Transphyseal distal humeral separation in neonates: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Birth trauma is a rare condition. Typically, injury in neonates occurs as a result of obstetrical manipulation to allow delivery or from trauma sustained during a difficult passage through the birth canal. Transphyseal separation of the humerus is particularly rare. Diagnosis is not always straightforward and is prone to mistakes. There is a general consensus that the outcome is usually favorable. It is generally agreed that the fracture needs to be realigned, while the suggested methods in contention vary from a simple plaster cast to closed and even open reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation. The purpose of this study was to review our experience in treating transphyseal distal humeral separation in neonates to better define the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. METHODS: Ten consecutive cases of transphyseal distal humeral separation in neonates were treated at our institution between September 2008 and June 2021. All cases were reviewed and clinical data collected on birth injury risk factors, diagnostic workup, age at diagnosis and treatment, and type of treatment. Results of treatment and outcome were analyzed for time to fracture union, complications and clinical alignment, range of motion and residual pain at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age at diagnosis was 4.2 days (range 0 to 9 days) and time between diagnosis and treatment varied from three to 26 h (average 15 h). Risk factors for birth injury were present in six patients. Four patients were initially treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization, all the other cases were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Arthrography was performed at the time of treatment in six cases. Average follow-up was 37 months (range 12 to 120 months). At the latest follow-up, all fractures had healed with full range of motion. No clinical or radiographic deformity requiring repeated surgery or physeal damage was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This rare lesion may occur both in the presence and in the absence of risk factors. Due to the rarity of the injury, misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis are not uncommon. Treatment with closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation is advisable and safe.

The influence of laterality, sex and family history on clubfoot severity.

PURPOSE: Epidemiological studies on idiopathic clubfeet have shown a typical distribution consistent across ethnic groups: bilaterality in about 50% of cases and a male to female ratio of 2:1. Whether this corresponds also to differences in severity according to laterality and sex has been poorly evaluated. As well, the correlation between family history and severity has not been previously investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate how laterality, sex and family history influence severity and treatment. METHODS: In all, 97 infants with idiopathic clubfoot (81 male, 16 female; 55 unilateral, 42 bilateral; 19 with a first or second-degree relative affected) consecutively treated with Ponseti method were prospectively enrolled. Initial severity (according to Dimeglio and Pirani scores) and treatment (number of casts and need for tenotomy) were analyzed in the different subgroups. RESULTS: Initial severity according to Pirani (p = 0.020) and Dimeglio score (p = 0.006), number of casts (p = 0.000) and tenotomy (p = 0.045) were significantly higher in bilateral than in unilateral cases. In bilateral cases, a significant correlation was found between the right and left foot of each patient in terms of initial severity, number of casts and tenotomy performed. No statistically significant difference was found according to sex and family history. CONCLUSIONS: This study has confirmed the different behaviour of bilateral cases reported by previous studies; bilateral cases are more severe and show similar features in their right and left foot. This could be the result of different pathogenic mechanisms, likely on a genetic basis. Sex and family history did not seem to influence severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level of evidence II.

Methods to avoid gamma nail complications.

Femoral neck fractures are progressively increasing, due to higher survival rates, particularly among the female population. The gamma nail was created to treat intertrochanteric fracture types 31-A1, 31-A2 and 31-A3 and in some cases basicervical fractures of type 31-B2-1. Complications can be classified as intraoperative and postoperative. The intraoperative might be related to the nail's introduction site, lag and distal locking screw positions. Postoperative complications depend mostly on an incorrect surgical technique, which can lead to an inaccurate nail position and consequent implant failure. We rarely observe failures caused by severe bone osteoporosis.

The stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized design.

Micromotion of the tibial component in 40 knee arthroplasties for gonarthrosis was studied using Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. The stability of this component was assessed for 2 years' postoperatively. In all arthroplasties, an attempt was made to reconstruct the preoperative posterior slope. Posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) components showed at 2 years a maximum total point motion of 0.6 +/- 0.4 mm and 0.7 +/- 0.5 mm, respectively. Whereas 92.5% of the implants were determined to be stable, 1 of the CR group and 2 of the PS group displayed migration between the first and the second year of at least 0.2 mm. A negative correlation between subsidence of the tibial component at 2 years of follow-up and the difference between preoperative and postoperative tibial slope was found. Consequently, we suggest that restoring the original posterior slope of the tibial plateau must be a goal of tibial component implantation.