Human cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell immune reconstitution in preemptively treated heart transplant recipients identifies subjects at critical risk for infection.

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection represents a major threat for heart transplant recipients (HTXs). CMV-specific T cells effectively control virus infection, and thus, assessment of antiviral immune recovery may have clinical utility in identifying HTXs at risk of infection. In this study, 10 CMV-seropositive (R(+)) pretransplant patients and 48 preemptively treated R(+) HTXs were examined before and after 100 days posttransplant. Preemptive treatment is supposed to favor the immune recovery. CMV DNAemia and gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay were employed to assess the viremia and immune reconstitution. HTXs could be categorized into three groups characterized by high (>100), medium (50 to 100), and low (<50) spot levels. Early-identified high responders efficiently controlled the infection and also maintained high immunity levels after 100 days after transplant. No episodes of grade ≥2R rejection occurred in the high responders. Midresponders were identified as a group with heterogeneous trends of immune reconstitution. Low responders were 41% and 21% of HTXs before and after 100 days posttransplant, respectively. Low responders were associated with a higher incidence of infection. The effect of viremia on immune recovery was investigated: a statistically significant inverse correlation between magnitude of viremia and immune recovery emerged; in particular, each 10-fold increase in viremia (>4 log(10) DNAemia/ml) was associated with a 36% decrease of the ELISPOT assay spot levels. All episodes of high viremia (>4 log(10) DNAemia/ml) occurred from 1 to 60 days after transplant. Thus, the concomitant evaluation of viremia and CMV immune reconstitution has clinical utility in identifying HTXs at risk of infection and may represent a helpful guide in making therapeutic choices.

Evaluation of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cell immune reconstitution revealed that baseline antiviral immunity, prophylaxis, or preemptive therapy but not antithymocyte globulin treatment contribute to CMV-specific T cell reconstitution in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The ultimate goal of organ transplantation is the reestablishment of organ function and the restoration of a solid immunity to prevent the assault of potentially deadly pathogens. T cell immunity is crucial in controlling cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. It is still unknown how preexisting antiviral T cell levels, prophylaxis, or preemptive antiviral strategies and pharmacological conditioning affect immune reconstitution. METHODS: Seventy preemptively treated CMV-seropositive recipients, 13 prophylaxis-treated CMV-seronegative recipients of seropositive donor transplants, 2 seropositive recipients of seronegative donor kidneys, and 27 pretransplant subjects were enrolled in a cross-sectional study and analyzed for CMV viremia (DNAemia) and CMV-specific T cell response (interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay) before transplantation and at 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 days after transplantation. RESULTS: CMV-seropositive transplant recipients displayed a progressive but heterogeneous pattern of immune reconstitution starting from day 60 after transplantation. CMV-seronegative recipients did not mount a detectable T cell response throughout the prophylaxis regimen. A single episode of CMV viremia (CMV copy number, 7000-170,000 copies/mL) was sufficient to prime a protective T cell immune response in CMV-seronegative recipients. Antithymocyte globulin treatment did not significantly affect CMV-specific T cell response. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline immunity, antiviral therapy but not antithymocyte globulin treatments profoundly influence T cell reconstitution in kidney transplant recipients.

Diagnostic utility of human cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell response monitoring in predicting viremia in pediatric allogeneic stem-cell transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Several studies proved that virus-specific T-cells play a pivotal role in controlling cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) patients. Fewer data are available in pediatric HSCT settings, when immature and inexperienced immune system may affect antiviral immune reconstitution. METHODS: We analyzed prospectively the CMV-specific T-cell reconstitution in a cohort of 31 pediatric allogeneic HSCT recipients at 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 360 days after HSCT. RESULTS: Depending on donor-recipient CMV serostatus, we observed distinct patterns and kinetics of CMV-specific T-cell immune reconstitution: during the early time-points, patients displayed a severe reduction in CMV-specific T-cell recovery in both CMV seropositive donor (D+) group and CMV seronegative donor (D-) on CMV seropositive recipients (R+). From day 90 onward, statistical significant differences in the profile of T-cell immune reconstitution emerged between D+ and D-. The pattern of immune reconstitution was characterized by heterogeneous kinetics and efficiencies: we report cases of: (1) spontaneous antiviral T-cell recovery with no previous viremia, (2) immune T-cell recovery anticipated by CMV viremia, and (3) no T-cell immune reconstitution despite previous viremia episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Given the heterogeneous scenarios of antiviral T-cell immune recovery in pediatric allogeneic HSCT, we conclude that the evaluation of the antiviral immune reconstitution is a promising and appealing system for identifying patients at higher risk of CMV infection. The use of interferon-γ ELISPOT test is a valid tool for immunological monitoring and predicting CMV viremia in pediatric HSCT.