RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate clinical outcomes of patients with Pseudomonas endocarditis and identify factors associated with treatment failure. METHODS: Adult patients meeting definitive Duke's criteria for Pseudomonas endocarditis at 11 hospitals were identified between May 2000 and February 2024. Failure was defined as death or microbiological failure by day 42. First-line therapy consisted of cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime or ceftolozane/tazobactam alone or in combination. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients met inclusion criteria; 29% were persons who inject drugs and 13% were organ transplant recipients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the causative species in 98% of cases. Patients who experienced 42 day cure were more likely to be initially managed with first-line ß-lactam agents compared with those who experienced clinical failure (97% versus 62%, Pâ=â0.004). Treatment with first-line ß-lactams was associated with shorter time to treatment initiation and a lower likelihood of infection due to MDR Pseudomonas spp. In the univariate model, patients who experienced 90 day mortality were more likely to have prosthetic valve endocarditis (57% versus 24%, Pâ=â0.02), an intracardiac complication (36% versus 9%, Pâ=â0.04) and a higher median (IQR) Pitt bacteraemia score [2.5 (2-3.8) versus 1 (0-2), Pâ=â0.048]. Combination therapy did not improve clinical outcomes but did increase the rate of adverse effects resulting in drug discontinuation compared with monotherapy, (21% versus 0%, Pâ=â0.08). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of Pseudomonas endocarditis to date. We identified improved clinical outcomes when cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime or ceftolozane/tazobactam were used for initial treatment. We did not identify a clinical benefit for combination treatment.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Endocarditis Bacteriana , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humanos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , CefalosporinasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The incidence of Serratia endocarditis is increasing, yet optimal treatment has not been defined. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes of patients with Serratia endocarditis by treatment strategy. METHODS: We reviewed adult patients with definitive Serratia endocarditis at two independent health systems between July 2001 and April 2023. Combination therapy was defined as receipt of ≥2 in vitro active agents for ≥72 h. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were included; 64% (48/75) were male and 85% (64/75) were people who inject drugs. Compared with monotherapy, receipt of combination therapy was associated with lower rates of microbiological failure (0% versus 15%, P = 0.026) and 90 day all-cause mortality (11% versus 31%, P = 0.049). Antimicrobial discontinuation due to an adverse event was more common among patients receiving combination therapy compared with monotherapy (36% versus 8%, P = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest series of Serratia endocarditis to date, combination antibiotic treatment was associated with improved outcomes. However, larger, prospective studies are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Endocarditis , Serratia , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia CombinadaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sotrovimab, a monoclonal antibody with efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 including certain Omicron variants, has been used in treatment of mild-moderate COVID-19. Limited data exists regarding its use in pregnant women. METHODS: Electronic medical record review of pregnant COVID-19 patients treated with sotrovimab from 12/30/21 - 1/31/22 (Yale New Haven Health Hospital System [YNHHS]) was performed. Included were pregnant individuals ≥ 12 years, weighing ≥ 40 kg, with positive SARS-CoV-2 test (within 10 days). Those receiving care outside YNHHS or receiving other SARS-CoV-2 treatment were excluded. We assessed demographics, medical history, and Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score (MASS). The primary composite clinical outcome assessed included emergency department (ED) visit < 24 h, hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and/or death within 29 days of sotrovimab. Secondarily, adverse feto-maternal outcomes and events for neonates were assessed at birth or through the end of the study period, which was 8/15/22. RESULTS: Among 22 subjects, median age was 32 years and body mass index was 27 kg/m2. 63% were Caucasian, 9% Hispanic, 14% African-American, and 9% Asian. 9% had diabetes and sickle cell disease. 5% had well-controlled HIV. 18%, 46%, and 36% received sotrovimab in trimester 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No infusion/allergic reactions occurred. MASS values were < 4. Only 12/22 (55%) received complete primary vaccination (46% mRNA-1273; 46% BNT162b2; 8% JNJ-78,436,735); none received a booster. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant COVID-19 patients receiving sotrovimab at our center tolerated it well with good clinical outcomes. Pregnancy and neonatal complications did not appear sotrovimab-related. Though a limited sample, our data helps elucidate the safety and tolerability of sotrovimab in pregnant women.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Mujeres Embarazadas , Vacuna BNT162 , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality. AIMS: We describe a nosocomial outbreak investigation on an immunocompromised inpatient unit. METHODS: Patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 were identified. An epidemiologic investigation was assisted with whole genome sequencing of positive samples. RESULTS: Two patients were identified as potential index cases; one presented with diarrhea and was initially not isolated, and the other developed hypoxemia on hospital day 18 before testing positive. Following identification of a SARS-CoV-2 cluster, the unit was closed and all patients and staff received surveillance testing revealing eight additional positive patients and staff members. Whole genome sequencing confirmed an outbreak. Enhanced infection prevention practices mitigated further spread. Asymptomatic patients with COVID-19 were successfully treated with bamlanivimab. DISCUSSION: Preventing SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in transplant units poses unique challenges as patients may have atypical presentations of COVID-19. Immunocompromised patients who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 while asymptomatic may benefit from monoclonal antibody therapy to prevent disease progression. All hospital staff members working with immunocompromised patients should be promptly encouraged to follow infection prevention behaviors and receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on immunocompromised units can be mitigated through prompt identification of cases and robust infection prevention practices.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , VacunaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Review the magnitude and clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions between a new formulation of colchicine, used to treat gout, and antibiotics. SETTING AND PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Relevant to community and institutional pharmacists servicing patients with gout. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Pharmacists have clear roles for the identification of drug-drug interactions, providing recommendations for alternative therapy or dose adjustments/modifications, and monitoring for interactionrelated adverse events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Colchicine is metabolized via cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4); therefore, coadministration with agents that inhibit this isoenzyme can produce elevated colchicine plasma concentrations, resulting in severe and sometimes fatal adverse events. Knowledge of the potential for drug-drug interactions involving antibiotics (e.g., macrolide antibiotics, azole antifungals) allows pharmacists to help patients avoid serious adverse events. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and drug exposure (as assessed by area under the plasma concentration time curve [AUC]) of colchicine are increased by 277% and 282%, respectively, after coadministration with clarithromycin. Similarly, coadministration with ketoconazole increases colchicine C(max) and AUC by 102% and 212%, respectively. Other antibiotics that are strong CYP3A4 inhibitors include itraconazole and telithromycin, whereas erythromycin and fluconazole are moderate inhibitors of the isoenzyme CYP3A4. Coadministration of CYP3A4 inhibitors (particularly clarithromycin) and colchicine has resulted in acute colchicine toxicity manifested by severe gastrointestional toxicity, bone marrow suppression, multiorgan failure, and death. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist awareness of potentially clinically significant interactions between colchicine and antibiotics that inhibit CYP3A4 can help to ensure the efficacy of colchicine is realized while mitigating serious toxicities and minimizing the risk of adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Colchicina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Supresores de la Gota/efectos adversos , Gota/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacéuticos , Área Bajo la Curva , Biotransformación , Colchicina/sangre , Colchicina/farmacocinética , Comorbilidad , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A/metabolismo , Inhibidores del Citocromo P-450 CYP3A , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Supresores de la Gota/sangre , Supresores de la Gota/farmacocinética , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) is used in the treatment of opportunistic fungal and parasitic infections, including leishmaniasis. Given its lack of known teratogenicity in pregnancy, LAmB is a preferred agent for treatment for these patients. However, significant gaps remain in determining optimal dosing regimens for LAmB in pregnancy. We describe the use of LAmB for a pregnant patient with mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) using a dosing strategy of 5 mg/kg/day for days 1-7 using ideal body weight followed by 4 mg/kg weekly using adjusted body weight. We reviewed the literature for LAmB dosing strategies, particularly dosing weight, in pregnancy. Of the 143 cases identified in 17 studies, only one reported a dosing weight, in which ideal body weight was used. Five Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines in total discussed the use of amphotericin B in pregnancy but no guidelines included recommendations for dosing weight. This review describes our experience in using ideal body weight for dosing LAmB in pregnancy for the treatment of MCL. Use of ideal body weight may minimize risk of adverse effects to the fetus compared to the use of total body weight while maintaining efficacy for treatment of MCL in pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B , Liposomas , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Anfotericina B/efectos adversos , Peso Corporal , AntifúngicosRESUMEN
Morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 is due to severe inflammation and end-organ damage caused by a hyperinflammatory response. Multiple immunomodulatory agents to attenuate this response have been studied. Corticosteroids, specifically dexamethasone, have been shown to reduce mortality in hospitalized patients who require supplemental oxygen. Interleukin-6 antagonist, tocilizimab, and Janus kinase inhibitors have also been shown to reduce mortality. However, patients who have severe pulmonary end-organ damage requiring mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation appear not to benefit from immunomodulatory therapies. This highlights the importance of appropriate timing to initiate immunomodulatory therapies in the management of severe COVID-19 disease.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neumonía , Humanos , Agentes Inmunomoduladores , SARS-CoV-2 , PulmónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Drug-drug interactions can limit the safety of colchicine for treating rheumatic diseases. Seven separate drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies were performed to elucidate the in vivo effects of concomitant treatment with colchicine and known inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4)/P-glycoprotein (cyclosporine, ketoconazole, ritonavir, clarithromycin, azithromycin, verapamil ER [extended release]), and diltiazem ER) on the pharmacokinetics of colchicine. The objective was to develop colchicine-dosing algorithms with improved safety. METHODS: All studies were open-label, non-randomized, single-center, one-sequence, two-period DDI experiments, using two 0.6-mg doses of colchicine, separated by a minimum 14-day washout period, followed by administration of the approved on-label regimen of known CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors. Plasma concentrations of colchicine, but not the reference CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors, were determined, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. RESULTS: The ratios of the maximum concentration and area under the curve from time 0 to infinity for colchicine plus CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors versus colchicine alone were >125% across all studies, with the exception of studies involving azithromycin. Significant DDIs were present when single doses of colchicine were coadministered with most of the selected CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors. Recommended colchicine dose reductions of 33-66% for the treatment of acute gout and 50-75% for prophylaxis were calculated for concomitant therapy with each agent, with the exception of no dose adjustment when colchicine is used in combination with azithromycin. CONCLUSION: These studies provide quantitative evidence regarding drug interactions and necessary adjustments in the dose of colchicine if colchicine treatment is continued during therapy with multiple CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors. We demonstrated the need for specific reductions in the dose of colchicine when it is used in combination with 2 broadly prescribed calcium channel blockers (verapamil ER and diltiazem ER) and that the dose of colchicine does not need to be adjusted when it is used in combination with azithromycin.
Asunto(s)
Subfamilia B de Transportador de Casetes de Unión a ATP/antagonistas & inhibidores , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/farmacocinética , Inhibidores del Citocromo P-450 CYP3A , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Algoritmos , Colchicina/efectos adversos , Citocromo P-450 CYP3A , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a parasitic infection that causes significant maternal morbidity, and even fetal mortality, during pregnancy, yet there are limited therapeutic options. Here, we report a case of leishmaniasis in a pregnant immigrant with exuberant mucocutaneous lesions with favorable response to liposomal amphotericin B.
RESUMEN
Background: Collagen-rich fibrous septae and subcutaneous adipose protrusions play a role in cellulite pathophysiology. Collagenase clostridium histolyticum-aaes (CCH-aaes) injection causes enzymatic release of septae to resolve cellulite depressions and create a skin smoothing effect. This analysis pooled data from two identically designed, phase-3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies to examine the efficacy and safety of CCH-aaes. Methods: Adult women with moderate/severe cellulite (3-4 on Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale and Patient Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale) on the buttocks received up to three treatment sessions (Days 1, 22, and 43) of subcutaneous CCH-aaes 0.84 mg or placebo per treatment area. Composite and individual component response (≥2-level or ≥1-level improvement from baseline in Patient Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale and/or Clinician Reported Photonumeric Cellulite Severity Scale) and additional patient-reported outcomes were determined at Day 71. Results: Analysis included 424 CCH-aaes-treated and 419 placebo-treated women. CCH-aaes-treated women were 5.9 times more likely than placebo-treated women to be ≥2-level composite responders at Day 71 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 5.9 [2.2-15.4]; P < 0.001). A significantly greater percentage of CCH-aaes-treated women versus placebo-treated women were ≥1-level composite responders at Day 71 (39.4% versus 14.6%; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated no apparent impact of Fitzpatrick skin type category and baseline cellulite severity (moderate/severe) on CCH-aaes efficacy. An inverse relationship between age and CCH-aaes response was observed in those with a body mass index less than 32 kg per m2. The most common adverse events with CCH-aaes were injection-site bruising and injection-site pain. Conclusion: CCH-aaes treatment significantly improved moderate-to-severe buttock cellulite appearance and was generally well tolerated.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread use of colchicine, the evidence basis for oral colchicine therapy and dosing in acute gout remains limited. The aim of this trial was to compare low-dose colchicine (abbreviated at 1 hour) and high-dose colchicine (prolonged over 6 hours) with placebo in gout flare, using regimens producing comparable maximum plasma concentrations in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study compared self-administered low-dose colchicine (1.8 mg total over 1 hour) and high-dose colchicine (4.8 mg total over 6 hours) with placebo. The primary end point was > or = 50% pain reduction at 24 hours without rescue medication. RESULTS: There were 184 patients in the intent-to-treat analysis. Responders included 28 of 74 patients (37.8%) in the low-dose group, 17 of 52 patients (32.7%) in the high-dose group, and 9 of 58 patients (15.5%) in the placebo group (P = 0.005 and P = 0.034, respectively, versus placebo). Rescue medication was taken within the first 24 hours by 23 patients (31.1%) in the low-dose group (P = 0.027 versus placebo), 18 patients (34.6%) in the high-dose group (P = 0.103 versus placebo), and 29 patients (50.0%) in the placebo group. The low-dose group had an adverse event (AE) profile similar to that of the placebo group, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.7-3.2). High-dose colchicine was associated with significantly more diarrhea, vomiting, and other AEs compared with low-dose colchicine or placebo. With high-dose colchicine, 40 patients (76.9%) had diarrhea (OR 21.3 [95% CI 7.9-56.9]), 10 (19.2%) had severe diarrhea, and 9 (17.3%) had vomiting. With low-dose colchicine, 23.0% of the patients had diarrhea (OR 1.9 [95% CI 0.8-4.8]), none had severe diarrhea, and none had vomiting. CONCLUSION: Low-dose colchicine yielded both maximum plasma concentration and early gout flare efficacy comparable with that of high-dose colchicine, with a safety profile indistinguishable from that of placebo.
Asunto(s)
Colchicina/toxicidad , Gota/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Anciano , Artralgia/inducido químicamente , Colchicina/administración & dosificación , Colchicina/efectos adversos , Colchicina/farmacocinética , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melena/inducido químicamente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Placebos , Grupos Raciales , Valores de Referencia , Vómitos/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
As medication experts, clinical pharmacists play an active and dynamic role in a medication shortage response. Supplementing existing guidelines with an actionable framework of discrete activities to support effective medication shortage responses can expand the scope of pharmacy practice and improve patient care. Dissemination of best practices and illustrative, networked examples from health systems can support the adoption of innovative solutions. In this descriptive report, we document the translation of published shortage mitigation guidelines into system success through broad pharmacist engagement and the adaption and implementation of targeted strategies. The profound, wide-reaching medication shortages that accompanied the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are used to highlight coordinated but distinct practices and how they have been combined to expand the influence of the pharmacy enterprise.
RESUMEN
The SARS-CoV-2 virus has emerged and rapidly evolved into a current global pandemic. Although bacterial and fungal coinfections have been associated with COVID-19, little is known about parasitic infection. We report a case of a COVID-19 patient who developed disseminated strongyloidiasis following treatment with high-dose corticosteroids and tocilizumab. Screening for Strongyloides infection should be pursued in individuals with COVID-19 who originate from endemic regions before initiating immunosuppressive therapy.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/parasitología , Diabetes Mellitus/parasitología , Hipertensión/parasitología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/parasitología , Neumonía Viral/parasitología , Strongyloides stercoralis/patogenicidad , Estrongiloidiasis/parasitología , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Animales , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Coinfección , Connecticut , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/inmunología , Diabetes Mellitus/virología , Ecuador , Humanos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/inmunología , Hipertensión/virología , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Pandemias , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inmunología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/virología , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Estrongiloidiasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estrongiloidiasis/inmunología , Estrongiloidiasis/virologíaRESUMEN
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the antimicrobial stewardship module in our electronic medical record was reconfigured for the management of COVID-19 patients. This change allowed our subspecialist providers to review charts quickly to optimize potential therapy and management during the patient surge.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Neumonía Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Programas InformáticosAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Nocardiosis , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Nocardiosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Nocardiosis/diagnóstico , Nocardiosis/epidemiología , Nocardiosis/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2 , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Receptores de Trasplantes , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Strongyloides stercoralis , Estrongiloidiasis , Animales , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
This randomized, open-label, three-period crossover study compared the single-dose pharmacokinetics of three dose levels of oxycodone in combination with acetaminophen (5 mg/325 mg, 7.5 mg/500 mg, or 10 mg/650 mg) in healthy volunteers. Serial 24-hour blood samples were collectedfrom 23 fasting subjects after drug administration. The individual dose levels were evaluated on 3 different days, which were separated by washout periods of at least 7 days, in each subject. Oxycodone AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax were dose dependent, whereas tma and t(1/2) were not. The most frequently reported adverse events were dizziness, nausea, headache, pruritus, and vomiting. Most adverse events were mild, and all were self-limiting. Only dizziness occurred in a dose-related manner. Increasing dose levels of oxycodone/acetaminophen provides proportional increases in oxycodone Cmax and AUC. Adverse events were predictable based on the opioid pharmacologic actions of this agent.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacocinética , Oxicodona/farmacocinética , Acetaminofén/farmacocinética , Adulto , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/farmacocinética , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Área Bajo la Curva , Química Farmacéutica , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Semivida , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxicodona/administración & dosificación , Oxicodona/efectos adversos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
To determine whether temperature of rehydration fluid influences voluntary rehydration by horses, six 2-3-year-old horses were dehydrated (4-5% body weight loss) by a combination of furosemide administration and 30 km of treadmill exercise. For the initial 5 min following exercise, horses were offered a 0.9% NaCl solution at 10, 20, or 30 degrees C. Subsequently, after washing and cooling out, voluntary intake of water at 10, 20, or 30 degrees C from 20 to 60 min after exercise was measured. Fluid intake (FI) during the first 5 min of recovery was 9.8+/-2.5,12.3+/-2.1 and 9.7+/-2.0L (p>0.05) for saline at 10, 20, and 30 degrees C, respectively. Although not a significant finding, horses offered 0.9% NaCl at 20 degrees C tended to take fewer (p=0.07), longer drinks than when saline at either 10 or 30 degrees C was offered. Between 20 and 60 min of recovery, intake of water at 20 degrees C (7.7+/-0.8L) and 30 degrees C (6.6+/-1.2L) was greater (p<0.05) than that at 10 degrees C (4.9+/-0.5L). Thus, total FI was 14.7+/-2.5,19.9+/-2.5, and 16.3+/-2.4L for rehydration fluids at 10, 20, and 30 degrees C, respectively (p<0.05, value for 20 degrees C water greater than that for 10 degrees C water). Although the amount of metabolic heat transferred to the initial saline drink was correlated with the decrease in core temperature during the initial 5 min of recovery, heat transfer to ingested fluid was most likely responsible for the dissipation of, at most, 5% of the heat generated during endurance exercise. In conclusion, following exercise these dehydrated-normothermic horses voluntary drank the greatest amount of fluid at near ambient (20 degrees C) temperature. Although not determined in this study, greater satiation of thirst by oropharyngeal cooling may have contributed to lesser intake of colder (10 degrees C) fluid.
Asunto(s)
Deshidratación/veterinaria , Ingestión de Líquidos/fisiología , Fluidoterapia/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/terapia , Soluciones para Rehidratación/química , Animales , Deshidratación/inducido químicamente , Deshidratación/terapia , Diuréticos/administración & dosificación , Diuréticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Furosemida/administración & dosificación , Furosemida/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Caballos/inducido químicamente , Caballos , Masculino , Condicionamiento Físico Animal/efectos adversos , Condicionamiento Físico Animal/fisiología , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Temperatura , Sed/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Patients with acne should receive prompt and effective treatment that satisfies their needs. The combination of benzoyl peroxide/clindamycin has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of patients with acne vulgaris. The BenzaClin (benzoyl peroxide/clindamycin topical gel) Efficacy and Satisfaction Trial (BEST), a large, open-label, multicenter study, evaluated patient satisfaction in response to 8 weeks of treatment with benzoyl peroxide/clindamycin topical gel in patients with mild to moderate acne who were dissatisfied with their current acne treatment regimen. Patients eligible for the study were at least 12 years of age and had rated satisfaction with their prior acne therapy as low (0-4) on an 11-point visual analog scale (0 = not satisfied to 10 = very satisfied). Patients with clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, or endocrine disease were excluded from this study, as were those with a hypersensitivity to study drug components. Study variables evaluated at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment with benzoyl peroxide/clindamycin topical gel included patient satisfaction; acne severity, evaluated with the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS); evaluation of the social aspects of living with acne, measured with the Acne Quality of Life (AQOL) scale; and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of patient response to treatment, measured on a 5-point scale (0 = worse to 4 = marked improvement). This open-label study design allowed for assessment of patient satisfaction in response to treatment in a large patient population (n = 1,389) in a real-world setting.