Relationship between somatomedin-C and growth hormone levels in acromegaly: basal and dynamic evaluation.

The relationship between basal and stimulated plasma GH and somatomedin-C (SmC) levels in acromegalic patients was evaluated. The basal plasma SmC levels of 66 patients were significantly correlated (P less than 0.01) with mean daily plasma GH levels, but not with the percent GH increase after GH-releasing hormone or TRH or the GH decrease after acute bromocriptine administration. Bromocriptine (7.5-15 mg/day) administration for 9.2 +/- 0.9 (+/- SD) months in 20 patients significantly (P less than 0.05) decreased GH levels. SmC decreased significantly [from 9.8 +/- 1.9 to 5.1 +/- 0.7 U/ml (mean +/- SE)] only in the 10 patients who had the more marked GH inhibition. The administration of a somatostatin analog, SMS 201-995 (100 micrograms twice daily), to 12 patients for 16 weeks significantly decreased plasma GH and SmC levels beginning on the second day of therapy; normal SmC levels were achieved in 5 of 12 patients. Pituitary adenomectomy resulted in normal GH and SmC levels in 10 of 12 and 8 of 12 patients, respectively. Our data indicate an overall dependency of plasma SmC levels on plasma GH levels in acromegaly, although similar GH levels may have differing somatomedin-stimulating activities. A derangement in the feedback mechanisms controlling GH secretion is indicated by the failure of elevated SmC levels to influence the GH responsiveness to releasing hormones. In evaluating pharmacological or surgical treatments of acromegaly, a single plasma SmC value can reliably replace several plasma GH determinations.

Serum type III procollagen propeptide levels in acromegalic patients.

Serum type III procollagen propeptide (PIIIP) is a reliable index of tissue collagen synthesis. Since in acromegaly there is increased collagen production, we measured serum PIIIP in acromegalic patients before any treatment (basal), during medical treatment with the somatostatin analog SMS 201-995, and after pituitary adenomectomy. In all patients, serum GH and plasma somatomedin-C (SmC) levels were also measured. Basal serum PIIIP levels were significantly (P less than 0.01) higher in acromegalic patients (mean +/- SEM, 22.7 +/- 2.1 ng/ml) than in normal subjects (n = 30; 9.7 +/- 0.5 ng/ml), and they were significantly correlated with plasma SmC values (r = 0.31; P less than 0.05). A significant (P less than 0.01) reduction in PIIIP levels occurred in patients treated with SMS 201-995 or surgery (from 24.3 +/- 2.7 to 12.4 +/- 1 ng/ml) as well as in GH and SmC levels. The maximum percent decrease in serum PIIIP was significantly correlated with those in GH (r = 0.65; P less than 0.01) and SmC (r = 0.60; P less than 0.01). Serum PIIIP levels did not change in those patients in whom neither GH nor SmC were decreased by treatment. In conclusion, serum PIIIP levels are elevated in acromegalic patients, and they decline in parallel with GH and SmC during medical or surgical treatment. Serum PIIIP measurements may be useful in the evaluation of acromegalic patients to gain information on the biological activity of GH and in monitoring the course of the disease.

Bromocriptine does not alter growth hormone (GH) responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone in acromegaly.

GHRH (100 micrograms) and TRH (200 micrograms) were administered to 24 active acromegalic patients before and during chronic bromocriptine (Br) treatment (Br, 10-15 mg/day for 3-5 months) to evaluate the possible effects of the dopamine agonist on GH release induced by these releasing hormones. Mean daily plasma GH levels were reduced by Br treatment from 34 +/- 40 (SD) to 16 +/- 19 ng/ml (P less than 0.01). No significant changes were found when comparing the GH response to GHRH as mean area under the response curve (nanograms per min/ml above the basal) (pretreatment, 5453 +/- 7843; during Br, 7017 +/- 12763 ng/ml . min), and as mean individual peak GH values (pretreatment, 130 +/- 148; during Br, 126 +/- 187 ng/ml) before and during treatment. The percentage GH increase (pretreatment, 340 +/- 354; during Br, 617 +/- 539%) was however significantly higher during Br. Br treatment significantly reduced the GH response to TRH in terms of mean of individual peak levels (from 136 +/- 134 to 60 +/- 52 ng/ml; P less than 0.01) and area under the response curve (from 3142 +/- 3998 to 1331 +/- 1646 ng/min . ml; P less than 0.01). However, the percentage GH increase was not significantly different (pretreatment, 486 +/- 729; during Br, 1059 +/- 1862%). When the patients were divided into Br responders, i.e. mean daily GH reduction during Br of at least 50% below baseline, and nonresponders, the initial response to GHRH was significantly higher in the latter group, but was unaffected by Br treatment in either group. On the contrary, the response to TRH, statistically significant initially only in the Br responder group, was reduced by Br treatment. We suggest that cells sensitive to Br and TRH but not to GHRH (lactotroph-like) and cells sensitive to GHRH but not to Br (pure somatotrophs) may coexist in GH-secreting adenomas.

Dopaminergic treatment of acromegaly: different effects on hormone secretion and tumor size.

We studied the effects of long term treatment with bromocriptine (Br) or lisuride (L) on GH secretion and tumor size in 19 acromegalic patients with large pituitary adenomas. In 22 additional patients with smaller adenomas, only plasma GH levels were monitored during treatment. All patients underwent an acute test with 2.5 mg Br or 0.3 mg L and, on the basis of GH changes, were classified as responders, i.e. reduction in circulating GH concentrations by at least 50% below baseline, or as nonresponders. The chronic treatment was 5-20 mg/day Br in 26 patients or 0.3-2.0 mg/day L in 15 patients. Treatment was given for 4-26 months (mean +/- SE, 13.3 +/- 2.8 months). Plasma GH levels (baseline, 46.3 +/- 8.3 ng/ml) were significantly lower in the group as a whole (22.7 +/- 3.6 ng/ml; P less than 0.01) after the first month of treatment with dopamine agonist agents. GH levels decreased significantly in those acromegalic patients who responded to the acute test (P less than 0.001), but were unchanged in the nonresponders. In addition, there was a significant correlation between the maximal percent GH decrease in the acute test and the response during chronic treatment (r = 0.73; P less than 0.01). Computed tomography failed to show any tumor size changes in any of the GH nonresponders who had a macroadenoma . However, in two patients in the acute responder group with macroadenomas, chronic dopamine agonist therapy resulted in reduction of the extrasellar portion of the tumor (-30% and -40% of tumor area, respectively). These data show that although dopaminergic drugs lower GH levels and reverse signs and symptoms of active disease in those acromegalic patients who are responsive to an acute challenge, tumor size reduction occurred in a minority of such patients.

Effects of nomifensine on growth hormone and prolactin secretion in normal subjects and in pathological hyperprolactinemia.

We have studied the effect of the oral administration of 200 mg nomifensine (nom), a drug which activates the dopaminergic system, on GH and PRL secretion in 15 normal subjects, 18 patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, and 17 patients with tumoral hyperprolactinemia. GH levels increased significantly after nom in normal subjects (basal, 0.96 +/- 0.76 ng/ml; peak 4.6 +/- 0.61 ng/ml; P less than 0.01) and patients with hyperprolactinemia, both idiopathic (basal, 1.0 +/- 0.38 ng/ml; peak, 4.2 +/- 1.0 ng/ml; P less than 0.05) and tumoral (basal 0.88 +/- 0.3 ng/ml, peak 6.68 +/- 1.2 ng/ml; P less than 0.01). Peak GH levels higher than 5 ng/ml were observed in 8 of 15 normal subjects, 6 of 18 patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, and 8 of 17 patients with tumoral hyperprolactinemia. PRL levels decreased in response to nom in normal subjects, but not in patients with idiopathic or tumoral hyperprolactinemia. A reduction in plasma PRL levels of at least 30% below the baseline was observed only in two patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and in none of the patients with tumoral hyperprolactinemia. These results demonstrate that nom does not discriminate between idiopathic and tumoral hyperprolactinemia. Since nom probably requires a hypothalamic pool of dopamine to bring about its GH stimulatory effect, the suggestion that the lack of a PRL-lowering effect of the drug is attributable to a dopamine deficiency is not supported by our data.

Changes in growth hormone (GH) secretion induced by human pancreatic GH releasing hormone-44 in acromegaly: a comparison with thyrotropin-releasing hormone and bromocriptine.

We studied the effects of 100 micrograms human pancreatic GH releasing hormone-44 (GRH) in 35 acromegalic patients. Plasma GH levels significantly increased [basal, 30 +/- 10 (SE) ng/ml; peak, 82 +/- 21 ng/ml; P less than 0.01], but a wide intersubject variability of the responses was found (range, 20-1602%). No relationship was found between the percentage GH increase after GRH and basal values of GH, PRL, or somatomedin-C. All patients also underwent an acute test with bromocriptine (2.5 mg orally) and TRH (200 micrograms iv). When dividing the patients according to their GH responsiveness to bromocriptine (Br), an inverse correlation (r = -0.42, P less than 0.05) was found between percentage of GH changes after GRH and after Br; moreover Br responder patients had a lesser (P less than 0.001) GH increase after GRH (124 +/- 27%) than nonresponders (562 +/- 116%). No relationship was found between the GH response to TRH and GRH, and no differences were found between the percentage GH increase after TRH (513 +/- 117%) and after GRH (349 +/- 71%). We conclude that the tumoral somatotrophs are sensitive to their specific releasing hormone and we suggest that the presence in the adenoma of cells with surface membrane receptors similar to those on the lactotropes may explain the lower sensitivity to GRH of Br responders compared to nonresponders.

Chronic treatment of pathological hyperprolactinemia and acromegaly with the new ergot derivative terguride.

The long term effectiveness and tolerance of terguride, a new ergot derivative, as initial therapy were evaluated in 20 patients with pathological hyperprolactinemia (PHP; group A) and 7 patients with acromegaly. We also studied 10 patients with PHP whose treatment was changed from bromocriptine or lisuride to terguride (group B). Terguride, given for at least 6 months in divided doses ranging from 0.25-1.50 mg/day to group A patients, resulted in normal (11 patients) or markedly reduced plasma PRL levels. Gonadal function was restored in all but 2 patients in this group, and the tumors shrank in 3 of 5 patients with a macroprolactinoma and in 1 of 3 patients with a microprolactinoma. In group B patients, positive effects of the previous treatment on PRL levels, gonadal function, and tumor growth were maintained by terguride. Terguride suppressed plasma GH levels below 50% of baseline in 4 of the 7 acromegalic patients. Two of the 27 patients initially treated with terguride complained of mild nausea and postural hypotension only after the first dose (0.25 mg) of the drug. No patient in group B had any side-effects during terguride, with the exception of 1 patient who was also intolerant to bromocriptine. We conclude that terguride is an effective well tolerated dopaminergic agent in PHP.

Medical treatment of acromegaly with SMS 201-995, a somatostatin analog: a comparison with bromocriptine.

We studied the effects of acute and chronic sc administration of SMS 201-995 (SMS), a long-acting somatostatin analog, in acromegalic patients. The results were compared with those obtained in the same patients treated with oral bromocriptine (Brc). A single dose of 50 micrograms SMS administered to 28 patients induced a more rapid, greater, and more prolonged reduction in plasma GH levels than did 2.5 mg Brc. Chronic treatment [60-330 days; mean 208 +/- 23 (+/- SEM)] with SMS (100-300 micrograms/day) induced in 16 patients a significantly greater decrease in mean plasma GH and somatomedin-C levels than did 20 mg Brc. Combined treatment with the 2 agents had an additional effect. The clinical and metabolic parameters of acromegaly dramatically improved in all patients whose plasma GH and somatomedin-C levels decreased even if they were not normalized by SMS. Reduction in tumor size occurred in 3 of the 10 patients examined by computed tomography before and during SMS treatment. We conclude that SMS is more effective than Brc and that the 2 drugs may be complementary in the medical treatment of acromegaly.

Size reduction of macroprolactinomas by bromocriptine or lisuride treatment.

We have administered to 29 patients with macroprolactinoma the dopamine agonists bromocriptine and lisuride for 1-50 months (mean +/- SE, 12.7 +/- 1.8) in order to assess the effects of these drugs on tumor size. Fourteen patients were treated with bromocriptine (dose range, 7.5-20 mg/day), 12 patients were treated with lisuride (0.6-2 mg/day), and 3 patients were given both drugs. Computed tomography performed before and during treatment showed the occurrence of tumor shrinkage in 18 patients (62%), but in no case was a complete disappearance of the tumor observed. In 5 of these patients, it was even possible to document tumor shrinkage within the first month of treatment with low doses of the dopamine agonists, whereas in other patients, tumors shrank only after prolonged treatment with higher doses. Visual field and acuity improved or normalized in 8 of the 13 patients with visual defects; in some cases, the improvement was reported as early as 2 days after the treatment was started. Plasma PRL levels fell in all patients who showed a reduction in tumor size; in 2 other patients, PRL levels were only poorly suppressed, and tumor size remained unchanged. In the remaining patients, PRL levels were lowered without convincing evidence of tumor shrinkage. In considering the high percentage of patients showing tumor shrinkage under medical treatment, we propose a course with dopamine agonists as the first step in the management of patients with macroprolactinomas regardless of the presence of visual impairments.

A comparison between octreotide-LAR and lanreotide-SR in the chronic treatment of acromegaly.

BACKGROUND: At present long-acting somatostatin analogs represent the first-line medical treatment of acromegaly. These drugs produce stable suppression of GH in most sensitive patients and IGF-I normalization in many; they also increase the compliance of acromegalic patients. The recent availability of octreotide (OC)-LAR, a somatostatin analog to be administered at 28-day intervals, has prompted us to compare, in the same group of patients, its effects and those of another somatostatin analog already available, lanreotide-SR (LSR, to be administered at 14-day intervals). PATIENTS: Twelve somatostatin analog-sensitive acromegalic patients with active disease were enrolled in a prospective open sequential study after giving their informed consent. After chronic treatment with LSR (6-24 months), the patients were changed to treatment with OC-LAR, without wash-out. LSR had been administered at individually tailored dosages (30 mg i.m. at 7-21-day intervals, median 10 days - every 7 days in seven patients, 10 days in two patients, 14 days in two patients and 21 days in one patient) according to GH and IGF-I responses. Disease stability was obtained, as shown by maximal GH/IGF-I suppression without any significant hormonal change between the last two control measurements. OC-LAR was administered i.m. at 28-day intervals six times at the dosage of 20 mg for the first three times and 10 or 30 mg for the last three times (according to individual GH/IGF-I responses). GH (mean of three, hourly samples) and IGF-I concentrations were evaluated on the same day as each administration of the drug, before its injection. RESULTS: GH and IGF-I values were significantly decreased by LSR treatment. GH decreased from 41.6 +/- 14.6 microg/l (mean +/- s.e.) to 7.2 +/- 1.5 microg/l (P < 0.02), whereas IGF-I values declined from 959 +/- 95 microg/l to 460 +/- 61 microg/l (P < 0.00001), expressed as absolute values, and from 287 +/- 30% to 137 +/- 19% expressed as percentage of the upper limit of normal range (% ULNR). At the end of the last cycle, OC-LAR treatment achieved a significant further suppression both in GH (to 5.1 +/- 1.1 microg/l, P < 0.05 compared with LSR) and in IGF-I concentrations (to 374 +/- 60 microg/l, P<0.05 compared with LSR, and to 112 +/- 19% as % ULNR). LSR decreased GH concentrations to less than 2.5 microg/l in one patient and normalized IGF-I concentrations in four patients. OC-LAR decreased GH concentrations to less than 2.5 microg/l in four patients and normalized or near-normalized IGF-I concentrations (i.e. to < 110% ULNR) in eight patients. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results show that the once-monthly OC-LAR administration schedule proved more efficacious than LSR given every 7-21 days, in a greater number of acromegalic patients.

Neurosurgery restores late GH rise after glucose-induced suppression in cured acromegalics.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: A decrease of GH levels below 2 microg/l after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is still currently accepted as the gold standard for assessing cure in surgically treated acromegaly. Whether glucose-induced suppression of GH is accompanied by a restoration of normal GH late rebound has not yet been evaluated in this disease. In order to assess the restoration of normal GH regulation after removal of a pituitary adenoma, we have evaluated GH changes after an OGTT in a series of selected acromegalic patients (transsphenoidal surgery and lack of pituitary failure). METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (13 male, 16 female, age range 27-70 years) entered the study. Their neuroradiological imaging before neurosurgery showed microadenoma in 7, intrasellar macroadenoma in 8 and macroadenoma with extrasellar extension in 14. Plasma GH levels were assayed up to 300 min after glucose administration (75 g p.o.) and IGF-I on basal samples. RESULTS: Basal GH levels were below 5 microg/l in 20 patients and below 2 microg/l in 5 of these. Normal age-adjusted IGF-I levels were observed in 12 patients. GH values were suppressed below 2 microg/l during an OGTT in 13 patients, and below 1 microg/l in 7 of these. In 9 patients out of these 13, a marked rise in GH levels occurred after nadir. Baseline and nadir GH values of these 9 patients were not different from the corresponding values of the other 4 patients without OGTT-induced late GH peaks. CONCLUSIONS: GH rebound after GH nadir occurs in acromegalic patients considered as cured on the basis of OGTT-induced GH suppression and/or IGF-I normalization. The restoration of this physiological response could be regarded as a marker of recovered/preserved integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Even though the reason for this GH rebound has not yet been elucidated (GHRH discharge?/end of somatostatin inhibition?), the lack of late GH peak in the patients regarded as cured by the usual criteria could be due to injury to the pituitary stalk caused by the adenoma or by surgical manipulation.

Failure of radiotherapy in acromegaly.

BACKGROUND: Recent data has raised skepticism regarding the long-term effectiveness of radiotherapy (RxT) in acromegaly and its role as an ancillary tool to neurosurgery (Tx). PATIENTS: We evaluated 72 acromegalic patients previously submitted to RxT. Data were discarded in 23 patients, who were lost to follow-up, operated on after RxT or irradiated with techniques different from external conventional fractionated RxT. Among the remaining 49 (five with mixed GH-prolactin adenoma), 34 were irradiated after surgical failure and 15 as primary treatment. A second cycle of RxT was administered in two. RESULTS: (i) GH/IGF-I. After a median follow-up of 14 years (range 3-41), normal age-matched IGF-I levels were reached in eight patients (16%) after 10 years, and GH levels <2.5 microg/l in six (12%) after 9 years. The rate of persistently pathological hormonal levels was still 90% at 25 years. All patients with GH/IGF-I normalization had undergone irradiation without any antisecretory drug. Neither basal GH nor tumor size affected the outcome of RxT. In three patients (6%) a relapse/worsening occurred. (ii) Tumor size. Tumor shrank after 8.5 years in 24 patients (49%), in nine of whom during GH-suppressive treatment. Tumor shrinkage was not predictive of hormonal normalization. (iii) Side-effects. Hypopituitarism was diagnosed in four patients (selective in three and global in one) and GH deficiency in one. Three patients had neurological side-effects and meningioma was shown in two patients. CONCLUSION: RxT is unable to cure acromegaly, because it seldom achieves hormonal normalization even after a very prolonged follow-up. Concomitant antisecretory treatment seems to counteract its effects. RxT can still play a role in those patients with large tumor remnants, because of its capacity to shrink tumor size.

Persistence of somatostatinergic tone in acromegaly.

It is a matter of debate whether hypothalamic somatostatin (SRIH) secretion in acromegaly is preserved and still regulated by the physiological feedback mechanisms of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I. To gather further information on this, the reproducibility of plasma GH changes induced by growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) administration was evaluated in 15 acromegalic patients. There was a highly significant correlation between the peak/basal ratio (P/B) GH response in the 15 patients administered GHRH on two separate occasions (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). The test was performed also before and after the administration of drugs able to inhibit or stimulate hypothalamic SRIH release, by activating (pyridostigmine) or inhibiting (pirenzepine) cholinergic pathways, respectively. The GHRH-induced GH response (P/B = 2, range 1.1-26.1) was increased significantly by pyridostigmine pretreatment in 30 patients (P/B = 2.6, range 1.3-34.8; p = 0.0045). In nine out of 30 patients an increase of greater than 2 SD of within-subject GHRH variability was observed in response to GHRH plus pyridostigmine when compared to GHRH alone. An inverse correlation (r = -0.37, p < 0.05) was observed between GH response to GHRH alone and after pyridostigmine pretreatment. On the contrary, no change of GHRH-induced GH response was observed in 12 patients after pirenzepine pretreatment (P/B = 1.9, range 1.1-5 and P/B = 2, range 1.3-6 without and after pirenzepine pretreatment, respectively). These data suggest that in acromegaly the somatostatinergic tone does not seem to fluctuate, and that it can be inhibited often by cholinergic pathway activation but not increased further by cholinergic suppression.

Cabergoline in acromegaly: a renewed role for dopamine agonist treatment?

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Eighteen active acromegalics entered a prospective open study with cabergoline (CAB), a dopaminergic drug much more potent than bromocriptine (Br). METHODS: CAB was administered for 6 months at doses ranging between 0.5 mg twice weekly and 0.5 mg/day. Clinical-anamnestic characteristics of the patients were: (i) sensitivity to dopamine agonist drugs (10 patients); (ii) resistance to somatostatin analogs (SAs) (8 patients): (iii) intolerance to SA (3 patients). In 2 patients marked hyperprolactinemia was present. RESULTS: Basal GH was 6.6 microg/l (2.2-50) (median (range)), and on treatment it was 3.5 microg/l (1.2-34) (P=0.013). The corresponding IGF-I values were 720 microg/l (410-1438) and 375 microg/l (167-1260) respectively (P=0.00001). Individual GH levels decreased below 2 microg/l in 5 patients, and between 2 and 5 microg/l in another 5 patients. IGF-I levels were suppressed below 50% of baseline in 8 patients and normal age-adjusted IGF-I values were reached in 5 patients (27% of the series). The retrospective comparison with previous chronic treatment with Br in the 10 suitable patients showed a greater effectiveness of CAB (IGF-I decrease on CAB treatment, 46.8%, on Br treatment, 31%, P=0.02). Adenoma shrank in the 3 patients whose pituitary imaging was repeated during CAB. CONCLUSIONS: These results envisage that CAB may represent a worthy therapeutic tool in acromegalic patients, inducing a degree of IGF-I and GH suppression comparable to SAs, administered by the oral route and much less expensive.

Effects of terguride on anterior pituitary function in parkinsonian patients treated with L-dopa: a double-blind study versus placebo.

In a randomized double-blind study, 20 parkinsonian patients (suffering from the disease for 2-18 years), chronically treated with levodopa (500-750 mg/day for 0.5-12 years), received terguride (1 mg b.i.d.) or placebo for 4 weeks. Growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) secretions were studied before and after the morning dose of levodopa (250 mg p.o.), both before and at the end of study period. At the beginning of the study, basal hormonal levels were within normal limits, and levodopa administration induced a significant suppression in PRL and TSH levels (both p < 0.01)) and a significant increase in GH (p < 0.01). The same results were observed at the end of the study period in the placebo group. Addition of terguride induced a significant suppression in basal PRL levels (p < 0.01), whereas levodopa-induced hormonal changes were unaffected. These data suggest that the hypothalamic dopaminergic function that controls anterior pituitary hormones is preserved in parkinsonian patients, regardless of both the duration of the disease and the long-term treatment with levodopa. The strong additional prolactin-lowering effect of terguride indicates long-lasting dopaminergic effects, as is already known from hyperprolactinemic conditions. The dopaminergic effects of levodopa on TSH, GH, and IGF-I secretion were unchanged by terguride treatment. The anti-dopaminergic effects of terguride observed in the motor system in animal studies, as well as in levodopa-induced dyskinesias in parkinsonian patients, could not be observed in the case of the dopaminergic control of anterior pituitary hormones under the conditions of this study.

[Medical treatment of acromegaly with dopaminergic agents]. / Il trattamento medico dell'acromegalia con farmaci dopaminergici.

The medical treatment of acromegaly with dopaminergic drugs has its physiopathological premise in the observation that agents capable of stimulating dopaminergic receptors directly are capable of determining GH secretion inhibition in a large percentage of acromegalic patients. Chronic administration of 5-20 mg/die of bromocryptin, long acting dopaminergic agonist, leads to a stable reduction in the levels of GH and somatomedin C (SmC) in about 50% of patients. However, these are only normalised in 20%. Treatment induces marked improvement in the clinical and metabolic changes typical of acromegalic disease. The therapeutic effect of dopaminergics may be maintained for periods of treatment lasting years but upon suspension of treatment pH levels return quickly to pretreatment levels. The antitumoral effect of the dopaminergic frequently encountered in prolactinomas is a rarer event in acromegaly and occurs more readily in patients with mixed secreting GH and PRL tumours than in pure GH. Currently octractide, a long lasting somatostatin analogue, is the most effective drug in the medical treatment of acromegaly; however the dopaminergic agonists remain a valid alternative.

Macroprolactinomas: CT evaluation of reduction of tumor size after medical treatment.

Thirty patients with macroprolactinomas were treated with dopaminergic drugs from a minimum of 4 months to a maximum of 6 years. Tumor size was evaluated with serial CT during treatment; serum prolactin levels and visual fields were also assessed at the same time. Reduction of PRL levels was found in 28 patients of whom 20 also had marked reduction of tumor volume on CT. Two patterns of reduction of size of tumor in relation with time were observed. In one, tumor shrinkage occurred rapidly in the first month and even in the first week after starting treatment. In the other pattern the tumor reduced in size only after some months of treatment. It is proposed that all patients with macroprolactinomas should be treated medically before considering surgery. A radiological diagnostic and research protocol is proposed, including scout views, thin slices, coronal sections, objective measurement of tumor size and density, serial CTs at 7,21,45 days, 6 months and then every year after the beginning of treatment.

Effect of chronic bromocriptine administration on tumor size in patients with "nonsecreting" pituitary adenomas.

The effect of chronic bromocriptine administration (7.5-20 mg/day for 1-32 months) on the size of "nonsecreting" pituitary adenomas (NPA) was studied in 20 patients. Brain computed tomography showed a marked reduction of the adenoma in one patient after 1 month of treatment (7.5 mg/day); further scans taken 2 and 15 months later, under the same bromocriptine dose, did not show any other variations in the tumoral mass. In the remaining 19 patients, no changes in tumor size were documented by CT during the treatment. Four patients had a worsening of visual fields during bromocriptine administration and they were referred for neurosurgery. In conclusion, bromocriptine was ineffective in reducing tumor size in all but one patient with NPA and, in some cases, it did not prevent tumor growth as is suggested by the worsening of visual fields. Thus, bromocriptine treatment, at least at the doses capable of shrinking macroprolactinomas, seems to be of limited value in patients with NPA.

CV 205-502 in acromegaly.

In a series of acromegalic patients the effects of CV 205-502, a new long-acting dopamine-agonist drug, on growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and prolactin (PRL) levels were evaluated in an open study. After acute administration of CV 205-502 (0.0375 mg, po) in 12 patients. GH levels did not change, whereas PRL values significantly decreased and remained suppressed for 24 h. In the 14 patients who underwent chronic CV 205-502 treatment (at daily doses of 0.150-0.600 mg/day given at bedtime or b.i.d. for up to 12 months). GH and IGF-I levels fell significantly from 60 +/- 17 (mean +/- SEM) micrograms/l to 28 +/- 10 micrograms/l and from 1127 +/- 84 micrograms/l to 738 +/- 57 micrograms/l, respectively (p < 0.05). A retrospective comparison with the results obtained for the same patients during a previous chronic bromocriptine treatment (at daily doses of 5-20 mg given t.i.d. or q.i.d.) did not show any significant difference in the suppression of GH levels between the two treatments; no bromocriptine-resistant patient was CV 205-502 sensitive, even at the highest CV 205-502 dose used. We conclude that in acromegaly chronic treatment with this new dopaminergic drug has a GH- and PRL-lowering effect that is similar to but more prolonged than that of bromocriptine, and normal or near-normal GH and IGF-I levels may be obtained in a few patients with b.i.d. administration. However, no GH-lowering effect is observed in bromocriptine-resistant patients.

Reenlargement of macroprolactinomas during bromocriptine treatment: report of two cases.

We report two cases with macroprolactinoma who during medical treatment with bromocriptine showed a normalization of PRL levels and a reduction of tumor size as documented by computed tomography. After a few months of therapy both patients suddenly complained of worsening of their visual fields and a computed tomography demonstrated a reenlargement of the tumor mass; whereas in one patient PRL levels remained always within normal range, in the other patient, who was taking spiramycin for an intercurrent illness, there was also an escape of the hormonal secretion from the inhibitory effect of bromocriptine. The first patient underwent surgery, whereas in the second patient continuation of bromocriptine and interruption of antibiotic treatment resulted in progressive improvement in visual fields and a reduction of tumor size again. We want to stress that in patients with macroprolactinomas responsive to the medical treatment both in terms of PRL secretion and of tumor size reduction, an escape from the effects of bromocriptine, although infrequently, may occur.