age- and sex-matched control group, with both univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses. Association with the development of an os acromiale and rotator cuff tears later in life was assessed with follow-up imaging after age 25 years. RESULTS: Edema at the acromial apophyses was found in 2.6% (61 of 2372) of patients and was associated with incomplete fusion of the acromial apophyses (χ(2), P < .001) and superior shoulder tenderness (P < .001). The entity was named acromial apophysiolysis. A pitch count of more than 100 pitches per week was shown to be a risk factor for acromial apophysiolysis (odds ratio [ OR odds ratio ] = 6.5, P = .017). Follow-up imaging showed that acromial apophysiolysis was significantly associated with the development of an os acromiale ( OR odds ratio = 138, P < .001) and rotator cuff tears ( OR odds ratio = 5.4, P = .015) after age 25 years. CONCLUSION: Acromial apophysiolysis is characterized by incomplete fusion and edema at the acromial apophyses. It is associated with superior shoulder pain in young patients (< 25 years old), and pitching is a risk factor. It predisposes the patient to the development of an os acromiale and rotator cuff tears after age 25 years.

Biomechanical comparison of graft fixation at 30° and 90° of elbow flexion for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction by the docking technique.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries have been successfully treated by the docking reconstruction. Although fixation of the graft has been suggested at 30° of elbow flexion, no quantitative biomechanical data exist to provide guidelines for the optimal elbow flexion angle for graft fixation. METHODS: Testing was conducted on 10 matched pairs of cadaver elbows with use of a loading system and optoelectric tracking device. After biomechanical data on the native UCL were obtained, reconstruction by the docking technique was performed with use of palmaris longus autograft with one elbow fixated at 30° and the contralateral elbow at 90° of elbow flexion. Biomechanical testing was undertaken on these specimens. RESULTS: The load to failure of the native UCL (mean, 20.1 N-m) was significantly higher (P = .004) than that of the reconstructed UCL (mean, 4.6 N-m). There was no statistically significant difference in load to failure of the UCL reconstructions fixated at 30° of elbow flexion (average, 4.86 N-m) compared with those at 90° (average, 4.35 N-m). Elbows reconstructed at 30° and 90° of elbow flexion produced similar kinematic coupling and valgus laxity characteristics compared with each other and with the intact UCL. Although not statistically significant, the reconstructions fixated at 30° more closely resembled the biomechanical characteristics of the intact elbow than did reconstructions fixated at 90°. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was found in comparing the docking technique of UCL reconstruction with graft fixation at 30° vs. 90° of elbow flexion.

Outcomes for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: a retrospective review using the KJOC assessment score with two-year follow-up in an overhead throwing population.

BACKGROUND: Injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) often results in valgus elbow instability requiring reconstruction. No standardized and validated outcome measure has compared outcomes between surgical techniques and institutions in the overhead throwing athlete. The aim of this study was to use the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic shoulder and elbow score (KJOC score) to report functional outcomes in overhead throwing athletes undergoing UCL reconstruction. We predict that the KJOC score in our general throwing population will provide an accurate assessment of postoperative outcomes consistent with previously published reports. METHODS: A retrospective review of 33 patients undergoing UCL reconstruction was carried out during a 5-year period between 2004 and 2009. Minimum follow-up was 2.2 years with an average of 3.7 years. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained surgeons using either the docking (n = 12) or modified Jobe technique (n = 21). Age, sport, position, and return to play status were obtained. The KJOC score was administered to assess final functional outcome. RESULTS: A total of 33 athletes underwent UCL reconstruction-30 baseball players and 3 javelin throwers. Of these, 27 (82%) returned to their sport at their previous level in an average of 12.25 months. The overall average KJOC score was 76. Athletes who returned to their previous level of play had a mean KJOC score of 77. Those who were unable to return to play had a mean score of 69. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates consistent outcomes for UCL reconstruction using the KJOC shoulder and elbow score compared with previously reported data.

Pectoralis major ruptures in professional American football players.

BACKGROUND: Pectoralis major injuries are an infrequent shoulder injury that can result in pain, weakness, and deformity. These injuries may occur during the course of an athletic competition, including football. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of pectoralis major ruptures in professional football players and time lost from the sport following injury. We hypothesized that ruptures most frequently occur during bench-press strength training. METHODS: The National Football League Injury Surveillance System was reviewed for all pectoralis major injuries in all players from 2000 to 2010. Details regarding injury setting, player demographics, method of treatment, and time lost were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 10 injuries-complete ruptures-were identified during this period. Five of the 10 were sustained in defensive players, generally while tackling. Nine occurred during game situations, and 1 occurred during practice. Specific data pertinent to the practice injury was not available. No rupture occurred during weight lifting. Eight ruptures were treated operatively, and 2 cases did not report the method of definitive treatment. The average days lost was 111 days (range, 42-189). The incidence was 0.004 pectoralis major ruptures during the 11-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: Pectoralis major injuries are uncommon while playing football. In the National Football League, these injuries primarily occur not during practice or while bench pressing but rather during games. When pectoralis major ruptures do occur, they are successfully treated operatively. Surgery may allow for return to full sports participation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

ChatGPT Can Offer Satisfactory Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Purpose: To determine whether ChatGPT effectively responds to 10 commonly asked questions concerning ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction. Methods: A comprehensive list of 90 UCL reconstruction questions was initially created, with a final set of 10 "most commonly asked" questions ultimately selected. Questions were presented to ChatGPT and its response was documented. Responses were evaluated independently by 3 authors using an evidence-based methodology, resulting in a grading system categorized as follows: (1) excellent response not requiring clarification; (2) satisfactory requiring minimal clarification; (3) satisfactory requiring moderate clarification; and (4) unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification. Results: Six of 10 ten responses were rated as "excellent" or "satisfactory." Of those 6 responses, 2 were determined to be "excellent response not requiring clarification," 3 were "satisfactory requiring minimal clarification," and 1 was "satisfactory requiring moderate clarification." Four questions encompassing inquiries about "What are the potential risks of UCL reconstruction surgery?" "Which type of graft should be used for my UCL reconstruction?" and "Should I have UCL reconstruction or repair?" were rated as "unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification." Conclusions: ChatGPT exhibited the potential to improve a patient's basic understanding of UCL reconstruction and provided responses that were deemed satisfactory to excellent for 60% of the most commonly asked questions. For the other 40% of questions, ChatGPT gave unsatisfactory responses, primarily due to a lack of relevant details or the need for further explanation. Clinical Relevance: ChatGPT can assist in patient education regarding UCL reconstruction; however, its ability to appropriately answer more complex questions remains to be an area of skepticism and future improvement.

Impact of Climate on Stress Ultrasound Findings of the Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament in Professional Baseball Pitchers: An 18-Year Study.

Background: The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is the primary soft tissue stabilizer to valgus stress in the elbow and is placed under this valgus stress during the throwing motion. Although there are known risk factors for UCL injury, it is unknown whether the UCL undergoes adaptive changes in athletes from different climates. Purpose: To compare elbow stress ultrasound (SUS) findings between professional baseball pitchers from warm climates versus cold climates and assess significant differences in adaptive and morphologic changes in the UCL. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Dynamic SUS evaluations were performed over 18 years on the dominant and nondominant arms of 643 professional pitchers from warm and cold climates as determined by the player's country/state of origin. Studies were compared with respect to relative UCL thickness (dominant arm vs nondominant arm), relative glenohumeral joint laxity (joint space distance under stress vs joint space distance at rest), and the presence of morphologic changes such as tears or calcifications. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed to compare the progression of SUS findings over 3 years in players with sequential yearly data. Results: Players from warmer climates had significantly greater relative UCL thicknesses than players from colder climates (1.75 vs 1.50 mm, respectively; P = .047). There were no differences between these 2 groups in terms of relative ulnohumeral joint laxity (P = .201), presence of morphologic changes (P = .433), 3-year progression of relative UCL thickness (P = .748), or relative joint laxity (P = .904). Conclusion: Professional pitchers from warm climates had a greater side-to-side difference in UCL thickness between the dominant and nondominant arms. This may be due to the potential for year-round throwing among baseball players from warm climates. There was no difference in laxity, thickness progression, laxity progression, or the presence of additional morphologic changes.

Patients' under 25 subjective readiness to return to sport after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar-bone grafts: Autograft vs. allograft.

Purpose: To assess the difference in perceived readiness to return to sport (RTS) within the first year postoperative period between individuals undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts or allografts. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction done either with BTB autograft or allograft from 2010 to 2018. Skeletally mature patients aged 14 to 25 were eligible for inclusion. Patients completed the Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS) questionnaire postoperatively evaluating perceived ability to perform various activities to compare subjective ability to RTS. Those patients who were outside outlined cohort age, failed to complete a single post-operative survey, underwent revision procedures, or underwent simultaneous or staged additional ligament surgery were excluded. Results: Fifty-nine patients (20.1 ± 3.19 years, 57.6 % Male) were included in the study. Sixteen patients underwent ACL reconstruction with allograft (19.8 ± 3.43 years) while 43 patients received autograft (20.2 ± 3.13). At 3 months autograft recipients reported higher perceived ability to cut (P = .003). At 6-months, allograft recipients reported higher perceived ability to run (P = .033), cut (P = .048), and decelerate (P = .008) as well as a higher overall perceived ability to RTS (P = .032). At all other times, there was no significant difference between cohorts' subjective readiness to perform activities. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that at times within the first year of recovery following ACL reconstruction, patients who receive allografts and autografts may have significantly different perceived ability to perform activities or RTS. However, while present at various times throughout the first year of recovery, any difference in perceived ability to perform activities or in overall RTS is no longer present at 12 months. Level of evidence: Level II, Prospective cohort study.