90 Y SPECT/CT quantitative study and comparison of uptake with pretreatment 99 m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT in radiomicrosphere therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Yttrium-90 (90 Y) microsphere post-treatment imaging reflects the true distribution characteristics of microspheres in the tumor and liver compartments. However, due to its decay spectra profile lacking a pronounced photopeak, the bremsstrahlung imaging for 90 Y has inherent limitations. The absorbed dose calculations for 90 Y microspheres radiomicrosphere therapy (RMT) sustain a limitation due to the poor quality of 90 Y imaging. The aim of this study was to develop quantitative methods to improve the post-treatment 90 Y bremsstrahlung single photon emission tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) image analysis for dosimetric purposes and to perform a quantitative comparison with the 99m Tc-MAA SPECT/CT images, which is used for theranostics purposes for liver and tumor dosimetry. METHODS: Pre and post-treatment SPECT/CT data of patients who underwent RMT for primary or metastatic liver cancer were acquired. A Jasczak phantom with eight spherical inserts of various sizes was used to obtain optimal iteration number for the contrast recovery algorithm for improving 90 Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT images. Comparison of uptake on 99m Tc-MAA and 90 Y microsphere SPECT/CT images was assessed using tumor to healthy liver ratios (TLRs). The voxel dosimetry technique was used to estimate absorbed doses. Absorbed doses within the tumor and healthy part of the liver were also investigated for correlation with administered activity. RESULTS: Improvement in CNR and contrast recovery coefficients on patient and phantom 90 Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT images respectively were achieved. The 99m Tc-MAA and 90 Y microspheres SPECT/CT images showed significant uptake correlation (r = 0.9, P = 0.05) with mean TLR of 9.4 ± 9.2 and 5.0 ± 2.2, respectively. The correlation between the administered activity and tumor absorbed dose was weak (r = 0.5, P > 0.05), however, healthy liver absorbed dose increased with administered activity (r = 0.8, P = 0.0). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated correlation in mean TLR between 99m Tc-MAA and 90 Y microsphere SPECT/CT.

18F-FLT Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in Pancreatic Cancer: Determination of Tumor Proliferative Activity and Comparison with Glycolytic Activity as Measured by 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: This phase-I imaging study examined the imaging characteristic of 3'-deoxy-3'-(18F)-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with pancreatic cancer and comparisons were made with (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG). The ultimate aim was to develop a molecular imaging tool that could better define the biologic characteristics of pancreas cancer, and to identify the patients who could potentially benefit from surgical resection who were deemed inoperable by conventional means of staging. METHODS: Six patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer underwent a combined FLT and FDG computed tomography (CT) PET/CT imaging protocol. The FLT PET/CT scan was performed within 1 week of FDG PET/CT imaging. Tumor uptake of a tracer was determined and compared using various techniques; statistical thresholding (z score=2.5), and fixed standardized uptake value (SUV) thresholds of 1.4 and 2.5, and applying a threshold of 40% of maximum SUV (SUVmax) and mean SUV (SUVmean). The correlation of functional tumor volumes (FTV) between 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT was assessed using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: It was found that there is a correlation in FTV due to metabolic and proliferation activity when using a threshold of SUV 2.5 for FDG and 1.4 for FLT (r=0.698, p=ns), but a better correlation was obtained when using SUV of 2.5 for both tracers (r=0.698, p=ns). The z score thresholding (z=2.5) method showed lower correlation between the FTVs (r=0.698, p=ns) of FDG and FLT PET. CONCLUSION: Different tumor segmentation techniques yielded varying degrees of correlation in FTV between FLT and FDG-PET images. FLT imaging may have a different meaning in determining tumor biology and prognosis.