Safe endovascular retrieval of a vena cava filter after duodenal perforation.

The use of vena cava filters (VCF) is a common procedure utilized in the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE), yet VCFs have some significant and known complications, such as strut penetration and migration. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and PE remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. It is estimated that as many as 900,000 individuals are affected by these each year with estimates suggesting that nearly 60,000-100,000 Americans die of DVT/PE each year. Currently, the preferred treatment for DVT/PE is anticoagulation. However, if there are contraindications to anticoagulation, an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter can be placed. These filters have both therapeutic and prophylactic indications. Therapeutic indications (documented thromboembolic disease) include absolute or relative contraindications to anticoagulation, complication of anticoagulation, failure of anticoagulation, propagation/progression of DVT during therapeutic anticoagulation, PE with residual DVT in patients with further risk of PE, free-floating iliofemoral IVC thrombus, and severe cardiopulmonary disease and DVT. There are also prophylactic indications (no current thromboembolic disease) for these filters. These include severe trauma without documented PE or DVT, closed head injury, spinal cord injury, multiple long bone fractures, and patients deemed at high risk of thromboembolic disease (immobilized or intensive care unit). Interruption of the IVC with filters has long been practiced and is a procedure that can be performed on an outpatient basis. There are known complications of filter placement, which include filter migration within the vena cava and into various organs, as well as filter strut fracture. This case describes a 66-year-old woman who was found to have a filter migration and techniques that were utilized to remove this filter.

Outcomes of a combined antegrade and retrograde approach for dilatation of radiation-induced esophageal strictures (with video).

BACKGROUND: Treatment of head, neck, and esophageal cancers with radiation therapy can lead to esophageal strictures. In some cases, these can progress to complete esophageal obstruction, precluding typical antegrade endoscopic dilation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review our experience with a combined antegrade/retrograde technique for dilation of complete esophageal strictures. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: Twelve patients with complete esophageal radiation-induced strictures. INTERVENTIONS: In collaboration with otolaryngologists who performed direct antegrade esophagoscopy, retrograde endoscopy via gastrostomy was simultaneously performed. While visualizing the stricture from both sides and transilluminating, it was recannulated with use of a biliary or spring-tipped guidewire, and then dilated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Dilation method, complications, and postdilation oral intake. RESULTS: Combined antegrade and retrograde dilation was technically possible in 10 of the 12 patients (83%). Two cases were unsuccessful due to an inability to achieve transillumination. The only significant complication was a contained esophageal perforation that was managed nonoperatively. The mean number of repeat dilations was 7 (range, 1-22); none were complicated by perforation. Esophageal patency allowing at least some oral intake and tolerance of secretions was ultimately successful in 8 patients (67%). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective, single center. CONCLUSIONS: A combined antegrade/retrograde approach for dilation of complete esophageal radiation-induced strictures in collaboration with colleagues from otolaryngology is a viable treatment option. The procedure is technically feasible, effective, and well tolerated, although there may be an increased risk of esophageal perforation. This strategy may obviate a more invasive surgical approach.

Colonoscopy Findings in HIV-Infected Men and Women from an Urban U.S. Cohort Compared with Non-HIV-Infected Men and Women.

INTRODUCTION: As HIV-infected patients live longer, non-AIDS-defining cancers are now a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence, type, and location of colorectal neoplastic lesions found on colonoscopy in HIV-infected patients from an urban U.S. cohort with non-HIV-infected patients. METHODS: We collected clinical data and colonoscopy findings on 263 HIV-infected patients matched with 657 non-HIV-infected patients on age, race, and sex. Frequency distributions and descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population. The primary exposure was HIV infection, and the primary outcome was any adenoma or adenocarcinoma. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Participants were primarily African American and 40% were women. HIV-infected patients were less likely to have any neoplastic lesions (21.3% vs. 27.7%, p < .05), adenoma (20.5% vs. 27.1%, p = .04), tubular adenomas >10 mm (0.4% vs. 2.9%, p = .02), and serrated adenomas (0.0% vs.2.6%, p = <.01). There was a nonsignificant increased prevalence of adenocarcinoma in HIV-infected individuals compared with non-HIV-infected individuals (1.5% vs. 0.8%, p = .29). The lower prevalence of any adenoma remained after controlling for age, sex, smoking status, body-mass index, and diabetes mellitus [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.88]. HIV-infected patients had a lower prevalence of colorectal neoplastic lesions, including high-risk adenomas, than non-HIV-infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that HIV infection in a primarily African American population is associated with a lower prevalence of colorectal adenomas, but not adenocarcinoma, found by colonoscopy.