RESUMEN
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of invasive vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Background: Heart failure is characterized by autonomic nervous system imbalance and electrical events that can lead to sudden death. The effects of parasympathetic (vagal) stimulation in patients with HF are not well-established. Methods: From May 1994 to July 2020, a systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for clinical trials, comparing VNS with medical therapy for the management of chronic HFrEF (EF ≤ 40%). A meta-analysis of several outcomes and adverse effects was completed, and GRADE was used to assess the level of evidence. Results: Four randomized controlled trials (RCT) and three prospective studies, totalizing 1,263 patients were identified; 756 treated with VNS and 507 with medical therapy. RCT data were included in the meta-analysis (fixed-effect distribution). Adverse effects related to VNS were observed in only 11% of patients. VNS was associated with significant improvement (GRADE = High) in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (OR, 2.72, 95% CI: 2.07-3.57, p < 0.0001), quality of life (MD -14.18, 95% CI: -18.09 to -10.28, p < 0.0001), a 6-min walk test (MD, 55.46, 95% CI: 39.11-71.81, p < 0.0001) and NT-proBNP levels (MD -144.25, 95% CI: -238.31 to -50.18, p = 0.003). There was no difference in mortality (OR, 1.24; 95% CI: 0.82-1.89, p = 0.43). Conclusions: A high grade of evidence demonstrated that vagal nerve stimulation improves NYHA functional class, a 6-min walk test, quality of life, and NT-proBNP levels in patients with chronic HFrEF, with no differences in mortality.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estimulación del Nervio Vago , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , Inflamación/terapia , Nervio Vago/fisiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUÇÃO: Vários estudos foram realizados para definir preditores de eventos adversos pós-intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP). Pacientes cujo fluxo fracionado de reserva do miocárdio (FFR) pós-procedimento é < 0,90 apresentam índice de eventos cardíacos adversos maiores em 6 meses pelo menos 3 vezes maior do que aqueles cujo FFR é ≥ 0,90. Este estudo teve por objetivo identificar fatores clínicos, angiográficos e do procedimento associados a FFR pós-ICP < 0,90. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos 193 pacientes (256 lesões) tratados entre 2004 e 2005, e o FFR foi medido antes e depois da ICP em todos os vasos tratados. Os pacientes foram divididos nos grupos FFR < 0,90 e FFR ≥ 0,90. Análise multivariada por regressão logística foi utilizada para determinar as razões de chances (odds ratio - OR) ajustadas. RESULTADOS: Foi possível obter o FFR em todas as lesões. Não se observou diferença nos parâmetros clínicos entre os dois grupos de pacientes. Houve diferença em alguns parâmetros angiográficos e do procedimento, porém, ao aplicarmos o modelo de regressão logística, a única variável que se associou com FFR pós-ICP < 0,90 foi o tratamento da artéria descendente anterior (OR = 12,1; IC 95% 6,4-22,9; P < 0,01). CONCLUSÕES: A única variável preditora de FFR pós-ICP < 0,90 foi o tratamento da artéria descendente anterior.
BACKGROUND: Several studies were performed to define predictors of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients whose post-procedure myocardial fractional flow of reserve (FFR) is < 0.90 have an incidence of major cardiac events at 6 months at least 3 times higher than those whose FFR is ≥ 0.90. The aim of this study was to identify clinical, angiographic and procedure-related factors associated with a post-PCI FFR < 0.90. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-three patients (256 lesions) treated between 2004 and 2005 were included, and FFR was measured before and after PCI in all of the treated vessels. Patients were divided into groups with FFR < 0.90 and FFR ≥ 0.90. Logistic regression multivariate analysis was used to determine the adjusted odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: FFR was measured in all lesions. No difference was observed in clinical parameters between groups. There were differences in angiographic and procedure-related parameters, however, when the logistic regression model was used, the only variable associated to post-PCI FFR < 0.90 was the treatment of the left anterior descending artery (OR, 12.1; 95% CI, 6.4-22.9; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The only predictor of a FFR < 0.90 after PCI was the treatment of the left anterior descending artery.