Are sex differences in the outcome of peritoneal dialysis explained by nurse assistance? A cohort study with data from the Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate sex differences in peritoneal dialysis (PD) outcomes and to explore direct and indirect effects of nurse-assisted PD on outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using data from the Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française of incident PD patients between 2005 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to analyse transfer to haemodialysis (HD), death, PD failure, peritonitis and renal transplantation. Mediation analyses with a counterfactual approach were carried out to evaluate natural direct and indirect effects of sex on transfer to HD and peritonitis, with nurse-assisted PD as a mediator a priori. RESULTS: Of the 14 659 patients included, there were 5970 females (41%) and 8689 males (59%). Women were more frequently treated by nurse-assisted PD than men [2926/5970 (49.1%) versus 3357/8689 (38.7%)]. In the multivariable analysis, women had a lower risk of transfer to HD [cause-specific hazard ratio {cs-HR} 0.82 {95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.88}], death [cs-HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.95)], peritonitis [cs-HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.87)], PD failure [cs-HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.90)] and a lower chance of undergoing transplant [cs-HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.90)] than men. There was a direct effect of sex on the risk of transfer to HD [cs-HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.82-0.83)], with an indirect effect of nurse-assisted PD [cs-HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.99)]. Nurse-assisted PD had no indirect effect on the risk of peritonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that compared with men, women have a lower risk of both transfer to HD and peritonitis. Mediation analysis showed that nurse assistance was a potential mediator in the causal pathway between sex and transfer to HD.

Access to preemptive registration on the waiting list for renal transplantation: a hierarchical modeling approach.

Preemptive kidney transplantation is associated with both longer patient and graft survival. This study was carried out to estimate the association between the renal units and preemptive registration on the waiting list for first deceased donor renal transplantation in a French network of care. From 2008 to 2012, 1529 adult patients followed in 48 units of the French North-West network and registered on the waiting list for a first deceased donor renal allograft were included. We used a mixed logistic regression with renal units as random-effects term for statistical analysis. Of the 1529 patients included, 407 were placed on the waiting list preemptively. There was a significant variability across renal units (variance 0.452). In multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with preemptive registration were cardiovascular disease (odds ratio (OR) 0.57, [95% CI: 0.42-0.79]), social deprivation (OR 0.73, [95% CI 0.57-0.94]), and renal units' characteristics (ownership of the facility: academic hospital, reference-community hospital, OR 0.44, [95% CI 0.24-0.80]-private hospital, OR 0.35, [95% CI 0.18-0.69] and transplant center; P < 0.10]. Variability between renal units was reduced after taking into account their characteristics but was not influenced by patient characteristics. Preemptive registration is associated with renal units, transplant centers, and social deprivation and can be partly explained by disparities in practices.

Sex disparities in the utilization of nurse-assisted peritoneal dialysis: a mediation analysis using data from the REIN registry.

Background: This study was carried out to evaluate the association between patient sex and the proportion of nurse-assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD) at dialysis initiation and to explore whether sex disparities in nurse-assisted PD utilization was explained by predialysis care and/or by social deprivation using mediation analysis. Methods: This was a retrospective study using data from the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry linked to the French National Healthcare Database (SNDS) of incident patients between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018. A regression logistic was used for statistical analysis. A mediation analysis explored the direct effect of sex on nurse-assisted PD proportion and the indirect effect through the European Deprivation Index (EDI), and the number of general practitioner (GP) and nephrologist visits before dialysis initiation. Results: Among 1706 patients on PD, there were 637 women (37.3%) and 1069 men (62.7%). Nurse-assisted PD proportion was 332/610 (54.4%) for women vs 464/1036 (44.8%) for men. In the multivariable analysis women were more likely to be treated by nurse-assisted PD {odds ratio (OR) 1.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-2.52]}. Nurse-assisted PD was associated with the median number of GP visits [OR 1.44 (95% CI 1.11-1.86)] and with the median number of nephrologist visits [OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.46-0.76)]. The mediation analysis showed a direct effect of sex on nurse-assisted PD [OR 1.90 (95% CI 1.80-2.01)] and an indirect effect through the median number of GP visits [OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.04-1.06], the median number of nephrologist visits [OR 1.02 (95% CI 1.02-1.03)] and quintile 5 of the EDI [OR 1.03 (95% CI 1.02-1.03)]. Conclusion: Women were more frequently treated by nurse-assisted PD than men. Differences between women and men in predialysis care and social deprivation could explain the greater utilization of nurse-assisted PD among women.