RESUMEN
Giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) is a rare primary bone neoplasm, representing about 5% of all primary bone tumors. Most GCTBs are found in the epiphysis of long bones, with only 2% of GCTBs involving the skull. In recent years, the receptor activator of nuclear factor Kappa ligand monoclonal antibody denosumab has been demonstrated as a promising therapeutic option for GCTB; however, this is an evolving field. We present a case of a 57-year-old female with a rare GCTB in the right orbit and sinuses, originally thought to be an aneurysmal bone cyst. Her symptoms included proptosis, intermittent blurry vision, sinus congestion, and frontal headaches. After excision, the tumor recurred within 18 months. Upon repeat excision, a diagnosis of GCTB was made. The patient started denosumab therapy and had no tumor growth over the ensuing 2 years, with stability of symptoms and clinical signs on follow-up.
RESUMEN
Trastuzumab beyond first progression in the metastatic setting has been adopted based on limited data suggesting improved outcomes compared to second-line chemotherapy alone although predictive factors for preferential benefit remain elusive. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients receiving trastuzumab for HER2 + metastatic disease between Jan 1, 1999-June 15, 2011. Univariate and time to event analyses described treatment and survival patterns. Median duration of each line of therapy and overall survival times for covariates, including treatment era (pre versus post Jan 1, 2005), lines of trastuzumab-based therapy (1 versus 2 versus 3 + ), first-line chemotherapy partner (docetaxel/paclitaxel versus other) and median exposure to first-line trastuzumab-based therapy (=/> versus < cohort median) were estimated. A total of 119 patients received a median of two lines of trastuzumab-based therapy (range 1-8). Median overall survival was 21.8 months (95% CI = 14.5-27.1 m), by era was 15.6 m (95% CI = 9.7-24.8 m) versus 26.1 m (95% CI = 20.0-39.3 m; p = 0.11) and by lines of trastuzumab-based therapy received was 10.6 m (95% CI = 5.3-17.4 m) versus 13.9 m (95% CI = 9.5-27.6 m) versus 32.5 m (95% CI = 25-49.4 m) (p = 0.0014). Median overall survival was significantly longer for those receiving taxanes with trastuzumab compared to other first line partners (26.1 m, 95% CI = 17.8-31.4 m versus 14.5 m, 95% CI = 9.4-21.9 m, p = 0.02). Median overall survival with duration of first-line trastuzumab-based therapy =/> cohort median was 31.9 m (95% CI = 26.2-52.2 m) versus 10.3 m for shorter durations (95% CI = 6.9-15.6 m; p < 0.0001). Our observations support progression-free survival on first-line trastuzumab-based therapy as a clinically relevant predictive factor for overall survival benefit with the adoption of a trastuzumab beyond progression treatment strategy.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Trastuzumab , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We compared standard adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy with anthracycline-taxane combination chemotherapy in women with operable node-positive breast cancer. Here we report the final, 10-year follow-up analysis of disease-free survival, overall survival, and long-term safety. METHODS: BCIRG 001 was an open label, phase 3, multicentre trial in which 1491 patients aged 18-70 years with node-positive, early breast cancer and a Karnofsky score of 80% or more were randomly assigned to adjuvant treatment with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) or fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) every 3 weeks for six cycles. Randomisation was stratified according to institution and number of involved axillary lymph nodes per patient (one to three vs four or more). Disease-free survival was the primary endpoint and was defined as the interval between randomisation and breast cancer relapse, second primary cancer, or death, whichever occurred first. Efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. BCIRG 001 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00688740. FINDINGS: Enrolement took place between June 11, 1997 and June 3, 1999; 745 patients were assigned to receive TAC and 746 patients were assigned to receive FAC. After a median follow-up of 124 months (IQR 90-126), disease-free survival was 62% (95% CI 58-65) for patients in the TAC group and 55% (51-59) for patients in the FAC group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·80, 95% CI 0·68-0·93; log-rank p=0·0043). 10-year overall survival was 76% (95% CI 72-79) for patients in the TAC group and 69% (65-72) for patients in the FAC group (HR 0·74, 0·61-0·90; log-rank p=0·0020). TAC improved disease-free survival relative to FAC irrespective of nodal, hormone receptor, and HER2 status, although not all differences were significant in these subgroup analyses. Grade 3-4 heart failure occurred in 26 (3%) patients in the TAC group and 17 (2%) patients in the FAC group, and caused death in two patients in the TAC group and four patients in the FAC group. A substantial decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (defined as a relative decrease from baseline of 20% or more) was seen in 58 (17%) patients who received TAC and 41 (15%) patients who received FAC. Six patients who received TAC developed leukaemia or myelodysplasia, as did three patients who received FAC. INTERPRETATION: Our results provide evidence that the initial therapeutic outcomes seen at the 5-year follow-up with a docetaxel-containing adjuvant regimen are maintained at 10 years. However, a substantial percentage of patients had a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction, probably caused by anthracycline therapy, which warrants further investigation. FUNDING: Sanofi.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antraciclinas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estado de Ejecución de Karnofsky , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although contact days-days with health-care contact outside home-are increasingly adopted as a measure of time toxicity and treatment burden, they could also serve as a surrogate of treatment-related harm. We sought to assess the association between contact days and patient-reported outcomes and the prognostic ability of contact days. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of CO.17 that evaluated cetuximab vs supportive care in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. CO.17 collected European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 instrument data. We assessed the association between number of contact days in a window and changes in physical function and global health status and the association between number of contact days in the first 4 weeks with overall survival. RESULTS: There was a negative association between the number of contact days and change in physical function (per each additional contact day: at 4 weeks, 1.50-point decrease; 8 weeks, 1.06-point decrease; P < .0001 for both) but not with global health status. This negative association was seen in patients receiving cetuximab but not supportive care. More contact days in the first 4 weeks was associated with worse overall survival for all participants and patients receiving cetuximab (per each additional contact day: all participants, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.10; and cetuximab, adjusted HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.11; P < .0001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: In this secondary analysis of a clinical trial, more contact days early in the course were associated with declines in physical function and worse survival in all participants and in participants receiving cancer-directed treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00079066.
Asunto(s)
Cetuximab , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pronóstico , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Estado de Salud , Rendimiento Físico FuncionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: ABP 215 is a biosimilar to the reference product, bevacizumab, and was one of the first biosimilars approved by Health Canada for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study aimed to address gaps in real-world evidence (RWE) including patient characteristics, treatment safety (primary objective), and effectiveness (secondary objective) for first-line ABP 215 therapy in Canadian patients with mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective data were collected in 2 waves, at least 1 year (Wave 1) or 2 years (Wave 2) after commercial availability of ABP 215 at each participating site. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients from Wave 1 and 164 patients from Wave 2 treated with a minimum of 1 cycle of ABP 215 were included. At least one safety event of interest (EOI) was recorded for 34.7% of Wave 1 and 42.7% of Wave 2 patients. The median progression free survival (PFS) for Wave 1 and 2 patients were 9.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.71, 11.90) and 21.38 (95% CI: 15.82, not estimable) months, respectively. Median overall survival was not estimable for Wave 1 and was 26.45 months for Wave 2. CONCLUSION: The safety and effectiveness of ABP 215 observed in this real-world study were comparable to clinical trial findings and to other RWE with longer PFS in the current study.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Bevacizumab , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Canadá/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
(1) Background: Cancer is the leading cause of death in Canada, with significant resource limitation impacting the delivery of cancer care nationwide. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic forced additional resource restriction and diversion, further impacting care delivery. Our intention is to analyze the impact COVID-19 on a provincial medical oncology workload and bring attention to the limitations of the current workload metric for oncologists. (2) Methods: All medical oncology patient encounters were extracted and compared, collected by year and encounter type, from April 2014 through March 2022. (3) Results: There was an increase in all patient encounters by an average of 9.5% per year, including during the strictest COVID-19 restrictions. There was an increase in virtual care encounters from 37.9% to 52.1%. (4) Conclusions: Medical Oncology workloads have increased over time and estimates suggest growing demand. Little data exist to inform workforce requirements and actual workload is not captured by the current metric. Though volume of new consults continues to increase, COVID-19 has highlighted additional changes in the delivery of care, likely with lasting impact, little of which are included in the current workload metric.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Pandemias , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The time spent in pursuing treatments for advanced cancer can be substantial. We have previously proposed a pragmatic and patient-centered metric of these time costs-which we term time toxicity-as any day with physical health care system contact. This includes outpatient visits (eg, bloodwork, scans, etc), emergency department visits, and overnight stays in a health care facility. Herein, we sought to assess time toxicity in a completed randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.17 RCT that evaluated weekly cetuximab infusions versus supportive care alone in 572 patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Initial results reported a 6-week improvement in median overall survival (OS) with cetuximab (6.1 v 4.6 months). Subsequent analyses reported that benefit was restricted to patients with K-ras wild-type tumors. We calculated patient-level time toxicity by analyzing trial forms. We considered days without health care contact as home days. We compared medians of time measures across arms and stratified results by K-ras status. RESULTS: In the overall population, median time toxic days were higher in the cetuximab arm (28 v 10, P < .001) although median home days were not statistically different between arms (140 v 121, P = .09). In patients with K-ras-mutated tumors, cetuximab was associated with almost numerically equal home days (114 days v 112 days, P = .571) and higher time toxicity (23 days v 11 days, P < .001). In patients with K-ras wild-type tumors, cetuximab was associated with more home days (186 v 132, P < .001). CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept feasibility study demonstrates that measures of time toxicity can be extracted through secondary analyses of RCTs. In CO.17, despite an overall OS benefit with cetuximab, home days were statistically similar across arms. Such data can supplement traditional survival end points in RCTs. Further work should refine and validate the measure prospectively.[Media: see text].
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Cetuximab , CanadáRESUMEN
Importance: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have limited activity in microsatellite-stable (MSS) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) colorectal cancer. Recent findings suggest the efficacy of ICIs may be modulated by the presence of liver metastases (LM). Objective: To investigate the association between the presence of LM and ICI activity in advanced MSS colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this secondary analysis of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO26 (CCTG CO.26) randomized clinical trial, patients with treatment-refractory colorectal cancer were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to durvalumab plus tremelimumab or best supportive care alone between August 10, 2016, and June 15, 2017. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) with 80% power and 2-sided α = .10. The median follow-up was 15.2 (0.2-22.0) months. In this post hoc analysis performed from February 11 to 14, 2022, subgroups were defined based on the presence or absence of LM and study treatments. Intervention: Durvalumab plus tremelimumab or best supportive care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratios (HRs) and 90% CIs were calculated based on a stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model. Plasma tumor mutation burden at study entry was determined using a circulating tumor DNA assay. The primary end point of the study was OS, defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: Of 180 patients enrolled (median age, 65 [IQR, 36-87] years; 121 [67.2%] men; 19 [10.6%] Asian, 151 [83.9%] White, and 10 [5.6%] other race or ethnicity), LM were present in 127 (70.6%). For patients with LM, there was a higher proportion of male patients (94 of 127 [74.0%] vs 27 of 53 [50.9%]; P = .005), and the time from initial cancer diagnosis to study entry was shorter (median, 40 [range, 8-153] vs 56 [range, 14-181] months; P = .001). Plasma tumor mutation burden was significantly higher in patients with LM. Patients without LM had significantly improved PFS with durvalumab plus tremelimumab (HR, 0.54 [90% CI, 0.35-0.96]; P = .08; P = .02 for interaction). Disease control rate was 49% (90% CI, 36%-62%) in patients without LM treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab, compared with 14% (90% CI, 6%-38%) in those with LM (odds ratio, 5.70 [90% CI, 1.46-22.25]; P = .03). On multivariable analysis, patients without LM had significantly improved OS and PFS compared with patients with LM. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of the CCTG CO.26 study, the presence of LM was associated with worse outcomes for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Patients without LM had improved PFS and higher DCR with durvalumab plus tremelimumab. Liver metastases may be associated with poor outcomes of ICI treatment in advanced colorectal cancer and should be considered in the design and interpretation of future clinical studies evaluating this therapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias del Recto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Canadá , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are usually caused by somatic mutations, but there are rare germline variants that predispose patients to the development of one or, more commonly, multiple GISTs. We present 2 cases of multifocal GISTs related to previously unreported germline variants. The first case is a 28-year-old female who developed multiple gastric GISTs with widespread abdominal metastases that were resistant to imatinib. Assessment by Medical Genetics identified a germline SDHB splice site mutation (NM_003000.3, c.286 + 2T > G, p.?). The second case is a 64-year-old male who presented with multiple gastric tumors that were resistant to imatinib. Next-generation sequencing revealed a germline KIT exon 17 mutation (NM_000222.3, c.2459A > T, p.D820V). These cases highlight the diverse clinical presentations of patients with germline variants and raise several important points about the diagnosis and management of these patients, in particular: mutation in the SDH family of genes (somatic or germline) should be suspected in KIT and PDGFRA wild-type tumors; germline testing should be considered in patients with multiple GISTs or those who present with disease at a young age; and somatic next-generation sequencing cannot only help identify optimal therapy in all patients with GISTs but also help guide referral to Medical Genetics for appropriate patients.
Asunto(s)
Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Gástricas , Adulto , Femenino , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/genética , Células Germinativas/metabolismo , Células Germinativas/patología , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-kit/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Succinato Deshidrogenasa/genética , Succinato Deshidrogenasa/metabolismo , Succinato Deshidrogenasa/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
On behalf of the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists, we are pleased to present the abstracts of the 2022 Annual Meeting. The CAMO Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting (ASM) took place on 28 April 2022. Twenty-five (25) abstracts were selected for presentation as oral presentations and poster presentations. Awards for the top three (3) abstracts were presented during the ASM. All of them are marked as "Award Recipient". We congratulate all the presenters on their research work and contribution.
Asunto(s)
Oncólogos , Sociedades Médicas , Canadá , HumanosRESUMEN
On behalf of the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists, we are pleased to present the Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Meeting. The National CAMO Residents Research Day was held virtually on 1 April 2021 and the CAMO Virtual Annual Scientific Meeting (ASM) & Annual General Meeting (AGM) took place on 22 April 2021. Twenty (20) abstracts were selected for presentation as oral presentations and rapid-fire presentations. Awards for the top three (3) abstracts were presented during the ASM and AGM. All of them were marked as "Award Recipient". We congratulate all the presenters on their research work and contribution.
RESUMEN
The annual Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2019 was held in Morell, Prince Edward Island, 19-21 September 2019. Experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology, and surgical oncology who are involved in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies participated in presentations and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses multiple topics in the management of anal, colorectal, biliary tract, and gastric cancers, including: radiotherapy and systemic therapy for localized and advanced anal cancer; watch and wait strategy for the management of rectal cancer; role of testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency prior to commencement of fluoropyrimidine therapy; radiotherapy and systemic therapy in the adjuvant and unresectable settings for biliary tract cancer; and radiotherapy and systemic therapy in the perioperative setting for early-stage gastric cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Neoplasias del Recto , Canadá , Consenso , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Humanos , Oncología MédicaRESUMEN
Importance: Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibition has not shown activities in advanced refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), other than in those patients who are microsatellite-instability high (MSI-H). Objective: To evaluate whether combining programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibition improved patient survival in metastatic refractory CRC. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized phase 2 study was conducted in 27 cancer centers across Canada between August 2016 and June 2017, and data were analyzed on October 18, 2018. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; received all available standard systemic therapies (fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab if appropriate; cetuximab or panitumumab if RAS wild-type tumors; regorafenib if available); were aged 18 years or older; had adequate organ function; had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and measurable disease. Interventions: We randomly assigned patients to receive either 75 mg of tremelimumab every 28 days for the first 4 cycles plus 1500 mg durvalumab every 28 days, or best supportive care alone (BSC) in a 2:1 ratio. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and a 2-sided P<.10 was considered statistically significant. Circulating cell-free DNA from baseline plasma was used to determine microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB). Results: Of 180 patients enrolled (121 men [67.2%] and 59 women [32.8%]; median [range] age, 65 [36-87] years), 179 were treated. With a median follow-up of 15.2 months, the median OS was 6.6 months for durvalumab and tremelimumab and 4.1 months for BSC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 90% CI, 0.54-0.97; P = .07). Progression-free survival was 1.8 months and 1.9 months respectively (HR, 1.01; 90% CI, 0.76-1.34). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were significantly more frequent with immunotherapy (75 [64%] patients in the treatment group had at least 1 grade 3 or higher adverse event vs 12 [20%] in the BSC group). Circulating cell-free DNA analysis was successful in 168 of 169 patients with available samples. In patients who were microsatellite stable (MSS), OS was significantly improved with durvalumab and tremelimumab (HR, 0.66; 90% CI, 0.49-0.89; P = .02). Patients who were MSS with plasma TMB of 28 variants per megabase or more (21% of MSS patients) had the greatest OS benefit (HR, 0.34; 90% CI, 0.18-0.63; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance: This phase 2 study suggests that combined immune checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab plus tremelimumab may be associated with prolonged OS in patients with advanced refractory CRC. Elevated plasma TMB may select patients most likely to benefit from durvalumab and tremelimumab. Further confirmation studies are warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02870920.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Paliativos , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Canadá , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We compared docetaxel plus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) with fluorouracil plus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable node-positive breast cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1491 women with axillary node-positive breast cancer to six cycles of treatment with either TAC or FAC as adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The primary end point was disease-free survival. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 55 months, the estimated rates of disease-free survival at five years were 75 percent among the 745 patients randomly assigned to receive TAC and 68 percent among the 746 randomly assigned to receive FAC, representing a 28 percent reduction in the risk of relapse (P=0.001) in the TAC group. The estimated rates of overall survival at five years were 87 percent and 81 percent, respectively. Treatment with TAC resulted in a 30 percent reduction in the risk of death (P=0.008). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 65.5 percent in the TAC group and 49.3 percent in the FAC group (P<0.001); rates of febrile neutropenia were 24.7 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively (P<0.001). Grade 3 or 4 infections occurred in 3.9 percent of the patients who received TAC and 2.2 percent of those who received FAC (P=0.05); no deaths occurred as a result of infection. Two patients in each group died during treatment. Congestive heart failure and acute myeloid leukemia occurred in less than 2 percent of the patients in each group. Quality-of-life scores decreased during chemotherapy but returned to baseline levels after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy with TAC, as compared with FAC, significantly improves the rates of disease-free and overall survival among women with operable node-positive breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Análisis de Supervivencia , Taxoides/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Eniluracil (776C85), a potent inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, allows fluorouracil (5-FU) to be administered orally on a schedule that simulates continuous-infusion 5-FU. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the objective tumor response rate of orally administered eniluracil and 5-FU in the treatment of anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer were enrolled onto this open-label, phase II, multicenter study. Patients received orally administered 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) with eniluracil given in a 10:1 ratio (eniluracil:5-FU) twice daily for the first 28 days of each 35-day cycle. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled. Eight partial responses were observed in 84 patients (10%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2% to 17.9%), and 20 patients (24%) had stable disease. The median duration of partial response was 20.1 weeks (95% CI, 12 to 26.7 weeks). The median duration of progression-free survival and overall survival for all patients was 9.9 weeks and 40.4 weeks, respectively. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in intensity. Diarrhea, nausea, malaise/fatigue, vomiting, and mucositis were the most common treatment-related nonhematologic adverse events. The most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were malaise/fatigue and diarrhea, occurring in 17% and 7% of patients, respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was low. Grade 3 or 4 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 17% of patients. CONCLUSION: Eniluracil-5-FU has modest antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in anthracycline- and taxane-resistant breast cancer. Treatment was convenient, and patient compliance was high.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Fluorouracilo/farmacología , Taxoides , Uracilo/análogos & derivados , Uracilo/farmacología , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/farmacología , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uracilo/administración & dosificación , Uracilo/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study (FUMA3008) conducted in the United States and Canada compared the safety and efficacy of EU/5-FU (11.5 mg/m(2)/1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily for 28 days every 35 days) with that of intravenous 5-FU/LV (425 mg/m(2)/20 mg/m(2) once daily for 5 days every 28 days) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 981 patients were randomized and 964 patients received treatment (485 EU/5FU, 479 5FU/LV). Survival for EU/5-FU was not statistically equivalent (but not statistically inferior) to that for 5-FU/LV (hazard ratio, 0.880; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.03). Median duration of survival was 13.3 months in the EU/5-FU group and 14.5 months in the 5-FU/LV group. Median duration of progression-free survival for EU/5-FU was statistically inferior to that of the control group (20.0 weeks [95% CI, 19.1 to 20.9 weeks] v 22.7 weeks [95% CI, 18.3 to 24.6 weeks]; P =.01). Both treatments were well tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity in both groups; treatment-related grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 19% of patients treated with EU/5-FU and 16% of patients receiving 5-FU/LV (P =.354). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 5% of EU/5-FU patients and 47% of 5-FU/LV patients. CONCLUSION: Safety profiles of both treatments were acceptable. Although antitumor activity was observed, EU/5-FU did not meet the protocol-specified statistical criteria for equivalence to 5-FU/LV in terms of OS.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Uracilo/análogos & derivados , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uracilo/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer among males and second among females worldwide. The treatment landscape for advanced CRC (aCRC) is rapidly evolving and there are now a number of randomized trials assessing treatment of aCRC beyond first-line, prompting important questions about how to optimize therapy and maximize benefit. The availability of targeted agents has increased the complexity of post-progression treatment of aCRC. Targeted biological agents with varying modes of action are now approved for use in second-line and beyond, including the VEGF-inhibitors bevacizumab and aflibercept, the VEGFR/multikinase-inhibitor regorafenib, and the EGFR-inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab. This article provides a systematic overview of the available phase III trial data, discusses biomarkers predictive of response to treatment, addresses safety concerns associated with specific agents, and provides practical, evidence-based recommendations for the later lines of treatment for patients with unresectable aCRC.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/metabolismo , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Bevacizumab , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Cetuximab , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Humanos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Panitumumab , Compuestos de Fenilurea/farmacología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/farmacología , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/farmacología , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/farmacología , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 study showed that patients with advanced colorectal cancer had improved overall survival when cetuximab, an epidermal growth factor receptor-targeting antibody, was given in addition to best supportive care. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using prospectively collected resource utilization and health utility data for patients in the CO.17 study who received cetuximab plus best supportive care (N = 283) or best supportive care alone (N = 274). METHODS: Direct medical resource utilization data were collected, including medications, physician visits, toxicity management, blood products, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Mean survival times for the study arms were calculated for the entire population and for the subset of patients with wild-type KRAS tumors over an 18- to 19-month period. All costs were presented in 2007 Canadian dollars. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to determine the robustness of the results. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were determined. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and the incremental cost-utility ratios were estimated by use of a nonparametric bootstrapping method (with 1000 iterations). RESULTS: For the entire study population, the mean improvement in overall and quality-adjusted survival with cetuximab was 0.12 years and 0.08 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), respectively. The incremental cost with cetuximab compared with best supportive care was $23,969. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $199,742 per life-year gained (95% CI = $125,973 to $652,492 per life-year gained) and the incremental cost-utility ratio was $299,613 per QALY gained (95% CI = $187,440 to $898,201 per QALY gained). For patients with wild-type KRAS tumors, the incremental cost with cetuximab was $33,617 and mean gains in overall and quality-adjusted survival were 0.28 years and 0.18 QALYs, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $120,061 per life-year gained (95% CI = $88,679 to $207,075 per life-year gained) and the incremental cost-utility ratio was $186,761 per QALY gained (95% CI = $130,326 to $334,940 per QALY gained). In a sensitivity analysis, cetuximab cost and patient survival were the only variables that influenced cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of cetuximab over best supportive care alone in unselected advanced colorectal cancer patients is high and sensitive to drug cost. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were lower when the analysis was limited to patients with wild-type KRAS tumors.