Button batteries in the ear, nose and throat: a novel survey of knowledge of UK advanced nurse practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Button battery (BB) impaction in the ear, nose and throat can result in significant morbidity. Advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) are increasingly responsible for initial patient assessment and prompt escalation to otolaryngologists for definitive management. AIM: Our novel national study aimed to assess ANPs' knowledge with respect to the assessment and management of patients with BBs in the ear, nose and throat. METHOD: A national 13-point survey was disseminated among ANPs over a 2-week period. Knowledge was assessed through eight multiple choice questions with a maximum attainable score of 21. FINDINGS: A total of 242 responses were analysed. Knowledge deficits were identified in all domains (mean overall score 8.5/21), including presenting clinical features, preliminary investigations and intervention strategies. The overwhelming majority of respondents (97%; n=234) advocated for further training. CONCLUSION: A need for further education has been highlighted by this surveyed cohort of ANPs. Implementation of standardised protocols, virtual resources and simulation platforms may address knowledge deficits.

Intra-operative use of biological products-Are we aware of their derivatives?

INTRODUCTION: Global medical advances within healthcare have subsequently led to the widespread introduction of biological products such as grafts, haemostats, and sealants. Although these products have been used for many decades, this subject is frequently not discussed during the consent process and remains an area of contention. METHODS: A nationwide confidential online survey was distributed to UK-based junior registrars (ST3-5), senior registrars (ST6-8), post-CCT fellows, specialist associates/staff grade doctors and consultants working in general/vascular surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, oral and maxillofacial surgery and plastic surgery. RESULTS: Data were collected from a total of 308 survey respondents. Biological derivatives were correctly identified in surgical products by only 25% of survey respondents, only 19% stated that they regularly consent for use of these products. Our results demonstrate that most participants in this study do not routinely consent (81%) to the intra-operative use of biological materials. An overwhelming 74% of participants agreed that further education on the intra-operative use of biological materials would be valuable. DISCUSSION: This study highlights deficiencies in knowledge that results in potential compromise of the consenting process for surgical procedures. A solution to this would be for clinicians to increase their awareness via educational platforms and to incorporate an additional statement on the consent form which addresses the potential intraoperative use of biological products and what their derivatives may be. CONCLUSION: Modernising the current consent process to reflect the development and use of surgical biological products will help to ensure improved patient satisfaction, fewer future legal implications as well as a better surgeon-patient relationship.

Personal protective equipment guidance during a global pandemic: A statistical analysis of National perceived confidence, knowledge and educational deficits amongst UK-based doctors.

INTRODUCTION: On the 11th of March 2020, the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared a global pandemic following the upsurge of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Unprecedented global demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) resulted in restricted availability, as well as evolving guidance on use, the latter of which was complicated by conflicting guidance provided by numerous healthcare bodies. AIM: To assess perceived confidence and knowledge of PPE guidance as published by Public Health England (PHE) amongst doctors of varying specialties and grades. METHOD: A nationwide 11-point survey comprising of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and a 5-point Likert scale assessing perceived confidence was disseminated to UK-based doctors using multiple platforms. Statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey's honest significant difference (Tukey HSD) and Pearson's chi-squared test was undertaken to assess for statistical significance. RESULTS: Data collated from 697 respondents revealed that average perceived confidence was low across all specialties and grades. Notably, 59% (n = 411) felt they had received insufficient education regarding up-to-date guidance, with 81% (n = 565) advocating further training. Anaesthetics and ophthalmology were highest and lowest scoring specialties in knowledge-based MCQs, achieving scores of 59% and 31%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between specialty, but not grade. CONCLUSION: Ensuring uniformity in published guidance, coupled with education may aid knowledge and subsequent confidence regarding the appropriate use of PPE. The absence of a unified consensus and sustained training not only poses significant ramifications for patient and healthcare professional (HCP) safety, but also risks further depletion of already sparse resources. Because of the novelty of COVID-19, appropriate PPE is continually evolving leaving an absence in formal training and education. This paper reveals insight into confidence and knowledge of PPE amongst doctors of various specialities/grades during a global pandemic, highlighting key deficits in education and training.

The perceived global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors' medical and surgical training: An international survey.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a significant burden on healthcare systems causing disruption to the medical and surgical training of doctors globally. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This is the first international survey assessing the perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training of doctors of all grades and specialties. METHODS: An online global survey was disseminated using Survey Monkey® between 4th August 2020 and 17th November 2020. A global network of collaborators facilitated participant recruitment. Data were collated anonymously with informed consent and analysed using univariate and adjusted multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Seven hundred and forty-three doctors of median age 27 (IQR: 25-30) were included with the majority (56.8%, n = 422) being male. Two-thirds of doctors were in a training post (66.5%, n = 494), 52.9% (n = 393) in a surgical specialty and 53.0% (n = 394) in low- and middle-income countries. Sixty-nine point two percent (n = 514) reported an overall perceived negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their training. A significant decline was noted amongst non-virtual teaching methods such as face-to-face lectures, tutorials, ward-based teaching, theatre sessions, conferences, simulation sessions and morbidity and mortality meetings (P ≤ .05). Low or middle-income country doctors' training was associated with perceived inadequate supervision while performing invasive procedures under general, local or regional anaesthetic. (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSION: In addition to the detrimental impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare infrastructure, this international survey reports a widespread perceived overall negative impact on medical and surgical doctors' training globally. Ongoing adaptation and innovation will be required to enhance the approach to doctors' training and learning in order to ultimately improve patient care.

Emergency management of neck stoma patients during the coronavirus pandemic: a national nurse survey.

BACKGROUND: Neck stoma patient care involves significant clinical complexity. Inadequate staff training, equipment provision and infrastructure have all been highlighted as causes for avoidable patient harm. AIMS: To establish the perception of knowledge and confidence levels relating to the emergency management of neck stomas among UK nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: A nationwide prospective electronic survey of both primary and secondary care nurses via the Royal College of Nursing and social media. FINDINGS: 402 responses were collated: 81 primary care and 321 secondary care; the majority (n=130) were band 5. Forty-nine per cent could differentiate between a laryngectomy and a tracheostomy; ENT nurses scored highest (1.56; range 0-2) on knowledge. Fifty-seven per cent could oxygenate a tracheostomy stoma correctly and 54% could oxygenate a laryngectomy stoma correctly. Sixty-five per cent cited inadequate neck stoma training and 91% felt inclusion of neck stoma training was essential within the nursing curriculum. CONCLUSION: Clinical deficiencies of management identified by nurses can be attributed to a lack of confidence secondary to reduced clinical exposure and education.

Personal protective equipment: knowledge of the guidance.

BACKGROUND: On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a global pandemic in the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. The unpredictable nature of transmission of COVID-19 requires a meticulous understanding of guidance on personal protective equipment (PPE) as published by WHO and Public Health England (PHE). AIM: To assess perceived confidence and knowledge of PHE guidance relating to PPE by nursing staff. METHODS: A nationwide survey was disseminated between May and June 2020 through social media platforms as well as internal mail via regulatory bodies and individual hospital trusts. RESULTS: Data were collated from 339 nurses. Perceived confidence as measured on a Likert scale was a mode score of 3/5, with the average score for knowledge-based questions being 5/10. Of the respondents, 47% cited insufficient training on PPE guidance, and 84% advocated further training. Conclusions: Unifying published PPE guidance and ensuring consistency in training can improve awareness, confidence, and knowledge among nursing staff.

Nurse-led epistaxis management within the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: the incidence of epistaxis has increased secondary to increased life expectancy and morbidities. This study sought to assess the knowledge, practice and opinion relating to adequacy of training of advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) and staff nurses (SNs) in the emergency department. METHODS: a national survey was distributed over an 8-week period; this included a 3-point scoring system based on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Clinical Knowledge Summaries guidance on epistaxis management to assess overall performance. RESULTS: analysis included 109 ANPs and 101 SNs; 12% of ANPs achieved the maximum score, 40% scored 2, 25% scored 1, and 23% scored 0, while 14% of SNs achieved the maximum score, 24% scored 2, 29% scored 1, and 32% scored 0. Overall 88% of respondents advocated further training. CONCLUSION: significant deficits in knowledge regarding epistaxis management were highlighted. Further training could help to empower patients in basic first aid measures, subsequently reducing admissions rates.

Neck stoma patients: is vital information displayed at the bedside?

Tracheostomies are common procedures in head and neck and critical care practice, with 50% of airway-related deaths attributable to complications such as occlusion or displacement. The National Tracheostomy Safety Project (NTSP) published guidance regarding emergency management of neck stoma patients. A prospective multicentre regional audit of all neck stoma inpatients (ward and intensive care unit (ICU) settings) was conducted. Bed spaces were assessed for tracheostomy care bundles and essential stoma information, as recommended by the NTSP guidelines. The results demonstrate inadequate ward compliance across all three trusts, with ICU compliance greater in comparison to a ward environment. Of note, crucial information regarding the nature of stoma and whom to contact in the event of an emergency, was not displayed in the majority of cases. A greater awareness of the NTSP guidance and implementation of vital information is a necessity across all disciplines in order to reduce stoma complication-related morbidity and mortality.

Test performance of PET-CT for mediastinal lymph node staging of pulmonary carcinoid tumours.

Positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) is one of the initial mediastinal staging modality for non-small cell lung cancer; however, the clinical utility in carcinoid tumours is uncertain. We sought to determine the test performance of PET-CT for mediastinal lymph node staging of pulmonary carcinoid tumours. We collated data from seven institutions, performing a retrospective search on pathological databases for a consecutive series of patients who underwent thoracic surgery (with lymph nodal dissection) for carcinoid tumours with preoperative PET-CT staging. PET-CT results were compared with the reference standard of pathologic results obtained from lymph node dissection and test performance reported using sensitivity and specificity. From November 1999 to January 2013, 247 patients from seven institutions underwent surgery for carcinoid tumours with a corresponding preoperative PET-CT scan. The mean age of the patients was 61 (SD 15, range 73) and 84 were male patients (34%). The pathologic subtype was typical carcinoid in 217 patients (88%) and atypical carcinoid in 30 patients (12%). Results from lymph node dissection were obtained in 207 patients. The calculated sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT to identify mediastinal lymph node disease was 33% (95% CI 4% to 78%) and 94% (95% CI 89% to 97%), respectively. Our results indicate that PET-CT has a poor sensitivity but good specificity to detect the presence of mediastinal lymph node metastases in pulmonary carcinoid tumours. Mediastinal lymph node metastases cannot be ruled out with negative PET-CT uptake, and if the absence of mediastinal lymph node disease is a prerequisite for directing management, tissue sampling should be undertaken.

Comparing the use of high dose to standard dose corticosteroids for the treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adults - A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is typically treated with systematic or intratympanic corticosteroids. Current ENT-UK guidelines suggest treatment with a dose of oral prednisolone 1mg/kg/day for 7 days then tapered over a further 5 days. However, there is no consensus on the effectiveness of corticosteroids for idiopathic SSNHL and no universally accepted optimal regime. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the effect of high dose versus standard dose corticosteroids in the management of idiopathic SSNHL. METHODS: A systematic review was performed of all published data related to patients with idiopathic SSNHL who were treated acutely with high dose corticosteroid therapy. Articles were included that reported data on high dose, or comparing standard dose to high dose, oral or intravenous corticosteroid therapy for the treatment of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Articles where patients received only combination treatment with intra-tympanic steroid were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool and the ROB-2 tool. RESULTS: Six studies were included in the analysis, representing 919 patients. Two prospective single-arm studies of patients with SSNHL treated with a high dose steroid regime found mean hearing level improved (79.5dB to 42.3dB) and 45.8% of idiopathic patients had complete recovery of hearing. Three retrospective case-series comparing high dose to standard dose regimes found a significantly greater improvement in hearing level (38.3dB vs. 48.8dB, P = 0.042), a greater mean absolute hearing gain (44.4dB vs. 15.1dB) and a significantly higher rate of functionally relevant recovery (35.7% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.035) in patients treated with high dose regimes. The single included prospective randomised trial found no statistically significant difference in mean hearing level or speech discrimination score between patients treated with high dose pulse steroids or a standard dose regime. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review found the reported outcomes in the literature in this area to be mixed, with some studies suggesting a greater degree of hearing recovery with a high dose regime but others suggesting no difference. The overall quality of the available evidence was deemed to be low, with the studies at moderate risk of bias.

Reconstruction and Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for the Management of Clival Chordomas-A Systematic Review.

The success of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to surgically manage clival chordomas (CC) relies on robust repair methods to reduce complications, such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Our study aims to evaluate the existing literature to assess reconstructive techniques utilised and post-operative CSF leak rates in this cohort. A systematic review and analysis was performed of all published data related to CC patients managed with an EEA. A total of 24 articles were included, representing 363 patients and 396 procedures. A variety of reconstruction methods were used with 95.9% of studies using an intracranial repair graft, 70.8% using a nasoseptal flap (NSF), 62.5% using glue/haemostat, 58.3% using nasal packs and 75.0% employing multi-layered reconstruction. Post-operative CSF leak rate was 10.1%. The leak rate was less in subgroups where a NSF was used (9.4%) although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.273). There were no differences in leak rates when glue/haemostat (p = 0.139) or nasal packs (p = 0.550) were used. Our review is the most up-to-date synthesis of the existing literature surrounding the EEA to CCs assessing reconstruction and post-operative CSF leaks. It demonstrates most authors employ a multi-layered reconstruction method. The lack of statistical significance observed for CSF leaks in subgroups is likely due to a variety of cofounding surgeon and patient factors. Higher quality prospective randomised multi-centric studies, with reporting of specific repair techniques will enable future systematic reviews to provide a more accurate consensus regarding optimal methods of reconstruction in this field.

Relationship Between Clinical Features and the Arc and Length of Dehiscence in SCDS: A Single Center Review of 42 Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) is a rare disorder characterized by an array of audiovestibular symptoms due to a dehiscence of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal (SSC). In the presence of debilitating symptoms, surgical management, to plug or resurface the SCC is performed. Although computed tomography (CT) may overestimate the size or presence of a dehiscence due to a partial volume effect, it remains an invaluable diagnostic tool. OBJECTIVES: To assess for correlation between the arc and length of dehiscence and clinical symptomology. METHOD: A single-center, single-operator retrospective analysis of 42 patients who underwent trans mastoid plugging of SCC with confirmed radiological dehiscence of their SSC between January 2008 and July 2019 was undertaken. Patients were assessed based on seven predefined clinical symptoms. Length and arc of dehiscence's were evaluated by means of high resolution (0.5 mm) CT (HRCT), using multiplanar reconstruction (MPR). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC), and more specifically the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) were used to assess for statistical significance. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate overall very little correlation between the arc and size of the dehiscence and symptoms. The only statistically significant correlation we found was between length of dehiscence and the presence of aural fullness. CONCLUSION: SCDS is a debilitating condition with an array of symptoms on presentation. While dehiscence length demonstrated a correlation with aural fullness, no other symptomology in patients with radiologically evident SCDS demonstrated a statistically significant correlation either against the length or arc of dehiscence.

The Use of Auricular Cartilage Grafts in Septorhinoplasty: A Dual-Centre Study of Donor Site Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Objectives The use of autologous grafts is a key aspect of contemporary septorhinoplasty. When septal cartilage is deficient, auricular cartilage serves as a biocompatible, readily accessible alternative. Our study aimed to assess donor site patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) where auricular cartilage has been harvested for use in septorhinoplasty, adding to the limited existing literature on this topic. Design A dual-centre, single-surgeon retrospective analysis of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty surgery with augmentation using auricular cartilage grafts was conducted. Grafts were harvested using an anterior anti-helical approach. Patients were followed up at one week, three months and 12 months post-operatively. Donor site outcomes were assessed across several physical and psychological domains by adapting the EAR-Q questionnaire, which was administered via telephone consultation. Responses were quantified using a Likert scale. Results A total of 22 patients met our inclusion criteria. Four were lost to follow-up, five were non-responders and one case was excluded due to documentation of body dysmorphic disorder. A significant proportion of patients reported no reduction in quality of life (QOL) or confidence attributed to donor site cosmesis. High satisfaction was noted with anti-helical donor site scars. Although noticeable differences in shape and symmetry were reported, these had negligible effects across psychological domains. Conclusions Preliminary results suggest high levels of patient satisfaction, with minimal physical and psychological donor site sequelae following auricular cartilage harvest in septorhinoplasty. Subsequent studies should involve the use of validated questionnaires, coupled with larger patient cohorts in order to provide further data for statistical analysis.

Recognition and Management of Button Battery Ingestion Amongst Emergency Practitioners.

Introduction Button battery ingestion (BBI) carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. We conducted a regional analysis following an NHS England national patient safety alert to evaluate the knowledge base in the emergency management of BBI amongst emergency practitioners. Methods A ten-point questionnaire was distributed electronically and in hardcopy formats to emergency departments across 15 hospitals within the West Midlands, United Kingdom. The questionnaire assessed participants' knowledge of emergency management of BBI. The effect of clinician grade and previous otorhinolaryngology experience on knowledge scores was evaluated. Results A total of 176 responses were received from 11 hospitals. A small proportion (18%) were aware of a local department protocol. The majority of participants (70%) routinely screened for a button battery in their history taking. Our findings highlighted a lack of awareness of the timeframe for mucosal injury, potential complications, radiological signs, and the necessity for immediate retrieval. The median knowledge score was 18.8% (IQR=12.5-31.3%). Both registrars and consultants scored the highest (median 25%). Previous otorhinolaryngology experience was associated with a higher median score (P=0.002). Conclusion Our multi-center regional emergency medicine analysis demonstrated knowledge deficiency in the initial assessment and management of BBI. A high index of suspicion for button battery ingestion is needed. In view of the time-critical nature of button battery impaction in the esophagus, a "golden hour" concept should be integrated into acute management pathways with the early involvement of otorhinolaryngologists.

Seronegative granulomatosis with polyangiitis presenting as an acute skull base osteomyelitis with multiple cranial neuropathies.

Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA, formerly Wegener's) is a rare form of vasculitis, commonly affecting the upper and lower respiratory tract with simultaneous glomerulonephritis. Ear, nose and throat (ENT) manifestations account for the majority of presentations. The presence of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody is a recognized hallmark of GPA, but clinicians should remain cautious of false negative results. We describe a rare case of GPA presenting with concurrent middle ear disease and multiple lower cranial nerve palsies. Clinical judgment was affected by repeated negative autoimmune screens, and a definitive diagnosis was only achieved following renal biopsy. Reported cases of GPA presenting with mastoiditis or cranial nerve involvement are typically seropositive, with seronegative GPA following a less aggressive process. This case highlights the importance of clinical suspicion in the face of treatment resistant ENT pathology, and the need for early histopathological analysis. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial in limiting disease progression.

The Effectiveness of a Foundation Year 1 Doctor Preparation Course for Final Year Medical Students.

BACKGROUND: Starting work as a junior doctor can be daunting for any medical student. There are numerous aspects of the hidden curriculum which many students fail to acquire during their training. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel foundation year one (FY1) doctor preparation course focusing on certain core topics, practical tips and components of the hidden curriculum. The primary objective was to improve the confidence level and knowledge of final year medical students transitioning to FY1 doctors. METHOD: A 2-day, practical course titled 'Preparation 2 Practice' delivering hands-on, small-group and lecture-based teaching, covering core medical student undergraduate curriculum topics in medicine and surgery. The course content spanned therapeutics, documentation skills and managing acute clinical tasks encountered by FY1 doctors during an on-call shift. A pre- and post-course survey and knowledge assessment were carried out to assess the effectiveness of the course. The assessment was MCQ-based, derived from topics covered within our course. The 20-question test and a short survey were administered electronically. RESULTS: Twenty students from a single UK medical school attended the course. 100% participation was observed in the pre- and post-course test and survey. The median post-course test result was 22 (IQR 20.25-23.75) which was higher than the median pre-course test score of 18.75 (IQR 17-21.75). A Wilcoxon sign rank test revealed a statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-course test results (P = .0003). The self-reported confidence score of delegates on starting work as a junior doctor was also significantly higher following the course (P = .004). CONCLUSION: The results show a significant improvement in perceived confidence and knowledge on core curriculum topics amongst final year medical students having attended our FY1 doctor preparation course. We conclude that there is scope for similar supplementary courses as an adjunct to the undergraduate medical curriculum.

Simultaneous dysphagia and stridor: an unreported presentation of hypocalcaemia.

Hypocalcaemia is a well-recognized complication of total thyroidectomy surgery. Patients who develop post-operative hypocalcaemia often report symptoms of neuromuscular instability including peripheral numbness and/or tingling. In severe cases, larygospasm with stridor and bronchospasm can occur. We present the first reported case in the literature, to our knowledge, of a 58-year-old male presenting with intermittent exertional stridor, dysphonia and dysphagia following thyroid surgery 2 years previously. Clinical and radiological investigations were unremarkable. Pre-operative screening for a planned panendoscopy to investigate his symptoms highlighted a profound hypocalcaemia (adjusted calcium 1.42 mmol/l). Following calcium replacement therapy, his symptoms subsided. There is an absence of literature describing both dysphagia and stridor synchronously. We not only advocate regular routine follow-up and compliance assessments for such patients but also the consideration of hypocalcaemia as a differential in any patient presenting with such symptoms following any thyroid surgery.

Rhinocerebral Mucormycosis: A Ten-Year Single Centre Case Series.

Introduction Rhinocerebral mucormycosis (RCM) is a rare, frequently lethal, opportunistic infection of the paranasal sinuses and brain caused by fungi of the Mucoracea family. The overall global incidence is low, with the condition most commonly found in India and the Middle East. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment are essential. Overall mortality is high; reported rates range from 25-60%. Its infrequent presentation can pose both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for centers not familiar with the condition. Objective We aimed to evaluate patient demographics, clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and the complications of this uncommon condition. Methods We carried out a retrospective case-series analysis of all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of RCM presenting to a single tertiary-level hospital between 2000-2010. Hospital patient records were used to attain the specific clinical details for each case. Results A total of nine patients (eight males and one female) were diagnosed with RCM during this period. All patients had diabetes mellitus; the mean age was 58.2 years. The most common presenting features were foul-smelling blood-stained rhinorrhoea (100%), nasal congestion (100%), reduced visual acuity (89%), and hard palate ulceration (67%). Two patients had a cerebral abscess at presentation; two patients had skull base erosions with associated cranial nerve palsies. All patients received systemic amphotericin B and surgical debridement. The overall mortality rate was 78%. Conclusions Rhinocerebral mucormycosis is a notoriously difficult infection to treat. Our case series demonstrates how patients often present late with a disease that has already spread beyond the paranasal sinuses. Despite treatment with antifungals and extensive surgical debridement, mortality remains high.