Proposal for reference values for the developmental effects of valproate based on human data using a benchmark dose approach.

Following accidental release of valproate into ambient air during manufacture at a French production site in 2018, concerns were raised for inhabitants of the surrounding area. As no toxicological reference value (TRV) was available, the risks could not be properly assessed. The French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES) was mandated to determine a TRV by inhalation to be used for risk assessment. Major congenital malformations (MCMs) in offsprings of mothers exposed to valproate during pregnancy have been reported in international scientific literature. As these adverse effects were the most sensitive effect identified, they were retained as the critical effect to be used for the TRV. The data from a robust registry on MCMs established by the International Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs and Pregnancy (EURAP) were modellized and support a strong DRR between the prevalence of MCMs in the fetus and in utero exposure. A benchmark dose (BMD) was then calculated as the dose that may trigger a 5% increase in this risk. A lower 95% confidence limit (BMD5%L95%) of 2.26 mg/kg/day, leading to an oral TRV of 0.08 mg/kg/day and a respiratory TRV of 0.26 mg.m-3 after applying an uncertainty factor of 30, was determined.

Refinement of health-based guidance values for cadmium in the French population based on modelling.

In France, part of the population is overexposed to cadmium by the diet. In our work, we first revised the tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 0.36 µg Cd.kg bw.d.-1 proposed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), derived from effects on kidneys and based on the critical urinary Cd concentration of 1.0 µg Cd.g-1 creatinine for humans. After reviewing the epidemiological data on Cd toxicity published after 2011, bone effects were selected as the critical effects. Body burden data of 0.5 µg.g-1 creatinine was chosen for the critical threshold for human urinary cadmium concentrations. To be used for the derivation of the new oral toxicological reference value, we used a modified physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK). The reverse calculation on the PBPK model gave a TDI of 0.35 µg Cd.kg bw-1.day-1. This TDI is compatible with a urinary Cd concentrations not exceeding 0.5 µg Cd.g-1 creatinine, in a 60 year-old adult, assuming that ingestion is the only source of exposure to Cd at 60 years. After implementing the PBPK model with French physiological data, Cd biological reference values as a function of age were modelled so as to remain below the revised health-based guidance values.

Association between concomitant use of several systemic NSAIDs and an excess risk of adverse drug reaction. A case/non-case study from the French Pharmacovigilance system database.

AIMS: To examine whether the risk of some selected adverse effects increases with the number of systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) drugs. METHODS: The French Pharmacovigilance database was examined for an association between drug reaction reports and the exposure to one and two or more NSAIDs using a case/non-case study design. In the analysis, 54,583 spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions were included, consisting of 2270 reports of hepatic injury, 994 reports of acute renal failure, 194 reports of gastrointestinal bleeding and 525 reports of angioedema, among others. RESULTS: Use of NSAIDs significantly increased the risk of hepatic injury, gastrointestinal bleeding, acute renal failure and angioedema. The odds ratios tended to increase with the number of NSAIDs for hepatic injury, gastrointestinal bleeding and acute renal failure but not for angioedema. In comparison with reports that did not mention any use of NSAIDs, the odds ratios associated with the use of a single NSAID and two or more NSAIDs were respectively 1.2 (95%CI: 0.9-1.5) and 2.2 (95%CI: 1.3-3.8) for hepatic injury, 7.3 (95%CI: 4.9-10.9) and 10.7 (95%CI: 2.9-40.2) for gastrointestinal bleeding, 3.2 (95%CI: 2.5-4.1) and 4.8 (95%CI: 2.6-8.8) for acute renal failure. For angioedema, the odds ratios were roughly similar when a single NSAID (OR=2.7; 95% CI: 2.2-3.4) or two or more NSAIDs (OR=2.0; 95%CI: 0.7-6.0) were used. The risk of severe ADRs (hepatic injury and acute renal failure) was six- to sevenfold higher in reports mentioning concomitant use of two NSAIDs or more than in those that did not. CONCLUSION: This study shows that concomitant use of two or more NSAIDs was associated with an excess risk of adverse effects such as hepatic injury, acute renal failure and gastrointestinal bleeding. Although simultaneous use of several systemic NSAIDs has no pharmacological justification, this may raise a serious public health problem with the increasing use of over-the-counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents.

Incidence of drug-induced hepatic injuries: a French population-based study.

The incidence of hepatic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) remains unknown in the general population. The goal of this population-based study was to assess the incidence and seriousness of hepatic ADRs. All new cases of symptomatic drug-induced hepatic injuries were collected by 139 trained physicians (general practitioners [GPs] and specialists) between November 1997 and November 2000 in an area containing 81,301 inhabitants who could not go elsewhere for medical care. Over 3 years, 34 cases of hepatic ADRs were collected, 82% of them in outpatients. Global crude annual incidence rate was 13.9 +/- 2.4 per 100,000 inhabitants; corresponding standardized annual global rate was 8.1 +/- 1.5. There was no difference between urban and rural areas. Standardized incidence female/male ratio was 0.86 (0.26-2.90) until 49 years of age and 2.62 (1.00-6.92) after this age. Diagnosis was carried out by GPs in half of the cases. The outcome was recovery for 32 patients and death for 2. The main drugs implicated were anti-infectious, psychotropic, hypolipidemic agents, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Our results suggest that the number of hepatic ADRs in the French population would be 16 times greater than the number noted by spontaneous reporting to French regulatory authorities. In conclusion, the incidence and seriousness of drug-induced hepatitis are largely underestimated in the general population. These results may be useful for further evaluation of drug-induced hepatotoxicity.