Opportunity for a Community Health Fair Model of Bleeding Control Training.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic hemorrhage is a prevalent cause of death nationally, with >50% of civilian deaths estimated to be preventable with more timely intervention. This study investigated the efficacy of training large and diverse audiences in bleeding control methods including tourniquets in community health fair settings. METHODS: A booth was utilized for bleeding control training at community health fairs via direct demonstrations of pressure, wound packing, and commercial and improvised tourniquet application followed by hands-on practice. Participants self-rated their perceived abilities while instructors rated the participant competency. RESULTS: 117 community members participated during two fairs, though not every person completed every portion of the training. Average age was 33 (range 6-82) and the majority were female (65.0%). There was no difference in self-perceived skill compared to trainer grading of participant's ability to identify life-threatening bleeding (112 (97.4%) vs 106 (97.2%); P = 1), apply pressure (113 (98.3%) vs 106 (97.2%); P = .68), and pack a wound (102 (88.7%) vs 92 (84.4%); P = .43). No difference in difficulty was noted in placing commercial vs improvised tourniquets (16 (43%) vs 14 (45%); P = .87). However, participants were overconfident in their ability to place tourniquets compared to trainer grading, respectively (112 (98.2%) vs 100 (91.7%; P = .03)). DISCUSSION: Community fair classes provide opportunities to train large and diverse audiences in bleeding control techniques. However, participants overestimated their ability to appropriately apply tourniquets. Further investigation is needed into best educational approaches to optimize the impact of bleeding control kits that have been distributed in multiple states.

Prospective Assessment of Social Determinants of Health and Length of Stay Among Emergency General Surgery and Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDOH) including insurance and substance use affect 50-90% of health outcomes, yet there remains no standard means to quantify or predict their impact. We prospectively evaluated the effects of SDOH on length of stay (LOS) and readmissions among emergency general surgery (EGS) and trauma patients. We compared these outcomes with Medicare Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) data to better quantify the impact of SDOH. METHODS: Adult (≥18 years old) EGS/trauma patients admitted July 7-28, 2020 at a Level 1 trauma center were prospectively enrolled. Primary outcomes were overall LOS, one-year readmissions, and excess LOS (eLOS), defined as days beyond DRG mean LOS. RESULTS: Assessment of SDOH among the 52 patients enrolled revealed that 5.8% of patients were homeless; 26.9% experienced substance abuse; 13.5% were uninsured on admission; and 7.7% on discharge. Mean LOS was 5 ± 4 days; 1-year readmission rate 25.0%; eLOS mean 1.75 ± 2.4 days. LOS was associated with substance use (OR 70.6 95% CI 11.7-160.4). eLOS was associated with substance use (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.5-25.1) and public or no insurance (OR 26.0, 95% CI 4.9-138.1). No correlations were found between SDOH and readmission rates. DISCUSSION: EGS and trauma patients experience high rates of negative SDOH which affect clinical outcomes including LOS and readmissions. Medicare DRG determined eLOS is a fiscally relevant measure of the impact of SDOH and differs from LOS and readmissions. Further investigation is required to determine if eLOS can delineate the effects of other SDOH on admission outcomes for this patient population.