Staged Management for Distal Femur Fractures: Impacts on Reoperation, Stiffness, and Overall Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of staged management with external fixation (ex-fix) prior to definitive fixation of distal femur fractures. METHODS: Design: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Single Level I Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adults treated operatively between 2004 and 2019 for distal femur fractures (OTA/AO 33A/33C) were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Excluded cases were those with screw only fixation, acute distal femur replacement, 33B fracture pattern, no radiographs available, or did not have 6-months of follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Postoperative complication rates including surgical site infection [SSI], reoperation to promote bone healing, final knee arc of motion <90 degrees, heterotopic ossification formation, and reoperation for stiffness were compared between patients treated with ex-fix prior to definitive fixation and those not requiring ex-fix. RESULTS: A total of 407 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 27 months (median [IQR] of 12 [7,33] months), (range 6-192 months). Most patients were male (52%) with an average age of 48 [Range: 18-92] years. Ex-fix was utilized in 150 (37%) cases and 257 (63%) cases underwent primary definitive fixation. There was no difference in SSI rates (p=0.12), final knee arc of motion <90 degrees (p=0.51), and reoperation for stiffness (p=0.41) between the ex-fix and no ex-fix groups. The 150 patients requiring ex-fix spent an average of 4.2 days (SD 3.3) in the ex-fix before definitive fixation. These patients were further analyzed by comparing the duration of time spent in ex-fix, <4 days (n=82) and ≥4 days (n=68). Despite longer time spent in ex-fix prior to definitive fixation, there was again no significant difference in any of the complication and reoperation rates when comparing the two groups, including final knee arc of motion <90 degrees (p=0.63), reoperation for stiffness (p=1.00), and SSI (p=0.79). CONCLUSION: Ex-fix of distal femur fractures as a means of temporary stabilization prior to definitive ORIF does not increase the risk of complications such as SSI, final knee arc of motion <90 degrees, or reoperations for bone healing or stiffness when compared to single stage ORIF of distal femur fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Assessing the biomechanical properties of nitinol staples in normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic bone models: A finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Bone staples are internal fixation devices that are frequently used in the foot, ankle, and hand to provide stabilization. Fixation stability is vital after fusion or fracture surgeries to ensure proper bone healing. Patients undergoing surgeries that require fixation to keep bones aligned and stable may present with diminishing bone mechanical properties, and this may compromise the ability of the fixation hardware to maintain a stable construct. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanical performance of shape memory and superelastic nitinol bone staples with different bridge geometries in normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic bone models. Contact forces and maximum principal stress and strain in the bone were recorded. METHODS: Finite element simulations of a bone staple fixation procedure were performed to examine the initial and post-surgery contact force, as well as the maximum principal stress and strain of 15 mm bridge and 20 mm bridge staple-bone constructs. RESULTS: Shape memory nitinol staples exhibited higher contact forces compared to superelastic nitinol staples. Nitinol bone staples with 20 mm bridge lengths displayed higher contact forces and lower stresses in all bone types, as well as lower strains in osteoporotic bone models compared to nitinol staples with a 15 mm bridge length. CONCLUSION: Nitinol bone staple constructs with 20 mm bridge length staples provide higher contact forces and display lower stresses in the bone than 15 mm bridge staple-bone constructs, which may be beneficial in bone with diminishing mechanical properties. Both superelastic and shape memory effect nitinol staples provide adequate compression and stress relief. However, if osteopenia is present, shape memory effect nitinol staples with a 20 mm bridge length may provide more stress relief and compression, if the bone anatomy allows.

Tibial Intramedullary Nail From a Suprapatellar Approach in a Semi-Extended Position.

An intramedullary nail is a common and reliable treatment option for diaphyseal tibial fractures. One such approach for this technique is suprapatellar. This video shows the surgical technique of a tibial nail through a suprapatellar approach in a semi-extended position in a 22-year-old man with a distal third tibial shaft fracture.

The Production of Antibiotic Cement Beads.

The use of antibiotic beads in open fracture cases can lead to decreased rates of infection and surgeon production is associated with significant time and cost savings. This video demonstrates production of antibiotic impregnated polymethylmethacrylate beads used in the setting of a grade IIIB open tibial shaft fracture.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Combination of Autograft and Allograft Tendon: A MOON Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts less than 8.5 mm in diameter is associated with worse patient-reported outcome scores and increased risk of revision surgery compared with reconstructions performed with larger grafts. One proposed solution to small autograft harvest is to create a hybrid graft by augmenting autografts with allograft tissue to increase graft diameter. PURPOSE: To compare hybrid autograft/allograft ACL reconstruction to autograft ACL reconstruction, specifically analyzing the patient-reported outcome scores and the risk of revision surgery at 2 years postoperative. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: From the years 2002 to 2009, a total of 34 patients were identified from a prospectively collected database as having undergone hybrid ACL reconstruction. Twenty-seven of 34 (79.4%) patients had a 2-year follow-up. These 27 patients were matched by age (within 1 year) and sex to 27 patients who underwent hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction during the same period. At the 2-year mark, revision surgery risk and patient-reported outcome scores were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The mean age for the hybrid and matched groups (±SD) was 20.9 ± 7.0 years. Both the hybrid and control groups had 17 males and 10 females. There was no significant difference in preoperative patient-reported outcome scores, meniscus tears, or cartilage lesions between the 2 groups. Graft size was larger in the hybrid group (9.5 ± 0.6 mm) than in the autograft group (8.4 ± 0.9 mm) (P < .001). At 2 years postoperative, patient-reported outcome scores were similar between the hybrid and autograft groups. Revision surgery was required in 5 (18.5%) patients who underwent hybrid reconstruction compared with 2 (7.4%) of those who underwent autograft reconstruction (P = .26). CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo ACL reconstruction with hybrid hamstring grafts and hamstring autografts report similar patient-reported outcome scores at 2 years postoperative but may be at increased risk for revision ACL reconstruction.