Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 125(6): 968-975, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35088904

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the perioperative surgical outcomes for head and neck cancer patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed using data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2010 and 2014. Logistic regression analysis by enter and backward stepwise methods were used. RESULTS: A total of 8346 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with concomitant CVD had a higher frequency of complications (57.6%) compared with those without (47.4%) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-1.48, p < 0.001). Patients with CVD comorbidities were prone to experience in-patient mortality at both admission (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.42-4.05) and readmission (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.10-5.87). CVD patients have prolonged hospital admission (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.02-1.27, p = 0.020) and higher cost (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.15-1.43, p < 0.001). Patients with congestive heart failure were prone to 30 days readmission (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.10-2.53, p = 0.019) and 90 days (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.14-2.39, p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: This is the first study identifying factors predicting higher risk of perioperative complications of surgical management of head and neck cancer. Those with CVD had higher risk of adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Atención a la Salud , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(11): 73, 2020 Oct 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098008

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Multimodal pain management is the most effective way to treat postsurgical pain. However, the use of opioids for acute pain management has unfortunately been a significant contributor to the current opioid epidemic. The use of opioids should be limited and only considered a "rescue" pain medication after other modalities of pain management have been utilized. RECENT FINDINGS: It may be difficult to curtail the use of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain; however, in the postsurgical setting, there is compelling evidence that an opioid-centric analgesic approach is not necessary for good patient outcomes and healthcare cost benefits. Opioid-related adverse effects are the leading cause of preventable harm in the hospital setting. After the realization in recent years of the many harmful effects of opioids, alternative regimens including the use of multimodal analgesia have become a standard practice in acute pain management. Exparel, a long-lasting liposomal bupivacaine local anesthetic agent, has many significant benefits in the management of postoperative pain. Overall, the literature suggests that Exparel may be a significant component for postoperative multimodal pain control owing to its efficacy and long duration of action.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Liposomas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA