IS IT WORTH SUPPRESSING TSH IN LOW- AND INTERMEDIATE-RISK PAPILLARY THYROID CANCER PATIENTS BEFORE THE FIRST DISEASE ASSESSMENT?

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression before the first response to treatment assessment in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) patients. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of structural disease (SD) in low- and intermediate-risk PTC patients according to TSH levels measured 1 year after primary treatment. METHODS: A consecutive, prospective series of low- and intermediate-risk PTC patients with 3-years follow-up was collected. TSH, thyroglobulin (Tg), antithyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb), and neck ultrasonography (US) 1 and 3 years after primary treatment were analyzed. Recurrence risk and disease status at 1 year were defined according to the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines and as the presence or absence of SD after 3 years. Patients were grouped according to TSH level at 1 year: group 1, TSH <0.1 µUI/mL; group 2, TSH 0.1 to 0.5 µUI/mL; group 3, 0.5 to 2 µUI/mL; and group 4 >2 µUI/mL. RESULTS: This study included 263 patients (70.9% female, median age 47.2 years) of whom the risk of recurrence was low in 170 (65%), intermediate-low in 63 (24%), and intermediate-high in 30 (11%). The response to initial treatment at 1 year was excellent in 149 (57%), biochemical incomplete in 18 (7%), indeterminate in 84 (32%), and structural incomplete in 12 (4%). Group 1 consisted of 53 (20%) patients, group 2 of 85 (32%), group 3 of 61 (23%), and group 4 of 64 (24%). The rate of SD at 1 and 3 years from primary treatment was not significantly different between TSH groups. CONCLUSION: TSH suppression before the first response to treatment assessment does not appear to influence the rate of SD evaluated 1 and 3 years after primary treatment. ABBREVIATIONS: ATA = American Thyroid Association; DTC = differentiated thyroid cancer; FTC = follicular thyroid cancer; LT4 = levothyroxine; PTC = papillary thyroid cancer; SD = structural disease; Tg = thyroglobulin; TgAb = antithyroglobulin antibodies; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone; US = ultrasonography.

Taller-Than-Wide Shape: A New Definition Improves the Specificity of TIRADS Systems.

INTRODUCTION: A taller-than-wide (TTW) shape is a suspicious feature of thyroid nodules commonly defined as an anteroposterior/transverse diameter (AP/T) ratio >1. An intraobserver variability of up to 18% in AP diameter evaluations has been described, which may lead to overreporting of this feature. To potentially improve the reliability of the TTW definition, we propose an arbitrary ratio of ≥1.2. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of this definition on diagnostic performance. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 553 thyroid nodules referred for cytology evaluation at an academic center. Before fine-needle aspiration, two examiners jointly defined all sonographic features considered in risk stratification systems developed by the American Thyroid Association (ATA), the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), the American College of Radiology (ACR TIRADS), the European Thyroid Association (EU-TIRADS), and the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (K-TIRADS). TTW was defined according to the current definition (AP/T diameter ratio >1) and an arbitrary alternative definition (AP/T ratio >1.2). RESULTS: The alternative definition classified fewer nodules as TTW (28, 5.1% vs. 94, 17%). The current and proposed definitions have a sensitivity of 26.2 and 11.9% (p = 0.03) and a specificity of 83.8 and 95.5% (p < 0.001). Thus, as a single feature, the arbitrary definition has a lower sensitivity and a higher specificity. When applied to sonographic risk stratification systems, however, the proposed definition would increase the number of avoided biopsies (up to 58.2% for ACR TIRADS) and the specificity of all systems, without negative impact on sensitivity or diagnostic odds ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Re-defining TTW nodules as those with an AP/T ratio ≥1.2 improves this marker's specificity for malignancy. Using this definition in risk stratification systems will increase their specificity, reducing the number of suggested biopsies without significantly diminishing their overall diagnostic performance.

Is thyroid nodule location associated with malignancy risk?

PURPOSE: Nodules located in the upper pole of the thyroid may carry a greater risk for malignancy than those in the lower pole. We conducted a study to analyze the risk of malignancy of nodules depending on location. METHODS: The records of patients undergoing thyroid-nodule fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) at an academic thyroid cancer unit were prospectively collected. The nodules were considered benign in cases of a benign histology or cytology report, and malignant in cases of malignant histology. Pathological findings were analyzed based on the anatomical location of the nodules, which were also scored according to five ultrasonographic classification systems. RESULTS: Between November 1, 2015 and May 30, 2018, 832 nodules underwent FNAC, of which 557 had a definitive diagnosis. The prevalence of malignancy was not significantly different in the isthmus, right, or left lobe. Among the 227 nodules that had a precise longitudinal location noted (from 219 patients [155 females], aged 56.2±14.0 years), malignancy was more frequent in the middle lobe (13.2%; odds ratio [OR], 9.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95 to 48.59). This figure was confirmed in multivariate analyses that took into account nodule composition and the Thyroid Imaging, Reporting, and Data System (TIRADS) classification. Using the American College of Radiologists TIRADS, the upper pole location also demonstrated a slightly significant association with malignancy (OR, 6.92; 95% CI, 1.02 to 46.90; P=0.047). CONCLUSION: The risk of thyroid malignancy was found to be significantly higher for mid-lobar nodules. This observation was confirmed when suspicious ultrasonographic features were included in a multivariate model, suggesting that the longitudinal location in the lobe may be a risk factor independently of ultrasonographic appearance.