RESUMEN
In this work, we fabricated indium-free perovskite solar cells (SCs) using direct- and dry-transferred aerosol single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs). We investigated diverse methodologies to solve SWNTs' hydrophobicity and doping issues in SC devices. These include changing wettability of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(styrenesulfonate) ( PEDOT: PSS), MoO3 thermal doping, and HNO3(aq) doping with various dilutions from 15 to 70 v/v% to minimize its instability and toxic nature. We discovered that isopropanol (IPA) modified PEDOT: PSS works better than surfactant modified PEDOT: PSS as an electron-blocking layer on SWNTs in perovskite SCs due to superior wettability, whereas MoO3 is not compatible owing to energy level mismatching. Diluted HNO3 (35 v/v%)-doped SWNT-based device produced the highest PCE of 6.32% among SWNT-based perovskite SCs, which is 70% of an indium tin oxide (ITO)-based device (9.05%). Its flexible application showed a PCE of 5.38% on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate.
RESUMEN
Transparent carbon electrodes, carbon nanotubes, and graphene were used as the bottom electrode in flexible inverted perovskite solar cells. Their photovoltaic performance and mechanical resilience were compared and analyzed using various techniques. Whereas a conventional inverted perovskite solar cells using indium tin oxide showed a power conversion efficiency of 17.8%, the carbon nanotube- and graphene-based cells showed efficiencies of 12.8% and 14.2%, respectively. An established MoO3 doping was used for carbon electrode-based devices. The difference in the photovoltaic performance between the carbon nanotube- and graphene-based cells was due to the difference in morphology and transmittance. Raman spectroscopy, and cyclic flexural testing revealed that the graphene-based cells were more susceptible to strain than the carbon nanotube-based cells, though the difference was marginal. Overall, despite higher performance, the transfer step for graphene has lower reproducibility. Thus, the development of better graphene transfer methods would help maximize the current capacity of graphene-based cells.
RESUMEN
The application of 58-π-1,4-bis(silylmethyl)[60]fullerenes, C60 (CH2 SiMe2 Ph)(CH2 SiMe2 Ar) (Ar=Ph and 2-methoxylphenyl for SIMEF-1 and SIMEF-2, respectively), in small-molecule organic solar cells with a diketopyrrolopyrrole donor (3,6-bis[5-(benzofuran-2-yl)thiophen-2-yl]-2,5-bis(2-ethylhexyl)pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4-dione (DPP(TBFu)2 )) is demonstrated. With the 58-π-silylmethyl fullerene acceptor, SIMEF-1, the devices showed the highest efficiency of 4.57 % with an average of 4.10 %. They manifested an improved open-circuit voltage (1.03â V) owing to the high-lying LUMO level of SIMEF-1, while maintaining a high short-circuit density (9.91â mA cm(-2) ) through controlling the crystallinity of DPP by thermal treatment. On the other hand, despite even higher open-circuit voltage (1.05â V), SIMEF-2-based devices showed lower performances of 3.53 %, owing to a low short-circuit current density (8.33â mA cm(-2) ) and fill factor (0.40) arising from the asymmetric structure, which results in a lower mobility and immiscibility.
RESUMEN
Organic solar cells are flexible and inexpensive, and expected to have a wide range of applications. Many transparent organic solar cells have been reported and their success hinges on full transparency and high power conversion efficiency. Recently, carbon nanotubes and graphene, which meet these criteria, have been used in transparent conductive electrodes. However, their use in top electrodes has been limited by mechanical difficulties in fabrication and doping. Here, expensive metal top electrodes were replaced with high-performance, easy-to-transfer, aerosol-synthesized carbon nanotubes to produce transparent organic solar cells. The carbon nanotubes were p-doped by two new methods: HNO3 doping via 'sandwich transfer', and MoOx thermal doping via 'bridge transfer'. Although both of the doping methods improved the performance of the carbon nanotubes and the photovoltaic performance of devices, sandwich transfer, which gave a 4.1% power conversion efficiency, was slightly more effective than bridge transfer, which produced a power conversion efficiency of 3.4%. Applying a thinner carbon nanotube film with 90% transparency decreased the efficiency to 3.7%, which was still high. Overall, the transparent solar cells had an efficiency of around 50% that of non-transparent metal-based solar cells (7.8%).