Helicobacter Pylori infection in children with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between Helicobacter-pylori(Hp)infection and inflammatory-bowel-disease(IBD) in pediatric-patients remains controversial. We aimed to assess the Hp-infection occurrence in newly-diagnosed pediatric-patients with IBD compared to no-IBD patients. Additionally, we aimed to examine differences in clinical-activity-index(CAI) and endoscopic-severity-score(ESS)between IBD-patients with and without Hp-infection, at baseline and at 1-year-follow-up(FU), after eradication-therapy(ET). METHODS: IBD diagnosis was based on Porto-criteria, and all patients underwent gastroscopy at baseline and 1-year FU. For Crohn's-disease(CD) and ulcerative colitis(UC), IBD-CAI and -ESS were classified using PCDAI/SES-CD and PUCAI/UCEIS, respectively. RESULTS: 76 IBD-patients were included in the study[35 F(46.1%),median-age 12(range 2-17)]. CD and UC were diagnosed in 29(38.2%) and 45(59.2%)patients, respectively, and unclassified-IBD in two(2.6%)patients. Non-IBD patients were 148[71 F(48.0%),median-age 12(range 1-17)]. Hp-infection at baseline was reported in 7(9.2%) and 18(12.2%)IBD and non-IBD patients, respectively(p = 0.5065). The 7 IBD patients with Hp infection were compared to 69 IBD patients without Hp-infection at baseline evaluation, and no significant differences were reported considering CAI and ESS in these two groups. At 1-year FU, after ET, IBD patients with Hp infection improved, both for CAI and ESS, but statistical significance was not reached. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of Hp-infection did not differ between IBD and no-IBD patients. No differences in CAI or ESS were observed at the diagnosis, and after ET no worsening of CAI or ESS was noted at one-year FU, between Hp-positive and -negative IBD patients.

Eosinophilic esophagitis improved by the discontinuation of sublingual immunotherapy for aeroallergens: a case report.

Introduction: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammation of the esophagus, characterized by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction, resulting from severe eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. It is common in atopic subjects and food antigens have been identified as the most common triggers. However, a seasonal variation in EoE prevalence, correlated with air pollen levels, is reported, suggesting that also aeroallergens may play a role. Little is known about the interplay between EoE and concomitant atopy treatment for aeroallergens. Case presentation: We describe the case of an 11-year-old boy who presented dysphagia, vomiting, drooling, and chest pain while eating meat, developed 15 months after receiving sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Alternaria (SUBLIVAC®). He underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealing severe eosinophilic predominant inflammation (100 eos/HPF), consistent with the diagnosis of EoE, not improving at the EGDs performed after both omeprazole and topical corticosteroids treatment, despite symptom improvement. Afterward, immunotherapy was switched from sublingual to injective form. At the EGD performed 1 month later, macroscopic examination of the esophageal mucosa was normal and eosinophilic infiltration was significantly decreased (5-10 eos/HPF). Conclusions: SLIT may induce EoE by chronic antigenic exposure of oral mucosa in patients with a robust allergic susceptibility: while attenuating the IgE-mediated immune reactions, the progressive contact with the causative allergen might induce a chronic stimulation of the immune system with the consequent activation of tissue eosinophils. Our data suggest monitoring patients receiving SLIT for EoE symptoms and to discontinue SLIT on their earlier appearance, possibly as a first-line treatment.