Genetic determinants of immune-related adverse events in patients with melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause profound immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The host genetic background is likely to play a role in irAE susceptibility because the presentation of toxicity varies among patients and many do not develop irAEs despite continued ICI use. We sought to identify potential genetic markers conferring risk for irAEs. METHODS: We conducted a pilot exploratory study in 89 melanoma patients who received ICIs (44 with irAEs, and 45 without irAEs after at least 1 year from starting treatment). Genotyping was performed using the Infinium Multi-Ethnic Global-8 v1.0 Bead Chip. The genotype data were extracted using PLINK (v1.90b3.34) and processed for quality control. Population structure-based clustering was carried out using IBS matrix, pairwise population concordance test (p < 1 × 10-3), and phenotype distribution for all study participants, resulting in seven population structure-based clusters. In the analytical stage, 599,931 variants in autosomal chromosomes were included for the association study. The association test was performed using an additive genetic model with exact logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, and population cluster. RESULTS: A total of 30 variants or single-nucleotide polymorphisms with p < 1 × 10-4 were identified; 12 were associated with an increased risk of irAEs, and the remaining 18 were associated with a decreased risk. Overall, nine of the identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms mapped to eight unique genes that have been associated with autoimmunity or inflammatory diseases. CONCLUSION: Several genetic variants associated with irAEs were identified. Additional larger studies are needed to validate these findings and establish their potential functional relevance.

Pulmonary cavitation in patients with thyroid cancer receiving antiangiogenic agents.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid malignancies are among the most common endocrine cancers worldwide. Owing to the angiogenic nature of these malignancies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are an attractive potential treatment. However, TKIs have been associated with an increased risk of tumor cavitation, in turn linked to poor outcomes, in patients with malignancies in the lungs, where thyroid cancer commonly metastasizes. METHOD: We performe d a retrospective cohort study of patients with thyroid cancer and evidence of metastatic disease to the lung that were treated with multi-targeted antiangiogenic TKIs. The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of pulmonary cavitation. The secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of pulmonary cavitation on survival. RESULTS: Of the 83 patients with pulmonary nodules, 10 developed cavitation during treatment. Of these 83 patients, two patients had to stop the treatment due to pneumothorax. Additionally, cavitation did not demonstrate any significant effect on survival. CONCLUSION: In patients with thyroid cancer and evidence of metastatic disease to the chest, the use of multi-targeted TKIs led to cavitations that were not uncommon but clinical consequences were marginal. Treatment was stopped only in two patients that developed pneumothorax, however the small sample is a strong limitation of our study.

Extraocular Muscle Enlargement and Thyroid Eye Disease-like Orbital Inflammation Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: To describe thyroid eye disease (TED)-like orbital inflammatory syndrome in 3 cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated by the senior author who were receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors and developed TED-like orbital inflammation were included. RESULTS: Three cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors developed orbital inflammation. The first patient was treated with a combination of a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitor and a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor and developed TED-like orbital inflammation with normal thyroid function and antibody levels. The second patient had a previous diagnosis of Graves disease without TED, and developed TED soon after initiating treatment with a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor. The third patient developed acute hyperthyroidism with symptomatic TED following treatment with an investigational cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitor agent. All 3 patients were managed with either systemic steroids or observation, with resolution of their symptoms and without the need to halt immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for their cancer. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: TED-like orbital inflammation may occur as a side effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 or anti-PD-1 inhibitors. To the best of their knowledge, this is the first reported case of TED as a result of programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor monotherapy. All 3 patients were treated with systemic steroids and responded quickly while continuing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors for their cancer. With increasing use of this class of drugs, clinicians should be familiar with the clinical manifestations and treatments for this adverse reaction.

Extrathyroidal Extension: Does Strap Muscle Invasion Alone Influence Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer?

BACKGROUND: According to the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, extrathyroidal extension (ETE) and primary tumor size remain the principle determinants of T stage. However, impact of gross ETE into strap muscles on survival remains controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 2084 patients with ≤ 4 cm nonmetastatic differentiated thyroid cancer who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2015 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups according to degree of ETE: no ETE (group 1), ETE into perithyroidal soft tissue (group 2), and gross ETE into strap muscle (group 3). Survivals were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Factors predictive of survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Ten-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients in groups 1-3 was 90, 82, and 83%, respectively (p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 55 years, male sex, and pathologic N1b category predicted significantly worse DFS, while ETE into perithyroidal soft tissue or gross strap muscle invasion did not predict worse DFS. Overall survival (p = 0.957) and disease-specific survival (p =0.910) were not significantly different between the three groups. There was a statistically significant difference in locoregional recurrence-free survival between groups 1 and 2 [HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.06-3.94]. CONCLUSION: Gross strap muscle invasion may not be an important survival prognostic factor for staging purposes. Although both gross strap muscle invasion and perithyroidal soft tissue extension may be predictive for locoregional recurrence, the distinction between them may not be as important for postoperative risk stratification.

Use of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Two independent events--the identification of activating mutations of the RET proto-oncogene, a receptor tyrosine kinase, in medullary thyroid carcinoma, and the recognition that small organic molecules could bind to and inhibit phosphorylation of signaling molecules, thereby inactivating the pathway-led to the recognition that kinase inhibitors could be used to treat medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). The introduction of these compounds into clinical practice has transformed the treatment of metastatic MTC and provided insight into the mechanisms by which RET causes C-cell transformation. This chapter will review the progress in this field over the past 7 years.

Sorafenib in metastatic thyroid cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for radioiodine-resistant metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). In addition, two drugs (vandetanib and cabozantinib) have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for use in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Several published phase II trials have investigated the efficacy of sorafenib in thyroid cancers, but to date, results from those studies have not been compared. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to assess response rate, median progression-free survival, and adverse events associated with sorafenib therapy for metastatic thyroid cancers. RESULTS: This review included seven trials involving 219 patients: 159 with DTC (papillary, follicular, and poorly differentiated), 52 with MTC, and 8 with anaplastic thyroid cancer. No study reported complete responses to treatment. Overall partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates were 21%, 60%, and 20%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 18 months for patients with all subtypes of thyroid cancer. Drug was discontinued in 16% of patients because of toxicities or intolerance, and the dose was reduced in a further 56%. Side effects with an incidence ≥ 50% were hand-foot syndrome (74%), diarrhea (70%), skin rash (67%), fatigue (61%), and weight loss (57%). Deaths not related to progressive disease occurred in nearly 4% of patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment with sorafenib in patients with progressive DTC and MTC is a promising strategy, but the adverse event rate is high, leading to a high rate of dose reduction or discontinuation. Consequently, sorafenib use in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer requires careful selection of patients and careful management of side effects.

Efficacy and tolerability of different starting doses of sorafenib in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Sorafenib has proven efficacy in advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), but many patients must reduce the dose or discontinue treatment because of toxicity. The tolerability and efficacy of lower starting doses of sorafenib for DTC remain largely unstudied. Methods. We retrospectively examined overall survival, time to treatment failure, time to progression, discontinuation rates, and dose-reduction and interruption rates in patients with metastatic DTC treated with first-line sorafenib outside of a clinical trial. Two patient groups were compared; group 1 received the standard starting dose of 800 mg/day, and group 2 received any dose lower than 800 mg/day. Results. We included 75 adult patients, with 51 in group 1 and 24 in group 2. Mean age at diagnosis was 54 years, and 56% were male. The most common histologies included 43% papillary thyroid cancer of the conventional type, 15% papillary thyroid cancer of the follicular variant, and 15% Hürthle cell carcinoma. Time to treatment failure was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.6-14.3) in group 1 and 8 months (95% CI: 3.4-12.5) in group 2 (p = .56). Median overall survival was 56 months (95% CI: 30.6-81.3) in group 1 and 30 months (95% CI: 16.1-43.8) in group 2 (p = .08). Rates of discontinuation due to disease progression were 79% in group 1 and 91% in group 2, and 21% in group 1 and 9% in group 2 (p = .304) stopped treatment because of toxicity. Dose-reduction rates were 59% and 43% (p = .29), and interruption rates were 65% and 67% (p = .908) in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Conclusion. Efficacy and tolerability of sorafenib in treatment-naïve DTC patients does not appear to be negatively influenced by lower starting daily doses.

Checkpoint Inhibition in Addition to Dabrafenib/Trametinib for BRAFV600E-Mutated Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma.

Background: The dabrafenib plus trametinib combination (DT) has revolutionized the treatment of BRAFV600E-mutated anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (BRAFm-ATC). However, patients eventually develop resistance and progress. Single-agent anti-PD-1 inhibitor spartalizumab has shown a median overall survival (mOS) of 5.9 months. Combination of immunotherapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) seems to improve outcomes compared with BRAF/MEKi alone, although no direct comparison is available. BRAF-targeted therapy before surgery (neoadjuvant approach) has also shown improvement in survival. We studied the efficacy and safety of DT plus pembrolizumab (DTP) compared with current standard-of-care DT alone as an initial treatment, as well as in the neoadjuvant setting. Methods: Retrospective single-center study of patients with BRAFm-ATC treated with first-line BRAF-directed therapy between January 2014 and March 2023. Three groups were evaluated: DT, DTP (pembrolizumab added upfront or at progression), and neoadjuvant (DT before surgery, and pembrolizumab added before or after surgery). The primary endpoint was mOS between DT and DTP. Secondary endpoints included median progression-free survival (mPFS) and response rate with DT versus DTP as initial treatments, and the exploratory endpoint was mOS in the neoadjuvant group. Results: Seventy-one patients were included in the primary analysis: n = 23 in DT and n = 48 in DTP. Baseline demographics were similar between groups, including the presence of metastatic disease at start of treatment (p = 0.427) and prior treatments with surgery (p = 0.864) and radiation (p = 0.678). mOS was significantly longer with DTP (17.0 months [confidence interval CI, 11.9-22.1]) compared with DT alone (9.0 months [CI, 4.5-13.5]), p = 0.037. mPFS was also significantly improved with DTP as the initial treatment (11.0 months [CI, 7.0-15.0]) compared with DT alone (4.0 months [CI, 0.7-7.3]), p = 0.049. Twenty-three patients were in the exploratory neoadjuvant group, where mOS was the longest (63.0 months [CI, 15.5-110.5]). No grade 5 adverse events (AEs) occurred in all three cohorts, and 32.4% had immune-related AEs, most frequently hepatitis and colitis. Conclusions: Our results show that in BRAFm-ATC, addition of pembrolizumab to dabrafenib/trametinib may significantly prolong survival. Surgical resection of the primary tumor after initial BRAF-targeted therapy in selected patients may provide further survival benefit. However, conclusions are limited by the retrospective nature of the study. Additional prospective data are needed to confirm this observation.

Analytical Validation of a Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) Promoter Mutation Assay.

CONTEXT: Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter-mutated thyroid cancers are associated with a decreased rate of disease-free and disease-specific survival. High-quality analytical validation of a diagnostic test promotes confidence in the results that inform clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to demonstrate the analytical validation of the Afirma TERT promoter mutation assay. METHODS: TERT promoter C228T and C250T variant detection in genomic DNA (gDNA) was analyzed by assessing variable DNA input and the limit of detection (LOD) of variant allele frequency (VAF). The negative and positive percentage agreement (NPA and PPA) of the Afirma TERT test was examined against a reference primer pair as was the analytical specificity from potential interfering substances (RNA and blood gDNA). Further, the intrarun, interrun, and interlaboratory reproducibility of the assay were tested. RESULTS: The Afirma TERT test is tolerant to variation in DNA input amount (7-13 ng) and can detect expected positive TERT promoter variants down to 5% VAF LOD at 7 ng DNA input with greater than 95% sensitivity. Both NPA and PPA were 100% against the reference primer pair. The test remains accurate in the presence of 20% RNA or 80% blood gDNA for an average patient sample that typically has 30% VAF. The test also demonstrated a 100% confirmation rate when compared with an external next-generation sequencing-based reference assay executed in a non-Veracyte laboratory. CONCLUSION: The analytical robustness and reproducibility of the Afirma TERT test support its routine clinical use among thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology that are Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier suspicious or among Bethesda V/VI nodules.

Adaptive Darwinian off-target resistance mechanisms to selective RET inhibition in RET driven cancer.

Patients treated with RET protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) selpercatinib or pralsetinib develop RET TKI resistance by secondary RET mutations or alterative oncogenes, of which alterative oncogenes pose a greater challenge for disease management because of multiple potential mechanisms and the unclear tolerability of drug combinations. A patient with metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) harboring a RET activation loop D898_E901del mutation was treated with selpercatinib. Molecular alterations were monitored with tissue biopsies and cfDNA during the treatment. The selpercatinib-responsive MTC progressed with an acquired ETV6::NTRK3 fusion, which was controlled by selpercatinib plus the NTRK inhibitor larotrectinib. Subsequently, tumor progressed with an acquired EML4::ALK fusion. Combination of selpercatinib with the dual NTRK/ALK inhibitor entrectinib reduced the tumor burden, which was followed by appearance of NTRK3 solvent-front G623R mutation. Preclinical experiments validated selpercatinib plus larotrectinib or entrectinib inhibited RET/NTRK3 dependent cells, whereas selpercatinib plus entrectinib was necessary to inhibit cells with RET/NTRK3/ALK triple alterations or a mixture of cell population carrying these genetic alterations. Thus, RET-altered MTC adapted to selpercatinib and larotrectinib with acquisition of ETV6::NTRK3 and EML4::ALK oncogenes can be managed by combination of selpercatinib and entrectinib providing proof-of-concept of urgency of incorporating molecular profiling in real-time and personalized N-of-1 care transcending one-size-fits-all approach.

Combination Targeted Therapy with Pembrolizumab and Lenvatinib in Progressive, Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancers.

PURPOSE: Lenvatinib, a potent multikinase inhibitor, improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer; however, most patients experience disease progression, warranting further therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with progressive, RAI-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who were either naïve to multikinase inhibitors (cohort 1) or who had progressed on lenvatinib (cohort 2). Patients received oral lenvatinib daily (cohort 1, 20 mg; cohort 2, dose at progression) and intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg) every 21 days. RESULTS: In cohorts 1 and 2, 30 and 27 patients were enrolled, respectively. Adverse events were consistent with those observed in other cancers. In cohort 1, the confirmed overall response rate was 65.5%. There were no complete responses (primary endpoint). The 12- and 18-month PFS were 72.0% and 58.0%, respectively, and the median PFS was 26.8 months. In cohort 2, the confirmed overall response rate was 16% (primary endpoint), and the median PFS was 10.0 months (95% confidence interval, 7.0-17.9 months). Tumor histology, driver mutations, and immune-related biomarkers, including PD-L1 expression, thyroid-specific antibody levels, and CD8+ T-cell tumor infiltrate, did not correlate with response to therapy. Increased baseline peripheral blood monocytes and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were associated with a worse PFS in cohort 1. CONCLUSIONS: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab may enhance the durability of lenvatinib monotherapy in lenvatinib-naïve patients. Furthermore, the addition of pembrolizumab may be a viable salvage therapy for patients who have progressed on lenvatinib.

Anti-Programmed Death Ligand 1 Plus Targeted Therapy in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rare and lethal cancer. Although progress has been made in recent years in patients with mutated BRAF tumors, those who respond initially eventually die of their disease; furthermore, there are no approved therapies for non-BRAF mutated tumors. Objective: To determine whether treatment with matched-targeted therapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with improved overall survival (OS). Design, Setting, and Participants: A phase 2 trial at a single center, tertiary institution with parallel cohorts, assigning treatment with targeted therapy according to the tumor mutation status. Patients with mutated BRAF V600E tumors received vemurafenib/cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (cohort 1); those with mutated RAS (NRAS, KRAS, or HRAS) or NF1/2 tumors received cobimetinib plus atezolizumab (cohort 2). Patients without any of these variants were assigned to receive bevacizumab plus atezolizumab (cohort 3). Patients were enrolled from August 3, 2017, to July 7, 2021. All consecutive, systemic therapy-naive patients with ATC with active disease and who met eligibility criteria were considered for participation. The analysis was conducted in September 2023. Interventions: Patients were assigned to targeted therapy based on the driver mutation as follow: BRAF V600E (cohort 1, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib), RAS/NF (cohort 2, cobimetinib), or non-BRAF/RAS/NF (cohort 3, bevacizumab). All received atezolizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of the study was median OS of the entire targeted therapy cohort, compared with historical median OS of 5 months. Results: Forty-three patients with ATC were enrolled in the targeted therapy cohorts, of which 42 were included in the primary analysis. The median OS in patients across these 3 cohorts was 19 months (95% CI, 7.79-43.24). Median OS and progression-free survival per cohort were as follows: cohort 1: 43 months (95% CI, 16-not estimable [NE]), 13.9 months (6.6-64.1); cohort 2: 8.7 months (95% CI, 5.1-37.0) and 4.8 months (1.8-14.7); cohort 3 (vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor group): 6.21 months (4.1-NE) and 1.3 months (1.3-NE), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, atezolizumab combined with targeted therapy resulted in a longer median OS than historical landmark, achieving the study's primary end point, with cohort 1 achieving the longest OS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03181100.

Next-Generation Sequencing in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer Patients: Mutation Profile and Disease Aggressiveness.

Context: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma (sMTC) has led to increased detection of somatic mutations, including RET M918T, which has been considered a negative prognostic indicator. Objective: This study aimed to determine the association between clinicopathologic behavior and somatic mutation identified on clinically motivated NGS. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with sMTC who underwent NGS to identify somatic mutations for treatment planning were identified. Clinicopathologic factors, time to distant metastatic disease (DMD), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between somatic mutations. Results: Somatic mutations were identified in 191 sMTC tumors, including RET M918T (53.4%), other RET codons (10.5%), RAS (18.3%), somatic RET indels (8.9%), and RET/RAS wild-type (WT) status (8.9%). The median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range, 11-83); 46.1% were female. When comparing patients with RET M918T, RET-Other, and RET WT (which included RAS and RET/RAS WT), there were no differences in sex, TNM category, systemic therapy use, time to DMD, DSS, or OS. On multivariate analysis, older age at diagnosis (HR 1.05, P < .001; HR 1.06, P< .001) and M1 stage at diagnosis (HR 3.17, P = .001; HR 2.98, P = .001) were associated with decreased DSS and OS, respectively, but mutation cohort was not. When comparing RET M918T to RET indels there was no significant difference in time to DMD, DSS, or OS between the groups. Conclusion: Somatic RET mutations do not portend compromised DSS or OS in a cohort of sMTC patients who underwent clinically motivated NGS.

Decreasing utilization for postoperative radiation therapy in locoregionally advanced medullary thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: Use of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in locoregionally advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) remains controversial. The objective was to evaluate the effect of PORT on locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 346 MTC patients separated into PORT and no-PORT cohorts. Relative indications for PORT, as well as changes in patterns of treatment, were recorded. RESULTS: 49/346 (14%) received PORT. PORT was associated with worse OS; adjusted HR = 2.0 (95%CI 1.3-3.3). PORT was not associated with improved LRC, even when adjusting for advanced stage (Stage III p = 0.892; Stage IV p = 0.101). PORT and targeted therapy were not associated with improved OS compared to targeted therapy alone; adjusted HR = 1.2 (95%CI 0.3-4.1). CONCLUSIONS: Use of PORT in MTC has decreased and its indications have become more selective, coinciding with the advent of effective targeted therapies. Overall, PORT was not associated with improved LRC or OS.

Initial Management of BRAF V600E-Variant Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer: The FAST Multidisciplinary Group Consensus Statement.

Importance: BRAF/MEK inhibitors revolutionized the treatment of BRAF V600E-variant anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (BRAFv-ATC), offering improved outcomes for patients with this previously incurable disease. Observations: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) accounts for approximately half of thyroid cancer-related deaths. It presents as a rapidly growing tumor that often invades locoregional structures and spreads to distant sites early; therefore, prompt diagnosis, staging, and treatment initiation are of the essence in the treatment of ATC. Although most oncologists will encounter a patient with ATC in their practice, the rarity of this disease makes treatment challenging, particularly because those with BRAFv-ATC no longer have a dismal prognosis. BRAF/MEK kinase inhibitors have transformed the outlook and treatment of BRAFv-ATC. Therefore, molecular profiling to identify these patients is critical. More recently, the addition of immunotherapy to BRAF/MEK inhibitors as well as the use of the neoadjuvant approach were shown to further improve survival outcomes in BRAFv-ATC. Many of these recent advances have not yet been incorporated in the currently available guidelines, allowing for disparities in the treatment of patients with BRAFv-ATC across the US. With the increasing complexity in the management of BRAFv-ATC, this Consensus Statement aims to formulate guiding recommendations from a group of experts to facilitate therapeutic decision-making. Conclusions and Relevance: This Consensus Statement from the FAST (Facilitating Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer Specialized Treatment) group at MD Anderson Cancer Center emphasizes that rapid identification of a BRAF V600E pathogenic variant and timely initiation of sequential therapy are critical to avoid excess morbidity and mortality in patients with BRAFv-ATC. In the past decade, remarkable progress has been made in the treatment of patients with BRAFv-ATC, justifying these new evidence-based recommendations reached through a consensus of experts from a high-volume center.

Patterns of loco-regional progression and patient outcomes after definitive-dose radiation therapy for anaplastic thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to characterize the patterns of loco-regional progression (LRP) and outcomes after definitive-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) with macroscopic neck disease at the time of IMRT. METHODS: Disease/treatment characteristics and outcomes for patients with unresected or incompletely resected ATC who received IMRT (≥45 Gy) were retrospectively reviewed. For those with LRP after IMRT, progressive/recurrent gross tumor volumes (rGTV) were contoured on diagnostic CTs and co-registered with initial planning CTs using deformable image registration. rGTVs were classified based on established spatial/dosimetric criteria. RESULTS: Forty patients treated between 2010-2020 formed the cohort. Median IMRT dose was 66 Gy (45-70 Gy); altered fractionation (AF) was used in 24 (60 %). All received concurrent chemotherapy. In addition to areas of gross disease, target volumes (TVs) commonly included: central compartment/upper mediastinum (levels VI/VII), neck levels II-V in an involved, and levels III-IV in an uninvolved lateral neck. Median overall survival was 7.1 m. Median progression free survival was 7.4 m for patients with locoregional disease and 1.8 m for patients with distant metastasis at the time of IMRT. Twenty-one patients (53 %) developed LRP at median of 10.9 m; freedom from LRP at 3 m and 12 m was 71 % (95 %CI 58-87 %) and 47 % (95 %CI 32-68 %). Forty-one individual rGTVs were identified and most occurred within the high dose (HD) TVs: Type A/central HD (n = 29, 71 %) and B/peripheral HD (n = 3, 7 %). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an intensive treatment schedule, including AF and concurrent chemotherapy, classic radio-resistant and rapid Type A failures predominated; isolated extraneous dose failures were rare. While these findings support the IMRT and TV delineation strategies described herein, they highlight the importance of identifying novel strategies to further improve LRC for patients with unresectable disease without targetable mutations for contemporary neo-adjuvant strategies.

Review article: new treatments for advanced differentiated thyroid cancers and potential mechanisms of drug resistance.

The treatment of advanced, radioiodine refractory, differentiated thyroid cancers (RR-DTCs) has undergone major advancements in the last decade, causing a paradigm shift in the management and prognosis of these patients. Better understanding of the molecular drivers of tumorigenesis and access to next generation sequencing of tumors have led to the development and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approval of numerous targeted therapies for RR-DTCs, including antiangiogenic multikinase inhibitors, and more recently, fusion-specific kinase inhibitors such as RET inhibitors and NTRK inhibitors. BRAF + MEK inhibitors have also been approved for BRAF-mutated solid tumors and are routinely used in RR-DTCs in many centers. However, none of the currently available treatments are curative, and most patients will ultimately show progression. Current research efforts are therefore focused on identifying resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and ways to overcome them. Various novel treatment strategies are under investigation, including immunotherapy, redifferentiation therapy, and second-generation kinase inhibitors. In this review, we will discuss currently available drugs for advanced RR-DTCs, potential mechanisms of drug resistance and future therapeutic avenues.

Prior Thyroid and Nonthyroid Cancer History Do Not Significantly Alter Overall Survival in Patients Diagnosed with Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.

Background: A history of thyroid and nonthyroid malignancies has traditionally been an exclusion criterion in patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) seeking to enroll in clinical trials. In this study, we examined the impact of prior malignancies on overall survival (OS) in patients diagnosed with ATC. Methods: In our retrospective cohort study, we identified 451 patients with ATC treated at MD Anderson between 2000 and 2019. Clinical and pathological information was obtained through chart review. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Results: A history of clinically documented differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) was reported in 14% of patients with ATC (n = 62), most commonly papillary thyroid cancer (81%, n = 50). The median time from diagnosis of prior DTC to ATC diagnosis was 3.5 years (range: 6 months to 35 years). Concomitant DTC was found on pathology in a higher proportion of patients (52%, n = 234). A history of nonthyroid cancer was reported in 23% of patients (n = 102), where 19% (n = 87) had one, 2% (n = 10) had two, and 1% (n = 5) had three prior cancers. The median time from diagnosis of prior nonthyroid cancer to ATC diagnosis was 8 years (range: 3 months to 53 years). The most common prior nonthyroid cancers were nonmelanoma skin (28.4%), prostate (19.6%), and breast cancers (16.7%). In a subgroup analysis performed in patients with available tumor mutation information (n = 183), the frequency of detected tumor driver mutations (BRAF, RAS, TP53) was not significantly different between patients with ATC with and without a history of nonthyroid cancer. On multivariate analysis after adjusting for age and overall stage, prior DTC, concomitant DTC, and prior nonthyroid cancers, all had no significant impact on OS. Conclusions: The presence of prior malignancy does not significantly impact OS in patients with ATC. Revision of eligibility criteria for enrollment of patients with ATC into clinical trials is warranted.

Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor diabetes mellitus at a comprehensive cancer center.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated diabetes mellitus (ICI-DM) is a rare adverse event. In this study, we characterize clinical outcomes of patients with ICI-DM and evaluate survival impact of this complication on melanoma patients. Research design & methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 76 patients diagnosed with ICI-DM from April 2014 to December 2020. Results: 68% of patients presented in diabetic ketoacidosis, 16% had readmissions for hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia occurred in 70% of patients after diagnosis. Development of ICI-DM did not impact overall survival or progression-free survival in melanoma patients. Conclusion: Development of ICI-DM is associated with long-term insulin dependence and pancreatic atrophy; the use of diabetes technology in this patient population can help improve glycemic control.

Cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause irreversible side effects. In this study, we describe the clinical presentations of 76 patients who developed immune checkpoint inhibitor diabetes mellitus, a rare complication of checkpoint inhibitor therapy that requires lifelong treatment with insulin therapy. Most patients presented with a life-threatening hyperglycemic emergency and had experienced weight loss and hyperglycemia several weeks prior to diagnosis. After diagnosis, these patients are at risk for high and low blood sugars, but the use of glucose monitoring devices and insulin pumps can help improve blood sugar control. In our study, the development of this complication did not affect survival for melanoma patients. We need to improve awareness of this rare complication to ensure timely treatment for patients.

Clinical outcomes of combined cervical and transthoracic surgical approaches in patients with advanced thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: Advanced thyroid disease involving the mediastinum may be managed surgically with a combined transcervical and transthoracic approach. Contemporary analysis of this infrequently encountered cohort will aid the multidisciplinary team in personalizing treatment approaches. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients undergoing combined transcervical and transthoracic surgery for thyroid cancer at a single high-volume institution from 1994 to 2015. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with median age 59 years (range 28-76) underwent surgery without perioperative mortality. Most patients had primary disease. A majority had distant metastases outside the mediastinum but had locoregionally curable disease. Common complications were temporary (39%) and permanent (18%) hypoparathyroidism, and wound infection (13%). One-year overall survival was 84%; 1-year locoregional disease-free survival was 64%. Median time to locoregional recurrence was 36 months. Only esophageal invasion was associated with worse oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Combined transcervical and transthoracic surgery for advanced thyroid cancer can be performed without mortality and with acceptable morbidity.