Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 214
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Haematol ; 189(6): 1093-1106, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32030738

RESUMEN

Population-based studies that assess long-term patterns of incidence, major aspects of treatment and survival are virtually lacking for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) at a younger age. This study assessed the progress made for young patients with HL (<25 years at diagnosis) in the Netherlands during 1990-2015. Patient and tumour characteristics were extracted from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Time trends in incidence and mortality rates were evaluated with average annual percentage change (AAPC) analyses. Stage at diagnosis, initial treatments and site of treatment were studied in relation to observed overall survival (OS). A total of 2619 patients with HL were diagnosed between 1990 and 2015. Incidence rates increased for 18-24-year-old patients (AAPC + 1%, P = 0·01) only. Treatment regimens changed into less radiotherapy and more 'chemotherapy only', different for age group and stage. Patients aged 15-17 years were increasingly treated at a paediatric oncology centre. The 5-year OS for children was already high in the early 1990s (93%). For patients aged 15-17 and 18-24 years the 5-year OS improved from 84% and 90% in 1990-1994 to 96% and 97% in 2010-2015, respectively. Survival for patients aged 15-17 years was not affected by site of treatment. Our present data demonstrate that significant progress in HL treatment has been made in the Netherlands since 1990.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Hodgkin/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/terapia , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
2.
Lancet Oncol ; 19(9): 1159-1169, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30098952

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A deceleration in the increase in cancer incidence in children and adolescents has been reported in several national and regional studies in Europe. Based on a large database representing 1·3 billion person-years over the period 1991-2010, we provide a consolidated report on cancer incidence trends at ages 0-19 years. METHODS: We invited all population-based cancer registries operating in European countries to participate in this population-based registry study. We requested a listing of individual records of cancer cases, including sex, age, date of birth, date of cancer diagnosis, tumour sequence number, primary site, morphology, behaviour, and the most valid basis of diagnosis. We also requested population counts in each calendar year by sex and age for the registration area, from official national sources, and specific information about the covered area and registration practices. An eligible registry could become a contributor if it provided quality data for all complete calendar years in the period 1991-2010. Incidence rates and the average annual percentage change with 95% CIs were reported for all cancers and major diagnostic groups, by region and overall, separately for children (age 0-14 years) and adolescents (age 15-19 years). We examined and quantified the stability of the trends with joinpoint analyses. FINDINGS: For the years 1991-2010, 53 registries in 19 countries contributed a total of 180 335 unique cases. We excluded 15 162 (8·4%) of 180 335 cases due to differing practices of registration, and considered the quality indicators for the 165 173 cases included to be satisfactory. The average annual age-standardised incidence was 137·5 (95% CI 136·7-138·3) per million person-years and incidence increased significantly by 0·54% (0·44-0·65) per year in children (age 0-14 years) with no change in trend. In adolescents, the combined European incidence was 176·2 (174·4-178·0) per million person-years based on all 35 138 eligible cases and increased significantly by 0·96% (0·73-1·19) per year, although recent changes in rates among adolescents suggest a deceleration in this increasing trend. We observed temporal variations in trends by age group, geographical region, and diagnostic group. The combined age-standardised incidence of leukaemia based on 48 458 cases in children was 46·9 (46·5-47·3) per million person-years and increased significantly by 0·66% (0·48-0·84) per year. The average overall incidence of leukaemia in adolescents was 23·6 (22·9-24·3) per million person-years, based on 4702 cases, and the average annual change was 0·93% (0·49-1·37). We also observed increasing incidence of lymphoma in adolescents (average annual change 1·04% [0·65-1·44], malignant CNS tumours in children (average annual change 0·49% [0·20-0·77]), and other tumours in both children (average annual change 0·56 [0·40-0·72]) and adolescents (average annual change 1·17 [0·82-1·53]). INTERPRETATION: Improvements in the diagnosis and registration of cancers over time could partly explain the observed increase in incidence, although some changes in underlying putative risk factors cannot be excluded. Cancer incidence trends in this young population require continued monitoring at an international level. FUNDING: Federal Ministry of Health of the Federal German Government, the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme, and International Agency for Research on Cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , Edad de Inicio , Niño , Preescolar , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
3.
Cancer Causes Control ; 28(9): 981-984, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28748344

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Cigarette smoking is the leading preventable cause of death and disability from cancer in the U.S. Smoking prevalence varies by racial and ethnic group, and therefore the smoking-related burden of cancer is expected to vary accordingly. METHODS: We estimated the cigarette smoking-attributable Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) lost to cancer, overall and within racial/ethnic groups, using published DALY estimates, smoking prevalence from survey data, and relative risks from large cohort studies. RESULTS: In 2011, 2.6 million DALYs were lost to cancer due to cigarette smoking (27% of all DALYs lost to cancer). Smoking-attributable DALY rates were higher in men (968 per 100,000 people [95% confidence interval: 943-992]) than women (557 [540-574]). In combined sex analyses, DALY rates were higher in non-Hispanic Blacks (960 [934-983]) and non-Hispanic Whites (786 [768-802]) than in Hispanics (409 [399-421]) and non-Hispanic Asians (335 [320-350]). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking-attributable cancer burden was substantial in all racial and ethnic groups, underscoring the need for intensified tobacco cessation in all populations.


Asunto(s)
Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Adulto , Fumar Cigarrillos/etnología , Estudios de Cohortes , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/etnología , Prevalencia , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Grupos Raciales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/etnología
4.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 22(5): 1598-603, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25408275

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Based on prior studies, we concluded that the female advantage in melanoma survival is caused by biological factors and not by differences in patient behavior. In this study, we investigated whether this biological advantage was caused by more aggressive tumors in males, as measured by mitotic rate (MR). METHODS: Data for patients with complete information on MR, Breslow thickness, ulceration and primary tumor location were extracted from the database of Melanoma Institute Australia in Sydney. A negative binomial regression model was used to assess the independent predictive value of sex for MR. Also, the impact of MR on the sex survival advantage was investigated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 9,306 patients were included in the analysis. Although males had a slightly higher MR at diagnosis, sex was not an independent predictor of MR after adjustment for all other prognostic factors: incidence rate ratio 0.98, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.02, p = 0.32. After adjustment for all prognostic factors, females had a survival advantage of 36 % (hazard ratio 0.65, 95 % CI 0.55-0.75, p < 0.001). When added as a confounder, MR did not influence this sex hazard ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Sex did not independently predict the aggressiveness of a primary melanoma. Furthermore, MR did not influence the known female survival advantage. Based on these results, the biological trait underlying sex survival differences in melanoma seems not to be tumor-related and therefore is more likely to be caused by host factors.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/patología , Mitosis , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice Mitótico , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Tasa de Supervivencia
5.
Haematologica ; 100(4): 525-33, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25512643

RESUMEN

Only a small number of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma take part in clinical trials, and elderly patients in particular are under-represented. Therefore, we studied data of the population-based nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry to determine trends in incidence, treatment and survival in an unselected patient population. We included all patients aged 15 years and older with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or Burkitt lymphoma in the period 1989-2010 and mantle cell lymphoma in the period 2001-2010, with follow up until February 2013. We examined incidence, first-line treatment and survival. We calculated annual percentage of change in incidence and carried out relative survival analyses. Incidence remained stable for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=23,527), while for mantle cell lymphoma (n=1,634) and Burkitt lymphoma (n=724) incidence increased for men and remained stable for women. No increase in survival for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma was observed during the period 1989-1993 and the period 1994-1998 [5-year relative survival 42% (95%CI: 39%-45%) and 41% (38%-44%), respectively], but increased to 46% (43%-48%) in the period 1999-2004 and to 58% (56%-61%) in the period 2005-2010. The increase in survival was most prominent in patients under 65 years of age, while there was a smaller increase in patients over 75 years of age. However, when untreated patients were excluded, patients over 75 years of age had a similar increase in survival to younger patients. In the Netherlands, survival for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma increased over time, particularly in younger patients, but also in elderly patients when treatment had been initiated. The improvement in survival coincided with the introduction of rituximab therapy and stem cell transplantation into clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Linfoma de Células B/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Incidencia , Linfoma de Células B/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B/historia , Linfoma de Células B/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Sistema de Registros , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Ann Hematol ; 94(1): 45-56, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25038918

RESUMEN

As survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) increases and the number of patients who live long rises, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) becomes a relevant endpoint. Few studies investigated this, mainly as a secondary endpoint in randomized clinical trials where patients with early stage CLL/SLL, and elderly/frail patients were underrepresented. The aim of our study was to assess HRQoL in a population-based setting, including these previously underrepresented patients. Out of 175 patients diagnosed with CLL/SLL between 2004 and 2011, 136 (78 %) returned the HRQoL questionnaire. The outcomes were compared to an age- and sex-matched norm population. Detailed data on stage and treatment were extracted from a population-based hematological registry (PHAROS). Patients ever treated for CLL/SLL reported significantly poorer HRQoL than the norm population (p < 0.01 with large clinically important differences. Interestingly, no differences were observed between the norm population and patients under active surveillance. In contrast to our hypothesis, patients treated with chlorambucil reported the lowest HRQoL scores. Drastic, long-lasting negative effects of starting treatment on HRQoL cannot be excluded, whereas active surveillance does not seem to provoke worrying, anxiety, or depressive symptoms. Further elaborate research into the impact of starting therapy on HRQoL is needed, especially in patients that are underrepresented in most clinical trials, and thoroughly consider its results during revision of treatment guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Clorambucilo/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/epidemiología , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/terapia , Vigilancia de la Población , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/diagnóstico , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Sistema de Registros
7.
Int J Cancer ; 134(3): 674-81, 2014 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23873096

RESUMEN

Cancer of the larynx is a frequently occurring head and neck cancer in The Netherlands. The main risk factors are smoking and excessive alcohol consumption. The aim of our study was to evaluate the progress against laryngeal cancer by studying trends in incidence, mortality and survival in The Netherlands. All patients in The Netherlands Cancer Registry diagnosed with invasive primary squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx during the period 1989-2010 were included for analysis. Time trends in incidence, mortality, treatment and survival were described for the total group and stratified by sex and subsite: glottis, supraglottis and subglottis. The most frequently affected subsite for men was the glottis (69%) and for women the supraglottis (55%). Glottic cancer was diagnosed at lower stages than supraglottic cancer. Incidence and mortality rates decreased for males with -2.5 and -2.8% per year, respectively, but remained stable for women, except for an increasing mortality rate in older women (EAPC: +2.5%). Five-year relative survival rates were stable for glottic (85%) and supraglottic (50%) cancer, whereas patients with high-staged cancers more often received radiotherapy. Multivariable analysis showed lower relative excess risks of dying for women, younger patients (<75 years), glottic cancer, lower stage cancer and those undergoing surgery. Changes in incidence and mortality rates are in line with changing smoking habits in The Netherlands. Declining incidence with stable survival rates gives rise to hope and worry at the same time.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Laríngeas/prevención & control , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Laríngeas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Laríngeas/mortalidad , Países Bajos/epidemiología
8.
Int J Cancer ; 135(4): 905-12, 2014 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24420527

RESUMEN

Our study assessed whether rising age, socioeconomic status (SES) and the presence of serious comorbidity affected treatment choice and survival in a population-based series of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in The Netherlands. Therefore, a consecutive series was studied, including all patients diagnosed with MIBC between 1995 and 2009 in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry, preceding centralization of cystectomy. The independent effects of age, SES and serious comorbidity on therapy choice and their effects on overall survival were estimated by multivariate logistic regression and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses, respectively. Out of the 2,445 patients, 38% were aged ≥ 75 years at diagnosis and 63% had at least one serious comorbid condition. Higher age and serious comorbidity were independent predictors for abstaining from cystectomy, where SES was not (61-74 vs. ≤ 60: odds ratio [OR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.0; ≥ 75 vs. ≤ 60: OR, 0.1; 95% CI,0.1-0.2; one comorbid condition vs. none: OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9; two vs. none: OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.8). Patients undergoing cystectomy, external beam radiotherapy or interstitial radiotherapy survived longer independent of age, SES and serious comorbidity (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.4-0.5; HR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.7-0.9; HR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.3-0.5, respectively). Consequently, preceding centralization of cystectomy, higher age and serious comorbidity were independent predictors for abstaining from cystectomy owing to an expected high rate of short-term medical problems. As cystectomy is associated with a better survival, independently of age, SES and serious comorbidity, it can be questioned whether cystectomy has been underutilised in elderly and in patients with serious comorbidity. Centralization might be a solution for this suggested underutilisation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Cistectomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Músculo Liso/patología , Invasividad Neoplásica , Países Bajos , Oportunidad Relativa , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Clase Social , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología
9.
Int J Cancer ; 135(1): 157-65, 2014 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24285345

RESUMEN

Observational and intervention studies suggest that low dose aspirin use may prevent cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate the protective effect of long term low dose aspirin use (≤100 mg daily) on cancer in general and site-specific cancer among low dose aspirin users in the Dutch general population. We conducted a population-based cohort study with detailed information on aspirin exposure and cancer incidence. Only incident (new) low dose aspirin users, who were included in the linkage between PHARMO and the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (1998-2010) and free of cancer before the start of follow up were included. A Cox proportional hazard model with cumulative aspirin use as a time-varying determinant was used to obtain hazard ratios (HR). Duration of aspirin use amongst 109,276 incident low dose aspirin users was not associated with a decreased risk of any of the site-specific cancers or cancer in general (adjusted HR per year of aspirin use for all cancers: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.04, HR of >6 years aspirin use compared to <2 years: 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.34). After adjusting for current and past aspirin use, 2-6 years of low dose aspirin use was associated with a reduced colorectal cancer risk compared to <2 years of aspirin use (adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.96). However, a clear dose-response relationship was not observed (adjusted HR >6 years aspirin use 0.95, 95% CI 0.60-1.49). Our results do not support the primary prevention of cancer among long term aspirin users.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/patología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo
10.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 145(2): 429-37, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24748569

RESUMEN

We determined the re-attendance rate at screening mammography after a single or a repeated false positive recall and we assessed the effects of transition from screen-film mammography (SFM) to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) on screening outcome in women recalled twice for the same mammographic abnormality. The study population consisted of a consecutive series of 302,912 SFM and 90,288 FFDM screens. During a 2 years follow-up period (until the next biennial screen), we collected the breast imaging reports and biopsy results of all recalled women. Re-attendance at biennial screening mammography was 93.2 % (95 % CI 93.1-93.3 %) for women with a negative screen (i.e., no recall at screening mammography), 65.4 % (95 % CI 64.0-66.8 %) for women recalled once, 56.7 % (95 % CI 47.1-66.4 %) for women recalled twice but for different lesions and 44.3 % (95 % CI 31.4-57.1 %) for women recalled twice for the same lesion. FFDM recalls comprised a significantly larger proportion of women who had been recalled twice for the same lesion (1.9 % of recalls (52 women) at FFDM vs. 0.9 % of recalls (37 women) at SFM, P < 0.001) and the positive predictive value of these recalls (PPV) was significantly lower at FFDM (15.4 vs. 35.1 %, P = 0.03). At review, 20 of 52 women (39.5 %, all with benign outcome) would not have been recalled for a second time at FFDM if the previous hard copy SFM screen had been available for comparison. We conclude that a repeated false positive recall for the same lesion significantly lowered the probability of screening re-attendance. The first round of FFDM significantly increased the proportion of women recalled twice for the same lesion, with a significantly lower PPV of these lesions. Almost 40 % of repeatedly recalled women would not have been recalled the second time if the previous hard copy SFM screen had been available for comparison at the time of FFDM.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Mamografía/métodos , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Países Bajos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA