Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Oncologist ; 24(3): 385-393, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30606884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with increased risk of colon cancer (CC), whereas metformin use seems to be protective. However, the impact of metformin use on the risk of death or disease recurrence after radical surgery for CC remains uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a substudy conducted in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III CC randomized in the TOSCA trial, which compared 3 versus 6 months of fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin adjuvant chemotherapy. Objective of the study was to investigate the impact of metformin exposure during adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). We also evaluated the impact of T2DM or metformin dosage on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Out of 3,759 patients enrolled in the TOSCA trial, 133 patients with diabetes (9.2%) and 1,319 without diabetes (90.8%) were recruited in this study. After excluding 13 patients with diabetes without information on metformin exposure, 76 patients with T2DM (63.3%) were defined as metformin users and 44 (36.7%) as metformin nonusers. After a median follow-up of 60.4 months, 26 (21.7%) patients relapsed and 16 (13.3%) died. Metformin use was neither associated with OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-4.77; p = .4781) nor with RFS (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.69-3.54; p = .2881). Similarly, we found no association between T2DM or metformin dosage and OS or RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin use and T2DM did not impact on OS or RFS in patients with resected CC treated with adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy. Larger studies and longer follow-up are required to clarify the potential efficacy of metformin in improving the prognosis of patients with CC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The role of the antidiabetic drug metformin in colon cancer prevention and treatment is highly debated. While low-dose metformin reduced the incidence of colorectal adenomas in two prospective studies, its effect in patients with already established colon cancer remains unclear. In this study, the potential impact of metformin on the survival of resected colon cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy was investigated in the context of the TOSCA study. We did not find any association between metformin use or dosages and patient survival. Prospective studies are required to draw definitive conclusions about metformin impact on colon cancer recurrence and survival.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluorouracilo/análogos & derivados , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patología , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/farmacología , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacología , Masculino , Metformina/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxaliplatino/farmacología , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 33(4): 355-362, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38190337

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Universal screening of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients for Lynch syndrome (LS) through MisMatch Repair (MMR) testing is recommended. BRAF V600E mutation and/or MLH1 promoter methylation (Reflex Testing, RefT)generally rule out LS in MLH1-deficient (dMLH1) patients. We estimated the impact of RefTon genetic counseling (GC) and on the diagnostic yield of genetic testing (GT). METHODS: Overall, 3199 CRC patients were referred to our center between 2011 and 2021. Patients referred until January 2019 (n=2536) underwent universal MMR testing and were termed 'Cohort A'; among patients after February 2019 (n=663), 'Cohort B', RefT was also performed in dMLH1 patients. RESULTS: Overall, 401/3199 patients (12.5%) were MMR-deficient (dMMR); 312 (77.8%) in cohort A and 89 (22.2%) inB; 346/401 were dMLH1 (86.3%), 262/312 (83.9%) in cohort A and 84/89 (94.3%) in B. In Cohort A, 91/312 (29.1%) dMMR patients were referred to GC, 69/91 (75.8%) were in the dMLH1 group; 57/69 (82.6%) dMLH1 patients underwent GT and 1/57 (1.7%) had LS. In Cohort B, 3/84 dMLH1 patients did not undergo BRAF testing. Three BRAF wt and not hypermethylated of the remaining 81 dMLH1 patients were referred to GC and GT, and one had LS. This diagnostic pathway reduced GC referrals by 96% (78/81) in Cohort B and increased the diagnostic yield of GT by about 20 times. CONCLUSION: Our findings support RefT in dMLH1 CRC patients within the LS diagnostic pathway, as it reduces the number of GC sessions needed and increases the diagnostic yield of GT.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Pruebas Genéticas , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/genética , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Italia/epidemiología , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN/genética , Anciano , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Adulto , Metilación de ADN , Asesoramiento Genético , Mutación , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento
3.
Curr Oncol ; 29(5): 3364-3374, 2022 05 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35621663

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Information on immune responses in cancer patients following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is still insufficient, but generally, patients had impaired serological responses, especially those with hematological malignancies. We evaluated serological response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy compared with healthy controls. METHODS: In total, 195 cancer patients and 400 randomly selected controls who had been administered a Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in two doses were compared. The threshold of positivity was 4.33 BAU/mL. Patients were receiving anticancer treatment after the first and second dose of the vaccines. RESULTS: a TOTAL OF 169 patients (87%) had solid tumors and 26 hemolymphopoietic diseases. Seropositivity rate was lower in patients than controls (91% vs. 96%), with an age/gender-adjusted rate ratio (RR) of 0.95 (95% CL = 0.89-1.02). Positivity was found in 97% of solid cancers and in 50% of hemolymphopoietic tumors. Both advanced and adjuvant therapy seemed to slightly reduce seropositivity rates in patients when compared to controls (RR = 0.97, 95% CL = 0.89-1.06; RR = 0.94, 95% CL = 0.87-1.01). CONCLUSIONS: the response to vaccination is similar in patients affected by solid tumors to controls. On the contrary, hemolymphopietic patients show a much lower response than controls.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Formación de Anticuerpos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunas Sintéticas , Vacunas de ARNm
4.
Immunotherapy ; 10(13): 1123-1132, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30236027

RESUMEN

Immunotherapy is associated with different response patterns compared with chemotherapy and targeted therapy, including delayed response and stabilization after progression (pseudoprogression). According to new immuno-based response criteria, immunotherapy can be continued after radiological progression when a clinical benefit is observed. We report a case of an advanced renal cell carcinoma patient treated with nivolumab, who developed clinical benefit and delayed radiological response after initial progression. We performed a review of the literature on immunotherapy beyond progression in advanced solid tumors. 12 clinical trials were identified and showed that selected patients have subsequent response and survival benefit receiving immunotherapy beyond progression. Future studies are needed to optimize timing and duration of immunotherapy and to define patient selection criteria for treatment beyond progression.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Carcinoma de Células Renales/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/inmunología , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Selección de Paciente , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Drugs Context ; 6: 212307, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29167690

RESUMEN

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare neoplasms, but they also represent the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract originating from the cell of Cajal. GIST incidence ranges around 1% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. Approximately 5% of all GISTs have a hereditary etiology. The remaining 95% of GISTs are considered sporadic events, with up to 75% of cases driven by a constitutional activation of the c-KIT proto-oncogene. GISTs are generally solitary lesions. Nonetheless, multiple sporadic GISTs can occur and present as synchronous or metachronous tumors, usually associated with familial GIST. Here, we report a case of primary prostate and lung tumors associated with gastric and small bowel GISTs, unrelated to any known hereditary syndrome. Also, in the case we describe, the prostatic tumor came before the GISTs, while the lung tumor occurred later in time and led to pulmonary lobectomy plus lymphoadenectomy, with a diagnosis of nonsmall cell lung cancer. With the exception of a slight difference in lymphoid infiltration, the abdominal and gastric GIST nodules shared the same proliferative MIB1 index and mitotic count. However, the genetic analysis revealed that the gastric GIST and abdominal tumors were characterized by two different c-KIT mutations. This molecular heterogeneity supported the hypothesis of two different synchronous GISTs arising from stomach and ileum. At present, the patient is disease free and has already completed the third year of adjuvant therapy with imatinib. This case supports the importance of the analysis of c-KIT mutational status to distinguish metastases from synchronous multicentric GISTs, with relevant implications in therapeutic decisions, as well as the importance of a dedicated multidisciplinary team and of a radiological follow-up after the diagnosis of a primary GIST, to discover a relapse of the GIST or, possibly, additional malignancies.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA