Infectiological, functional, and radiographic outcome after revision for prosthetic hip infection according to a strict algorithm.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Successful treatment of prosthetic hip joint infection (PI) means elimination of infection and restored hip function. However, functional outcome is rarely studied. We analyzed the outcome of the strict use of a treatment algorithm for PI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study groups included 22 hips with 1-stage exchange for PI (group 1), 22 matched hips revised for aseptic loosening (controls), and 50 hips with 2-stage exchange (group 2). Relapse of infection, Harris hip score (HHS), limping, use of crutches, reoperations, complications, and radiographic changes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There was 1 relapse of infection, which occurred in group 2. In group 1, the mean HHS was 84; 4 of 19 patients were limping and 2 required 2 crutches, which was similar to the control results. In group 2, scores were lower and complication rates higher. The use of a Burch-Schneider ring and the presence of a deficient trochanter impaired function. There were no differences in radiographic outcome between the groups. INTERPRETATION: With the algorithm used, infection can be cured with high reliability. With a 1-stage procedure, mobility is maintained. After 2-stage procedures, function was impaired due to there being more previous surgery and more serious infection.

Cemented hip revision surgery in severe acetabular defects using a semirigid acetabular reinforcement ring--a 5- to 25-year follow-up study.

Between 1978 and 1998, a total of 38 consecutive acetabular component revisions were performed in 38 patients. Average age was 67 years, and 87% of patients had severe uncontained segmental acetabular defects of more than 50%. We describe the operative technique of acetabular component revisions performed with bone grafting and a steel, semirigid acetabular reinforcement ring (Eichler), and long-term results are presented. After an average of 11.2 years follow-up, 1 cup was revised after 0.8 years for mechanical loosening, but the ring remained stably fixed. Remodeling (partial) of autografts occurred in all cases. The average HHS was 72.5. The Eichler reinforcement ring is a viable option for segmental acetabular defects in revision hip surgery, allows for restoration of pelvic bone, and makes future revisions feasible.

Small stem total hip arthroplasty in hypoplasia of the femur.

UNLABELLED: Total hip arthroplasty in hypoplastic femurs is technically difficult and the incidence of complications and aseptic loosening is relatively high. Cemented, uncemented, off-the-shelf, and custom-made stems all have been advocated in these cases. From 1978 to 1997, we performed 86 total hip arthroplasties in 77 patients with a hypoplastic femur using a cemented, off-the-shelf, small, curved, cobalt-chromium stem. We hypothesized results equaled those of the identical but larger-sized stems in normal-sized femora which were used as comparisons. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed. Minimum followup was 4.2 years (mean, 12 years; range, 4.2-20.3 years); mean Harris hip score was 88, and mean hip flexion was 104 degrees . Six stems were revised: four because of aseptic loosening, one after a femoral fracture, and one because of malpositioning. Complications included one perforation and one fracture of the femur, one fracture, one nonunion of the greater trochanter, and one deep infection. Implant survivorship for all hips at 15 years with aseptic revision of the stem as the end point was 90% (confidence interval, 82-99) which equaled results of the larger stems. The small off-the-shelf cemented Weber stem has a high long-term survival and a low complication rate. Survival compares favorably with other small-sized total hip systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study, case-control.

Is the long-term outcome of cemented THA jeopardized by patients being overweight?

Although the effect of being overweight on the long- and short-term outcome of THA remains unclear, the majority of orthopaedic surgeons believe being overweight negatively influences the longevity of a hip implant. We asked whether complications and long-term survival of cemented THA differed in overweight patients (body mass index [BMI] > 25 kg/m2) and obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m2) compared with normal-weight patients (BMI < 25 kg/m2). We retrospectively analyzed 411 consecutive patients (489 THAs) treated with cemented THA between 1974 and 1993. Except for cardiovascular comorbidity, we observed no differences in demographics among these weight groups. We found no differences in the number of intraoperative or postoperative complications. The survival rates for the three BMI groups were similar. The 10-year survival for any revision was 94.9% (95% confidence interval, 91.6%-98.2%), 90.4% (95% confidence interval, 85.6%-95.2%), and 91% (95% confidence interval, 81.2%-100%) for normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed BMI and weight had no major influence on survival rates. The differences in mean Harris hip score at final followup were 4.8 between normal-weight and overweight patients and 7.1 between normal-weight and obese patients. Being overweight and obesity had no influence on perioperative complication rates in this cohort and did not negatively influence the long-term survival of cemented THA.