Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 265
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Transplant ; 17(3): 803-808, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27647685

RESUMEN

Solid organ transplant patients are vulnerable to suffering neurologic complications from a wide array of viral infections and can be sentinels in the population who are first to get serious complications from emerging infections like the recent waves of arboviruses, including West Nile virus, Chikungunya virus, Zika virus, and Dengue virus. The diverse and rapidly changing landscape of possible causes of viral encephalitis poses great challenges for traditional candidate-based infectious disease diagnostics that already fail to identify a causative pathogen in approximately 50% of encephalitis cases. We present the case of a 14-year-old girl on immunosuppression for a renal transplant who presented with acute meningoencephalitis. Traditional diagnostics failed to identify an etiology. RNA extracted from her cerebrospinal fluid was subjected to unbiased metagenomic deep sequencing, enhanced with the use of a Cas9-based technique for host depletion. This analysis identified West Nile virus (WNV). Convalescent serum serologies subsequently confirmed WNV seroconversion. These results support a clear clinical role for metagenomic deep sequencing in the setting of suspected viral encephalitis, especially in the context of the high-risk transplant patient population.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Meningoencefalitis/diagnóstico , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/diagnóstico , Virus del Nilo Occidental/genética , Adolescente , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Función Renal , Meningoencefalitis/virología , Metagenómica , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Fiebre del Nilo Occidental/virología , Virus del Nilo Occidental/patogenicidad
2.
Ann Oncol ; 24(1): 31-8, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22831986

RESUMEN

Extensive clinical development in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has led to the introduction of three new agents in little more than a year, with more on the horizon. With the exception of autologous cellular immunotherapy, all of the agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of mCRPC are approved for use in combination with corticosteroids. Corticosteroids play a crucial role in the management of men with mCRPC, but the availability of multiple lines of therapy that include corticosteroids raises potential toxicity considerations. In addition, the immunosuppressive effects of corticosteroids may alter the efficacy of immunotherapies. The recent increase in treatment options with different mechanisms of action raises the importance of understanding how corticosteroids are used and the implications of such use on treatment selection and sequencing. A number of corticosteroids with varied potencies are used in general medical practice at varying doses. The differences in potency, dose, and disease settings in which corticosteroids are used complicate the ability to fully understand the impact that any one corticosteroid can have, such as prednisone in prostate cancer. This article reviews the published literature on corticosteroid use in advanced cancer, focusing on their role in mCRPC.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Orquiectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Músculo Esquelético/efectos de los fármacos , Osteoporosis/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/inducido químicamente
3.
BJU Int ; 109 Suppl 6: 1-12, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22672120

RESUMEN

Since Huggins and Hodges demonstrated the responsiveness of prostate cancer to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), androgen-suppressing strategies have formed the cornerstone of management of advanced prostate cancer. Approaches to ADT have included orchidectomy, oestrogens, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists, anti-androgens and more recently the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists. The most extensively studied antagonist, degarelix, avoids the testosterone surge and clinical flare associated with LHRH agonists, offering more rapid PSA and testosterone suppression, improved testosterone control and improved PSA progression-free survival compared with agonists. The clinical profile of degarelix appears to make it a particularly suitable therapeutic option for certain subgroups of patients, including those with metastatic disease, high baseline PSA (>20 ng/mL) and highly symptomatic disease. As well as forming the mainstay of treatment for advanced prostate cancer, ADT is increasingly used in earlier disease stages. While data from clinical trials support the use of ADT neoadjuvant/adjuvant to radiotherapy for locally advanced or high-risk localized prostate cancer, it remains to be established whether specific ADT classes/agents provide particular benefits in this clinical setting.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/uso terapéutico , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antagonistas de Hormonas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/efectos de los fármacos , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Testosterona/sangre , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 1675, 2022 03 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35354815

RESUMEN

The epidemiology of infectious causes of meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa is not well understood, and a common cause of meningitis in this region, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB), is notoriously hard to diagnose. Here we show that integrating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) with a host gene expression-based machine learning classifier (MLC) enhances diagnostic accuracy for TB meningitis (TBM) and its mimics. 368 HIV-infected Ugandan adults with subacute meningitis were prospectively enrolled. Total RNA and DNA CSF mNGS libraries were sequenced to identify meningitis pathogens. In parallel, a CSF host transcriptomic MLC to distinguish between TBM and other infections was trained and then evaluated in a blinded fashion on an independent dataset. mNGS identifies an array of infectious TBM mimics (and co-infections), including emerging, treatable, and vaccine-preventable pathogens including Wesselsbron virus, Toxoplasma gondii, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Nocardia brasiliensis, measles virus and cytomegalovirus. By leveraging the specificity of mNGS and the sensitivity of an MLC created from CSF host transcriptomes, the combined assay has high sensitivity (88.9%) and specificity (86.7%) for the detection of TBM and its many mimics. Furthermore, we achieve comparable combined assay performance at sequencing depths more amenable to performing diagnostic mNGS in low resource settings.


Asunto(s)
Meningitis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis Meníngea , Sistema Nervioso Central , Humanos , Meningitis/microbiología , Metagenómica , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Tuberculosis Meníngea/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Tuberculosis Meníngea/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Meníngea/genética
5.
Int J Clin Pract ; 65(11): 1180-92, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21995694

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is an advanced form of prostate cancer associated with poor survival rates. However, characterisation of the disease epidemiology is hampered by use of varying terminology, definition and disease management. The aim of this review was to conduct a systematic review to provide greater clarity on the sum of the available epidemiologic evidence and to guide future research into the disease prevalence, progression, characteristics and outcome. METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed and Embase were performed in March 2010 to identify relevant observational studies relating to the epidemiology, progression and outcomes of CRPC. Further studies were identified for inclusion in our review through manual searches of the authors' bibliographical databases and the reference lists of the included articles. RESULTS: We identified 12 articles (10 full papers and 2 abstracts) reporting studies that included a total of 71,179 patients observed for up to 12 years for evaluation in our review. Five studies looked at the prevalence of CRPC in patients with prostate cancer. Together, the data indicate that 10-20% of prostate cancer patients develop CRPC within approximately 5 years of follow-up. Two studies reported the prevalence of bone metastases present at diagnosis of CRPC. Together, ≥ 84% were shown to have metastases at diagnosis. Of those patients with no metastases present at diagnosis of CRPC, 33% could expect to develop them within 2 years. The median survival of patients with CRPC was reported in five studies, with values varying from 9 to 30 months. A pooled, sample-weighted survival estimate calculated from the survival data included in this review is 14 months. Very few studies that met our inclusion criteria evaluated treatment patterns in CRPC. One study reported that only 37% of patients with CRPC received chemotherapy, with the remainder receiving only steroids and supportive care. The most common palliative therapies administered to patients with skeletal symptoms were radiotherapy, radionuclide therapy, bisphosphonates and opioids. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the poor prognosis of patients with CRPC, and demonstrates a survival of 9-13 months in those patients with metastatic CRPC. Furthermore, progression to CRPC is associated with deterioration in quality of life, and few therapeutic options are currently available to patients with CRPC. However, epidemiologic study of these patients is hampered by differing terminology, definitions and treatment paradigms. Our review highlights the need for further well-designed, epidemiological studies of CRPC, using standardised definitions and methods.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Orquiectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Neoplasias Óseas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Calidad de Vida , Análisis de Supervivencia
6.
Nat Med ; 26(4): 599-607, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32094926

RESUMEN

Mucosal immunity develops in the human fetal intestine by 11-14 weeks of gestation, yet whether viable microbes exist in utero and interact with the intestinal immune system is unknown. Bacteria-like morphology was identified in pockets of human fetal meconium at mid-gestation by scanning electron microscopy (n = 4), and a sparse bacterial signal was detected by 16S rRNA sequencing (n = 40 of 50) compared to environmental controls (n = 87). Eighteen taxa were enriched in fetal meconium, with Micrococcaceae (n = 9) and Lactobacillus (n = 6) the most abundant. Fetal intestines dominated by Micrococcaceae exhibited distinct patterns of T cell composition and epithelial transcription. Fetal Micrococcus luteus, isolated only in the presence of monocytes, grew on placental hormones, remained viable within antigen presenting cells, limited inflammation ex vivo and possessed genomic features linked with survival in the fetus. Thus, viable bacteria are highly limited in the fetal intestine at mid-gestation, although strains with immunomodulatory capacity are detected in subsets of specimens.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Feto/microbiología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Intestinos/microbiología , Viabilidad Microbiana , Autopsia , Bacterias/clasificación , Bacterias/genética , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Femenino , Feto/patología , Feto/ultraestructura , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/genética , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Mucosa Intestinal/microbiología , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Mucosa Intestinal/ultraestructura , Intestinos/ultraestructura , Lactobacillus/clasificación , Lactobacillus/genética , Lactobacillus/aislamiento & purificación , Meconio/microbiología , Micrococcaceae/clasificación , Micrococcaceae/genética , Micrococcaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Embarazo , Segundo Trimestre del Embarazo , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética
7.
Phys Med Biol ; 53(20): N397-406, 2008 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18827317

RESUMEN

Due to lack of imaging modalities to identify prostate cancer in vivo, current TRUS guided prostate biopsies are taken randomly. Consequently, many important cancers are missed during initial biopsies. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential clinical utility of a high-speed registration algorithm for a 3D prostate cancer atlas. This 3D prostate cancer atlas provides voxel-level likelihood of cancer and optimized biopsy locations on a template space (Zhan et al 2007). The atlas was constructed from 158 expert annotated, 3D reconstructed radical prostatectomy specimens outlined for cancers (Shen et al 2004). For successful clinical implementation, the prostate atlas needs to be registered to each patient's TRUS image with high registration accuracy in a time-efficient manner. This is implemented in a two-step procedure, the segmentation of the prostate gland from a patient's TRUS image followed by the registration of the prostate atlas. We have developed a fast registration algorithm suitable for clinical applications of this prostate cancer atlas. The registration algorithm was implemented on a graphical processing unit (GPU) to meet the critical processing speed requirements for atlas guided biopsy. A color overlay of the atlas superposed on the TRUS image was presented to help pick statistically likely regions known to harbor cancer. We validated our fast registration algorithm using computer simulations of two optimized 7- and 12-core biopsy protocols to maximize the overall detection rate. Using a GPU, patient's TRUS image segmentation and atlas registration took less than 12 s. The prostate cancer atlas guided 7- and 12-core biopsy protocols had cancer detection rates of 84.81% and 89.87% respectively when validated on the same set of data. Whereas the sextant biopsy approach without the utility of 3D cancer atlas detected only 70.5% of the cancers using the same histology data. We estimate 10-20% increase in prostate cancer detection rates when TRUS guided biopsies are assisted by the 3D prostate cancer atlas compared to the current standard of care. The fast registration algorithm we have developed can easily be adapted for clinical applications for the improved diagnosis of prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Modelos Anatómicos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Masculino , Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Recto/patología , Técnica de Sustracción
8.
Int J Impot Res ; 18(4): 323-8, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16281043

RESUMEN

Substantial evidence supports the value of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in improving quality of life in men with proven aging male syndrome (AMS). Benefits of TRT include improved bone mineral density, reduced fracture risk, increased muscle mass, and improved mood, sense of well being, and libido, among others. There is currently a heated debate about the theoretical association between TRT and the initiation, progression, and aggressiveness of prostate cancer; however, this link has not been uniformly studied, and any results have been contradictory and nonconclusive. Although no clear evidence links TRT to prostate cancer, the possibility of increasing the risk of a clinical manifestation of a latent pre-existing malignancy can influence the decision about TRT use. Current recommendations are to exclude prostate cancer before initiating TRT in men over age 40 and to closely monitor men in the first year of testosterone replacement, followed by observation in subsequent years.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Reemplazo de Hormonas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etiología , Testosterona/uso terapéutico , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Masculino , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Grupos Raciales/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Testosterona/efectos adversos , Testosterona/sangre
9.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 82(2): 143-6, 1990 Jan 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2294224

RESUMEN

A phase II trial of intermittent high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) was initiated to evaluate the response rate, remission duration, and toxic effects in patients with measurable metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The rIL-2 was administered as a bolus intravenous infusion at a dose level of 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2 three times weekly, preceded by indomethacin (50 mg orally). Dose reductions of rIL-2 for hypotension and other grade 3 or 4 toxic effects were permitted. Forty-four patients were entered and 41 were eligible. Previous treatment included nephrectomy (23 patients), radiation therapy (seven), and hormone therapy (three). Most toxic effects observed were moderate and included nausea, vomiting, anorexia (85%); hypotension (85%); fever, chills (78%); central nervous system changes (24%); myelosuppression (27%); and creatinine elevation (15%). Four instances of grade 4 toxicity were observed and included nausea, vomiting with dehydration; hypotension; and myocardial infarction. Thirty patients (73%) required dose adjustments because of toxicity. Five responses (12%) were seen, which included one complete and four partial. Sites of response included lung, liver, and soft tissue; the duration of response ranged from 2 to 20+ months. These results demonstrate that this schedule of rIL-2 can be administered in an outpatient setting, and can produce tumor regression in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, including durable complete responses.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Interleucina-2/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Creatinina/sangre , Evaluación de Medicamentos , Eosinofilia/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Hipotensión/inducido químicamente , Interleucina-2/administración & dosificación , Interleucina-2/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/inducido químicamente , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Inducción de Remisión
10.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 90(20): 1537-44, 1998 Oct 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9790546

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For patients with metastatic prostate cancer, treatment is primarily palliative, relying mainly on the suppression of systemic androgen hormone levels. To help document the achievement of palliation and to characterize positive and negative effects of treatment, we evaluated quality-of-life (QOL) parameters in patients with metastatic prostate cancer who were randomly assigned to two methods of androgen deprivation. METHODS: Patients (n = 739) with stage M1 (bone or soft tissue metastasis) prostate cancer were enrolled in a QOL protocol that was a companion to Southwest Oncology Group INT-0105, a randomized double-blind trial comparing treatment with bilateral orchiectomy (surgical castration) plus either flutamide or placebo. Patients completed a comprehensive battery of QOL questionnaires at random assignment to treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months later. Data were collected on three treatment-specific symptoms (diarrhea, gas pain, and body image), on physical functioning, and on emotional functioning. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Questionnaire return rates for this study never dropped below 80%; only 2% of the patients did not submit baseline QOL assessments. Cross-sectional analyses (corrected for multiple testing) identified statistically significant differences that favored orchiectomy plus placebo for two of the five primary QOL parameters as follows: patients receiving flutamide reported more diarrhea at 3 months (P = .001) and worse emotional functioning at 3 and 6 months (both P<.003). Longitudinal analyses replicated these findings. Other analyzed QOL parameters favored the group receiving placebo but were not statistically significant after adjustment for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: We found a consistent pattern of better QOL outcomes at each follow-up assessment during the first 6 months of treatment for orchiectomized patients with metastatic prostate cancer who received placebo versus flutamide. Improvement over time was evident in both treatment groups but more so for patients receiving placebo.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Flutamida/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Método Doble Ciego , Flutamida/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Orquiectomía , Dolor/etiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Cancer Res ; 47(17): 4736-9, 1987 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3621171

RESUMEN

Monthly serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstenedione, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and free testosterone levels were measured in 94 of 129 patients with castration resistant prostatic carcinoma treated on a clinical protocol with aminoglutethimide (1000 mg/day) plus hydrocortisone (40 mg/day) Base-line steroid levels were not found to be age related. Therapy reduced the median levels of all monitored steroids but this suppression was not uniform. Although 87% of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels were suppressed compared to base-line measurements, only 52% of androstenedione and 49% of testosterone levels were reduced. Androstenedione levels in 34% of patients actually rose to greater than twice base-line levels with similar but less frequent rises seen in testosterone, free testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone levels. The highest testosterone level measured was 190 ng/ml. Neither the cause, the deviation, nor the clinical significance of the androgen rise seen in these patients was established. Therapy with aminoglutethimide plus hydrocortisone as administered in this study may not uniformly achieve the objective of suppressing adrenal androgen production.


Asunto(s)
Aminoglutetimida/administración & dosificación , Andrógenos/sangre , Hidrocortisona/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Androstenodiona/sangre , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Orquiectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Testosterona/sangre
12.
Genome Biol ; 17: 41, 2016 Mar 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26944702

RESUMEN

Next-generation sequencing has generated a need for a broadly applicable method to remove unwanted high-abundance species prior to sequencing. We introduce DASH (Depletion of Abundant Sequences by Hybridization). Sequencing libraries are 'DASHed' with recombinant Cas9 protein complexed with a library of guide RNAs targeting unwanted species for cleavage, thus preventing them from consuming sequencing space. We demonstrate a more than 99 % reduction of mitochondrial rRNA in HeLa cells, and enrichment of pathogen sequences in patient samples. We also demonstrate an application of DASH in cancer. This simple method can be adapted for any sample type and increases sequencing yield without additional cost.


Asunto(s)
Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Hibridación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Sistemas CRISPR-Cas/genética , Enfermedades Transmisibles/genética , Células HeLa , Humanos , Neoplasias/genética , ARN/genética , Edición de ARN/genética , ARN Mitocondrial , ARN Ribosómico/genética
14.
J Clin Oncol ; 12(9): 1868-75, 1994 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8083710

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of prognostic factors, including continued (orchiectomy) versus discontinued androgen-suppression (nonorchiectomy) therapy, on chemotherapy response and survival of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. METHODS: Analysis of five consecutive Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) phase II chemotherapy trials was undertaken. RESULTS: Two hundred five hormone-refractory patients were evaluated. Eighty-four percent had been orchiectomized. The median survival durations for the nonorchiectomy and orchiectomy patients were 6 and 7 months, respectively (P = .73). In a univariate analysis, orchiectomy patients had a significantly longer median time from diagnosis to first hormone therapy (1.1 v 0.1 years, P = .003), were more likely to have had chemotherapy initiated > or = 2 years from diagnosis (75% v 56%, P = .03), had a lower incidence of liver metastases (16% v 30%, P = .05), and had lower likelihood of being black (8% v 18%, P = .05) when compared with the nonorchiectomy group. Orchiectomy patients had a marginally significant longer median time from initial hormone treatment, more prior endocrine manipulations, lower median baseline alkaline phosphatase levels, and a lower likelihood of response to chemotherapy when compared with the nonorchiectomy group. Absence of liver metastases (P = .004), hemoglobin level > or = 10 g/dL (P < .001), acid phosphatase level > or = 1.2 IU/L (P = .05), response to chemotherapy (P = .001), and > or = 2 years from initial hormone treatment (P = .01) are important factors for survival. CONCLUSION: This study failed to show obvious advantages in response to chemotherapy or survival for patients with continued gonadal suppression. A prospective randomized trial is suggested to evaluate the effect of this factor on progression-free and overall survival of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer receiving chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Orquiectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Fosfatasa Ácida/sangre , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Inducción de Remisión , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
15.
J Clin Oncol ; 18(13): 2537-44, 2000 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10893284

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium has promising activity and acceptable toxicity. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen in a cooperative group setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced TCC were treated every 21 days with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), administered as a 3-hour infusion, followed by carboplatin dosed to an area under the curve of 5. Prior systemic adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy was not permitted unless completed at least 1 year before enrollment. Patients were evaluated for response every three cycles, and follow-up was conducted to determine survival. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and were assessable. Four (14%) had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Node-only disease was present in 24%, and 76% of patients had extranodal disease. The median number of cycles received was five. Grade 4 toxicity consisted primarily of neutropenia (38% of patients). Neurologic toxicity was noted in 16 patients (grade 1 in four patients, grade 2 in five patients, grade 3 in six patients, and grade 4 in one patient). Six partial responses and no complete responses were noted, for a response proportion of 20.7% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 40%). Median progression-free survival time was 4 months, and overall survival time was 9 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced TCC is reasonably well tolerated. However, a response proportion considerably lower than that previously reported was noted. In addition, the median survival time of 9 months was less than the survival time previously reported for patients treated with the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Although our results may reflect enrollment of patients with poor prognostic features, they also call into question the utility of this regimen.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidad
16.
J Clin Oncol ; 10(7): 1066-73, 1992 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1607913

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A prospective randomized trial was performed to determine if the addition of methotrexate, vinblastine, and doxorubicin to cisplatin (M-VAC) imparted a response rate or a survival advantage over single-agent cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 1984 through May 1989, 269 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma were entered onto this international intergroup trial and randomized to receive intravenous (IV) cisplatin (70 mg/m2) alone or with methotrexate (30 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, 22), vinblastine (3 mg/m2 on days 2, 15, 22) plus doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 on day 2). Cycles were repeated every 28 days until tumor progression or a maximum of six cycles. There were 246 fully assessable patients of whom 126 were randomized to cisplatin alone and 120 were randomized to the M-VAC regimen. RESULTS: As expected, the M-VAC regimen was associated with a greater toxicity, especially leukopenia, mucositis, granulocytopenic fever, and drug-related mortality. Response rates were superior for the M-VAC regimen compared with single-agent cisplatin (39% v 12%; P less than .0001). Similarly, the progression-free survival (10.0 v 4.3 months) and overall survival (12.5 v 8.2 months) were significantly greater for the combined therapy arm. CONCLUSION: Although a more toxic regimen, we found M-VAC to be superior to single-agent cisplatin with respect to response rate, duration of remission, and overall survival in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/secundario , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación
17.
J Clin Oncol ; 15(7): 2564-9, 1997 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9215826

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A previously reported randomized intergroup trial demonstrated that combination chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) was superior to single-agent cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. We conducted a long-term analysis of patients included in the intergroup trial to examine factors associated with long-term survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred fifty-five assessable patients with urothelial carcinoma were randomized to receive either single-agent cisplatin (70 mg/m2 on day 1) or combination chemotherapy with methotrexate (30 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, and 22), vinblastine (3 mg/m2 on days 2, 15, and 22), doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 on day 2), and cisplatin (70 mg/m2 on day 2). Courses were repeated every 28 days. The association between patient characteristics and survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: With long-term follow-up evaluation, survival in the M-VAC arm continues to be superior to cisplatin (P = .00015, log-rank test). Predictors of survival include performance status, histology, and the presence of liver or bone metastasis. Only 3.7% of the patients randomized to M-VAC are alive and continuously disease-free at 6 years. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up evaluation of the intergroup trial confirms that M-VAC is superior to single-agent cisplatin in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma; however, durable progression-free survival is rare. Patients with non-transitional-cell histology, poor performance status, and/or bone or visceral involvement fare poorly and are unlikely to benefit significantly from M-VAC chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/secundario , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación
18.
J Clin Oncol ; 18(5): 1043-9, 2000 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10694555

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering a combination of suramin and hydrocortisone in addition to androgen deprivation in a cooperative group setting; to assess the feasibility of treatment with multiple courses of suramin; and to assess progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who underwent such treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who had adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, neurologic, and coagulation parameters were treated by combined androgen deprivation and suramin plus hydrocortisone. Suramin was administered on a 78-day fixed dosing schedule (one cycle), and suramin treatment cycles were repeated every 6 months for a total of four cycles. The statistical design was developed on the basis of the feasibility of administering suramin, as judged by the number of patients who developed neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher or by treatment interruption of 4 weeks or longer due to any persistent suramin-related toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients enrolled onto the study between August 1994 and January 1997, 59 were eligible and assessable for toxicity on the first cycle. Thirty-two (54%) of 59 patients received a second cycle, 13 (22%) of 59 patients received a third cycle, and only five patients (8%) received a fourth cycle. During the first cycle, 27 patients were removed from the study: 17 because of toxicity, five because of disease progression, two who had died, and three because of other reasons. There was one therapy-related death. Grade 4 toxicities were noted in 11 and three patients during first and second courses, respectively. Neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher was observed in nine and seven patients during the first and second cycles, respectively. Fifteen patients had treatment interruptions of 4 weeks or longer. Overall, only 54% (95% confidence interval, 41% to 67%) of the patients demonstrated acceptable limits of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Suramin plus hydrocortisone and androgen deprivation has limited applicability in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Andrógenos/metabolismo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Suramina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Andrógenos/deficiencia , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Goserelina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/uso terapéutico , Leuprolida/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Orquiectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Suramina/administración & dosificación , Suramina/efectos adversos , Suramina/sangre , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
J Clin Oncol ; 16(4): 1287-93, 1998 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9552027

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare standard therapy with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) to experimental therapy with etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP) as primary treatment of men with advanced, disseminated germ cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 304 men with advanced disseminated germ cell tumors were randomly allocated to receive four courses of BEP or VIP. Two hundred ninety-nine patients were assessable for toxicity and 286 were assessable for response. Complete response rates, favorable response (complete remission, surgical free of disease, continuous partial remission for 2+ years), time to treatment failure, and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: Overall complete remission rate (VIP, 37%; BEP, 31%), favorable response rate (VIP, 63%; BEP, 60%), failure-free at 2 years (VIP, 64%; BEP, 60%), and 2-year overall survival (VIP, 74%; BEP, 71%) were not significantly different between the two treatments. Grade 3 or worse toxicity, particularly hematologic and genitourinary toxicity, was significantly more common in patients who received VIP. CONCLUSION: BEP and VIP produce comparable favorable response rate and survival in patients with poor-risk germ cell tumors. The substitution of ifosfamide for bleomycin, however, was associated with significantly greater toxicity. Four courses of BEP remain the standard treatment for advanced disseminated germ cell tumors.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Germinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Bleomicina/efectos adversos , Bleomicina/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Etopósido/uso terapéutico , Germinoma/clasificación , Germinoma/patología , Humanos , Ifosfamida/efectos adversos , Ifosfamida/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Análisis de Supervivencia
20.
J Clin Oncol ; 8(10): 1675-82, 1990 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2213104

RESUMEN

Cytotoxic chemotherapy has not provided survival benefit in metastatic prostate cancer, although it has been used most frequently in patients with far-advanced, refractory disease. To evaluate the effects of chemotherapy given earlier in the course of the disease, the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) performed a randomized trial between September 1982 and October 1986 comparing endocrine therapy (diethylstilbestrol [DES] or orchiectomy) alone followed by cyclophosphamide-Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) chemotherapy at progression versus initial combined chemo-endocrine therapy. One hundred forty-three patients were registered, and only six were declared ineligible. Patients on the combined chemo-endocrine therapy arm had a slightly higher response rate (63%) compared with endocrine therapy alone (48%). A log-linear model of tumor response and treatment arm adjusted for the stratification factors favored the combination arm (P = .059). Only three of 27 patients on the endocrine therapy alone arm had an objective partial response when crossed over to chemotherapy, while two others had stable disease. Despite the difference in initial response rate, time to treatment failure and survival were identical in the two treatment arms. Seventy-seven percent of patients on the initial endocrine therapy alone arm have died (median survival, 25.6 months) compared with 78% on the chemo-endocrine therapy arm (median survival, 22.0 months). No significant effect of treatment on survival was observed even after adjustment for the stratification variables in a Cox regression model. Exploratory survival analyses with patients on both arms combined did show a marginally significant time to treatment failure and survival advantage for patients treated with DES rather than orchiectomy as initial endocrine therapy. Eighty-six percent of patients treated by orchiectomy have died compared with only 65% of those treated with DES. These data do not support the addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy to initial endocrine therapy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Dietilestilbestrol/administración & dosificación , Dietilestilbestrol/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Orquiectomía , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Inducción de Remisión , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA