RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Correct inhaler use depends on a complex interplay of factors, including device preparation and generating sufficient inspiratory flow. It is currently unknown which inhalation technique errors can be considered critical in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients on Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) maintenance therapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between inhalation technique errors and health status or exacerbations in patients with COPD. Additionally, the association between the number of errors and COPD outcomes was determined. METHODS: The PIFotal study is a cross-sectional multi-country observational study in a primary care setting, including 1434 COPD patients aged ≥ 40 years (50.1% female; mean age 69.2 yrs) using a DPI for their maintenance therapy. Inhalation technique was video recorded and scored by two independent researchers using inhaler-specific checklists. Health status was assessed with two questionnaires; the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). The number of moderate and severe exacerbations in the past 12 months was recorded. Critical errors were identified based on their association with health status or exacerbations through multi-level prediction models adjusted for identified confounding. RESULTS: Errors in inhalation technique steps 'Breathe in', 'Hold breath', and 'Breathe out calmly after inhalation' were significantly associated with poorer CCQ and CAT outcomes and thus deemed critical. None of the errors were significantly associated with moderate exacerbations. Patients with errors 'Preparation', 'Hold inhaler in correct position during inhalation', and 'Breathe in' had significantly more severe exacerbations, and therefore these errors were also deemed critical. 81.3% of patients with COPD made at least one critical error. Specific combinations of errors were associated with worse outcomes. The more inhalation technique errors identified, the poorer the health status and the higher the exacerbation rate. CONCLUSION: In this study, we identified multiple critical inhalation technique errors in COPD patients using DPIs each associated with poorer outcomes. Explorative analysis revealed that specific combinations of errors may be of clinical relevance, especially those related to the inhalation manoeuvre. COPD outcomes worsened with increasing error count. These results warrant further prospective longitudinal studies to establish the effect of correcting these errors on COPD control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04532853 (31/08/2020).
Asunto(s)
Inhaladores de Polvo Seco , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Femenino , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado de Salud , Lista de VerificaciónRESUMEN
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Inhalers are often used to treat patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there are many available, which can lead to confusion and poor inhaler technique. It is important for a patient to be happy with their inhaler. This study looked at how patients liked the re-usable Respimat® Soft Mist™ inhaler vs. their previous inhaler. It also asked whether they would be willing to continue using the device at the end of the study period.After 4-6 weeks of using the re-usable device, patients reported that they were happy with the inhaler and most would be willing to carry on using it.Overall, these results show that doctors can prescribe Respimat re-usable to patients, even if the patient has not used the inhaler before.
Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Administración por Inhalación , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Percepción , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inhaled drug delivery is the cornerstone treatment for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, use of inhaler devices can be challenging, potentially leading to critical errors in handling that can significantly reduce drug delivery to the lungs and effectiveness of treatment. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to define 'critical' errors and their impact on health outcomes and resource use between 2004 and 2016, using key search terms for inhaler errors in asthma and COPD (Search-1) and associated health-economic and patient burden (Search-2). RESULTS: Search-1 identified 62 manuscripts, 47 abstracts, and 5 conference proceedings (n = 114 total). Search-2 identified 9 studies. We observed 299 descriptions of critical error. Age, education status, previous inhaler instruction, comorbidities and socioeconomic status were associated with worse handling error frequency. A significant association was found between inhaler errors and poor disease outcomes (exacerbations), and greater health-economic burden. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown wide variations in how critical errors are defined, and the evidence shows an important association between inhaler errors and worsened health outcomes. Given the negative impact diminished disease outcomes impose on resource use, our findings highlight the importance of achieving optimal inhaler technique, and a need for a consensus on defining critical and non-critical errors.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida/normas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Humanos , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida/tendencias , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores/tendencias , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
To identify patients hospitalized for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have a poor prognosis and might benefit from proactive palliative care, a set of indicators had been developed from the literature. A patient is considered eligible for proactive palliative care when meeting ≥2 criteria of the proposed set of 11 indicators. In order to develop a doctor-friendly and patient-convenient tool, our primary objective was to examine whether these indicators are documented consistently in the medical records. Besides, percentage of patients with a poor prognosis and prognostic value were explored. We conducted a retrospective medical record review of 33 patients. Five indicators; non-invasive ventilation (NIV), comorbidity, body mass index (BMI), previous admissions for acute exacerbation COPD and age were always documented. Three indicators; hypoxaemia and/or hypercapnia, professional home care and actual forced expiratory volume1% (FEV1%) were documented in more than half of the records, whereas the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ), medical research council dyspnoea (MRC dyspnoea) and the surprise question were never registered. Besides, 78.8% of the patients met ≥2 criteria and there was a significant association between meeting ≥2 criteria and mortality within 1 year (one-sided Fisher's exact test, p = 0.04). The set of indicators for proactive palliative care in patients with COPD appeared to be user-friendly and feasible.
Asunto(s)
Disnea/fisiopatología , Hospitalización , Hipercapnia/fisiopatología , Hipoxia/fisiopatología , Registros Médicos/normas , Ventilación no Invasiva , Cuidados Paliativos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Disnea/etiología , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Humanos , Hipercapnia/etiología , Hipoxia/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Pronóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most randomised clinical trials typically exclude a significant proportion of asthma patients, including those at higher risk of adverse events, with comorbidities, obesity, poor inhaler technique and adherence, or smokers. However, these patients might differentially benefit from extrafine-particle inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). This matched cohort, database study, compared the effectiveness of extrafine-particle with fine-particle ICS in a real-life population initiating ICS therapy in the Netherlands. METHODS: Data were from the Pharmo Database Network, comprising pharmacy and hospital discharge records, representative of 20 % of the Dutch population. The study population included patients aged 12 - 60, with a General Practice-recorded diagnosis for asthma (International Classification of Primary Care code R96), when available, ≥2 prescriptions for asthma therapy at any time in their recorded history, and receiving first prescription of ICS therapy as either extrafine-particle (ciclesonide or hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP]) or fine-particle ICS (fluticasone propionate or non-extrafine-particle-BDP). Patients were matched (1:1) on relevant demographic and clinical characteristics over 1-year baseline. Primary outcomes were severe exacerbation rates, risk domain asthma control and overall asthma control during the year following first ICS prescription. Secondary outcomes, treatment stability and being prescribed higher versus lower category of short-acting ß2 agonists (SABA) dose, were compared over a 1-year outcome period using conditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: Following matching, 1399 patients were selected in each treatment cohort (median age: 43 years; males: 34 %). Median (interquartile range) initial ICS doses (fluticasone-equivalents in µg) were 160 (160 - 320) for extrafine-particle versus 500 (250 - 500) for fine-particle ICS (p < 0.001). Following adjustment for residual confounders, matched patients prescribed extrafine-particle ICS had significantly lower rates of exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio [95 % CI], 0.59 [0.47-0.73]), and significantly higher odds of achieving asthma control and treatment stability in the year following initiation than those prescribed fine-particle ICS, and this occurred at lower prescribed doses. Patients prescribed extrafine-particle ICS had lower odds of being prescribed higher doses of SABA (0.50 [0.44-0.57]). CONCLUSION: In this historical, matched study, extrafine-particle ICS was associated with better odds of asthma control than fine-particle ICS in patients prescribed their first ICS therapy in the Netherlands. Of importance, this was reached at significantly lower prescribed dose.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Antiasmáticos/administración & dosificación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Tamaño de la Partícula , Administración por Inhalación , Adulto , Beclometasona/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Pregnenodionas/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Proactive palliative care is not yet common practice for patients with COPD. Important barriers are the identification of patients with a poor prognosis and the organization of proactive palliative care dedicated to the COPD patient. Recently a set of indicators has been developed to identify those patients with COPD hospitalized for an acute exacerbation who are at risk for post-discharge mortality. Only after identification of these patients with poor prognosis a multi disciplinary approach to proactive palliative care with support of a specialized palliative care team can be initiated. METHODS/DESIGN: The PROLONG study is a prospective cluster controlled trial in which 6 hospitals will participate. Three hospitals are selected for the intervention condition based on the presence of a specialized palliative care team. The study population consists of patients with COPD and their main informal caregivers. Patients will be included during hospitalization for an acute exacerbation. All patients in the study receive standard care (usual care). Besides, patients in the intervention condition who meet two or more criteria of the set of indicators for proactive palliative care will have additionally regular consultations with a specialized palliative care team. The objectives of the PROLONG study are: 1) to assess the discriminating power of the proposed set of indicators (indicator study) and 2) to assess the effects of proactive palliative care for qualifying patients with COPD on the wellbeing of these patients and their informal caregivers (intervention study). The primary outcome measure of the indicator study is time to death for any cause. The primary outcome measure of the intervention study is the change in quality of life measured by the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) three months after inclusion. DISCUSSION: The PROLONG study may lead to better understanding of the conditions to start and the effectiveness of proactive palliative care for patients with COPD. Innovative aspects of the PROLONG study are the use of a set of indicators for proactive palliative care, the active involvement of a specialized palliative care team and the use of a patient-tailored proactive palliative care plan. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR): NTR4037.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Paliativos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Pronóstico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a growing worldwide problem that imposes a great burden on the daily life of patients. Since there is no cure, the goal of treating COPD is to maintain or improve quality of life. We have developed a new tool, the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool, to assess and visualize the integrated health status of patients with COPD, and to provide patients and healthcare providers with a treatment algorithm. This tool may be used during consultations to monitor the burden of COPD and to adjust treatment if necessary. The aim of the current study is to analyse the effectiveness of the ABC tool compared with usual care on health related quality of life among COPD patients over a period of 18 months. METHODS/DESIGN: A cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted in COPD patients in both primary and secondary care throughout the Netherlands. An intervention group, receiving care based on the ABC tool, will be compared with a control group receiving usual care. The primary outcome will be the change in score on a disease-specific-quality-of-life questionnaire, the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes will be a different questionnaire (the COPD Assessment Test), lung function and number of exacerbations. During the 18 months follow-up, seven measurements will be conducted, including a baseline and final measurement. Patients will receive questionnaires to be completed at home. Additional data, such as number of exacerbations, will be recorded by the patients' healthcare providers. A total of 360 patients will be recruited by 40 general practitioners and 20 pulmonologists. Additionally, a process evaluation will be performed among patients and healthcare providers. DISCUSSION: The new ABC tool complies with the 2014 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines, which describe the necessity to classify patients on both their airway obstruction and a comprehensive symptom assessment. It has been developed to classify patients, but also to provide visual insight into the burden of COPD and to provide treatment advice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR3788.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Costo de Enfermedad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Proyectos de Investigación , Atención Secundaria de Salud , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Países Bajos , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are held responsible for a decline in health status (HS). This may not apply equally to all exacerbations, because different definitions are required for quite different illnesses. Selection of definitions and the sensitivity of the HS instrument may affect results regarding the impact of exacerbations. Sensitivity of a new HS instrument, which covers different and more aspects, has not yet been tested, with respect to exacerbations. OBJECTIVES: Confirmation of the negative HS effect of exacerbations by using a highly differentiated instrument, and to evaluate which aspects of HS are affected most. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-eight ambulatory patients with COPD were evaluated prospectively with regard to a wide range of HS aspects, at the beginning and end of a 1-year follow-up. Recording of symptom changes and treatment on monthly diary cards resulted in the identification of event-based exacerbations. HS was assessed via a newly validated instrument integrating both physiological and non-physiological sub-domains. Parametric correlations were calculated between exacerbation frequency and HS scores at the end of the study. Partial corre-lations were then explored using HS scores at baseline to correct for prior HS levels. RESULTS: Correlations between -exacerbation frequency and HS sub-domains were found to be frequent, predominantly in non-physiological sub--domains. After correction for hs scores at baseline, only 2 sub-domains (belonging to the main domain 'complaints') remained significantly but weakly correlated. CONCLUSION: Exacerbation frequency and HS show weak correlations after a year, but most of these disappear after correction for prior HS levels. In such exacerbations, aggravated HS probably takes much longer to manifest itself.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Controlled mechanical ventilation leads to diaphragmatic contractile dysfunction and atrophy. Since proteolysis is enhanced in the diaphragm during controlled mechanical ventilation, we examined whether the administration of a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, would have a protective effect against ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled experiment. SETTINGS: Basic science animal laboratory. INTERVENTIONS: Anesthetized rats were submitted for 24 hrs to controlled mechanical ventilation while receiving 0.05 mg/kg bortezomib or saline. Control rats were acutely anesthetized. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After 24 hrs, diaphragm force production was significantly lower in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of saline compared to control animals (-36%, p<.001). Importantly, administration of bortezomib improved the diaphragmatic force compared to mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of saline (+15%, p<.01), but force did not return to control levels. Compared to control animals, diaphragm cross-sectional area of the type IIx/b fibers was significantly decreased by 28% in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of saline (p<.01) and by 16% in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of bortezomib (p<.05). Diaphragmatic calpain activity was significantly increased in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of saline (+52%, p<.05) and in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of bortezomib (+36%, p<.05). Caspase-3 activity was increased after controlled mechanical ventilation with saline by 55% (p<.05), while it remained similar to control animals in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of bortezomib. Diaphragm 20S proteasome activity was slightly increased in both ventilated groups, and the amount of ubiquitinated proteins was significantly and similarly enhanced in mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of saline and mechanically ventilated animals receiving an injection of bortezomib. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the administration of bortezomib partially protects the diaphragm from controlled mechanical ventilation-induced diaphragm contractile dysfunction without preventing atrophy. The fact that calpain activity was still increased after bortezomib treatment may explain the persistence of atrophy. Part of bortezomib effects might have been due to its ability to inhibit caspase-3 in this model.
Asunto(s)
Ácidos Borónicos/uso terapéutico , Diafragma/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de Proteasoma , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Animales , Bortezomib , Calpaína/metabolismo , Caspasa 3/metabolismo , Diafragma/fisiopatología , Masculino , Contracción Muscular/efectos de los fármacos , Atrofia Muscular/etiología , Atrofia Muscular/prevención & control , Complejo de la Endopetidasa Proteasomal/metabolismo , Ratas , Ratas WistarRESUMEN
Optimal delivery of medication via dry powder inhalers, the most commonly prescribed inhaler type, is dependent on a patient achieving a minimum level of inspiratory flow during inhalation. However, measurement of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) against the simulated resistance of a dry powder inhaler is not frequently performed in clinical practice due to time or equipment limitations. Therefore, defining which patient characteristics are associated with lower PIF is critically important to help clinicians optimize their inhaler choice through a more personalized approach to prescribing. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically evaluate patient and disease characteristics determining PIF in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant studies on PIF in patients with COPD published in English between January 2000 and May 2021. The quality of evidence was assessed using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation checklist. Of 3382 citations retrieved, 35 publications were included in the review (nine scored as high quality, 13 as moderate, nine as low, and four as very low). Factors correlating with PIF in >70% of papers included both patient characteristics (lower PIF correlated with increased age, female gender, shorter height, decreased handgrip and inspiratory muscle strength, and certain comorbidities) and disease characteristics (lower PIF correlated with markers of lung hyperinflation, lower peak expiratory flow [PEF] and increased disease severity). Other factors correlating with adequate/optimal or improved PIF included education/counseling and exercise/inspiratory muscle training; impaired physical function and errors in inhalation technique/non-adherence were associated with low/suboptimal PIF. In conclusion, clinicians should measure PIF against the simulated resistance of a particular device wherever possible. However, as this often cannot be done due to lack of resources or time, the patient and disease characteristics that influence PIF, as identified in this review, can help clinicians to choose the most appropriate inhaler type for their patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Switching inhaler regimens can be driven by poor disease control but also by nonclinical factors, such as cost and environmental impact. The consequences of switching for nonclinical reasons are largely unclear. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the real-world consequences of switching inhaler regimens for nonclinical reasons in asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE, EBM Reviews, and EconLit were searched to November 21, 2020. Conference searches and reference checking were also performed. Real-world studies of asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients undergoing a switch in inhaler regimen for any reason apart from clinical need were included. Two reviewers screened and extracted data. Key outcomes included symptom control, exacerbations, and patient-doctor relationships. RESULTS: A total of 8,958 records were screened and 21 studies included. Higher-quality (matched comparative) studies were prioritized. Five matched studies (6 datasets) reported on symptom control: 5 datasets (n = 7,530) with unclear patient consent reported improved disease control following switching, and 1 dataset (n = 1,648) with non-consented patients reported significantly worsened disease control. Three matched studies (5 datasets, n = 10,084) reported on exacerbation rate ratios; results were heterogeneous depending on the definition used. Two studies (n = 137) reported that switching inhaler regimens could have a negative impact on the doctor-patient relationship, especially when the switches were non-consented. Study quality was generally low. CONCLUSIONS: Switching inhaler regimens is a complex issue that can have variable clinical consequences and can harm the patient-doctor relationship. Limited high-quality evidence was identified, and study designs were heterogeneous. A robust framework is needed to guide the personalized switching of inhalers.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Administración por Inhalación , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Over 1400 patients using dry powder inhalers (DPIs) to deliver COPD maintenance therapies were recruited across Europe and Australia. Their peak inspiratory flow (PIF) was measured, inhaler technique was observed, and adherence to treatment assessed. From relating the findings with patient health status, and thereby identifying critical errors, key clinical recommendations for primary care clinicians were determined, namely - measure PIF before prescribing a DPI to ensure inhalation manoeuvre ability is well-matched with the device. Some patients could benefit from inhalation training whereas others should have their DPI changed for one better suited to their inspiratory ability or alternatively be prescribed an active device (such as a soft mist inhaler or pressurized metered dose inhaler). Observing the inhalation technique was valuable however this misses suboptimal PIF (approaching one fourth of patients with a satisfactory observed manoeuvre had a suboptimal PIF for their DPI). Assess adherence as deliberate non-adherence can point to a mismatch between a patient and their inhaler (deliberate non-adherence was significantly associated with PIFs below the minimum for the DPI). In-person observation of inhalation technique was found to be inferior to video rating based on device-specific checklists. Where video assessments are not possible, observation training for healthcare professionals would therefore be valuable particularly to improve the ability to identify the critical errors associated with health status namely 'teeth and lips sealed around mouthpiece', 'breathe in' and 'breathing out calmly after inhalation'. However, it is recommended that observation alone should not replace PIF measurement in the DPI selection process.Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04532853 .
Asunto(s)
Inhaladores de Polvo Seco , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Administración por Inhalación , Inhaladores de Dosis Medida , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
Purpose: To assess the relationship between suboptimal Peak Inspiratory Flow (sPIF), inhalation technique errors, and non-adherence, with Healthcare Resource Utilisation (HCRU) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients receiving maintenance therapy via a Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI). Patients and methods: The cross-sectional, multi-country PIFotal study included 1434 COPD patients (≥40 years) using a DPI for maintenance therapy. PIF was measured with the In-Check DIAL G16, and sPIF was defined as a typical PIF lower than required for the device. Inhalation technique was assessed by standardised evaluation of video recordings and grouped into 10 steps. Patients completed the "Test of Adherence to Inhalers" questionnaire. HCRU was operationalised as COPD-related costs for primary healthcare, secondary healthcare, medication, and total COPD-related costs in a 1-year period. Results: Participants with sPIF had higher medication costs compared with those with optimal PIF (cost ratio [CR]: 1.07, 95% CI [1.01, 1.14]). Multiple inhalation technique errors were associated with increased HCRU. Specifically, "insufficient inspiratory effort" with higher secondary healthcare costs (CR: 2.20, 95% CI [1.37, 3.54]) and higher total COPD-related costs (CR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31). "no breath-hold following the inhalation manoeuvre (<6 s)" with higher medication costs (CR: 1.08, 95% CI [1.02, 1.15]) and total COPD-related costs (CR 1.17, 95% CI [1.07, 1.28]), and "not breathing out calmly after inhalation" with higher medication costs (CR: 1.19, 95% CI [1.04, 1.37]). Non-adherence was not significantly associated with HCRU. Conclusion: sPIF and inhalation technique errors were associated with higher COPD-related healthcare utilisation and costs in COPD patients on DPI maintenance therapy.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Administración por Inhalación , Estudios Transversales , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
The study aimed to determine the associations of Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF), inhalation technique and adherence with health status and exacerbations in participants with COPD using DPI maintenance therapy. This cross-sectional multi-country observational real-world study included COPD participants aged ≥40 years using a DPI for maintenance therapy. PIF was measured three times with the In-Check DIAL G16: (1) typical PIF at resistance of participant's inhaler, (2) maximal PIF at resistance of participant's inhaler, (3) maximal PIF at low resistance. Suboptimal PIF (sPIF) was defined as PIF lower than required for the device. Participants completed questionnaires on health status (Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ)), adherence (Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI)) and exacerbations. Inhalation technique was assessed by standardised evaluation of video recordings. Complete data were available from 1434 participants (50.1% female, mean age 69.2 years). GOLD stage was available for 801 participants: GOLD stage I (23.6%), II (54.9%), III (17.4%) and IV (4.1%)). Of all participants, 29% had a sPIF, and 16% were shown able to generate an optimal PIF but failed to do so. sPIF was significantly associated with worse health status (0.226 (95% CI 0.107-0.346), worse units on CCQ; p = 0.001). The errors 'teeth and lips sealed around mouthpiece', 'breathe in', and 'breathe out calmly after inhalation' were related to health status. Adherence was not associated with health status. After correcting for multiple testing, no significant association was found with moderate or severe exacerbations in the last 12 months. To conclude, sPIF is associated with poorer health status. This study demonstrates the importance of PIF assessment in DPI inhalation therapy. Healthcare professionals should consider selecting appropriate inhalers in cases of sPIF.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Anciano , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Transversales , Inhaladores de Polvo Seco , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Diaphragm muscle weakness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Recent studies indicate that increased contractile protein degradation by the proteasome contributes to diaphragm weakness in patients with COPD. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of proteasome inhibition on diaphragm function and contractile protein concentration in an animal model for COPD. Elastase-induced emphysema in hamsters was used as an animal model for COPD; normal hamsters served as controls. Animals were either treated with the proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib (iv) or its vehicle saline. Nine months after induction of emphysema, specific force-generating capacity of diaphragm bundles was measured. Proteolytic activity of the proteasome was assayed spectrofluorometrically. Protein concentrations of proteasome, myosin, and actin were measured by means of Western blotting. Proteasome activity and concentration were significantly higher in the diaphragm of emphysematous hamsters than in normal hamsters. Bortezomib treatment reduced proteasome activity in the diaphragm of emphysematous and normal hamsters. Specific force-generating capacity and myosin concentration of the diaphragm were reduced by ~25% in emphysematous hamsters compared with normal hamsters. Bortezomib treatment of emphysematous hamsters significantly increased diaphragm-specific force-generating capacity and completely restored myosin concentration. Actin concentration was not affected by emphysema, nor by bortezomib treatment. We conclude that treatment with a proteasome inhibitor improves contractile function of the diaphragm in emphysematous hamsters through restoration of myosin concentration. These findings implicate that the proteasome is a potential target of pharmacological intervention on diaphragm weakness in COPD.
Asunto(s)
Diafragma/fisiopatología , Inhibidores de Proteasoma , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Animales , Fenómenos Biomecánicos/efectos de los fármacos , Ácidos Borónicos/farmacología , Bortezomib , Proteínas Contráctiles/metabolismo , Cricetinae , Diafragma/efectos de los fármacos , Diafragma/enzimología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Masculino , Especificidad de Órganos/efectos de los fármacos , Fosforilación/efectos de los fármacos , Complejo de la Endopetidasa Proteasomal/metabolismo , Procesamiento Proteico-Postraduccional/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/metabolismo , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfisema Pulmonar/complicaciones , Enfisema Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Pirazinas/farmacologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare conventional exercise-based assessment of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) with improvement in training exercises employed during a PR program, and to describe the cardiopulmonary response of different training exercises during PR of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Inpatient PR. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with moderate to very severe COPD (N=18). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiopulmonary responses to interval cycling, arm exercise, and a test of functional activities of daily living (ADLs) were evaluated during the PR training program using a mobile telemetric breath-by-breath system. The effects of PR were evaluated by comparing pre-PR and post-PR training activities, incremental and constant work-rate cycling, and a 6-minute walk test. RESULTS: Interval cycling and the ADLs test were moderate-intensity to heavy-intensity exercises (70%-80% of maximal oxygen consumption), while the arm exercise was a low-intensity activity (40% of maximal oxygen consumption). After 12 weeks of PR, cycle load, arm weights, and walking distances during training activities had increased alongside increased muscle mass. At iso-intensities, no cardiopulmonary changes in the training exercises were observed. Exercise duration of constant work-rate cycling and 6-minute walk distance increased by 160% and 14%, respectively, after PR, with concurrent right-shifts of anaerobic threshold and a decrease in heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Supervised increases in weight, load, and walking distance during training activities were useful clinical outcomes for patients, demonstrating the beneficial effects of progressive training on physical performance. However, for physiologic evaluation of PR, conventional tests, such as maximal incremental cycling, endurance cycling, and a 6-minute walk test, had greater validity. Physiologic evaluation of the training exercises showed that the training program complied with the training recommendations for PR.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/rehabilitación , Actividades Cotidianas , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Consumo de Oxígeno , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The large number of available medicines and devices makes it almost impossible to have sufficient knowledge of each individual medicine and device, especially for general practitioners. This may lead to suboptimal treatment, more exacerbations, hospitalisations and higher treatment costs. Reducing the number of medicines and devices, based on rational criteria, allows physicians and pharmacists to build experience with a more limited set of medicines and to standardise the inhalation instructions. METHODS: In this study inhalers are compared by means of the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis (SOJA) method. The following selection criteria were applied: uniformity in device, number of steps per inhalation, risk of errors, hygienic aspects, feedback mechanism, and risk of inhalation with an empty inhaler. RESULTS: Substantial differences were seen in the overall scores, with the Ellipta device showing the highest score, followed by Diskus/Accuhaler, Genuair and Nexthaler. Several devices require more or less identical techniques, such Ellipta and Diskus/Accuhaler as well as Genuair and Novolizer. When patients use these devices in combination this increases their uniformity, because additional medicines become available for the devices: starting therapy with Diskus or Novolizer and follow-up with Ellipta or Genuair. The resistance of Respimat and Breezhaler is lower than that of other devices, which makes these devices suitable for patients who cannot generate sufficient inhalation flow. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial reduction of inhalers, combined with optimal and standardised instructions, should improve the care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Asunto(s)
Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Administración por Inhalación , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Dry powder inhalers (DPIs), a commonly prescribed inhaler type for respiratory diseases, require patients to generate sufficient peak inspiratory flow (PIF) to ensure optimal drug delivery to the airways. Effectiveness of therapy also requires a good inhalation technique and adequate medication adherence. For patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), recent studies conducted in tertiary care suggest that DPI users with suboptimal PIF have poorer COPD-related health status and increased exacerbation risk versus those with optimal PIF. The PIFotal study will investigate the impact of PIF, inhalation technique and medication adherence on patient-reported outcomes in patients with COPD in primary care using a DPI for their maintenance therapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional observational study will assess 1200 patients (aged ≥ 40 years, diagnosed with COPD and using a DPI for COPD maintenance therapy for ≥ 3 months) from the Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, Poland, Greece and Australia. Assessments will consist of (1) PIF measurements (usual patient inhalation manoeuvre, maximal PIF against resistance of own inhaler, and maximal PIF against low resistance); (2) Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), COPD Assessment Test and Test of Adherence to Inhalers scores; and (3) video recordings of patient inhalation technique. Dependent variables include health status (CCQ score), number of self-reported exacerbations in previous 12 months, and healthcare resource utilisation in previous 6 months. Independent variables include PIF values, inhalation technique errors, medication adherence, and demographic and clinical characteristics. In the primary analysis, the mean difference in CCQ score between patients (1) with optimal/suboptimal PIF, (2) exhibiting/not exhibiting inhalation technique errors, and (3) adhering/not adhering to medication will be examined in a multivariable linear mixed model. ETHICS: The study protocol was approved by ethics committees/institutional review boards of all participating sites prior to enrolment; written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04532853.
RESUMEN
We recently demonstrated aberrant staining of fibrillin-1 in lung tissue specimens with emphysematous lesions. In this study, we have extended this observation by an elaborate analysis of the elastic fibre. Using domain-specific antibodies to fibrillin-1, and to other elastin fibre-associated molecules, lung tissue derived from patients without obvious clinical emphysema, but harbouring various degrees of microscopical emphysematous lesions, was analysed. In addition, the fibrillin-regulated growth factor TGF-beta was studied. Electron microscopy and biochemical analysis of desmosine (a marker for elastin) were also performed. Results were compared with lung tissue derived from patients with clinical emphysema. Domain-specific antibodies recognizing the C-terminal, N-terminal, and middle part of fibrillin-1 showed aberrant staining patterns associated with increasing degrees of microscopical emphysema. Staining for elastin, emilin-1, and fibulin-2 was, however, not aberrant. TGF-beta staining was markedly increased. On the electron microscopic, but not light microscopical, level, initial elastic fibre degradation was noticed in specimens with microscopical emphysema. Lung specimens from patients with clinical emphysema also displayed fragmented fibrillin-1 staining and, in addition, displayed extensive degradation of the elastic fibre. The results suggest that fibrillin-1 anomalies and TGF-beta overexpression are associated with initial events occurring during the emphysematous process. Based on these and other data, a mechanism for emphysematogenesis is proposed.