Landmark Series: A Review of Landmark Studies in the Treatment of Primary Localized Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

Primary localized retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS) have shorter survival than other soft tissue sarcoma sites owing to higher local recurrence rates associated with histologic types most commonly found in this location, large tumor size at diagnosis (median 20 cm), and anatomical constraints of surgery in the retroperitoneum. The only curative treatment for RPS has traditionally been complete macroscopic en bloc resection with adjacent structures that cannot be surgically separated from the tumor. Compartmental resection, incorporating adjacent organs and soft tissues en bloc, even without overt infiltration at the time of surgery, performed in sarcoma referral centers may reduce local recurrence rates. Preoperative radiotherapy has not been shown to reduce early 3-year local recurrences in a phase III, international, randomized, controlled trial (STRASS). Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether well-differentiated and low-grade dedifferentiated liposarcoma prone to late local recurrences may benefit. Currently, there is no level 1 evidence to support the use of perioperative systemic therapy. Observational studies suggest that patients with high-grade histologies and borderline resectable RPS may benefit. A phase III, international, randomized, controlled trial (STRASS2) is currently evaluating a histology-tailored chemotherapy regimen for patients with leiomyosarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma at high risk of distant metastatic recurrence. Novel biomarkers can help determine prognosis and more accurately predict response to treatment, but more research is needed to translate these discoveries into therapeutic benefits. Refined molecular data for histological types will allow personalized surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy with lower toxicity and improved survival in the future.

Factors influencing cancer survivors' experiences with follow-up cancer care: results from the pan-Canadian Experiences of Cancer Patients in Transition Study survey.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of individual and structural factors on cancer survivors' experiences with follow-up cancer care. METHODS: In 2016, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer collected survey responses from cancer survivors about their experiences with follow-up cancer care. We included respondents from this survey if they were diagnosed with non-metastatic breast, hematologic, colon, melanoma, and prostate cancer. Our primary outcome was cancer survivors' self-reported overall experience with follow-up cancer care. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the influence of individual and structural factors on cancer survivors' experiences with follow-up cancer care. RESULTS: Of the 8402 cancer survivors included in our study, 81.8% (n = 6,875) reported a positive experience with their follow-up cancer care. The individual factors associated with positive overall experiences were more commonly those associated with self-perceptions of respondents' personal health and well-being rather than baseline sociodemographic factors, such as sex, income, or education. For example, respondents were more likely to report a positive experience if they perceived their quality of life as good (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.5, p < 0.01) or reported not having an unmet practical concern (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6, p < 0.01). The structural factors most strongly associated with positive overall experiences included respondents perceiving their oncology specialist was in charge of their follow-up cancer care (OR 5.2, 95% CI 3.6-7.5, p < 0.01) and reporting the coordination of their follow-up cancer care among healthcare providers was good or very good (OR 8.4, 95% CI 6.7-10.6, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: While real-world experiences with follow-up cancer care in Canada are reported to be positive by most cancer survivors included in this study, we found differences exist based on individual and structural factors. A better understanding of the reasons for these differences is required to guide the provision of high-quality follow-up care that is adapted to the needs and resources of individuals and contexts.

Clinical outcomes of brain metastasectomy from soft tissue and bone sarcomas: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastasis in sarcomas is associated with a poor prognosis. Data regarding prognostic factors and clinical outcomes of surgical resection of brain metastasis from sarcomas are limited. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate survival outcomes post-brain metastasectomy for patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted examining survival outcomes among adults and children with soft tissue and bone sarcoma undergoing brain metastasectomy, in the English language from inception up to May 31, 2021. Two reviewers independently evaluated and screened the literature, extracted the data, and graded the included studies. The body of evidence was evaluated and graded according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series. Results were synthesized using descriptive methods. A meta-analysis was not possible due to the low quality and heterogeneity of studies. RESULTS: Ten studies published between 1994 and 2020 were included: three were retrospective cohort studies and seven were case series. 507 patients were included, of whom 269 underwent brain metastasectomy. The median follow-up period ranged between 14 and 29 months. The median survival period after metastasectomy ranged from 7 to 25 months. The most common prognostic factors associated with survival included presenting performance status, age, number of brain metastases, presence of lung metastases, and peri-operative radiation therapy administration. DISCUSSION: Although the level of evidence is low, retrospective studies support that brain metastasectomy can be performed with reasonable post-operative survival in selected individuals.

Identifying Naturalistic Coaching Behavior Among Practicing Surgeons in the Operating Room.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify examples of naturalistic coaching behavior among practicing surgeons operating together by analyzing their intraoperative discussion. BACKGROUND: Opportunities to improve surgical performance are limited for practicing surgeons; surgical coaching is one strategy to address this need. To develop peer coaching programs that integrate with surgical culture, a better understanding is needed of how surgeons routinely discuss operative performance. METHODS: As part of a "co-surgery" quality improvement program, 20 faculty surgeons were randomized into 10 dyads who performed an operation together. Discourse analysis was conducted on transcribed intraoperative discussions. Themes were coded using an existing framework of surgical coaching principles (self-identified goals, collaborative analysis, constructive feedback, peer learning support) and surgical coaching content (technical skills, nontechnical skills). Coaching principles were cross-referenced with coaching content; c-coefficient measured the strength of association between pairs of themes. RESULTS: Overall, 44 unique coaching examples were identified in 10 operations. Of the 4 principles of surgical coaching, only self-identified goals and collaborative analysis were identified consistently. Self-identified goals were most associated with discussions regarding technical skills of "tissue exposure," "flow of operation," and "instrument handling" and the nontechnical skill "situation awareness." Collaborative analysis was most associated with discussions regarding technical skills of "respect for tissue" and "flow of operation" and nontechnical skills of "communication and teamwork." CONCLUSIONS: In naturalistic discussions between practicing surgeons in the operating room, numerous examples of unprompted coaching behavior were identified that target intraoperative performance. Prominent coaching gaps-constructive feedback and peer learning support-were also observed. Surgical coach trainings should address these gaps.

The Association Between Wait Times for Colorectal Cancer Treatment and Health Care Costs: A Population-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Health care costs and wait times for colorectal cancer treatment are increasing in Canada, but the association between the 2 remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the association between wait times and health care costs and utilization. DESIGN: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING: This study was conducted in Manitoba, Canada. PATIENTS: Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2014 were sorted and ranked into quintiles based on the time from index contact for a colorectal cancer-related symptom to first treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is risk-adjusted health care costs, and the secondary outcomes include health care utilization and overall mortality. RESULTS: We included a total of 6936 patients. Total wait times ranged between 0 and 762 days. In comparison with very short wait times, longer wait times were associated with significantly increased costs (short: mean cost ratio 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10-1.32; moderate: mean cost ratio 1.30; 95% CI, 1.19-1.43; long: mean cost ratio 1.48; 95% CI, 1.33-1.64; and very long: mean cost ratio 1.39; 95% CI, 1.26-1.54). Compared with very short wait times, longer wait times were associated with significantly lower risk of mortality (short: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86; moderate: HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.80; long: HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.66-0.82; very long: HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85). The median number of pretreatment radiological and endoscopic investigations and surgeon clinic visits increased over the study period across all wait time categories. LIMITATIONS: This is a nonrandomized, retrospective cohort study with potentially limited generalizability. CONCLUSION: Patients with very short and short wait times are likely those diagnosed with life-threatening complications of colorectal cancer. Outside this window, patients with longer wait times experience increased health care costs and utilization with similar overall mortality. Improved care coordination and patient navigation may help contain the increasing wait times and associated increasing health care costs and utilization. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B81. ASOCIACIÓN ENTRE LOS TIEMPOS DE ESPERA PARA EL TRATAMIENTO DE UN CÁNCER COLORRECTAL Y LOS COSTOS DE ATENCIÓN MÉDICA: UN ANÁLISIS DE POBLACIÓN: los costos de atención médica y los tiempos de espera para el tratamiento del cáncer colorrectal están aumentando en Canadá, pero la asociación entre los dos sigue sin estar clara.determinar la asociación entre los tiempos de espera y los costos y la utilización de la atención médicaun estudio de cohorte retrospectivo basado en la población.Manitoba, Canadálos pacientes diagnosticados con cáncer colorrectal entre 2004-2014 se clasificaron y sub-clasificaron en quintiles según el tiempo desde el primer contacto índice de síntomas relacionados con cáncer colorrectal hasta el primer tratamiento.El resultado primario son los costos de atención médica ajustados al riesgo, y los resultados secundarios incluyen la utilización de la atención médica y la mortalidad general.Incluimos un total de 6,936 pacientes. Los tiempos de espera totales oscilaron entre 0-762 días. En comparación con los tiempos de espera muy cortos, los tiempos de espera más largos se asociaron con costos significativamente mayores (Corto: relación de costo promedio 1.21, intervalo de confianza del 95% 1.10-1.32; Moderado: relación de costo promedio 1.30, intervalo de confianza del 95% 1.19-1.43; Largo: media relación de costo 1.48, intervalo de confianza del 95% 1.33-1.64; Muy largo: relación de costo promedio 1.39, intervalo de confianza del 95% 1.26-1.54). En comparación con tiempos de espera muy cortos, los tiempos de espera más largos se asociaron con un riesgo de mortalidad significativamente menor (Corto: razón de riesgo 0.78, intervalo de confianza del 95% 0.71-0.86; Moderado: razón de riesgo 0.72, intervalo de confianza del 95% 0.65-0.80; Largo: peligro cociente 0.73, intervalo de confianza del 95% 0.66-0.82; Muy largo: cociente de riesgos 0.76, intervalo de confianza del 95% 0.68-0.85). La mediana del número de investigaciones radiológicas y endoscópicas previas al tratamiento y las visitas al cirujano aumentaron durante el período de estudio en todas las categorías de tiempo de espera.estudio de cohortes retrospectivo, no aleatorio con generalización potencialmente limitadalos pacientes con tiempos de espera « muy cortos ¼ y « cortos ¼ son probablemente aquellos diagnosticados con complicaciones potencialmente mortales del cáncer colorrectal. Fuera de esta ventana, los pacientes con tiempos de espera más largos experimentan mayores costos de atención médica y utilización con una mortalidad general similar. La coordinación mejorada de la atención y la navegación del paciente pueden ayudar a contener el aumento de los tiempos de espera y el aumento de los costos y la utilización de la atención médica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B81. (Traducción-Dr. Edgar Xavier Delgadillo).

The incidence of iron deficiency anemia post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review.

SETTING: The physiological and anatomical changes that occur as a consequence of bariatric surgery result in macro- and micro-nutritional deficiencies, especially iron deficiency. The reported incidence of iron deficiency and associated anemia after bariatric surgery varies widely across studies. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review is to quantify the impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on the incidence of iron deficiency. METHODS: Databases including Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Helthstar, Scopus, Cochrane (CDSR), LILACS, and ClinicalKey were searched for original articles with additional snowballing search. Search terms included Obesity, nutrient deficiency, iron deficiency, iron deficiency anemia, bariatric surgery, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and sleeve gastrectomy. Original articles reporting the incidence of iron deficiency and anemia pre- and post-RYGB and SG from January 2000 to January 2015 with minimum 1-year follow-up were selected. Data extraction from selected studies was based on protocol-defined criteria. RESULTS: There were 1133 articles screened and 20 studies were included in the final analysis. The overall incidence of iron deficiency was 15.2% pre-operatively and 16.6% post-operatively. When analyzed by procedure, the incidence of iron deficiency was 12.9% pre-RYGB versus 24.5% post-RYGB and 36.6% pre-SG versus 12.4% post-SG. The incidence of iron deficiency-related anemia was 16.7% post-RYGB and 1.6% post-SG. Risk factors for iron deficiency were premenopausal females, duration of follow-up, and pre-operative iron deficiency. Prophylactic iron supplementation was reported in 16 studies and 2 studies provided therapeutic iron supplementation only for iron-deficient patients. Iron dosage varied from 7 to 80 mg daily across studies. CONCLUSION: Iron deficiency is frequent in people with obesity and may be exacerbated by bariatric surgery, especially RYGB. Further investigation is warranted to determine appropriate iron supplementation dosages following bariatric surgery. Careful nutritional surveillance is important, especially for premenopausal females and those with pre-existing iron deficiency.

Predicting surgical site infections following laparoscopic bariatric surgery: development of the BariWound tool using the MBSAQIP database.

BACKGROUND: Although bariatric surgery is a safe procedure for severe obesity, incisional surgical site infections (SSI) remain a significant cause of morbidity. Bariatric surgery patients are at high risk due to obesity and diabetes. The objective of this study was to develop a predictive tool for incisional SSI within 30 days of bariatric surgery. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the 2015 and 2016 MBSAQIP databases. This study included patients who underwent primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The primary outcome of interest was incisional SSI occurring within 30 days. Surgeries performed in 2015 were used in a derivation cohort and the predictive tool was validated against the 2016 cohort. A forward selection algorithm was used to build a logistic regression model predicting probability of SSI. RESULTS: A total of 274,187 patients were included with 71.7% being LSG and 28.3% LRYGB. 0.7% of patients had a SSI in which 71.0% had an incisional SSI, and 29.9% had an organ/space SSI. Of patients who had an incisional SSI, 88.7% were superficial, 10.9% were deep, and 0.4% were both. A prediction model to assess for risk of incisional SSI, BariWound, was derived and validated. BariWound consists of procedure type, chronic steroid or immunosuppressant use, gastroesophageal reflux disease, obstructive sleep apnea, sex, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, operative time, and body mass index. It stratifies individuals into very high (> 10%), high (5-10%), medium (1-5%), and low risk (< 1%) groups. This model accurately predicted events in the validation cohort with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73. CONCLUSIONS: BariWound accurately predicted the risk of 30-day incisional SSI in individuals undergoing bariatric surgery. Stratifying low- and high-risk groups allows for customized SSI prophylactic measures for patients in various risk categories and potentially enables future research targeted at high-risk patients.

Correction to: Global Survey of Perceptions of the Surgical Safety Checklist Among Medical Students, Trainees, and Early Career Providers.

In the original version of the article, Dominique Vervoort's last name was misspelled. It is correct as reflected here. The original article has been updated.

Global Survey of Perceptions of the Surgical Safety Checklist Among Medical Students, Trainees, and Early Career Providers.

BACKGROUND: The Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has been shown to reduce perioperative complications across global health systems. We sought to assess perceptions of the SSC and suggestions for its improvement among medical students, trainees, and early career providers. METHODS: From July to September 2019, a survey assessing perceptions of the SSC was disseminated through InciSioN, the International Student Surgical Network comprising medical students, trainees, and early career providers pursuing surgery. Individuals with ≥2 years of independent practice after training were excluded. Respondents were categorized according to any clinical versus solely non-clinical SSC exposure. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between clinical/non-clinical exposure and promoting future use of the SSC, adjusting for potential confounders/mediators: training level, human development index, and first perceptions of the SSC. Thematic analysis was conducted on suggestions for SSC improvement. RESULTS: Respondent participation rate was 24%. Three hundred and eighteen respondents were included in final analyses; 215 (67%) reported clinical exposure and 190 (60%) were promoters of future SSC use. Clinical exposure was associated with greater odds of promoting future SSC use (aOR 1.81 95% CI [1.03-3.19], p = 0.039). A greater proportion of promoters reported "Improved Operating Room Communication" as a goal of the SSC (0.21 95% CI [0.15-0.27]-vs.-0.12 [0.06-0.17], p = 0.031), while non-promoters reported the SSC goals were "Not Well Understood" (0.08 95% CI [0.03-0.12]-vs.-0.03 [0.01-0.05], p = 0.032). Suggestions for SSC improvement emphasized context-specific adaptability and earlier formal training. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical exposure to the SSC was associated with promoting its future use. Earlier formal clinical training may improve perceptions and future use among medical students, trainees, and early career providers.

Timing of Palliative Care in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Does It Matter?

BACKGROUND: Palliative care can improve end-of-life care and reduce health care expenditures, but the optimal timing for initiation remains unclear. We sought to characterize the association between timing of palliative care, in-hospital deaths, and health care costs. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including all patients who were diagnosed and died of colorectal cancer between 2004 and 2012 in Manitoba, Canada. The primary exposure was timing of palliative care, defined as no involvement, late involvement (less than 14 d before death), early involvement (14 to 60 d before death), and very early involvement (>60 d before death). The primary outcome was in-hospital deaths and end-of-life health care costs. RESULTS: A total of 1607 patients were included; 315 (20%) received palliative care and 162 (10%) died in hospital. Compared to those who did not receive palliative care, patients with early and very early involvement experienced significantly decreased odds of dying in hospital (OR 0.21 95% CI 0.06-0.69 P = 0.01 and OR 0.11 95% CI 0.01-0.78 P = 0.03, respectively) and significantly lower health care costs. There were no significant differences in in-hospital deaths and health care costs between patients without palliative care and those who received late palliative care. CONCLUSIONS: Early palliative care involvement is associated with decreased odds of dying in hospital and lower health care utilization and costs in patients with colorectal cancer. These findings provide real-world evidence supporting early integration of palliative care, although the optimal timing (early versus very early) remains a matter of debate.

Predicting venous thromboembolism following laparoscopic bariatric surgery: development of the BariClot tool using the MBSAQIP database.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for severe obesity; however, postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study is to develop a tool to stratify individuals undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery according to their 30-day VTE risk. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. This registry collects data specific for metabolic or bariatric surgery with 30-day outcomes from 791 centers. Individuals undergoing primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) were included. Characteristics associated with 30-day VTE were identified using univariate and multivariable analyses. A predictive model, BariClot, was derived from a randomly-generated derivation cohort using a forward selection algorithm. BariClot's robustness was tested against a validation cohort of subjects not included in the derivation cohort. The calibration and discrimination of two previously published VTE risk tools were assessed in the MBSAQIP population and compared to BariClot. RESULTS: A total of 274,221 patients underwent LRYGB or LSG. Overall, 1106 (0.4%) patients developed VTE, 452 (0.2%) developed pulmonary embolism, and 43 (0.02%) died due to VTE. VTE was the most commonly identified cause of 30-day mortality. A prediction model to assess for risk of VTE, BariClot, was derived and validated. BariClot consists of history of VTE, operative time, race, and functional status. It stratifies individuals into very high (> 2%), high (1-2%), medium (0.3-1%), and low risk groups (< 0.3%). This model accurately predicted events in the validation cohort and outperformed previously published scoring systems. CONCLUSIONS: BariClot is a predictive tool that stratifies individuals undergoing bariatric surgery based on 30-day VTE risk. Stratifying low- and high-risk populations for VTE allows for informed clinical decision-making and potentially enables further research on customized prophylactic measures for low- and high-risk populations.

Canadian general surgery residents' need formal curricula and objective performance assessments in gastrointestinal endoscopy training: a program director census.

INTRODUCTION: Methods of developing and determining General Surgery (GS) residents' competency in gastrointestinal endoscopy in Canada are not currently standardized. This study aimed to assess the status of gastrointestinal endoscopy training in Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) GS residency programs. METHODS: A 35-question survey was developed using GS gastrointestinal endoscopy curricula guidelines. All 17 RCPSC GS program directors were contacted to complete the questionnaire via the web-based SurveyMonkey.ca® platform. RESULTS: All 17 program directors completed the survey (100% response rate). Program demographics Sixteen programs reported having dedicated endoscopy rotations with a mean duration of 2.8 months (range 0-4, SD 1.1). Upon completion of dedicated endoscopy rotations, four programs (25%) reported having formal skills assessments and three (18.8%) reported formal knowledge examinations. All programs required endoscopy procedures be logged throughout residency, but only three (21.4%) included quality indicators. Only one program required residents to obtain Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery certification. Program outcomes The reported estimated mean number of procedures during residents' endoscopy rotations was 82 (range 10-150, standard deviation 33.6) gastroscopies and 156 (40-350, 76.3) colonoscopies. The mean number of procedures during residents' entire residencies was 150 (20-400, 98.6) gastroscopies and 241 (50-500, 76.3) colonoscopies. The number of months of dedicated endoscopy training significantly correlated with the total estimated number of endoscopic procedures performed (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.02). Eleven program directors (73.3%) believed residents were prepared for independent endoscopy practice, while four disagreed (26.7%). Program directors' perceptions of residents' preparedness were significantly correlated with the number of endoscopic procedures performed by residents (p < 0.01) but not the robustness of the endoscopy curriculum (p = 0.72). CONCLUSION: Endoscopy training in RCPSC GS residency programs is highly variable. Program directors' perceptions of residents' competency appear to be significantly correlated with procedure numbers and few have adopted formal curricula and performance assessments.

Crucial Conversations: An interprofessional learning opportunity for senior healthcare students.

Clinical errors due to human mistakes are estimated to result in 400,000 preventable deaths per year. Strategies to improve patient safety often rely on healthcare workers' ability to speak up with concerns. This becomes difficult during critical decision-making as a result of conflicting opinions and power differentials, themes underrepresented in many interprofessional initiatives. These elements are prominent in our interprofessional initiative, namely Crucial Conversations. We sought to evaluate this initiative as an interprofessional learning (IPL) opportunity for pre-licensure senior healthcare students, as a way to foster interprofessional collaboration, and as a method of empowering students to vocalise their concerns. The attributes of this IPL opportunity were evaluated using the Points for Interprofessional Education Score (PIPES). The University of the West of England Interprofessional Questionnaire was administered before and after the course to assess changes in attitudes towards IPL, relationships, interactions, and teamwork. Crucial Conversations strongly attained the principles of interprofessional education on the PIPES instrument. A total of 38 volunteers completed the 16 hours of training: 15 (39%) medical rehabilitation, 10 (26%) medicine, 7 (18%) pharmacy, 5 (13%) nursing, and 1 (2%) dentistry. Baseline attitude scores were positive for three of the four subscales, all of which improved post-intervention. Interprofessional interactions remained negative possibly due to the lack of IPL opportunities along the learning continuum, the hidden curriculum, as well as the stereotyping and hierarchical structures in today's healthcare environment preventing students from maximising the techniques learned by use of this interprofessional initiative.

Brain metastases in women with epithelial ovarian cancer: multimodal treatment including surgery or gamma-knife radiation is associated with prolonged survival.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of treatment modality on survival in patients with brain metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of cases of ovarian cancer with brain metastases treated at institutions in three countries (Canada, China, and India) and conducted a search for studies regarding brain metastases in ovarian cancer reporting survival related to treatment modality. Survival was analyzed according to treatment regimens involving (1) some form of surgical excision or gamma-knife radiation with or without other modalities, (2) other modalities without surgery or gamma-knife radiation, or (3) palliation only. RESULTS: Twelve patients (mean age 56 years) with detailed treatment/outcome data were included; five were from China, four from Canada, and three from India. Median time from diagnosis of ovarian cancer to brain metastasis was 19 months (range 10 to 37 months), and overall median survival time from diagnosis of ovarian cancer was 38 months (13 to 82 months). Median survival time from diagnosis of brain metastasis was 17 months (1 to 45 months). Among patients who had multimodal treatment including gamma-knife radiotherapy or surgical excision, the median survival time after the identification of brain metastasis was 25.6 months, compared with 6.0 months in patients whose treatment did not include this type of focused localized modality (P = 0.006). Analysis of 20 studies also indicated that use of gamma-knife radiotherapy and excisional surgery in multi-modal treatment resulted in improved median survival interval (25 months vs. 6.0 months, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the subset of patients with brain metastases from ovarian cancer, prolonged survival may result from use of multidisciplinary therapy, particularly if metastases are amenable to localized treatments such as gamma-knife radiotherapy and surgical excision.

Objectif : Explorer les effets de la modalité de traitement sur la survie chez les patientes qui présentent des métastases cérébrales attribuables au cancer épithélial de l'ovaire. Méthodes : Nous avons mené une analyse rétrospective des cas de cancer de l'ovaire donnant lieu à des métastases cérébrales qui ont été traités dans des établissements se situant dans trois pays (Canada, Chine et Inde); de plus, nous avons mené une recherche qui visait les études ayant traité des métastases cérébrales associées au cancer de l'ovaire qui faisaient mention des taux de survie liés aux modalités de traitement. La survie a été analysée en fonction de schémas de traitement mettant en jeu (1) une forme quelconque d'excision chirurgicale ou de radiochirurgie par scalpel gamma avec ou sans autres modalités, (2) d'autres modalités sans chirurgie ni radiochirurgie par scalpel gamma ou (3) des modalités palliatives seulement. Résultats : Douze patientes (âge moyen : 56 ans) comptant des données détaillées en ce qui concerne le traitement / les issues ont été admises à l'étude; cinq d'entre elles étaient de la Chine, quatre du Canada et trois de l'Inde. Le délai médian entre le diagnostic de cancer de l'ovaire et l'apparition de métastases cérébrales était de 19 mois (plage de 10 à 37 mois), et la durée de survie médiane globale à la suite du diagnostic de cancer de l'ovaire était de 38 mois (de 13 à 82 mois). La durée de survie médiane à la suite du diagnostic de métastases cérébrales était de 17 mois (de 1 à 45 mois). Chez les patientes ayant subi un traitement multimodal qui faisait appel à la radiochirurgie par scalpel gamma ou à l'excision chirurgicale, la durée de survie médiane à la suite de l'identification des métastases cérébrales était de 25,6 mois, par comparaison avec 6,0 mois chez les patientes dont le traitement ne faisait pas appel à ce type de modalité localisée ciblée (P = 0,006). L'analyse de 20 études a également indiqué que le recours à la radiochirurgie par scalpel gamma et à l'excision chirurgicale dans le cadre d'un traitement multimodal a donné lieu à une amélioration de l'intervalle de survie médian (25 mois vs 6,0 mois, P < 0,001). Conclusion : Dans le sous-ensemble des patientes qui présentent des métastases cérébrales attribuables au cancer de l'ovaire, le recours à un traitement multidisciplinaire pourrait mener à une prolongation de la survie, particulièrement lorsque les métastases se prêtent à des traitements localisés tels que la radiochirurgie par scalpel gamma et l'excision chirurgicale.

Variations in Emergency Service Utilization among Cancer Survivors: Results from the Pan-Canadian Experiences of Cancer Patients in Transition Study Survey.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to examine variations in emergency service utilization (ESU) among cancer survivors during the first year after completing primary cancer treatment. Methods: In 2016, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer collected survey responses from cancer survivors across Canada about self-reported ESU after completing primary cancer treatment. We included survey respondents diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast, hematologic, colorectal, melanoma, or prostate cancer. Multivariable, multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with cancer survivors' ESU. Results: Of the 5,774 cancer survivors included in our analysis, 22% reported ESU during the first year after completing their primary cancer treatment, 16% reported ESU one to three times, and 6% reported ESU more than three times. Factors significantly associated with frequent ESU included younger age, colorectal and hematologic cancers, more frequent primary care provider and oncology specialist visits, single or retired status, lower income, and self-reported lower quality of life. Conclusion: Our study identified factors associated with more frequent ESU among cancer survivors in the first year after completing primary cancer treatment. These factors highlight differences in cancer survivors' demographics, their ability to access and need for healthcare services, and the complexity of using ESU as a metric for quality improvement in survivorship care. These variations must be considered in quality improvement initiatives.

Health related quality of life is excellent and sustained at two decades after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in survivors of pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin.

INTRODUCTION: Optimal management of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), which can achieve 20-year disease-free, and overall survival. There is limited information on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of PMP survivors beyond five years. We report longitudinal HRQOL in patients with PMP of appendiceal origin up to 17-years after their CRS and HIPEC in 2003-2004. METHODS: Patients had HRQOL assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires pre-operatively, and at 1-, 10- and 17-years post-operatively. Comparisons in global health-related QOL (global-HRQOL) measures were made with (1) an age- and sex-matched normal European population, (2) between patients who underwent complete cytoreduction (CRS CC0/1) versus maximal tumor debulking (MTD), and (3) between those with and without peritoneal recurrence. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent CRS & HIPEC for appendiceal PMP. One patient withdrew from the study. Of the 45 patients, 23 patients were alive at ten and 15 patients at 17-years post-operatively. 21/23 (91%) and 14/15 patients (93%) completed questionnaires respectively. Pre-operatively, patients had significantly lower global-HRQOL compared with the reference population. Over follow-up, patients experienced improvements in their global-HRQOL. By post-operative year-10 and -17, there was no difference between the global-HRQOL of patients and reference population. As expected, patients with CC0/1 and without peritoneal tumor recurrence had better global-HRQOL at ten- and 17-years post-operatively compared with those with MTD or recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal CRS and HIPEC is an effective treatment for appendiceal PMP that can achieve long-term survival. HRQOL is excellent and maintained, in those who have CC0/1 without recurrence.

Survival of Patients With Head and Neck Merkel Cell Cancer: Findings From the Pan-Canadian Merkel Cell Cancer Collaborative.

Importance: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. Due to its relatively low incidence and limited prospective trials, current recommendations are guided by historical single-institution retrospective studies. Objective: To evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients in Canada with head and neck MCC (HNMCC) according to American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging and treatment modalities. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study of 400 patients with a diagnosis of HNMCC between July 1, 2000, and June 31, 2018, was conducted using the Pan-Canadian Merkel Cell Cancer Collaborative, a multicenter national registry of patients with MCC. Statistical analyses were performed from January to December 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 5-year OS. Multivariable analysis using a Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to identify factors associated with survival. Results: Between 2000 and 2018, 400 patients (234 men [58.5%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 78.4 [10.5] years) with malignant neoplasms found in the face, scalp, neck, ear, eyelid, or lip received a diagnosis of HNMCC. At diagnosis, 188 patients (47.0%) had stage I disease. The most common treatment overall was surgery followed by radiotherapy (161 [40.3%]), although radiotherapy alone was most common for stage IV disease (15 of 23 [52.2%]). Five-year OS was 49.8% (95% CI, 40.7%-58.2%), 39.8% (95% CI, 26.2%-53.1%), 36.2% (95% CI, 25.2%-47.4%), and 18.5% (95% CI, 3.9%-41.5%) for stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively, and was highest among patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy (49.9% [95% CI, 39.9%-59.1%]). On multivariable analysis, patients treated with surgery and radiotherapy had greater OS compared with those treated with surgery alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.46-1.25]); however, this was not statistically significant. In comparison, patients who received no treatment had significantly worse OS (HR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.26-2.96)]. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of the largest Canada-wide evaluation of HNMCC survival outcomes, stage and treatment modality were associated with survival. Multimodal treatment was associated with greater OS across all disease stages.

Metastasectomy in synovial sarcoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a malignancy with high metastatic potential. The role of metastasectomy in SS is unclear, with limited data on prognostic factors and clinical outcomes. In this systematic review, we evaluate the survival outcomes post-metastasectomy for patients with SS. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. English studies reporting survival outcomes among adults and children with SS undergoing metastasectomy were evaluated. Databases were searched from inception to May 31, 2021, and included Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two reviewers independently undertook literature evaluation and screening, data extraction and grading of studies. Risk of bias assessments utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Series. Qualitative data was summarized in descriptive format, and survival outcome data were assessed for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen retrospective studies, published between 1993 and 2017, were included, four were cohort studies, and nine were case series. A total of 598 patients with SS were included, of whom 462 had metastatic pulmonary disease, and 309 underwent metastasectomy. The median ages of the study cohorts ranged from 14 to 51 years. The median survival period after metastasectomy ranged from 21 to 80 months. Patients who underwent metastasectomy had a lower risk of mortality compared to those who did not (pooled HR 0.26 95% CI 0.14-0.49). The most common prognostic factors associated with survival included a disease-free interval of greater than 12 months and complete resection of the metastases. DISCUSSION: Although the level of evidence is low, retrospective studies support a clinical advantage for metastasectomy in selected patients with metastatic SS. FUNDING: This was not a funded study. REGISTRATION: This protocol has been registered within the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database (registration ID: CRD42019126906).

Metastasectomy in Leiomyosarcoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled Survival Analysis.

This study assesses the survival in patients undergoing metastasectomy for leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and compares the outcomes by the site of metastasectomy. We conducted a systematic review and pooled survival analysis of patients undergoing metastasectomy for LMS. Survival was compared between sites of metastasectomy. We identified 23 studies including 573 patients undergoing metastasectomy for LMS. The pooled median survival was 59.6 months (95% CI 33.3 to 66.0). The pooled median survival was longest for lung metastasectomy (72.8 months 95% CI 63.0 to 82.5), followed by liver (34.8 months 95% CI 22.3 to 47.2), spine (14.1 months 95% CI 8.6 to 19.7), and brain (14 months 95% CI 6.7 to 21.3). Two studies compared the survival outcomes between patients who did, versus who did not undergo metastasectomy; both demonstrated a significantly improved survival with metastasectomy. We conclude that surgery is currently being utilized for LMS metastases to the lung, liver, spine, and brain with acceptable survival. Although low quality, comparative studies support a survival benefit with metastasectomy. In the absence of randomized studies, it is impossible to determine whether the survival benefit associated with metastasectomy is due to careful patient selection rather than a surgical advantage; limited data were included about patient selection.

30-day Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) after elective bariatric surgery: the development and validation of the Bari-MACE clinical predictive tool.

BACKGROUND: Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) after bariatric surgery are poorly understood yet are thought to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence and clinical impact of short-term, 30-day MACE and to develop a pragmatic clinical predictive MACE scoring tool. SETTING: This retrospective study was conducted using all the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)-accredited center data from 2015 to 2019. METHODS: Primary Roux-en-Y and sleeve gastrectomy procedures were included, and prior revisional surgeries and emergency surgeries were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine the risk factors associated with 30-day MACE. Using forward regression, a Bari-MACE clinical prediction model was generated. RESULTS: A total of 750,498 patients were included in our analysis of which 959 (.1%) experienced a MACE. MACE patients were older (54.0 ± 11.5 yr versus 44.4 ± 12.0 yr, P < .0001), and comprised a higher proportion of males (36.3% versus 20.4%, P < .0001) and patients of White racial status (74.0% versus 71.6%, P < .0001). The MACE cohort also had a higher body mass index (46.6 ± 9.7 kg/m2 versus 45.2 ± 7.8 kg/m2, P < .0001), higher rates of sleep apnea (56.8% versus 38.2%, P < .0001), and a higher proportion of insulin-dependent diabetes (26.1% versus 8.4%, P < .0001) than non-MACE patients. Derivation of our clinical predictive Bari-MACE scoring model revealed 12 variables associated with development of MACE with a specificity of 97.8% using a 55-point threshold. CONCLUSION: Thirty-day major adverse cardiac events after elective bariatric surgery are rare, occurring in approximately .1% of all patients, but are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Using the MBSAQIP, we developed a Bari-MACE clinical predictive tool to risk-stratify patients with the aim to better guide perioperative care and foster improved surgical outcomes.