Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 114
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Dis ; 228(1): 89-100, 2023 06 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36655513

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine effectiveness (VE) against longitudinal outcomes is lacking among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM). We compared 12-month incidence and persistence of anal HPV infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated GBM. METHODS: We recruited GBM aged 16-30 years in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver, Canada, from 2017 to 2019. Participants were followed over a median of 12 months (interquartile range, 12-13 months). Participants self-reported HPV vaccination and self-collected anal specimens for HPV DNA testing. We calculated prevalence ratios (PR) for 12-month cumulative incidence and persistence with ≥1 quadrivalent vaccine type (HPV 6/11/16/18) between vaccinated (≥1 dose at baseline) and unvaccinated participants using a propensity score-weighted, modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: Among 248 participants, 109 (44.0%) were vaccinated at baseline, of whom 62.6% received 3 doses. PRs for HPV 6/11/16/18 were 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], .24-1.31) for cumulative incidence and 0.53 (95% CI, .25-1.14) for persistence. PRs were 0.23 (95% CI, .05-1.03) and 0.08 (95% CI, .01-.59) for incidence and persistence, respectively, among participants who received their first dose at age ≤23 years and 0.15 (95% CI, .03-.68) and 0.12 (95% CI, .03-.54) among participants who were sexually active for ≤5 years before vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support national recommendations for HPV vaccination at younger ages or soon after sexual debut.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Ano , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/normas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Incidencia , Enfermedades del Ano/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Ano/prevención & control , Enfermedades del Ano/virología , Virus del Papiloma Humano , Estudios de Cohortes
2.
Epidemiology ; 34(2): 225-229, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36722804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Self-report of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has ~80-90% sensitivity and ~75-85% specificity. We measured the effect of nondifferential exposure misclassification associated with self-reported vaccination on vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates. METHODS: Between 2017-2019, we recruited sexually active gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men aged 16-30 years in Canada. VE was derived as 1-prevalence ratio × 100% for prevalent anal HPV infection comparing vaccinated (≥1 dose) to unvaccinated men using a multivariable modified Poisson regression. We conducted a multidimensional and probabilistic quantitative bias analysis to correct VE estimates. RESULTS: Bias-corrected VE estimates were relatively stable across sensitivity values but differed from the uncorrected estimate at lower values of specificity. The median adjusted VE was 27% (2.5-97.5th simulation interval = -5-49%) in the uncorrected analysis, increasing to 39% (2.5-97.5th simulation interval = 2-65%) in the bias-corrected analysis. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of participants erroneously reporting HPV vaccination would be required to meaningfully change VE estimates.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Masculino , Humanos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Autoinforme , Virus del Papiloma Humano , Homosexualidad Masculina , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico , Vacunación
3.
Sex Transm Dis ; 49(2): 123-132, 2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34561370

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Starting in 2015, human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine has been publicly funded for gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) 26 years or younger in Canada. METHODS: Self-identified GBM who reported having sex with another man within the past 6 months were enrolled using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) between February 2017 and August 2019 in Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver, Canada. Men aged 16 to 30 years self-collected anal specimens for HPV-DNA testing. Prevalence was estimated using RDS-II weights. We compared the prevalence of quadrivalent (HPV-6/11/16/18) and 9-valent (HPV-6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) vaccine types between GBM who self-reported HPV vaccination (≥1 dose) and those reporting no vaccination using a modified Poisson regression for binary outcomes. RESULTS: Among 645 GBM who provided a valid anal specimen (median age, 26 years; 5.9% HIV positive), 40.3% reported receiving ≥1 dose of HPV vaccine, of whom 61.8% received 3 doses. One-quarter were infected with ≥1 quadrivalent type (crude, 25.7%; RDS weighted, 24.4%). After adjustment for potential confounders, vaccinated GBM had a 27% lower anal prevalence of quadrivalent types compared with unvaccinated GBM (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.00). Lower prevalence ratios were found among vaccinated participants who were vaccinated >2 years before enrollment (aPR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.86) or received their first vaccine dose at age ≤23 years (aPR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.99). Point estimates were similar for ≥2 or 3 doses and 9-valent types. CONCLUSIONS: Human papillomavirus vaccination was associated with a lower anal prevalence of vaccine-preventable HPV types among young, sexually active GBM. Findings will help inform shared decision making around HPV vaccination for GBM and their healthcare providers.


Asunto(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiología , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Prevalencia , Adulto Joven
4.
J Infect Dis ; 223(8): 1334-1338, 2021 04 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33400794

RESUMEN

We analyzed 21 676 residual specimens from Ontario, Canada collected March-August 2020 to investigate the effect of antibody decline on SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence estimates. Testing specimens orthogonally using Abbott (anti-nucleocapsid) and Ortho (anti-spike) assays, seroprevalence estimates were 0.4%-1.4%, despite ongoing disease activity. The geometric mean concentration (GMC) of antibody-positive specimens decreased over time (P = .015), and GMC of antibody-negative specimens increased over time (P = .0018). Association between the 2 tests decreased each month (P < .001), suggesting anti-nucleocapsid antibody decline. Lowering Abbott antibody index cutoff from 1.4 to 0.7 resulted in a 16% increase in positive specimens.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/inmunología , Proteínas de la Nucleocápside de Coronavirus/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19/métodos , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Fosfoproteínas/inmunología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(1): 83-90, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32384142

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies provide essential evidence on waning vaccine-derived immunity, a major threat to pertussis control. We evaluated how study design affects estimates by comparing 2 case-control studies conducted in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We compared results from a test-negative design (TND) with a frequency-matched design (FMD) case-control study using pertussis cases from 2005-2015. In the first study, we identified test-negative controls from the public health laboratory that diagnosed cases and, in the second, randomly selected controls from patients attending the same physicians that reported cases, frequency matched on age and year. We compared characteristics of cases and controls using standardized differences. RESULTS: In both designs, VE estimates for the early years postimmunization were consistent with clinical trials (TND, 84%; FMD, 89% at 1-3 years postvaccination) but diverged as time since last vaccination increased (TND, 41%; FMD, 74% by 8 years postvaccination). Overall, we observed lower VE and faster waning in the TND than the FMD. In the TND but not FMD, controls differed from cases in important confounders, being younger, having more comorbidities, and higher healthcare use. Differences between the controls of each design were greater than differences between cases. TND controls were more likely to be unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated than FMD controls (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The FMD adjusted better for healthcare-seeking behavior than the TND. Duration of protection from pertussis vaccines is unclear because estimates vary by study design. Caution should be exercised by experts, researchers, and decision makers when evaluating evidence on optimal timing of boosters.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina , Tos Ferina , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Ontario/epidemiología , Vacunación , Tos Ferina/epidemiología , Tos Ferina/prevención & control
6.
Euro Surveill ; 26(50)2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34915969

RESUMEN

BackgroundSerosurveys for SARS-CoV-2 aim to estimate the proportion of the population that has been infected.AimThis observational study assesses the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Ontario, Canada during the first pandemic wave.MethodsUsing an orthogonal approach, we tested 8,902 residual specimens from the Public Health Ontario laboratory over three time periods during March-June 2020 and stratified results by age group, sex and region. We adjusted for antibody test sensitivity/specificity and compared with reported PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases.ResultsAdjusted seroprevalence was 0.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1-1.5) from 27 March-30 April, 1.5% (95% CI: 0.7-2.2) from 26-31 May, and 1.1% (95% CI: 0.8-1.3) from 5-30 June 2020. Adjusted estimates were highest in individuals aged ≥ 60 years in March-April (1.3%; 95% CI: 0.2-4.6), in those aged 20-59 years in May (2.1%; 95% CI: 0.8-3.4) and in those aged ≥ 60 years in June (1.6%; 95% CI: 1.1-2.1). Regional seroprevalence varied, and was highest for Toronto in March-April (0.9%; 95% CI: 0.1-3.1), for Toronto in May (3.2%; 95% CI: 1.0-5.3) and for Toronto (1.5%; 95% CI: 0.9-2.1) and Central East in June (1.5%; 95% CI: 1.0-2.0). We estimate that COVID-19 cases detected by PCR in Ontario underestimated SARS-CoV-2 infections by a factor of 4.9.ConclusionsOur results indicate low population seroprevalence in Ontario, suggesting that public health measures were effective at limiting the spread of SARS-CoV-2 during the first pandemic wave.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Humanos , Ontario/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(1): 22-29, 2020 06 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31436814

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised adults are at .increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ) infection and related complications. We aimed to assess the incidence of hospital-attended HZ (ie, seen in hospital or emergency department) in immunocompromised populations and compare it to immunocompetent populations. METHODS: We calculated incidence rates (IRs) of hospital-attended HZ in Ontario, Canada, between 1 April 2002 and 31 August 2016 in adults ≥18 years of age categorized as immunocompromised or immunocompetent. We repeated these analyses by type of immunocompromising condition and provided incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing to immunocompetent adults. We also calculated IRs and IRRs of HZ complications by immunocompromised status. RESULTS: There were 135 206 incident cases of hospital-attended HZ during the study period. Immunocompromised adults accounted for 13% of these cases despite representing 3% of the population. The risk of hospital-attended HZ was higher for immunocompromised adults compared with immunocompetent adults (IRR, 2.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.9-3.0]) and ranged across type of immunocompromising conditions, from 2.6 (95% CI, 2.6-2.7) in those with a solid tumor malignancy to 12.3 (95% CI, 11.3-13.2) in those who had undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The risk of any HZ complication was higher in immunocompromised adults (IRR, 3.6 [95% CI, 3.5-3.7]) and highest for disseminated zoster (IRR, 32.8 [95% CI, 27.8-38.6]). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of hospital-attended HZ and related complications was higher in immunocompromised populations compared with immunocompetent populations. Our findings underscore the high-risk nature of this population and the potential benefits that may be realized through HZ vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Herpes Zóster , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Incidencia , Ontario/epidemiología
8.
Paediatr Child Health ; 25(6): 358-364, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32963648

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The combined measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) and measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) vaccines are part of Ontario's routine immunization schedule. OBJECTIVE: To assess adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) reported in Ontario following administration of MMR and MMRV vaccines between 2012 and 2016. METHODS: Reports of AEFIs were extracted from the provincial surveillance database on May 9, 2017. Events were grouped by provincial surveillance definitions. Reporting rates were calculated using provincial population estimates or net doses distributed as the denominator. A serious AEFI is defined as an AEFI that resulted in an in-patient hospitalization or death. RESULTS: Overall, 289 AEFIs were reported following administration of MMR (n=246) or MMRV (n=43) vaccines, for annualized reporting rates of 16.6 and 8.8 reports per 100,000 distributed doses, respectively. The highest age-specific reporting rate was in children aged 1 to 3 years for MMR (7.7 per 100,000 population) and children aged 4 to 9 years for MMRV (0.8 per 100,000 population). Systemic reactions were the most frequently reported event category, while rash was the most frequently reported event for both vaccines. There were 22 serious AEFIs, 19 following MMR and 3 following MMRV (1.3 and 0.6 per 100,000 doses distributed, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our assessment found a low reporting rate of adverse events following MMR and MMRV vaccines in Ontario. No safety concerns were identified. Our findings are consistent with the safety profiles of these vaccines. Continued monitoring of vaccine safety is necessary to maintain timely detection of unusual postvaccine events and public confidence in vaccine safety.

9.
Euro Surveill ; 24(11)2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30892178

RESUMEN

BackgroundGiven that measles is eliminated in Canada and measles immunisation coverage in Ontario is high, it has been questioned whether Ontario's measles outbreak response is worthwhile.AimOur objective was to determine cost-effectiveness of measles containment protocols in Ontario from the healthcare payer perspective.MethodsWe developed a decision-analysis model comparing Ontario's measles containment strategy (based on actual 2015 outbreak data) with a hypothetical 'modified response'. The modified scenario assumed 10% response costs with reduced case and contact tracing and no outbreak-associated vaccinations; it was based on local and provincial administrative and laboratory data and parameters from peer-reviewed literature. Short- and long-term health outcomes, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs discounted at 1.5%, were estimated. We conducted one- and two-way sensitivity analyses.ResultsThe 2015 outbreak in Ontario comprised 16 measles cases and an estimated 3,369 contacts. Predictive modelling suggested that the outbreak response prevented 16 outbreak-associated cases at a cost of CAD 1,213,491 (EUR 861,579). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was CAD 739,063 (EUR 524,735) per QALY gained for the outbreak response vs modified response. To meet the commonly accepted cost-effectiveness threshold of CAD 50,000 (EUR 35,500) per QALY gained, the outbreak response would have to prevent 94 measles cases. In sensitivity analyses, the findings were robust.ConclusionsOntario's measles outbreak response exceeds generally accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds and may not be the most efficient use of public health resources from a healthcare payer perspective. These findings should be balanced against benefits of increased vaccine coverage and maintaining elimination status.


Asunto(s)
Trazado de Contacto/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Brotes de Enfermedades/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Sarampión/economía , Adolescente , Canadá/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Trazado de Contacto/economía , Gastos en Salud , Humanos , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Ontario/epidemiología , Salud Pública , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Vacunación/economía , Adulto Joven
10.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(7): 1063-1069, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28628461

RESUMEN

The province of Ontario continues to experience measles virus transmissions despite the elimination of measles in Canada. We describe an unusual outbreak of measles in Ontario, Canada, in early 2015 that involved cases with a unique strain of virus and no known association among primary case-patients. A total of 18 cases of measles were reported from 4 public health units during the outbreak period (January 25-March 23, 2015); none of these cases occurred in persons who had recently traveled. Despite enhancements to case-patient interview methods and epidemiologic analyses, a source patient was not identified. However, the molecular epidemiologic analysis, which included extended sequencing, strongly suggested that all cases derived from a single importation of measles virus genotype D4. The use of timely genotype sequencing, rigorous epidemiologic investigation, and a better understanding of the gaps in surveillance are needed to maintain Ontario's measles elimination status.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Genotipo , Virus del Sarampión/genética , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/virología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Masculino , Sarampión/diagnóstico , Sarampión/historia , Virus del Sarampión/clasificación , Ontario/epidemiología , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , ARN Viral/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Serogrupo , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
11.
J Clin Microbiol ; 55(5): 1446-1453, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28228490

RESUMEN

Bordetella pertussis is a Gram-negative bacterium that causes respiratory infections in humans. Ongoing molecular surveillance of B. pertussis acellular vaccine (aP) antigens is critical for understanding the interaction between evolutionary pressures, disease pathogenesis, and vaccine effectiveness. Methods currently used to characterize aP components are relatively labor-intensive and low throughput. To address this challenge, we sought to derive aP antigen genotypes from minimally processed short-read whole-genome sequencing data generated from 40 clinical B. pertussis isolates and analyzed using the SRST2 bioinformatic package. SRST2 was able to identify aP antigen genotypes for all antigens with the exception of pertactin, possibly due to low read coverage in GC-rich low-complexity regions of variation. Two main genotypes were observed in addition to a singular third genotype that contained an 84-bp deletion that was identified by SRST2 despite the issues in allele calling. This method has the potential to generate large pools of B. pertussis molecular data that can be linked to clinical and epidemiological information to facilitate research of vaccine effectiveness and disease severity in the context of emerging vaccine antigen-deficient strains.


Asunto(s)
Bordetella pertussis/genética , Bordetella pertussis/inmunología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Genoma Bacteriano/genética , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/inmunología , Tos Ferina/epidemiología , Antígenos Bacterianos/genética , Antígenos Bacterianos/inmunología , Secuencia de Bases , Bordetella pertussis/aislamiento & purificación , Niño , Preescolar , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Humanos , Lactante , Ontario , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Tos Ferina/microbiología , Tos Ferina/patología
12.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 39(3): e118-e126, 2017 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27247122

RESUMEN

Background: Barriers and facilitators of mobile app adoption are not known. This study examined usage of a new Pan-Canadian immunization app to identify factors that contributed to usage. Methods: Women in their third trimester of pregnancy or had given birth in the previous 3 months were recruited from a hospital obstetrical unit. Fifty-five participants were instructed to download the ImmunizeCA app. After at least 6 months, 10 interviews were conducted, transcribed and coded. Themes identified were compared with aggregate ImmunizeCA usage data (n = 74 212 users). Results: Facilitators included features that address logistical challenges, improved convenience and information access. Barriers included absence of system integration. Concerns regarding the privacy and security of personal health information were not an inhibitor as long as best practices are followed. Google Analytics data on usage supported qualitative findings. Conclusion: Future studies should evaluate the quantitative impact of factors we identified on app uptake and usage. Subsequent mobile app studies may benefit from the use of analytic data as they were found to be effective in helping to validate qualitative data derived from interviews with study participants.


Asunto(s)
Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Aplicaciones Móviles , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa
13.
CMAJ ; 188(16): E399-E406, 2016 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27672225

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A resurgence of pertussis cases among both vaccinated and unvaccinated people raises questions about vaccine effectiveness over time. Our objective was to study the effectiveness of the pertussis vaccine and characterize the effect of waning immunity and whole-cell vaccine priming. METHODS: We used the test-negative design, a nested case-control study with test-negative individuals as controls. We constructed multivariable logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs). Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1 - OR) × 100. We assessed waning immunity by calculating the odds of developing pertussis per year since last vaccination and evaluated the relative effectiveness of priming with acellular versus whole-cell vaccine. RESULTS: Between Dec. 7, 2009, and Mar. 31, 2013, data on 5867 individuals (486 test-positive cases and 5381 test-negative controls) were available for analysis. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71% to 86%) at 15-364 days, 84% (95% CI 77% to 89%) at 1-3 years, 62% (95% CI 42% to 75%) at 4-7 years and 41% (95% CI 0% to 66%) at 8 or more years since last vaccination. We observed waning immunity with the acellular vaccine, with an adjusted OR for pertussis infection of 1.27 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.34) per year since last vaccination. Acellular, versus whole-cell, vaccine priming was associated with an increased odds of pertussis (adjusted OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.30 to 3.57). INTERPRETATION: We observed high early effectiveness of the pertussis vaccine that rapidly declined as time since last vaccination surpassed 4 years, particularly with acellular vaccine priming. Considering whole-cell vaccine priming and/or boosters in pregnancy to optimize pertussis control may be prudent.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Inmunidad Activa , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/uso terapéutico , Tos Ferina/epidemiología , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Incidencia , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Ontario/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
14.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 21(2): 224-31, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25625590

RESUMEN

It is unclear whether seasonal influenza vaccination results in a net increase or decrease in the risk for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). To assess the effect of seasonal influenza vaccination on the absolute risk of acquiring GBS, we used simulation models and published estimates of age- and sex-specific risks for GBS, influenza incidence, and vaccine effectiveness. For a hypothetical 45-year-old woman and 75-year-old man, excess GBS risk for influenza vaccination versus no vaccination was -0.36/1 million vaccinations (95% credible interval -1.22% to 0.28) and -0.42/1 million vaccinations (95% credible interval, -3.68 to 2.44), respectively. These numbers represent a small absolute reduction in GBS risk with vaccination. Under typical conditions (e.g. influenza incidence rates >5% and vaccine effectiveness >60%), vaccination reduced GBS risk. These findings should strengthen confidence in the safety of influenza vaccine and allow health professionals to better put GBS risk in context when discussing influenza vaccination with patients.


Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Gripe Humana/complicaciones , Modelos Estadísticos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo , Adulto Joven
17.
BMC Infect Dis ; 15: 341, 2015 Aug 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26282392

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2011 the largest measles outbreak in North America in a decade occurred in Quebec, Canada with over 700 cases. In contrast, measles activity in neighbouring province Ontario remained low (8 cases). Our objective was to determine the extent to which the difference could be explained by differing travel patterns. METHODS: We explored the relationship between measles cases over 2007-2011, by importation classification, in Quebec and Ontario in relation to global travel patterns to each province using an ecological approach. Global measles exposure was estimated by multiplying the monthly traveler volume for each country of origin into Quebec or Ontario by the yearly measles incidence rate for the corresponding country. Visual inspection of temporal figures and calculation of Pearson correlation coefficients were performed. RESULTS: Global measles exposure was similar in Ontario and Quebec. In Quebec, there was a nearly perfectly linear relationship between annual measles cases and its global measles exposure index over 2007-2011 (r = 0.99, p = 0.001). In contrast, there was a non-significant association in Ontario. The 2011 rise in Quebec's index was largely driven by a dramatic increase in measles activity in France the same year. CONCLUSIONS: Global measles activity was associated with measles epidemiology in Quebec. Global measles exposure risk is higher in Ontario than Quebec. Differences in measles epidemiology between Ontario and Quebec from 2007-2011 are not explained by greater exposure in Quebec. A combination of alternative factors may be responsible, including differences in population susceptibility.


Asunto(s)
Sarampión/epidemiología , Viaje , Brotes de Enfermedades , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Humanos , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna Antisarampión/uso terapéutico , Ontario/epidemiología , Quebec/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estaciones del Año
18.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 14: 5, 2014 Jan 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24423014

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the features and performance of health information systems can serve to strengthen the systems themselves as well as to guide other organizations in the process of designing and implementing surveillance tools. We adapted an evaluation framework in order to assess electronic immunization data collection systems, and applied it in two Ontario public health units. METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems are broad in nature and serve as an organizational tool to guide the development of comprehensive evaluation materials. Based on these Guidelines, and informed by other evaluation resources and input from stakeholders in the public health community, we applied an evaluation framework to two examples of immunization data collection and examined several system attributes: simplicity, flexibility, data quality, timeliness, and acceptability. Data collection approaches included key informant interviews, logic and completeness assessments, client surveys, and on-site observations. RESULTS: Both evaluated systems allow high-quality immunization data to be collected, analyzed, and applied in a rapid fashion. However, neither system is currently able to link to other providers' immunization data or provincial data sources, limiting the comprehensiveness of coverage assessments. We recommended that both organizations explore possibilities for external data linkage and collaborate with other jurisdictions to promote a provincial immunization repository or data sharing platform. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic systems such as the ones described in this paper allow immunization data to be collected, analyzed, and applied in a rapid fashion, and represent the infostructure required to establish a population-based immunization registry, critical for comprehensively assessing vaccine coverage.


Asunto(s)
Recolección de Datos/normas , Sistemas de Información en Salud/normas , Inmunización/normas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/normas , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Humanos , Inmunización/métodos , Programas de Inmunización/normas , Ontario , Vigilancia en Salud Pública
19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567363

RESUMEN

Background: SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence monitors cumulative infection rates irrespective of case testing protocols. We aimed to describe Nova Scotia blood donor seroprevalence in relation to public health policy and reported data over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic (May 2020 to August 2022). Methods: Monthly random Nova Scotia blood donation samples (24,258 in total) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection antibodies (anti-nucleocapsid) from May 2020 to August 2022, and vaccination antibodies (anti-spike) from January 2021 to August 2022. Multivariable logistic regression for infection antibodies and vaccination antibodies separately with month, age, sex, and racialization identified independent predictors. The provincial nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)-positive case rate over the pandemic was calculated from publicly available data. Results: Anti-N seroprevalence was 3.8% in January 2022, increasing to 50.8% in August 2022. The general population COVID-19 case rate was 3.5% in January 2022, increasing to 12.5% in August 2022. The percentage of NAAT-positive samples in public health laboratories increased from 1% in November 2021 to a peak of 30.7% in April 2022 with decreasing numbers of tests performed. Higher proportions of younger donors as well as Black, Indigenous, and racialized blood donors were more likely to have infection antibodies (p < 0.01). Vaccination antibodies increased to 100% over 2021, initially in older donors (60+ years), and followed by progressively younger age groups. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were relatively low in Nova Scotia until the more contagious Omicron variant dominated, after which about half of Nova Scotia donors had been infected despite most adults being vaccinated (although severity was much lower in vaccinated individuals). Most COVID-19 cases were detected by NAAT until Omicron arrived. When NAAT testing priorities focused on high-risk individuals, infection rates were better reflected by seroprevalence.


Historique: La séroprévalence du SRAS-CoV-2 permet de surveiller les taux d'infection cumulatifs, quels que soient les protocoles de dépistage des cas. Les chercheurs voulaient décrire la séroprévalence chez les donneurs de sang néo-écossais par rapport aux politiques sanitaires et aux données déclarées tout au long de la pandémie de COVID-19 (mai 2020 à août 2022). Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont mesuré les anticorps à l'infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 (antinucléocapsidiques) de manière aléatoire tous les mois dans des échantillons de dons de sang de la Nouvelle-Écosse (pour un total de 24 258) entre mai 2020 et août 2022, de même que les anticorps aux vaccins (antispiculaires) (entre janvier 2021 et août 2022). La régression logistique multivariable effectuée séparément pour les anticorps contre l'infection et les anticorps aux vaccins, par rapport au mois, à l'âge, au genre et à la race, ont permis d'établir les prédicteurs indépendants. Les chercheurs ont calculé le taux de cas provinciaux positifs aux tests d'amplification des acides nucléiques (TAAN) à partir des données publiques tout au long de la pandémie. Résultats: La séroprévalence anti-N, qui s'élevait à 3,8 % en janvier 2022, était passée à 50,8 % en août 2022. Le taux de cas de COVID-19 dans la population générale se situait à 3,5 % en janvier 2022 et était monté à 12,5 % en août 2022. Le pourcentage d'échantillons positifs au TAAN dans les laboratoires de santé publique est passé de 1 % en novembre 2021 à un pic de 30,7 % en avril 2022, conjointement à une diminution du nombre de tests effectués. De plus fortes proportions de donneurs plus jeunes et de donneurs noirs, autochtones et racisés étaient susceptibles de posséder des anticorps contre l'infection (p < 0,01). Les anticorps attribuables à la vaccination ont atteint 100 % en 2021, d'abord chez les donneurs plus âgés (de plus de 60 ans), puis dans les tranches d'âges progressivement plus jeunes. Conclusions: Les taux d'infection par le SRAS-CoV-2 sont demeurés relativement faibles en Nouvelle-Écosse jusqu'à la domination du variant Omicron plus contagieux, puis environ la moitié des donneurs néo-écossais ont été infectés, même si la plupart des adultes étaient vaccinés (la gravité de la maladie était toutefois beaucoup plus faible chez les personnes vaccinées). La plupart des cas de COVID-19 ont été dépistés par TAAN jusqu'à l'apparition du variant Omicron. Lorsque les priorités de dépistage par TAAN ont été limitées aux personnes à haut risque, les taux d'infection étaient mieux reflétés par la séroprévalence.

20.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(6): ofae275, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38868312

RESUMEN

Background: New vaccine products were recently authorized for protection against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in Canada. Our aim was to determine age- and serotype-specific trends in IPD incidence and severity in Canada's largest province, Ontario. Methods: We included all confirmed IPD cases reported in Ontario and defined the pre-pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV13) era (01/2007 to 12/2010), post-PCV13 era (01/2011 to 12/2019), and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic era (01/2020 to 12/2022). We estimated incidence, hospitalization, and case fatality rate (CFR) by age. We grouped IPD cases by vaccine-specific serotypes (PCV13; PCV15-non-PCV13; PCV20-non-PCV13; PCV20-non-PCV15; polysaccharide 23-valent vaccine-non-PCV20; and non-vaccine-preventable [NVP]). We then compared incidence rates by age and serotype group in the pre- and post-PCV13 eras by calculating rate ratios (RRs) and their 95% CIs. Results: Incidence and hospitalizations declined from the pre- to post-PCV13 era in children aged <5 years (RR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.8; and RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-0.9, respectively), but the CFR increased (1.4% to 2.3%). Other age groups saw smaller declines or more stable incidence rates across the years; hospitalizations increased in adults aged 50-64 years (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4) and ≥65 years (RR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1). For all ages, IPD cases and hospitalizations attributable to PCV13 serotypes declined, and those attributable to PCV15-non-PCV13, PCV20-non-PCV13, and NVP serotypes increased. IPD incidence declined during the COVID-19 era. Conclusions: IPD incidence and hospitalizations due to PCV13 serotypes decreased after PCV13 introduction but increased for other serotypes. Continued surveillance is required to evaluate changes to pneumococcal vaccination programs and ongoing changes to the distribution of IPD-causing serotypes.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA