RESUMEN
Simulation-based medical education (SBME) offers a secure and controlled environment for training in ultrasound-related clinical skills such as nerve blocking and intravenous cannulation. Sonographer training for point-of-care ultrasound often adopts the train-the-trainer (TTT) model, wherein a select group of sonographers receive on-site training to subsequently instruct others. This model traditionally relies on expensive commercial ultrasound simulators, which presents a barrier to the scale-up of the TTT model. This study aims to address the need for cost-effective ultrasound simulators suitable for both initial and cascaded TTT. The objective of this report is to present the design and development of an affordable ultrasound simulator, which mimics anatomical features under ultrasound. The simulator was created using additive manufacturing techniques, including 3D printing, ballistic gel, and silicone work. We report on three development-feedback iterations, with feedback provided by an experienced sonographer from FUJIFILM Sonosite Canada Inc. using the think-aloud approach. Overall the results indicate that de-gassed silicone may serve as a good medium; vessels are best produced as hollow canals within the de-gassed silicone; 3D-printed bones cast acoustic shadows, which are reduced by increasing rigidity of the structures, and 3D printing filament and silicone can be used for nerve bundles. Future developments will focus on achieving anatomical accuracy, exploring alternative materials and printing parameters for the bones, and analyzing embedded structures at varying depths within the silicone. The next steps involve integrating the simulator into ultrasound curricula for a formal assessment of its effectiveness as a training tool.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Poor sleep is highly prevalent in young people and increases risk of mental health difficulties, yet access to sleep interventions remains limited. This paper evaluates the use of a sleep intervention delivered by non-expert practitioners in a secondary care youth mental health service. METHOD: Assistant psychologists were trained to deliver a six-session 1:1 cognitive-behavioural sleep intervention adapted for use with young people with mental health difficulties. A within-subject design assessed clinical outcomes relating to sleep (Insomnia Severity Index), psychological distress and personal goals (Goal Based Outcome Measures) at four time points. RESULTS: High referral, intervention take-up (82.82%) and completion (70%) rates were reported, together with high baseline levels of insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index mean 20.47, SD 3.68) and poor sleep efficiency (56.36%, SD 17.23). Fifty-six young people (average age 19.2 years, SD 3.25) were included in the outcome analysis. Statistically and clinically significant improvements were seen across all outcome measures, with 68% no longer meeting clinical threshold (ISI ≥15) for insomnia at endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates exceptionally high levels of clinical need and engagement with a sleep intervention adapted specifically for young people with mental health difficulties. Whilst limited by the uncontrolled design, large improvements in insomnia and psychological distress support its effectiveness and utility in clinical settings. More robust implementation and evaluation is warranted in broader youth mental health services to promote earlier access.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of adolescent mild depression in the UK and the paucity of evidence-based interventions in non-specialist sectors where most cases present, creates an urgent need for early psychological interventions. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for obtaining unbiased estimates of intervention effectiveness. However, the complexity of mental health settings poses great challenges for effectiveness evaluations. This paper reports learning from an embedded process evaluation of the ICALM RCT which tested the feasibility of delivering Interpersonal Counselling for Adolescents (IPC-A) plus Treatment as Usual (TAU) versus TAU only for adolescent (age 12-18) mild depression by non-qualified mental health professionals in non-specialist sectors. METHODS: A qualitative mixed methods process evaluation, drawing on Bronfenbrenner's socioecological model to investigate key influences on trial delivery across macro-(e.g. policy), meso-(e.g. service characteristics) and micro-(e.g. on-site trial processes) contextual levels. Data collection methods included 9 site questionnaires, 4 observations of team meetings, policy documents, and 18 interviews with stakeholders including therapists, heads of service and managers. Thematic analysis focused on understanding how contextual features shaped trial implementation. RESULTS: The ICALM trial concluded in 2022 having only randomised 14 out of the target 60 young people. At a macro-level, trial delivery was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with services reporting a sharp increase in cases of (social) anxiety over low mood, and backlogs at central referral points which prolonged waiting times for mild cases (e.g. low mood). An interaction between high demand and lack of capacity at a meso-service level led to low prioritisation of trial activities at a micro-level. Unfamiliarity with research processes (e.g. randomisation) and variation in TAU support also accentuated the complexities of conducting an RCT in this setting. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting a RCT of IPC-A in non-specialist services is not feasible in the current context. Failure to conduct effectiveness trials in this setting has clinical implications, potentially resulting in escalation of mild mental health problems. Research done in this setting should adopt pragmatic and innovative recruitment and engagement approaches (e.g. creating new referral pathways) and consider alternative trial designs, e.g. cluster, stepped-wedge or non-controlled studies using complex systems approaches to embrace contextual complexity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN82180413. Registered on 31 December 2019.