Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(2): 177-188, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38224591

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic insomnia is common in patients undergoing in-center hemodialysis, yet there is limited evidence on effective treatments for this population. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), trazodone, and placebo for insomnia in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03534284). SETTING: 26 dialysis units in Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Seattle, Washington. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score of 10 or greater, with sleep disturbances on 3 or more nights per week for 3 or more months. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of CBT-I, trazodone, or placebo. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the ISI score at 7 and 25 weeks from randomization. RESULTS: A total of 923 patients were prescreened, and of the 411 patients with chronic insomnia, 126 were randomly assigned to CBT-I (n = 43), trazodone (n = 42), or placebo (n = 41). The change in ISI scores from baseline to 7 weeks with CBT-I or trazodone was no different from placebo: CBT-I, -3.7 (95% CI, -5.5 to -1.9); trazodone, -4.2 (CI, -5.9 to -2.4); and placebo, -3.1 (CI, -4.9 to -1.3). There was no meaningful change in ISI scores from baseline to 25 weeks: CBT-I, -4.8 (CI, -7.0 to -2.7); trazodone, -4.0 (CI, -6.0 to -1.9); and placebo, -4.3 (CI, -6.4 to -2.2). Serious adverse events (SAEs), particularly serious cardiovascular events, were more frequent with trazodone (annualized cardiovascular SAE incidence rates: CBT-I, 0.05 [CI, 0.00 to 0.29]; trazodone, 0.64 [CI, 0.34 to 1.10]; and placebo, 0.21 [CI, 0.06 to 0.53]). LIMITATION: Modest sample size and most participants had mild or moderate insomnia. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing hemodialysis with mild or moderate chronic insomnia, there was no difference in the effectiveness of 6 weeks of CBT-I or trazodone compared with placebo. The incidence of SAEs was higher with trazodone. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Trazodona , Humanos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Trazodona/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Proyectos de Investigación
2.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 32(8): 2048-2056, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34083409

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately affected socially disadvantaged populations. Whether disparities in COVID-19 incidence related to race/ethnicity and socioeconomic factors exist in the hemodialysis population is unknown. METHODS: Our study involved patients receiving in-center hemodialysis in New York City. We used a validated index of neighborhood social vulnerability, the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), which comprises 15 census tract-level indicators organized into four themes: socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing type and transportation. We examined the association of race/ethnicity and the SVI with symptomatic COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and August 3, 2020. COVID-19 cases were ascertained using PCR testing. We performed multivariable logistic regression to adjust for demographics, individual-level social factors, dialysis-related medical history, and dialysis facility factors. RESULTS: Of the 1378 patients on hemodialysis in the study, 247 (17.9%) developed symptomatic COVID-19. In adjusted analyses, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients had significantly increased odds of COVID-19 compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Census tract-level overall SVI, modeled continuously or in quintiles, was not associated with COVID-19 in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. Among non-Hispanic White patients, the socioeconomic status SVI theme, the minority status and language SVI theme, and housing crowding were significantly associated with COVID-19 in unadjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients on hemodialysis in New York City, there were substantial racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 incidence not explained by neighborhood-level social vulnerability. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic status, minority status and language, and housing crowding were positively associated with acquiring COVID-19 among non-Hispanic Whites. Our findings suggest that socially vulnerable patients on dialysis face disparate COVID-19-related exposures, requiring targeted risk-mitigation strategies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Diálisis Renal , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Pandemias , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Poblaciones Vulnerables , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
3.
BMC Nephrol ; 21(1): 443, 2020 10 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33081705

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) treated with hemodialysis (HD) experience many distressing symptoms. One frequently reported symptom is insomnia. There are unique issues about HD treatments and schedules that disrupt regular sleep/wake routines and possibly contribute to the high severity of insomnia. Despite evidence for broad-ranging health effects of insomnia, very few clinical trials have tested the efficacy of treatments for HD patients. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is a recommended first-line therapy but largely inaccessible to HD patients in the United States, partly because they commit considerable amounts of time to thrice-weekly dialysis treatments. Another important reason could be the logistical and reimbursement challenges associated with providing behavioral health care at the dialysis center. CBT-I delivered by telehealth can overcome barriers to access, but its efficacy has never been rigorously tested for these patients. Pharmacotherapy is the most widely used treatment for insomnia; however, some drugs presently used are unsafe as they are associated with a higher risk for death for HD patients (benzodiazepines and zolpidem-like drugs). The efficacy and safety of other medications (trazodone) for the treatment of insomnia has never been tested for patients treated with HD. METHODS: This trial tests the short- and long-term comparative effectiveness of 6-week treatment with telehealth CBT-I, trazodone, or medication placebo. This will be accomplished with a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which 126 participants treated with HD in community-based dialysis facilities with chronic insomnia will be assigned 1:1:1 to telehealth CBT-I, trazodone, or medication placebo, respectively; short-term effectiveness of each treatment arm will be determined at the end of 6-weeks of treatment and long-term effectiveness at 25-weeks. The primary and secondary patient-reported outcomes will be assessed with computer-based telephone interviewing by research scientists blinded to treatment assignment; additional secondary outcomes will be assessed by participant interview and actigraphy. DISCUSSION: This clinical RCT will provide the first evidence for the comparative effectiveness of two distinct approaches for treating chronic insomnia and other patient-reported outcomes for patients receiving maintenance HD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03534284 May 23, 2018. SLEEP-HD Protocol Version: 1.3.4 (7/22/2020).


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/terapia , Telemedicina , Trazodona/uso terapéutico , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Humanos , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/etiología
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 170(6): 369-379, 2019 03 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30802897

RESUMEN

Background: Although depression is common among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis, data on their acceptance of treatment and on the comparative efficacy of various therapies are limited. Objective: To determine the effect of an engagement interview on treatment acceptance (phase 1) and to compare the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) versus sertraline (phase 2) for treating depression in patients receiving hemodialysis. Design: Multicenter, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02358343). Setting: 41 dialysis facilities in 3 U.S. metropolitan areas. Participants: Patients who had been receiving hemodialysis for at least 3 months and had a Beck Depression Inventory-II score of 15 or greater; 184 patients participated in phase 1, and 120 subsequently participated in phase 2. Intervention: Engagement interview versus control visit (phase 1) and 12 weeks of CBT delivered in the dialysis facility versus sertraline treatment (phase 2). Measurements: The primary outcome for phase 1 was the proportion of participants who started depression treatment within 28 days. For phase 2, the primary outcome was depressive symptoms measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Clinician-Rated (QIDS-C) at 12 weeks. Results: The proportion of participants who initiated treatment after the engagement or control visit did not differ (66% vs. 64%, respectively; P = 0.77; estimated risk difference, 2.1 [95% CI, -12.1 to 16.4]). Compared with CBT, sertraline treatment resulted in lower QIDS-C depression scores at 12 weeks (effect estimate, -1.84 [CI, -3.54 to -0.13]; P = 0.035). Adverse events were more frequent in the sertraline than the CBT group. Limitation: No randomized comparison was made with no treatment, and persistence of treatment effect was not assessed. Conclusion: An engagement interview with patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis had no effect on their acceptance of treatment for depression. After 12 weeks of treatment, depression scores were modestly better with sertraline treatment than with CBT. Primary Funding Source: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Dialysis Clinic, Kidney Research Institute, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/terapia , Entrevista Psicológica , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Diálisis Renal , Adulto , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cooperación del Paciente , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Sertralina/efectos adversos , Sertralina/uso terapéutico
5.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings ; 25(1): 11-19, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29264730

RESUMEN

Barriers for renal transplant patients to immunosuppressant medication adherence are poorly understood, despite the high rate and toll of non-adherence. We sought to assess factors that contribute to barriers to immunosuppressive medication adherence in an ethnically diverse sample of 312 renal transplant patients recruited from three transplant centers across New York City. Transplant patients who were at least 6 months post-transplant completed questionnaires while waiting for their medical appointment. Ethnic differences were observed on barriers to immunosuppressant adherence. Black and Hispanic participants reported significantly more barriers to adherence compared to Caucasian participants. Differences in perception about the potential harm and necessity of immunosuppressant medications also were present. Using hierarchical multiple regression, age and income were significant predictors of reported barriers to adherence, even while controlling for ethnicity. The most robust predictor of reported barriers was the perception of the medication cost-benefit differential, i.e., the balance between concerns about immunosuppressant medications and their perceived helpfulness (B = - 0.5, p < .001), indicating that varying beliefs about the medication's necessity and utility rather than ethnicity explain the differences in barriers to medication adherence. Future interventions targeting non-adherence should aim to reduce the barriers to adherence by addressing perceived risks and benefits of taking immunosuppressant medication.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Riñón/psicología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
BMC Nephrol ; 18(1): 258, 2017 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28764654

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Objective of the study is to assess prevalence and survival among end stage renal disease patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) within a national database (USRDS). METHODS: A case-control, retrospective analysis was performed. Differences in characteristics between the groups, RLS and those with no sleep disorder (NSD), were determined using χ2 tests. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess survival between those with RLS and propensity score matched controls. RESULTS: Cases of restless legs syndrome were defined as patients that had received an ICD-9 code of 333.94 at any point during their treatment (n = 372). RLS group demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of patients with major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, anxiety, depression, minor depressive disorder, and psychological disorder. The difference between the survival was not statistically significant in those without sleep disorder as compared to those with RLS (HR =1.16±0.14, p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: True prevalence of RLS in dialysis patients can only be estimated if knowledge gap for care providers in diagnosis of RLS is addressed. RLS patients also have increased incidence of certain psychological disorders which needs to be addressed.


Asunto(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Bases de Datos Factuales , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/diagnóstico , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/mortalidad , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Acad Psychiatry ; 41(5): 674-678, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28097529

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There is little known about the demands of medical school on students' sleep behavior. The study's main goal was to examine the interplay between medical students' sleep knowledge, personal attitudes towards sleep, and their sleep habits. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was created and emailed to all students enrolled at a large metropolitan medical school. Data on demographics, sleep perception, and habits in addition to self-reported measures of students' sleep knowledge, beliefs, and sleepiness were collected. RESULTS: There were 261, out of a possible 720, responses to the survey. While 71.5% of respondents believed that they needed >7 h of sleep, only 24.9% of respondents stated they average >7 h of sleep. During the week of an examination, only 15.3% of students stated they averaged >7 h of sleep. A comparison of pre-clinical and clinical students revealed that reported median sleep during a school or rotation night was significantly lower in clinical students as compared to pre-clinical students while mean sleep during examination weeks between the two groups was not statistically different. In regard to sleep knowledge, clinical students were more knowledgeable (65.53% correct) than pre-clinical students (39.83% correct) (t(1) = -8.9, p = .00). However, there was no difference in the assessment of dysfunctional beliefs between the two groups (66.0 for preclinical students, 64.7 for clinical students (t(1) = 0.37, p = .71)) while clinical students had a higher score of sleepiness compared to pre-clinical students (9.12 to 7.83, t(1) = -2.3, p = .023). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of medical students are sleeping an inadequate amount of time during their 4 years, and as they progress from the pre-clinical to the clinical years, the amount of time they sleep decreases even though their knowledge about sleep increases. Increased awareness around sleep health is required beyond sleep education, as medical students appear to need help translating knowledge into strategies to improve their own sleep and well-being.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Sueño , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Facultades de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
9.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 25(1): 196-206, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24115478

RESUMEN

Patients with ESRD have high rates of depression, which is associated with diminished quality of life and survival. We determined whether individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) reduces depression in hemodialysis patients with elevated depressive affect in a randomized crossover trial. Of 65 participants enrolled from two dialysis centers in New York, 59 completed the study and were assigned to the treatment-first group (n=33) or the wait-list control group (n=26). In the intervention phase, CBT was administered chairside during dialysis treatments for 3 months; participants were assessed 3 and 6 months after randomization. Compared with the wait-list group, the treatment-first group achieved significantly larger reductions in Beck Depression Inventory II (self-reported, P=0.03) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (clinician-reported, P<0.001) scores after intervention. Mean scores for the treatment-first group did not change significantly at the 3-month follow-up. Among participants with depression diagnosed at baseline, 89% in the treatment-first group were not depressed at the end of treatment compared with 38% in the wait-list group (Fisher's exact test, P=0.01). Furthermore, the treatment-first group experienced greater improvements in quality of life, assessed with the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (P=0.04), and interdialytic weight gain (P=0.002) than the wait-list group, although no effect on compliance was evident at follow-up. In summary, CBT led to significant improvements in depression, quality of life, and prescription compliance in this trial, and studies should be undertaken to assess the long-term effects of CBT on morbidity and mortality in patients with ESRD.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Diálisis Renal/psicología , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Equilibrio Hidroelectrolítico
11.
Adv Kidney Dis Health ; 31(1): 21-27, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403390

RESUMEN

Individuals living with CKD are disproportionately burdened by a multitude of adverse clinical and person-centered outcomes. When patients transition from advanced kidney disease to kidney failure, the psychosocial effects as well as social determinants of health challenges are magnified, making this a particularly difficult time for patients beginning kidney replacement therapy. The key social determinants of health challenges often include food and housing insecurity, poverty, unreliable transportation, low level education and/or health literacy, lack of language interpreters and culturally concordant educational materials, lack of health care insurance coverage, and mistrust of the health care system. Psychosocial and physical stressors, such as depression, anxiety, sexual dysfunction, sleep difficulty, fatigue, and pain, are often part of the illness burden among individuals living with CKD and can interact synergistically with the social challenges making the transition to kidney replacement therapy particularly challenging. To better support patients during this time, it is critical that social and structural determinants of health as well as mental health be assessed and if needs are identified, that services be provided.


Asunto(s)
Salud Mental , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Atención a la Salud , Pobreza , Riñón
12.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 136: 107409, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38086444

RESUMEN

The HOPE Consortium Trial to Reduce Pain and Opioid Use in Hemodialysis (HOPE Trial) is a multicenter randomized trial addressing chronic pain among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease. The trial uses a sequential, multiple assignment design with a randomized component for all participants (Phase 1) and a non-randomized component for a subset of participants (Phase 2). During Phase 1, participants are randomized to Pain Coping Skills Training (PCST), an intervention designed to increase self-efficacy for managing pain, or Usual Care. PCST consists of weekly, live, coach-led cognitive behavioral therapy sessions delivered by video- or tele-conferencing for 12 weeks followed by daily interactive voice response sessions delivered by telephone for an additional 12 weeks. At 24 weeks (Phase 2), participants in both the PCST and Usual Care groups taking prescription opioid medications at an average dose of ≥20 morphine milligram equivalents per day are offered buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist with a more favorable safety profile than full-agonist opioids. All participants are followed for 36 weeks. The primary outcome is pain interference ascertained, for the primary analysis, at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include additional patient-reported measures and clinical outcomes including falls, hospitalizations, and death. Exploratory outcomes include acceptability, tolerability, and efficacy of buprenorphine. The enrollment target of 640 participants was met 27 months after trial initiation. The findings of the trial will inform the management of chronic pain, a common and challenging issue for patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis. NCT04571619.


Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Dolor Crónico , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Manejo del Dolor , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos
13.
Psychol Assess ; 35(2): 95-114, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36689386

RESUMEN

The seven-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) and the total score of the 14-item HADS (HADS-T) are both used for major depression screening. Compared to the HADS-D, the HADS-T includes anxiety items and requires more time to complete. We compared the screening accuracy of the HADS-D and HADS-T for major depression detection. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis and fit bivariate random effects models to assess diagnostic accuracy among participants with both HADS-D and HADS-T scores. We identified optimal cutoffs, estimated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, and compared screening accuracy across paired cutoffs via two-stage and individual-level models. We used a 0.05 equivalence margin to assess equivalency in sensitivity and specificity. 20,700 participants (2,285 major depression cases) from 98 studies were included. Cutoffs of ≥7 for the HADS-D (sensitivity 0.79 [0.75, 0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.75, 0.80]) and ≥15 for the HADS-T (sensitivity 0.79 [0.76, 0.82], specificity 0.81 [0.78, 0.83]) minimized the distance to the top-left corner of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Across all sets of paired cutoffs evaluated, differences of sensitivity between HADS-T and HADS-D ranged from -0.05 to 0.01 (0.00 at paired optimal cutoffs), and differences of specificity were within 0.03 for all cutoffs (0.02-0.03). The pattern was similar among outpatients, although the HADS-T was slightly (not nonequivalently) more specific among inpatients. The accuracy of HADS-T was equivalent to the HADS-D for detecting major depression. In most settings, the shorter HADS-D would be preferred. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Depresión/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo
15.
Curr Psychiatry Rep ; 14(1): 36-44, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22105534

RESUMEN

End-stage renal disease is growing in prevalence and incidence. With technical advancements, patients are living longer on hemodialysis. Depression is the most prevalent comorbid psychiatric condition, estimated at about 25% of end-stage renal disease samples. The identification and assessment of depression are confounded by the overlap between depression symptomatology and uremia. Several recent studies have employed time-varying models and identified a significant association between depression and mortality. Due to the high prevalence of depression and the potential impact on survival, well-constructed investigations are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Desnutrición/etiología , Desnutrición/psicología , Prevalencia , Diálisis Renal/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/inmunología
16.
Nephron Clin Pract ; 122(3-4): 139-45, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23736810

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence and prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is growing rapidly. Understanding the factors associated with declining renal function is of clinical significance. The current study's main goal was to identify variables that could predict decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) over time in outpatients with varying stages of CKD. METHODS: Seventy CKD patients completed psychological questionnaires and medical variables were extracted from the medical charts. Follow-up GFR was collected 6 months later. CKD patients with elevated depression scores were compared to patients with subclinical depression on medical and psychological variables. RESULTS: Average Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score was 10.0 ± 7.8, placing the mean below the cut-off for clinical elevation. GFR was significantly different for the two groups (nondepressed, 40.0 ± 11.3 vs. depressed 29.6 ± 8.9; p < 0.05). Similarly, patients with elevated depression scores reported lower quality of life (Short Form 36 Health Survey; p < 0.05) inferior social support (Interpersonal Support Evaluation List; p < 0.05), and worse community integration (Community Integration Questionnaire; p < 0.05). Utilizing a regression, with a model correcting for baseline GFR, the BDI explained 19% of the variance in GFR score (t = -2.0, p < 0.05) for subjects with decreased GFR. CONCLUSIONS: Increased levels of preexisting depression were associated with inferior quality of life, social support and kidney functioning. Depression scores explained a significant amount of variance in GFR scores at 6 months even when corrected for baseline variability. Elevated depression scores are prevalent in CKD populations and further research on the impact of depression interventions is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/psicología , Apoyo Social , Integración a la Comunidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Comorbilidad , Depresión/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Proyectos Piloto , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo
17.
Can J Kidney Health Dis ; 9: 20543581221118436, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36046483

RESUMEN

Background: Depression and anxiety are commonly reported (40% and 11%-52%) among adults receiving dialysis, compared with ~10% among all Canadians. Mental health in dialysis care is underrecognized and undertreated. Objective: (1) To describe preferences for mental health support reported by Albertans receiving dialysis; (2) to compare depression, anxiety, and quality-of-life (QOL) domains for people who would or would not engage in support for mental health; and (3) to explore sociodemographic, mental health, and QOL domains that explain whether people would or would not engage in support for mental health. Design: A cross-sectional survey. Setting: Alberta, Canada. Patients: Adults receiving all modalities of dialysis (N = 2972). Measurements: An online survey with questions about preferences for mental health support and patient-reported outcome measures (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9], Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7], and Kidney Disease QOL Instrument-36 [KDQOL-36]). Methods: To address objectives 1 and 2, we conducted chi-square tests (for discrete variables) and t tests (for continuous variables) to compare the distributions of the above measures for two groups: Albertans receiving dialysis who would engage or would not engage in support for mental health. We subsequently conducted a series of binary logistic regressions guided by the purposeful variable selection approach to identify a subset of the most relevant explanatory variables for determining whether or not people are more likely to engage in support for mental health (objective 3). To further explain differences between the two groups, we analyzed open-text comments following a summative content analysis approach. Results: Among 384 respondents, 72 did not provide a dialysis modality or answer the PHQ-9. The final data set included responses from 312 participants. Of these, 59.6% would consider engaging in support, including discussing medication with a family doctor (72.1%) or nephrologist (62.9%), peer support groups (64.9%), and talk therapy (60%). Phone was slightly favored (73%) over in person at dialysis (67.6%), outpatient (67.2%), or video (59.4%). Moderate to severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score ≥10) was reported by 33.4%, and most respondents (63.9%) reported minimal anxiety symptoms; 36.1% reported mild to severe anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 score ≥5). The mean (SD) PHQ-9 score was 8.9 (6.4) for those who would engage in support, and lower at 5.8 (4.8) for those who would not. The mean (SD) GAD-7 score was 5.2 (5.6) for those who would engage in support and 2.8 (4.1) for those who would not. In the final logistic regression model, people who were unable to work had 2 times the odds of engaging in support than people who are able to work. People were also more likely to engage in support if they had been on dialysis for fewer years and had lower (worse) mental health scores (odds ratios = 1.06 and 1.38, respectively). The final model explained 15.5% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance and with 66.6% correct classification. We analyzed 146 comments in response to the question, "Is there anything else you like to tell us." The top 2 categories for both groups were QOL and impact of dialysis environment. The third category differed: those who would engage wrote about support, whereas those who would not engage wrote about "dialysis is the least of my worries." Limitations: A low response rate of 12.9% limits representativeness; people who chose not to participate may have different experiences of mental health. Conclusions: Incorporating patients' preferences and willingness to engage in support for mental health will inform future visioning for person-centered mental health care in dialysis.


Contexte: La dépression et l'anxiété sont plus fréquemment signalées chez les adultes traités par dialyse (dépression: 40 %; anxiété: 11 à 52 %) comparativement à la population canadienne (environ 10 %). Les problèmes de santé mentale sont insuffisamment reconnus et traités dans les soins de dialyse. Objectifs: (1) décrire les préférences en matière de soutien en santé mentale des Albertains traités par dialyse; (2) comparer les domaines de la dépression, de l'anxiété et de la qualité de vie (QV) pour les personnes désirant obtenir ou non du soutien en santé mentale; (3) explorer les domaines sociodémographiques, de santé mentale et de QV qui expliquent pourquoi une personne désirerait obtenir ou non du soutien en santé mentale. Conception: Sondage transversal. Cadre: Alberta, Canada. Sujets: Adultes recevant toutes les modalités de dialyse (N=2972). Mesures: Un sondage en ligne comportant des questions sur les préférences en matière de soutien en santé mentale. Les mesures des résultats rapportés par les patients à trois questionnaires (questionnaire-9 sur la santé des patients [PHQ-9], questionnaire-7 sur les troubles anxieux généralisés [GAD-7] et l'instrument QOL-36 pour l'insuffisance rénale [KDQOL-36]). Méthodologie: Pour répondre aux objectifs 1 et 2, nous avons effectué des tests chi-carrés (pour les variables discrètes) et des tests t (pour les variables continues) pour comparer les distributions des mesures ci-dessus pour deux groupes: les Albertains sous dialyse désirant obtenir ou non du soutien en santé mentale. Une série de régressions logistiques binaires guidées par une approche de sélection ciblée des variables a ensuite été effectuée pour identifier un sous-ensemble des plus pertinentes variables explicatives permettant de déterminer si les gens sont plus susceptibles de vouloir obtenir du soutien en santé mentale (objectif 3). Pour expliquer plus précisément les différences entre les deux groupes, nous avons analysé les commentaires en texte ouvert en suivant une approche d'analyse de contenu sommative. Résultats: Des 384 répondants, 72 n'ont pas indiqué de modalité de dialyse ni répondu au questionnaire PHQ-9. L'ensemble de données final comprend les réponses de 312 patients. De ce nombre, 59,6 % envisageraient d'obtenir du soutien, notamment une discussion sur les médicaments avec un médecin de famille (72,1 %) ou un néphrologue (62,9 %), une participation à des groupes de soutien par les pairs (64,9 %) ou une psychothérapie (60 %). Les répondants préféraient le téléphone (73 %) plutôt qu'une visite en personne pendant la dialyse (67,6 %), qu'une consultation externe (67,2 %) ou qu'une consultation vidéo (59,4 %). Des symptômes dépressifs modérés à graves (score PHQ-9 ≥10) ont été rapportés par 33,4 % des répondants. La plupart des répondants (63,9 %) a signalé des symptômes minimes d'anxiété et 36,1 % ont signalé des symptômes d'anxiété légers à graves (score GAD-7 ≥5). Le score moyen (É-T) au PHQ-9 était de 8,9 (6,4) pour les sujets qui désiraient obtenir du soutien et de 5,8 (4,8) pour ceux qui n'en désiraient pas. Le score moyen (É-T) au GAD-7 était de 5,2 (5,6) pour les sujets qui désiraient obtenir du soutien et de 2,8 (4,1) pour ceux qui n'en désiraient pas. Dans le modèle final de régression logistique, les personnes qui ne pouvaient pas travailler étaient deux fois plus susceptibles de vouloir chercher du soutien que celles qui pouvaient travailler. Les répondants étaient également plus susceptibles de se faire aider s'ils étaient sous dialyse depuis moins longtemps et avaient des scores de santé mentale inférieurs (les plus faibles) (rapports de cotes respectifs: 1,06 et 1,38). Le modèle final expliquait 15,5 % (Nagelkerke R2) de la variance avec 66,6 % de classification correcte. Nous avons analysé 146 réponses à la question: « Y a-t-il autre chose que vous souhaiteriez nous dire? ¼ Dans les deux groupes, les deux principales catégories étaient la QV et l'impact de l'environnement de dialyse. La troisième catégorie différait: ceux qui en obtenaient écrivaient sur le soutien, alors que ceux qui n'en obtenaient pas ont indiqué que la « dialyse était le moindre de leurs soucis ¼. Limites: Le faible taux de réponse (12,9 %) limite la représentativité; les personnes qui ont choisi de ne pas participer pourraient avoir des expériences différentes en matière de santé mentale. Conclusion: L'intégration des préférences des patients et de leur volonté d'obtenir du soutien en santé mentale permettra d'éclairer la vision future des soins de santé mentale axés sur les patients traités par dialyse.

18.
Semin Nephrol ; 41(6): 534-549, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34973698

RESUMEN

Sexual dysfunction (SD) in patients with chronic kidney disease is common and negatively impacts quality of life. SD is often under-appreciated because of overall low awareness. Diagnosis of SD is subjective, and manifestations can be different among men and women. Causes of SD are multifactorial, including psychological disorders, hormonal imbalances, vascular disorders, neurological disorders, and medication side effects. Non-specific approaches to improving sexual function include addressing underlying psychological disorders, promoting lifestyle modifications, optimizing dialysis care, and facilitating successful kidney transplantation, whereas treatment with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, hormone replacement, and mechanical devices can be offered to patients with specific indications.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/etiología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/terapia , Testosterona/efectos adversos
19.
Semin Nephrol ; 41(6): 487-504, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34973694

RESUMEN

Chronic disease self-management is the establishment and maintenance of behaviors needed to be an active participant in one's health care and experience the best health outcomes. Kidney disease self-management behaviors to slow disease progression include engaging in exercise or physical activity; adhering to a diet low in sodium, potassium, and phosphorus; monitoring laboratory parameters; managing complex medication regimens; coping with disease-related emotional distress; and communicating effectively with providers. Durable behavior change has been difficult to achieve in kidney disease, in part because of an incomplete understanding of the multilevel factors determining chronic disease self-management in this patient group. The biopsychosocial model of chronic illness care posits that an individual's health outcomes result from biological, psychological, social, and environmental factors as part of a multilevel systems hierarchy. Although this theoretical model has been used to comprehensively identify factors driving self-management in other chronic conditions, it has been applied infrequently to behavioral interventions in kidney disease. In this scoping review, we apply the biopsychosocial model of health to identify individual, interpersonal, and systems-level drivers of kidney disease self-management behaviors. We further highlight factors that may serve as novel, impactful targets of theory-based behavioral interventions to understand and sustain behavior change in kidney disease.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Distrés Psicológico , Enfermedad Crónica , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
20.
Semin Nephrol ; 41(6): 516-525, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34973696

RESUMEN

Anxiety is common in patients with chronic kidney disease, but in its extreme expressions, anxiety can also be a complicating comorbid psychiatric illness. There is only a small literature base on anxiety disorders in patients with renal disease, and many of the studies are not sufficiently specific about which anxiety disorders are being studied. Larger epidemiological studies are required to delineate the incidence, prevalence, and outcomes associated with the varied anxiety disorders. In addition, the impact of the co-occurrence of anxiety with other chronic psychiatric or medical problems, needs further study. Anxiety is a clinical condition that warrants treatment, primarily due to its association with mortality in end-stage renal disease patients, and its negative impact on perceived quality of life. Therapeutic options for patients with anxiety and kidney disease include both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic approaches. Current treatment strategies for anxiety specific to patients with renal disease are provided.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Calidad de Vida , Ansiedad/terapia , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA