RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: It is common for cancer patients to seek a second opinion for a variety of reasons. Understanding what drives patients to choose to receive treatment with their second opinion provider may uncover opportunities to improve the second opinion process. Therefore, we sought to identify the patient, disease, and treatment characteristics that were associated with second opinion retention rates in patients seeking a second surgical opinion for breast, colon, and pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate patients who sought a second opinion within a large academic health-care system for breast, colon, and pancreatic cancer. Electronic medical records were reviewed for second opinions. Patient demographics and characteristics were collected and compared between the retained group and the nonretained groups. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients obtained second opinions for breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer. Patients that were offered a different treatment plan at their second opinion were more likely to be retained for systemic therapy (P = 0.009) for pancreatic cancer and any treatment for colon cancer (P = 0.003). Seeing a radiation oncologist (P = 0.007) or a plastic surgeon (P = 0.02) during the multidisciplinary consultation increased retention rates for breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons can better identify patients that are more likely to be retained after a second opinion by the individual patient characteristics and treatment factors. Understanding the factors that lead to retention for these three cancer types may help physicians provide the best possible resources for most patients presenting for second opinion evaluations.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the steps faculty surgeons take upon experiencing intraoperative error and synthesize these actions to offer a framework for coping with errors. BACKGROUND: While intraoperative errors are inevitable, formal training in error recovery is insufficient and there are no established curricula that teach surgeons how to deal with the intraoperative error. This is problematic because insufficient error recovery is detrimental to both patient outcomes and surgeon psychological well-being. METHODS: We conducted a thematic analysis. One-hour in-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with faculty surgeons from 3 hospitals. Surgeons described recent experiences with intraoperative error. Interviews were transcribed and coded. Analysis allowed for development of themes regarding responses to errors and coping strategies. RESULTS: Twenty-seven surgeons (30% female) participated. Upon completion of the analysis, themes emerged in 3 distinct areas: (1) Exigency, or a need for training surgical learners how to cope with intraoperative errors, (2) Learning, or how faculty surgeons themselves learned to cope with intraoperative errors, and (3) Responses, or how surgeons now handle intraoperative errors. The latter category was organized into the STOPS framework: Intraoperative errors could produce STOPS: Stop, Talk to your Team, Obtain Help, Plan, Succeed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study provides both novel insight into how surgeons cope with intraoperative errors and a framework that may be of great use to trainees and faculty alike.
Asunto(s)
Cirujanos , Adaptación Psicológica , Curriculum , Femenino , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Masculino , Errores Médicos/psicología , Cirujanos/psicologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Physician burnout has been demonstrated at high rates among surgeons. Research has shown that physicians experiencing burnout have higher rates of depression, substance abuse, attrition, and medical errors. Surgical culture often promotes self-reliance; however, lacking social connections may worsen burnout. Therefore, we aimed to determine if struggling to develop a professional or personal community is associated with worsened burnout in surgeons. METHODS: We conducted a survey of surgical residents and faculty at seven institutions in the United States in the spring of 2021. Variables measured included mentorship experience, presence of a social community outside work, burnout levels (Professional Fulfillment Index [PFI], 15: high professional fulfillment, 75: low professional fulfillment), average weekly hours worked over the previous 2 mo, and demographics (race, gender, and role: faculty or resident). RESULTS: A total of 218 participants completed the survey (50% residents and 54% male). Participants' PFI scores were an average of 36.29/75, indicating poor professional fulfillment (standard deviation [SD] = 11.80). A multiple linear regression revealed that struggling to find a mentor (ß = 0.20, P = 0.004) and not having a social community exterior to the hospital (ß = -0.25, P < 0.001) were independently associated with significantly higher PFI scores (P < 0.001, R2 = 0.13). Gender, race, role, and hours worked were not associated with the PFI score. CONCLUSIONS: Struggling to find a mentor and a lack of social community outside of work are associated with higher levels of burnout in this multi-institutional study. These findings suggest that targeting an improved support for building professional and personal relationships may be a strategy for improving burnout levels in both faculty and resident surgeons.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Internado y Residencia , Cirujanos , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mentores , Satisfacción Personal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical resident duty hour limitations have necessitated operative skill training outside of the operating room. Although wet-lab skills training is ideal, materials and human resource requirements make wet labs-utilizing biologic samples cost prohibitive for many residency programs. To resolve this problem, our general surgery residency program collaborated with the Institution's School of Veterinary Medicine Surgery Residency program to pilot a cost-effective interdisciplinary surgical skills curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The general surgery residency program manager and program director initiated a collaboration with the Veterinary Surgery Residency. Postgraduate year (PGY) 2 general surgery residents and PGY 1-3 veterinary surgery residents participated in monthly joint surgical skills practice sessions. A novel interdisciplinary surgical skills curriculum was implemented that incorporated skills beneficial to both sets of trainees utilizing donated canine cadavers. RESULTS: A total of nine joint skills sessions were conducted for nine general surgery residents and five veterinary surgery residents. A cost analysis was conducted for a surgical skills curriculum servicing both programs independently and compared to the actual costs of the collaborative curriculum. The cost analysis estimated total savings generated by the collaborative to be $27,323.79. Review of initial feedback from trainees suggest that skill sessions reinforce knowledge, and that the collaborative skills sessions were an enjoyable and valuable learning activity. CONCLUSIONS: The skills curriculum collaborative has proven to be a cost-effective and high quality interdisciplinary pedagogic tool. The partnership allowed for mutually beneficial resource sharing and allowed for the initiation of a surgical skills wet lab that had previously been unavailable to both groups.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/educación , Animales , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Perros , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Internado y Residencia/economía , Internado y Residencia/métodosRESUMEN
Social media interventions are a growing area of internet research, particularly for adolescent health. Researchers developing social media intervention approaches face the task of selecting a social media platform for their intervention. In this paper, we present the theoretical framework of affordances to help guide social media platform selection for intervention research. Affordances are a concept often used in fields associated with design and by those systematically studying the impact of a design of an object. Thus, the affordances approach is often used by those considering the impact of information technology and the design of social media platforms. Affordances are often described as properties of artifacts that can be recognized by users and contribute to their function or items that present an action possibility. We describe common affordances that can be applied to intervention design as well as current evidence and an intervention case example for each affordance. A scientific approach for the selection of the appropriate social media platform for a given intervention is an important research priority to advance the field of internet research.
Asunto(s)
Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Humanos , InternetRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Video-based performance assessments provide essential feedback to surgical residents, but in-person and remote video-based assessment by trained proctors incurs significant cost. We aimed to determine the reliability, accuracy, and difficulty of untrained attending staff surgeon raters completing video-based assessments of a basic laparoscopic skill. Secondarily, we aimed to compare reliability and accuracy between 2 different types of assessment tools. DESIGN: An anonymous survey was distributed electronically to surgical attendings via a national organizational listserv. Survey items included demographics, rating of video-based assessment experience (1â¯=â¯have never completed video-based assessments, 5â¯=â¯often complete video-based assessments), and rating of favorability toward video-based and in-person assessments (0â¯=â¯not favorable, 100â¯=â¯favorable). Participants watched 2 laparoscopic peg transfer performances, then rated each performance using an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) form and the McGill Inanimate System for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills (MISTELS). Participants then rated assessment completion ease (1â¯=â¯Very Easy, 5â¯=â¯Very Difficult). SETTING: National survey of practicing surgeons. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-one surgery attendings with experience in laparoscopic surgery from 10 institutions participated as untrained raters. Six experienced laparoscopic skills proctors participated as expert raters. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was substantial for both OSATS (kâ¯=â¯0.75) and MISTELS (kâ¯=â¯0.85). MISTELS accuracy was significantly higher than that of OSATS (κ: MISTELSâ¯=â¯0.18, 95%CIâ¯=â¯[0.06,0.29]; OSATSâ¯=â¯0.02, 95%CIâ¯=â¯[-0.01,0.04]). While participants were inexperienced with completing video-based assessments (medianâ¯=â¯1/5), they perceived video-based assessments favorably (meanâ¯=â¯73.4) and felt assessment completion was "Easy" on average. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that faculty raters untrained in simulation-based assessments can successfully complete video-based assessments of basic laparoscopic skills with substantial inter-rater reliability without marked difficulty. These findings suggest an opportunity to increase access to feedback for trainees using video-based assessment of fundamental skills in laparoscopic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Internado y Residencia , Laparoscopía , Grabación en Video , Laparoscopía/educación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , AdultoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Much attention and effort are devoted to general surgery residency applicant interview strategies and ranking. However, few interview strategies are positively associated with applicant communication performance. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of a LEGO-based communication assessment and a standardized patient-based emotional intelligence assessment to serve as an indicator for communication and interpersonal skills among peers in residency. METHODS: We examined general surgery residents who interviewed virtually at our institution in 2021-2022, then matriculated in 2022-2023. Residents' LEGO-based communication and emotional intelligence interview assessments were evaluated for associations with peer evaluations in intern year. A regression analysis was conducted testing the association between each assessment and peer-evaluation metrics, controlling for resident track (preliminary, categorical). RESULTS: Performance on LEGO-based communication assessments was significantly associated with peer evaluation of cross-cover performance (B = 0.09, standard error 0.044, 95% confidence interval 0.001-0.187, P = .048), whereas emotional intelligence scores had no significant association (P = .155). In contrast, performance on the LEGO-based communication assessments were associated with peer evaluations for desirability as a coworker (B = 0.098, standard error 0.038, 95% confidence interval 0.017-0.178, P = .021), whereas emotional intelligence scores were negatively associated with desirability as a coworker (B = -0.255, standard error 0.107, 95% confidence interval -0.482 to -0.029], P = .029). CONCLUSION: Although LEGO-based communication assessments before residency are associated with better resident peer evaluations 1 year into residency, our emotional intelligence applicant assessment during recruitment did not provide clear insight into resident performance. Future research should consider the ability of standardized assessments to predict performance.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Answering calls in the literature, we developed and introduced an evidence-based tool for surgeons facing errors in the operating room: the STOPS framework (stop, talk to you team, obtain help, plan, succeed). The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of presenting this psychological tool on resident coping in the operating room and the related outcome of burnout while examining sex differences. METHODS: In a natural experiment, general surgery residents were invited to attend 2 separate educational conferences regarding coping with errors in the operating room. Three months later, all residents were asked to fill out a survey assessing their coping in the operating room, level of burnout, and demographics. We assessed the impact of the educational intervention by comparing those who attended the coping conferences with those who did not attend. RESULTS: Thirty-five residents responded to the survey (65% response rate, 54% female respondents, 49% junior residents). Our hypothesized moderated mediation model was supported. Sex was found to moderate the impact of the STOPS framework-female residents who attended the coping educational conference reported higher coping self-efficacy, whereas attendance had no statistically significant impact on male levels of coping self-efficacy. In turn, higher coping self-efficacy was associated with lower levels of burnout. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that there is evidence of efficacy in this instruction-female residents presented this material report higher levels of coping in the operating room compared to those who did not receive the framework. Further, increase in coping ability was associated with reduced levels of burnout for both genders.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Agotamiento Profesional , Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Adulto , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Errores Médicos/psicología , Cirugía General/educación , Cirujanos/psicología , Cirujanos/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Quirófanos , Autoeficacia , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This paper seeks to contribute to the understanding of how and why religion affects psychosocial health outcomes. We propose a theoretical model predicting that when women with breast cancer defer control to God they will experience fewer breast cancer related concerns. Deferring control to God, however, should also reduce the likelihood that they take a proactive coping approach, which will be exacerbated by lowered breast cancer concerns. We therefore predict that this passive coping style will ultimately result in lower levels of quality of life. METHODS: Data were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial funded by the National Cancer Institute. A total of 192 women with breast cancer participated in a computer-mediated social support group. Deferring control to God statements were captured by using computer-aided content analysis of discussion posts. Psychosocial outcomes were measured using longitudinal survey data. Analysis was performed using structural equation modeling. RESULTS: The results of our analysis largely confirm our mediation model for which we find significant model fit. As predicted, deferring control to God leads to lower levels of breast cancer concerns but also to more passive coping styles. Ultimately, deferring control to God can lead to lower levels of quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates how and why religious coping can lead to both positive and negative psychosocial health outcomes. Health care practitioners should encourage patients who are relying on religion to keep their end of the bargain and maintain an active coping style.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Control Interno-Externo , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Religión y Psicología , Grupos de Autoayuda , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Internet , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Psicológicos , Apoyo SocialRESUMEN
Surgical educators and researchers have well-considered a breadth of topics related to surgery. However, there is one concept that is notably absent in this corpus: surgical wisdom. In this perspective, we draw on work from Aristotle and psychology research to introduce the concept of phronesis, which we believe is useful for understanding surgical wisdom. We further illustrate how this concept can be a useful tool for surgical educators through the discussion of four distinct functions of phronesis, and illustrating the ability of these functions to help learners cultivate knowledge at important decision points, or inflection points, in surgical training and a surgical career.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: Recent research has called for further resident training in coping with errors and adverse events in the operating room. To the best of our knowledge, there currently exists no evidence-based curriculum or training on this topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthesizing three prior studies on how experienced surgeons react to errors and adverse events, we developed the STOPS framework for handling surgical errors and adverse events (Stop, Talk to your team, Obtain help, Plan, Succeed). This material was presented to residents in two teaching sessions. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In this paper, we describe the presentation of, and the uniformly positive resident reaction to, the STOPS framework: an empirically based psychological tool for surgeons who experience operative errors or adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Adaptación PsicológicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative errors are inevitable, and how surgeons respond impacts patient outcomes. Although previous research has queried surgeons on their responses to errors, no research to our knowledge has considered how surgeons respond to operative errors from a contemporary first-hand source: the operating room staff. This study evaluated how surgeons react to intraoperative errors and the effectiveness of employed strategies as witnessed by operating room staff. METHODS: A survey was distributed to operating room staff at 4 academic hospitals. Items included multiple-choice and open-ended questions assessing surgeon behaviors observed after intraoperative error. Participants reported the perceived effectiveness of the surgeon's actions. RESULTS: Of 294 respondents, 234 (79.6%) reported being in the operating room when an error or adverse event occurred. Strategies positively associated with effective surgeon coping included the surgeon telling the team about the event and announcing a plan. Themes emerged regarding the importance of the surgeon remaining calm, communicating, and not blaming others for the error. Evidence of poor coping also emerged: "Yelling, feet stomping and throwing objects onto the field. [The surgeon] cannot articulate needs well because of anger." CONCLUSION: These data from operating room staff corroborates previous research presenting a framework for effective coping while shedding light on new, often poor, behaviors that have not emerged in prior research. Surgical trainees will benefit from the now-enhanced empirical foundation on which coping curricula and interventions can be built.
Asunto(s)
Cirujanos , Humanos , Adaptación Psicológica , QuirófanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In 2022, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores will become pass/fail. This may be problematic, as residency programs heavily rely on USMLE Step 1 scores as a metric when determining interview invitations. This study aimed to assess candidate application metrics associated with USMLE Step 1 scores to offer programs new cues for stratifying applicants. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study analyzing interviewed applicants to one general surgery residency program in 2019 and 2020. Applicant data analyzed included USMLE Step 1 scores, number of publications, clerkship scores, letter of recommendation scores (out of 2, scored by 0.25 interval), interview overall score (out of 5, scored by integer level), and standardized question score (out of 10). Each year, applicant's answers to one standardized behavioral question during their interview were scored by interviewers. SETTING: Tertiary medical center, academic general surgery residency program. PARTICIPANTS: Interviewed applicants at one general surgery residency program whose applications contained complete demographic information (203 out of 247). RESULTS: Multiple Linear Regression revealed that higher surgical clerkship (ßâ¯=â¯0.19, pâ¯=â¯0.006) and higher standardized interview question (ßâ¯=â¯0.32, p < 0.001) scores were positively associated with applicant USMLE Step 1 score (F[7, 195]â¯=â¯6.61, p < 0.001, R2â¯=â¯0.19). Letter of recommendation score, number of peer reviewed publications, gender, race, and applicant type (preliminary/categorical) were not associated with USMLE Step 1 scores. CONCLUSIONS: With USMLE Step 1 scores transitioning to pass/fail, surgical residency programs need new selection heuristics. Surgery clerkship scores and standardized behavioral questions answered by applicants prior to the interview could provide a holistic view of applicants and help programs better stratify candidates without USMLE Step 1 scores.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Cirugía General/educación , Heurística , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Purpose: Effective communication skills are a critical quality and skill that is highly sought after for surgeons which largely impacts patient outcomes. Residency programs design their interview processes to select the best candidates. LEGO®-based activities have been frequently used to enhance communication skills and team building. This study investigates the effectiveness and reliability of a novel LEGO®-based communication assessment in interviews for surgical residencies and the feasibility of implementing it in a virtual setting. Methods: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of a LEGO®-based communication assessment at the program's 2020/2021 residency interviews. Each applicant was assessed on a different model. The total scores were analyzed for consistency among raters and correlated to faculty interviews. Furthermore, the impact of the assessment structure, scoring criteria, and range of models' difficulties on the total scores were explored. Results: A total of 54 categorical and 55 preliminary applicants interviewed on 2 days. The assessment on different models and had no impact on applicants' total scores for either categorical and preliminary groups (p = 0.791 and 0.709, respectively). The communication components of the assessment showed high consistency between the raters. The two applicant groups displayed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.004) in the communication evaluation and model accuracy components. Total scores did not correlate with the faculty interviews of standardized questions in either group. Conclusion: This novel LEGO®-based communication assessment showed high reliability and promising results as a tool to assess communication and problem solving for residency interviews that can be readily implemented in a virtual setting. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00021-4.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The main consideration during residency recruitment is identifying applicants who will succeed during residency. However, few studies have identified applicant characteristics that are associated with competency development during residency, such as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestones. As mini multiple interviews (MMIs) can be used to assess various competencies, we aimed to determine if simulated surgical skills MMI scores during a general surgery residency interview were associated with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestone ratings at the conclusion of intern year. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. Interns' Step 1 and 2 clinical knowledge (CK) scores, interview day simulated surgical skills MMI overall score, traditional faculty interview scores, average overall milestone ratings in the spring of residency, and intern American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE) percentile scores were gathered. Two multiple linear regression were performed analyzing the association between Step 1, Step 2 CK, MMI, and traditional faculty interview scores with (1) average overall milestone rating and (2) ABSITE percentile scores, controlling for categorical/preliminary intern classification. SETTING: One academic medical center PARTICIPANTS: General surgery interns matriculating in 2020-2021 RESULTS: Nineteen interns were included. Multiple linear regression revealed that higher overall simulated surgical skills MMI score was associated with higher average milestone ratings (ßâ¯=â¯.45, pâ¯=â¯0.03) and higher ABSITE score (ßâ¯=â¯.43, pâ¯=â¯0.02) while neither Step 1, Step 2 CK, nor faculty interview scores were significantly associated with average milestone ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical residency programs invest a tremendous amount of effort into training residents, thus metrics for predicting applicants that will succeed are needed. Higher scores on a simulated surgical skills MMIs are associated with higher milestone ratings 1 year into residency and higher intern ABSITE percentiles. These results indicate a noteworthy method, simulated surgical skills MMIs, as an additional metric that may select residents that will have early success in residency.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Competencia Clínica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , AcreditaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies report higher burnout in women faculty surgeons compared to men. However, few studies have examined underlying mechanisms for these gendered differences. Gendered differences in microaggression experiences may explain part of the relationship between gender and burnout. We aimed to investigate the relationship between gender, gendered microaggressions, and burnout and test the hypothesis that microaggressions contribute to the relationship between gender and burnout. METHODS: In this 2021 study, a survey was distributed to surgical faculty at 7 institutions. Variables included gender identity, race, average hours worked recently, the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory, and a modified Racial and Ethnic Microaggressions Scale to assess gendered microaggressions. To assess the relationship between surgical faculty gender and burnout, and if this relationship could be explained by microaggressions, a mediation model was tested. RESULTS: A total of 109 participants (40% female) completed the survey and were included in analysis. The hypothesized indirect effect of gender on burnout (M = 2.70/5, SD = 0.81), through gender-based microaggressions (M = 1.7/5, SD = 1.9), was significant, B = -0.25, SE B = 0.09, confidence interval (-0.44 to -0.09): women surgeons reported higher levels of gendered microaggressions, which predicted higher levels of burnout. The overall model was significant (R2 = .16, F[6,102] = 3.33, P < .01). Race, specialty, hours worked, and years of experience were all not significant in the model. CONCLUSION: Gendered microaggressions mediate the relationship between gender and burnout, providing a potential mechanism for the higher rates of burnout in women surgeons evident in prior research. These multi-institutional data provide a focus for targeted initiatives that could decrease both burnout rates and the impact of gender bias on surgical faculty.
Asunto(s)
Microagresión , Sexismo , Agotamiento Psicológico , Docentes , Femenino , Identidad de Género , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Prior to 2015 residents in our Accreditation Council for Graduation Medical Education (ACGME) colon and rectal surgery training program were in charge of managing, with faculty oversight, the outpatient anorectal clinic at our institution. Starting in 2015 advanced practice providers (APPs) working in the division assumed management of the clinic. The effect of APPs on ACGME resident index diagnostic case volumes has not been explored. Herein we examine ACGME case log graduate statistics to determine if the inclusion of APPs into our anorectal clinic practice has negatively affected resident index diagnostic anorectal case volumes. DESIGN: ACGME year-end program reports were obtained for the years 2011 to 2019. Program anorectal diagnostic index volumes were recorded and compared to division volumes. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) tests were conducted to assess whether the number of cases per year (for each respective case type) prior to the introduction of APPs into the anorectal clinic (2011-2014) differed from the number of cases per year with the APP clinic in place (2015-2018). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SETTING: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (quaternary referral center). PARTICIPANTS: Colon and rectal surgery resident year-end ACGME reports (2011-2019). RESULTS: ANOVAs revealed a marginally significant (pâ¯=â¯0.007) downtrend for hemorrhoid diagnostic codes, and a significant uptrend (pâ¯=â¯0.000) for fistula cases. Controlling for overall division volume, ANCOVA only reveled significance for fistula cases (pâ¯=â¯0.004) with the involvement of APPs. CONCLUSIONS: At our institution we found the inclusion of APPs into our anorectal clinic practice did not negatively affect colon and rectal surgery resident ACGME index diagnostic anorectal case volumes. Inclusion of APPs into a multidisciplinary practice can promote resident education by allowing trainees to pursue other educational opportunities without hindering ACGME index case volumes.
Asunto(s)
Educación Médica , Cirugía General , Internado y Residencia , Acreditación , Competencia Clínica , Colon , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Cirugía General/educación , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The past decade has seen tremendous growth in research focused on understanding college students' alcohol-related social media displays. However, longitudinal studies remain rare. The purpose of this 5-year study was to describe alcohol and abstinence display patterns on Facebook. METHODS: This prospective longitudinal cohort study recruited incoming 17- to 19-year-old college students from two universities upon entering college. Trained coders evaluated Facebook profiles monthly over five years to identify alcohol and abstinence displays. Alcohol displays were further categorized as general alcohol use or intoxication/problem drinking references. Analyses included multivariate negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Among 338 participants recruited (mean age = 18.4, SD = .6), 56.1% were female, 74.8% were Caucasian, and 58.8% were from the Midwest college. General alcohol use references were most common in the spring semester of the third year (mean = 3.9 displays; 95% CI: 3.21-4.73), these often included references to a "21 run." Intoxication/problem drinking references were most common in spring semester of the first year (mean = .79 displays, 95% confidence interval: .56-1.10) and second year of college (mean = .77 displays, 95% confidence interval: .54-1.11). There were no gender differences associated with alcohol displays at any time point. Abstinence displays were rare and declined in frequency to a low of four total displays in year 5. CONCLUSIONS: This 5-year study is the first to document patterns of alcohol and abstinence displays throughout the undergraduate experience. Findings may inform planning targeted interventions by time point, or longitudinal studies of other substances or on different platforms.