RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Prior studies suggest hypothermia may be beneficial in acute respiratory distress syndrome, but cooling causes shivering and increases metabolism. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of performing a randomized clinical trial of hypothermia in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving treatment with neuromuscular blockade because they cannot shiver. DESIGN: Retrospective study and pilot, prospective, open-label, feasibility study. SETTING: Medical ICU. PATIENTS: Retrospective review of 58 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome based on Berlin criteria and PaO2/FIO2 less than 150 who received neuromuscular blockade. Prospective hypothermia treatment in eight acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with PaO2/FIO2 less than 150 receiving neuromuscular blockade. INTERVENTION: Cooling to 34-36°C for 48 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Core temperature, hemodynamics, serum glucose and electrolytes, and P/F were sequentially measured, and medians (interquartile ranges) presented, 28-day ventilator-free days, and hospital mortality were calculated in historical controls and eight cooled patients. Average patient core temperature was 36.7°C (36-37.3°C), and fever occurred during neuromuscular blockade in 30 of 58 retrospective patients. In the prospectively cooled patients, core temperature reached target range less than or equal to 4 hours of initiating cooling, remained less than 36°C for 92% of the 48 hours cooling period without adverse events, and was lower than the controls (34.35°C [34-34.8°C]; p < 0.0001). Compared with historical controls, the cooled patients tended to have lower hospital mortality (75% vs 53.4%; p = 0.26), more ventilator-free days (9 [0-21.5] vs 0 [0-12]; p = 0.16), and higher day 3 P/F (255 [160-270] vs 171 [120-214]; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Neuromuscular blockade alone does not cause hypothermia but allowed acute respiratory distress syndrome patients to be effectively cooled. Results support conducting a randomized clinical trial of hypothermia in acute respiratory distress syndrome and the feasibility of studying acute respiratory distress syndrome patients receiving neuromuscular blockade.
Asunto(s)
Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/métodos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Tiritona/fisiología , APACHE , Adulto , Glucemia , Temperatura Corporal/fisiología , Electrólitos/sangre , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/terapia , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/terapia , Reumatología/normas , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Humanos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Reumatología/normas , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Enfermedad Mixta del Tejido Conjuntivo/complicaciones , Enfermedad Mixta del Tejido Conjuntivo/diagnóstico , Miositis/diagnóstico , Miositis/complicaciones , Síndrome de Sjögren/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Sjögren/complicaciones , Prueba de PasoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. RESULTS: Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/diagnóstico , Reumatología/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). METHODS: We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes , Glucocorticoides , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Enfermedades Reumáticas , Reumatología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/complicaciones , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Reumatología/normas , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Estados Unidos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
Bamlanivimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, is available for ambulatory treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This real-world study confirms the efficacy of bamlanivimab in reducing hospital admissions and emergency department visits among high-risk outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 illness and reveals a trend toward improved mortality.
RESUMEN
Cardiac manifestations of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), including arrhythmia, have been described in the literature. However, to our knowledge, association of COVID-19 with bradycardia has not been reported. This case study describes sinus bradycardia as a potential manifestation of COVID-19. This is a retrospective case series of four patients with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, admitted to St. Luke's University Health Network ICU between 24 March 2020 and 5 April 2020. Medical records of these patients were reviewed using the EPIC electronic health record system. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were reviewed against periods of bradycardia in each patient. The patient group comprised two males and two females. Two patients had pre-existing cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities but no history of arrythmias. Heart rates ranged between 66 and 88 beats/min on admission. The lowest rates during bradycardia were between 42 and 49 beats/min. The onset of sinus bradycardia in patients 1, 2, and 3 were day nine, 15, and five of illness, respectively. Patient 4 had three episodes of bradycardia, starting on day 10 of illness. Patients' bradycardia episodes lasted one to 14 days. During bradycardia, maximum body temperatures ranged between 99.9 and 100.2 degree Fahrenheit. Patients 2, 3, and 4 required vasopressors to maintain mean arterial pressure > 65 mmHg during episodes. All four patients were on propofol at some point during bradycardia with patients 1, 2, and 3 also receiving dexmedetomidine. There was no consistent correlation of these medications with bradycardia. Electrocardiogram (ECG) findings included sinus bradycardia. Prolonged QTc interval observed in patient 2 on admission improved during bradycardia. Transient sinus bradycardia is a possible manifestation of COVID-19 and is important for close CV surveillance. Etiology can be multifactorial, but severe hypoxia, inflammatory damage of cardiac pacemaker cells, and exaggerated response to medications are possible triggers. High levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines may act directly on the sinoatrial (SA) node contributing to the development of bradycardia. This may be a warning sign of the onset of a serious cytokine storm. An increased awareness of possible exaggerated bradycardia response is important to consider with the use of empiric medications which have arrhythmogenic effects.
RESUMEN
Acute pancreatitis is an inflammatory condition caused by an insult to the pancreas. Pancreatitis is associated with local and systemic complications such as splenic vein thrombosis and systemic inflammatory response syndromes (SIRS), respectively. Pancreatitis increases the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) through a combination of increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and systemic vascular injury. However, DVT and pulmonary embolism remain under-recognized and underappreciated complications of acute pancreatitis as they fall through the cracks in the commonly used venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment model. We therefore propose that VTE prophylaxis needs to be considered by all clinicians when admitting and evaluating patients with acute pancreatitis and that acute pancreatitis needs to be included on the various VTE risk assessment calculators as it is a significant risk factor for the development of VTE.
RESUMEN
Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is uncommon following solid organ transplantation. We present a case of PTLD presenting as hematochezia and abdominal pain in a 66-year-old man, who had undergone bilateral lung transplantation with alemtuzumab induction 7 months prior to presentation. The transplant serologic status was "high-risk" for the presence of both Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serologies in the donor and negative serologies in the recipient. Biopsies taken during colonoscopy stained strongly positive for EBV-encoded RNA. Mediastinal lymph node biopsies also showed atypical, EBV-positive lymphohistiocytic infiltration with focal necrosis. The patient's hospital course was complicated by treatment side effects, most notably bowel perforation following rituximab. In this case report the topic of PTLD is reviewed and consideration is given to whether alemtuzumab induction may have contributed to the patient's development of PTLD.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/virología , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Anciano , Herpesvirus Humano 4/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Perforación Intestinal/inducido químicamente , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Linfoproliferativos/etiología , Masculino , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sleepiness and fatigue are commonly reported by family members of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Sleep deprivation may result in cognitive deficits. Sleep deprivation and cognitive blunting have not been quantitatively assessed in this population. We sought to determine the proportion of family members of ICU patients that experience excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep-associated functional impairment, and cognitive blunting. METHODS: Multicenter, cross-sectional survey of family members of patients admitted to ICUs at the University of Maryland Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University Hospital, and Christiana Hospital. Family members of ICU patients were evaluated using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, a validated survey assessing sleepiness in everyday situations (normal, less than 10); the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10 (FOSQ-10), a questionnaire quantifying the impact of sleepiness on daily activities (normal, at least 17.9); and psychomotor vigilance testing, a test of cognitive function, in relation to sleep deprivation (normal mean reaction time less than 500 ms). RESULTS: A total of 225 family members were assessed. Of these, 50.2 % (113/225) had Epworth scores consistent with excessive daytime sleepiness. Those with sleepiness experienced greater impairment in performing daily activities by FOSQ-10 (15.6 ± 3.0 vs 17.4 ± 2.2, p < 0.001). Cognitive blunting was found in 13.3 % (30/225) of family members and 15.1 % (14/93) of surrogate decision-makers. Similar rates of cognitive blunting as reported by mean reaction time of at least 500 ms were found among family members whether or not they reported sleepiness (15.0 % (17/113) vs. 11.6 % (13/112), p = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Half of the family members of ICU patients suffer from excessive daytime sleepiness. This sleepiness is associated with functional impairment, but not cognitive blunting.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Familia , Fases del Sueño , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the prevalence of and clinical variables associated with learned helplessness, a psychologic state characterized by reduced motivation, difficulty in determining causality, and depression, in family members of patients admitted to ICUs. METHODS: We conducted an observational survey study of a prospectively defined cohort of family members, spouses, and partners of patients admitted to surgical, medical, and trauma ICUs at a large academic medical center. Two validated instruments, the Learned Helplessness Scale and the Perceived Stress Scale, were used, and self-report of patient clinical characteristics and subject demographics were collected. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-nine family members were assessed. Of these, 238 of 460 (51.7%) had responses consistent with a significant degree of learned helplessness. Among surrogate decision-makers, this proportion was 50% (92 of 184). Characteristics associated with significant learned helplessness included grade or high school education (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.29-8.27; P = .01) and Perceived Stress Scale score > 18 (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 2.65-6.50; P < .001). The presence of a patient advance directive or do not resuscitate (DNR) order was associated with reduced odds of significant learned helplessness (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.98; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of family members of patients in the ICU experience significant learned helplessness. Risk factors for learned helplessness include lower educational levels, absence of an advance directive or DNR order, and higher stress levels among family members. Significant learned helplessness in family members may have negative implications in the collaborative decision-making process.