Impact of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiretroviral Drugs in Routine Clinical Management of People Living With HIV: A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of HIV infection has evolved significantly since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. As a result, a response rate of 90%-95% now represents a realistically achievable target. Given this background, it is difficult to imagine the additional benefits that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could provide in the management of HIV infection. METHODS: This article is not intended to provide a systematic literature review on TDM of antiretroviral agents; rather, the authors aim to discuss the potential added value of TDM in the optimal management of people living with HIV (PLWH) in selected real-life clinical scenarios based on data collected over 10 years by their TDM service. RESULTS: Some clinical situations, in which the selection of the optimal antiretroviral therapy is challenging, have been identified. These include poorly compliant patients, suboptimal antiretroviral therapies (in terms of both efficacy and toxicity), polypharmacy with a high risk of drug-drug interactions, and different patient populations, such as pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: The transformation of HIV infection from a near-universally fatal illness to a lifelong chronic disease has resulted in an HIV population that is growing and aging, placing new and increasing demands on public programs and health services. Increasingly, the management of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and drug-drug interaction, and their impact on antiretroviral therapy will have to be undertaken. These clinical settings represent some of the new frontiers for the use of TDM with the goal of achieving optimal prescription and outcome for PLWH.

Drug-Drug Interactions Between Antiretrovirals and Carbamazepine/Oxcarbazepine: A Real-Life Investigation.

BACKGROUND: Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are potent modulators of metabolic enzymes. Hence, potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may occur between these 2 drugs and antiretrovirals. Here, we aimed to assess the relevance of these drug-drug interactions in real-life clinical settings. METHODS: Patients treated concomitantly with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine and antiretrovirals for at least 3 months were considered. Data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of both antiepileptic and antiretrovirals as trough concentrations were collected. HIV-infected patients not concomitantly treated with antiepileptic drugs and who underwent TDM for antiretrovirals in the previous 2 years were considered as controls. RESULTS: Eleven HIV-positive patients prescribed carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine were identified. All the TDM evaluations for carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine that resulted were within the therapeutic ranges. TDM results of darunavir measured in these patients were comparable with values usually measured in the control group. Conversely, the trough concentrations for atazanavir and dolutegravir demonstrated significantly lower values when compared with values usually measured in HIV-infected patients not treated with antiepileptic drugs (190 ± 91 versus 546 ± 380 ng/mL; -65%, P < 0.001; 191 ± 78 versus 1096 ± 510 ng/mL; -83%, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine with atazanavir or dolutegravir should be avoided owing to the potential risk of virological failure; in case of these 2 drugs, the adoption of TDM is strongly advisable, eventually combining with increased antiretroviral doses.

Intrathecal nusinersen treatment for SMA in a dedicated neuromuscular clinic: an example of multidisciplinary and integrated care.

Nusinsersen is now available in Italy for all SMA types. We describe the experience with intrathecal treatment with nusinersen in 50 patients with SMA at the NEMO Center (NEuroMuscular Omniservice Clinical Center) in Milan, a neuromuscular patient-centered clinic hosted within Niguarda Hospital, a National Public General Hospital. Our results indicate that the pathway of care described outweighs the burden due to the repeated intrathecal injections. Irrespective of age and severity, the treatment is feasible, accessible, and replicable provided that there is a multidisciplinary team having experience and training in SMA.

Comparison of the ARK Immunoassay With High-Performance Liquid Chromatography With Ultraviolet Detection for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Linezolid.

BACKGROUND: An enzymatic immunoassay is under development by ARK Diagnostics, Inc for the quantification of plasma concentrations of linezolid (LZD). In this study, the authors aimed to assess the performance of this immunoassay using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) ultraviolet method as reference. METHODS: Within- and between-day in vitro inaccuracy and imprecision of the ARK LZD assay were firstly tested using spiked quality controls (QC) provided by the kit manufacturer. Subsequently, the performance of the immunoassay was verified in vivo by analyzing 170 trough LZD plasma samples from patients on antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Imprecision of the spiked QCs resulted in every instance less than 7.0% and the inaccuracy ranged from -1.5% to 6.6%. The linear correlation between the 2 methods was documented by the Pearson analysis of plasma samples from patients on LZD therapy (coefficient = 0.9619). By Bland-Altman comparison, 8.2% of the patient samples resulted out of the limits ranging from -27.0% to +33.5%, with most of them having LZD concentrations exceeding 10 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable analytical performance of the ARK LZD immunoassay has been demonstrated both with spiked QC and patients' samples, making it a viable alternative to HPLC for the therapeutic drug monitoring of LZD in clinical practice in laboratory hospitals that do not have HPLC equipment.

Development and Validation of a Chromatographic Ultraviolet Method for the Simultaneous Quantification of Dolutegravir and Rilpivirine in Human Plasma.

BACKGROUND: We have developed and validated a high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous quantification, in human plasma, of dolutegravir, a new human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) integrase inhibitor, and rilpivirine, a novel HIV nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. METHODS: An internal standard (quinoxaline) was added to plasma aliquots (500 µL), and a simple solid-phase extraction procedure was applied. Chromatographic separation of the drugs and internal standard was achieved with a gradient of acetonitrile and acetate buffer, and with an analytical run time of 25 minutes using an XBridge C18 column. The column eluate was monitored at 260 nm for dolutegravir and the internal standard and at 305 nm for rilpivirine. RESULTS: The method was linear in the range of 20-8000 and 20-2000 ng/mL for dolutegravir and rilpivirine, respectively (mean r ≥ 0.993 on 10 replicates for both analytes). Mean intraday and interday precision and inaccuracy were <15% for both compounds. The mean recovery was 73% and 80% for dolutegravir and rilpivirine, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method we developed showed a good analytical performance required for therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals, leading to potential improvements in HIV-infected patient care and laboratory management.

Comparison of the QMS Analyzer With HPLC-UV for the Quantification of Lamotrigine Concentrations in Human Plasma Samples.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a turbidimetric immunoassay method has been developed for use in the form of a QMS lamotrigine (LTG) commercial immunoassay. This study was designed to evaluate the performance of this immunoassay using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) method as the reference. METHODS: The performance of QMS was initially tested using drug-free plasma spiked with different amounts of LTG and, subsequently, by analyzing 61 trough plasma samples from epileptic patients given the drug as part of their maintenance antiepileptic therapies. RESULTS: The correlation between LTG concentrations measured by QMS and HPLC was good, with a Pearson coefficient of 0.968 (P < 0.0001). The Bland-Altman approach showed that LTG concentrations measured with QMS exceeded HPLC on an average by 15.6% (limits of agreement, -18% to +63%), with a concentration-dependent performance (mean percent bias, 49.5 ± 8.2% and 0.6 ± 12.7% for concentrations less than 2 mg/L and greater than 14.9 mg/L, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The QMS provided acceptable analytical performance across a wide concentration range for routine LTG measurements, being at least comparable with the other commercial immunoassays. It could be, therefore, considered as a viable alternative to HPLC methods for routine LTG monitoring in the clinical practice, although its suitability for accurate analysis of samples with low concentration is limited.

Comparison of the in vivo pharmacokinetics and in vitro dissolution of raltegravir in HIV patients receiving the drug by swallowing or by chewing.

The pharmacokinetics of raltegravir (RAL) in HIV patients is characterized by high interpatient/intrapatient variability. We investigated the potential contribution of the drug pharmaceutical formulation to RAL pharmacokinetics. We first compared in vivo the pharmacokinetics of RAL for 67 patients to whom the drug was administered by swallowing the intact tablet with those obtained from 13 HIV-infected patients who chewed the RAL tablet due to swallowing difficulties. Subsequently, we evaluated in vitro the dissolution of RAL tablets under different conditions. In the in vivo study, we found that patients given RAL by chewing the tablets presented pharmacokinetic profiles characterized by significantly higher RAL absorption than did patients receiving the drug by swallowing. The in vitro studies showed that when the whole tablets were exposed to an acidic medium, the release of RAL was very low, whereas when the tablets were crushed, the profiles presented significantly higher concentrations of RAL. Crushed tablets tested in water or in a pH 6.8 buffer exhibited prompt and complete dissolution of RAL. HIV-infected patients receiving RAL by chewing the tablet showed higher drug absorption and reduced pharmacokinetic variability compared with patients swallowing the intact tablet. This is related to problems in tablet disintegration and to erratic drug absorption. The amelioration of the RAL pharmaceutical formulation could improve drug pharmacokinetics.

Inter- and intra-patient variability of raltegravir pharmacokinetics in HIV-1-infected subjects.

OBJECTIVES: Limited studies in healthy volunteers and in HIV-1-infected patients have shown that raltegravir pharmacokinetics are characterized by high inter-patient variability. Only scanty data are, however, available on intra-patient raltegravir variability. The present study was designed to evaluate in parallel the inter- and intra-patient variability of raltegravir pharmacokinetics in HIV-1-infected patients during routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). METHODS: Fifteen HIV-infected patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy containing 400 mg of raltegravir twice daily were included in the study. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed during two consecutive visits. Only patients given raltegravir for at least 1 month and with no changes in antiretroviral and concomitant therapy between the two pharmacokinetic evaluations were considered. Raltegravir plasma concentrations were determined by a validated HPLC method. Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after the morning drug dose. Raltegravir AUC(0-12) was estimated using a recently developed algorithm. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic evaluation was repeated after an average of 52 ± 68 days. Raltegravir AUC(0-12) values ranged from 1495 to 49 051 ng ·â€Šh/mL. The main finding was that intra-patient variability was a large component of the overall variability in raltegravir pharmacokinetics. In some instances the difference between raltegravir AUC(0-4) and AUC(0-12) measured in the same patient during two consecutive evaluations exceeded 110% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in HIV-1-infected subjects are characterized not only by inter-patient variability but also by high intra-patient variability. This condition limits the application of TDM for raltegravir, and might potentially affect patient outcome.

Co-administration of raltegravir reduces daily darunavir exposure in HIV-1 infected patients.

The potential drug-to-drug interaction between darunavir and raltegravir in the setting of HIV infection is a highly debated issue still unresolved. In the present study we have evaluated the pharmacokinetics of darunavir and ritonavir in 53 HIV-1 infected patients with or without concomitant raltegravir administration. The assessment of trough plasma drug concentrations was carried out in all subjects and the potential influence of raltegravir on darunavir and ritonavir disposition, assessed by specific pharmacokinetic evaluations in a subgroup of 25 patients. No significant differences on darunavir and ritonavir plasma trough levels were observed between patients receiving or not raltegravir. Co-administration of raltegravir was, however, associated with a 40% reduction in darunavir C(max) and estimated AUC(0-24), as well a 60% increase in the estimated darunavir clearance compared with values measured in patients not given raltegravir. Notably, this interaction was independent of the dosage of darunavir and not due to effects of raltegravir on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir. These results should be taken into account when darunavir-based regimens are implemented in the setting of HIV, especially considering that this drug is usually administered at fixed daily dose and no therapeutic drug monitoring is performed in most centres.

Supra-therapeutic Linezolid Trough Concentrations in Elderly Patients: A Call for Action?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: According to the drug label, linezolid dosage adjustments are not needed in geriatric patients. Nevertheless, clinical evidence suggests that elderly patients may benefit from the use of reduced linezolid doses to limit drug overexposure. Here, we aimed to describe the results of the last 5 years of therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid in our institution with a special focus on elderly patients. METHODS: Linezolid therapeutic drug monitoring requests collected between January 2016 and June 2020 were considered. Linezolid trough concentrations were considered both as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable, clustering data according to the therapeutic range proposed by available literature (< 2, 2-8, and > 8 mg/L, respectively). Patients' age and sex were considered as categorical variables. Comparisons of linezolid trough concentrations between groups of patients stratified according to age were performed using an analysis of variance; comparisons in the frequency distributions were performed using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2020, we collected 3250 linezolid TDM requests. A highly significant, progressive increment in the linezolid trough concentrations was observed moving from patients aged < 50 years (5.8 ± 5.6 mg/L) to those aged > 90 years (16.6 ± 10.0 mg/L), with an overall increment of 30% per decade of age. Nearly 30%, 50%, and 65% of patients aged < 65 years, 65-80 years, and > 80 years, respectively, had supra-therapeutic linezolid trough concentrations at the first therapeutic drug monitoring assessment. This trend did not change significantly moving from 2016 to 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients given linezolid at the conventional 600-mg twice-daily dose might be at a high risk of being overexposed to treatment, eventually increasing their risk to experience drug-related hematological toxicity. Reduced linezolid dosing schemes should be potentially considered in elderly patients at a low risk of treatment failure, ideally guided by therapeutic drug monitoring.

Determination of linezolid in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of linezolid in human plasma was developed and validated. After precipitation of plasma proteins with perchloric acid, the protein-free supernatant was separated by isocratic reverse-phase chromatography on a X Bridge C18 column. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of phosphoric acid 0.05%: acetonitrile (75:25, v/v) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The column elute was monitored at 254 nm. The method was linear from 0.2 to 48 mg/L (mean r2 = 0.9996, n = 10). The observed intra- and inter-day assay imprecision ranged from 2.83% to 8.16% (18.80% at the lower limit of quantification); inaccuracy varied between -0.33% and 8.18%. Mean drug recovery was 99.8% for linezolid and 90.0% for the internal standard (para-toluic acid). The method was found to be precise and accurate and suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid in routine clinical practice.

Exposure-related effects of atazanavir on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir in HIV-1-infected patients.

Raltegravir (RAL) is primarily metabolized by uridine diphosphate-glucorunosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1). Atazanavir (ATV), a strong inhibitor of UGT1A1, has been shown to increase plasma concentrations of RAL by approximately 50% in healthy volunteers. However, the extent of this interaction has not been studied in HIV-infected patients. A pharmacokinetic study was performed in 22 HIV-infected adults treated with 400 mg RAL plus 300 mg ATV 300 twice a day. Both drugs showed high pharmacokinetic variability (RAL AUC 0-12 7649 ± 4862 ng*h/mL; ATV AUC 0-12 = 19237 ± 13136 ng*h/mL). Notably, RAL trough concentrations were significantly higher compared with those measured in HIV subjects (n = 24) on RAL plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (506 ± 411 versus 177 ± 262 ng/mL, P < 0.01). A significant correlation was found between RAL and ATV area under the curve (AUC) (r = 0.611, P = 0.005). Notably, patients with ATV AUC 0-12 above the mean or with concentrations exceeding the half maximal inhibitory concentration for UGT1A1 had twofold higher RAL AUCs compared with patients with lower ATV exposure. Coadministration of ATV significantly increased plasma concentrations of RAL, especially in HIV-1-infected patients exposed to high concentrations of the protease inhibitor. This pharmacokinetic drug interaction could be handled by routine measurements of ATV trough concentrations and by the assessment of plasma RAL concentrations 2 to 3 hours after the morning drug intake.

TNF-alpha downregulates eNOS expression and mitochondrial biogenesis in fat and muscle of obese rodents.

Obesity is associated with chronic low-grade inflammation. Thus, at metabolically relevant sites, including adipose tissue and muscle, there is abnormal production of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-alpha. Here we demonstrate that eNOS expression was reduced, with a concomitant reduction of mitochondrial biogenesis and function, in white and brown adipose tissue and in the soleus muscle of 3 different animal models of obesity. The genetic deletion of TNF receptor 1 in obese mice restored eNOS expression and mitochondrial biogenesis in fat and muscle; this was associated with less body weight gain than in obese wild-type controls. Furthermore, TNF-alpha downregulated eNOS expression and mitochondrial biogenesis in cultured white and brown adipocytes and muscle satellite cells of mice. The NO donors DETA-NO and SNAP prevented the reduction of mitochondrial biogenesis observed with TNF-alpha. Our findings demonstrate that TNF-alpha impairs mitochondrial biogenesis and function in different tissues of obese rodents by downregulating eNOS expression and suggest a novel pathophysiological process that sustains obesity.