Selective histology of cholecystectomy specimens--is it justified?

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is rare but the most common malignancy of biliary tract with a dismal prognosis. The early diagnosis and surgical treatment of GBC offers the only chance of long-term survival. Despite advances in radiological imaging, early diagnosis of GBC is still rarely achieved without histopathology. In our hospital, routine histologic examination of all resected gallbladder specimens has been standard practice. This study seeks to define whether selective histologic examination for gallbladder specimens based on preoperative imaging or intraoperative findings is justified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2008-September 2013, all histopathology reports of gallbladder specimens after elective cholecystectomy were retrospectively analyzed in a single surgical unit. Preoperative imaging, intraoperative findings, and histology notes were analyzed in all cases. RESULTS: Out of 14,369 (60% female and 40% male) patients undergoing cholecystectomy, GBC was found in only 46 cases (0.32%). More than one fifth (10/46) of GBC patients presented with acute cholecutitis (AC). All 10 AC patients coexisted with GBC harbored "significantly inflamed' gallbladders, and about 83.49% AC patients were judged with "significant inflammation." Carcinoma in situ and early GBC (T1a, T1b) accounted for 61% of all cases. Only two patients with Tis and T1a respectively did not show suspicious lesion on preoperative and intraoperative findings, but for the remaining cases (44/46), GBC was suspected either by preoperative imaging and/or intraoperative findings. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all cases of invasive GBC will show macroscopic abnormalities following examination by a simple procedure-a full dissection, inspection, and palpation of the gallbladder. Any patient with early GBCs "missed" on macroscopic examination can still receive the appropriate treatment by the cholecystectomy alone. The gallbladder should be sent for histology only if macroscopic examination raises suspicion. This selective policy is more cost-effective, and does not appear to compromise patients outcome.

Histological examination of frozen sections for patients with acute cholecystitis during cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Unexpected gallbladder cancer may present with acute cholecystitis-like manifestations. Some authors recommended that frozen section analysis should be performed during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for all cases of acute cholecystitis. Others advocate selective use of frozen section analysis based on gross examination of the specimen by the surgeon. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether surgeons could effectively identify suspected gallbladder with macroscopic examination alone. If not, is routine frozen section analysis worth advocating? METHODS: A total of 1162 patients with acute cholecystitis who had undergone simple cholecystectomy in our hospital from February 2009 to February 2014 were enrolled in the study. The data of patients with acute cholecystitis especially those with concurrent gallbladder cancer in terms of clinical characteristics, operative records, frozen section diagnosis and histopathology reports were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with acute cholecystitis were found to have concurrent gallbladder cancer, with an incidence of 1.1% in acute cholecystitis. Forty patients with acute cholecystitis were suspected to have gallbladder cancer by macroscopic examination and specimens were taken for frozen section analysis. Six patients with gallbladder cancer were correctly identified by macroscopic examination alone but 7 patients with gallbladder cancer missed, including 3 patients with advanced cancer (2 T3 and 1 T2). Meanwhile, in 6 gallbladder cancer specimens sent for frozen section analysis, 3 early gallbladder cancers (2 Tis and 1 T1a) were missed by frozen section analysis. However, the remaining 3 patients with advanced gallbladder cancers (2 T3 and 1 T2) were correctly diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of comorbidity of gallbladder cancer and acute cholecystitis is higher than that of non-acute cholecystitis. The accurate diagnosis of gallbladder cancer by surgeons is poor and frozen section analysis is necessary.

Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid as an adjuvant treatment to prevent acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation (LT) is one of the most common problems faced by transplant recipients in spite of advances in immunosuppressive therapy. Recently, clinical trials reported that ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) reduced the incidence of ACR significantly. However, others have shown contradictory conclusion. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy of UDCA in reducing ACR after LT. DATA SOURCES: All RCTs that evaluated efficacy of UDCA as an adjuvant treatment to prevent ACR after LT were searched from PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ScienceDirect databases and Web of Science (from January 1981 to March 2012). There was no language limitation in these searches. Relevant abstracts of international meetings were also searched. References of each included study were searched manually. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients from four high-quality RCTs (Jadad score 4 to 5) were included in this meta-analysis. Prophylactic use of UDCA did not decrease the incidence of ACR (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.77-1.16, P>0.05), steroid-resistant rejection (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.47-1.27, P>0.05) and the number of patients with the multiple episodes of ACR (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.28-1.30, P>0.05). Different intervention programs (high-dose vs low-dose UDCA; early vs delayed UDCA treatment) also did not alter the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: UDCA, as an adjuvant treatment, was not able to prevent ACR and steroid-resistant rejection after LT. Further trials should be done to determine whether higher dose of UDCA will be beneficial.

Organ fibrosis inhibited by blocking transforming growth factor-ß signaling via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonists.

BACKGROUND: Organ fibrosis has been viewed as one of the major medical problems, which can lead to progressive dysfunction of the liver, lung, kidney, skin, heart, and eventually death of patients. Fibrosis is initiated by a variety of pathological, physiological, biochemical, and physical factors. Regardless of their different etiologies, they all share a common pathogenetic process: excessive activation of the key profibrotic cytokine, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma), a ligand-activated transcription factor of the nuclear receptor superfamily, has received particular attention in recent years, because the activation of PPARgamma by both natural and synthetic agonists could effectively inhibit TGF-beta-induced profibrotic effects in many organs. DATA SOURCES: The English-language medical databases, PubMed, Elsevier and SpringerLink were searched for articles on PPARgamma, TGF-beta, and fibrosis, and related topics. RESULTS: TGF-beta is recognized as a key profibrotic cytokine. Excessive activation of TGF-beta increases synthesis of extracellular matrix proteins and decreases their degradation, associated with a gradual destruction of normal tissue architecture and function, whereas PPARgamma agonists inhibit TGF-beta signal transduction and are effective antifibrogenic agents in many organs including the liver, lung, kidney, skin and heart. CONCLUSIONS: The main antifibrotic activity of PPARgamma agonists is to suppress the TGF-beta signaling pathway by so-called PPARgamma-dependent effect. In addition, PPARgamma agonists, especially 15d-PGJ2, also exert potentially antifibrotic activity independent of PPARgamma activation. TGF-beta1/Smads signaling not only plays many essential roles in multiple developmental processes, but also forms cross-talk networks with other signal pathways, and their inhibition by PPARgamma agonists certainly affects the cytokine networks and causes non-suspected side-effects. Anti-TGF-beta therapies with PPARgamma agonists may have to be carefully tailored to be tissue- and target gene-specific to minimize side-effects, indicating a great challenge to the medical research at present.

Relationship between pancreaticobiliary maljunction and gallbladder carcinoma: meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Reports on the relationship between pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) are conflicting. The frequency of PBM in GBC patients and the clinical features of GBC patients with PBM vary in different studies. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles describing the association between PBM and GBC were searched in the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Nine case-control studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and addressed the relevant clinical questions of this analysis. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers using a predefined spreadsheet. RESULTS: The incidence of PBM was higher in GBC patients than in controls (10.60% vs 1.76%, OR: 7.41, 95% CI: 5.03 to 10.87, P<0.00001). The proportion of female patients with PBM was 1.96-fold higher than in GBC patients without PBM (80.5% vs 62.9%, OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.09 to 3.52, P=0.12). GBC patients with PBM were 10 years younger than those without PBM (SMD: -9.90, 95% CI: -11.70 to -8.10, P<0.00001). And a difference in the incidence of associated gallstone was found between GBC patients with and without PBM (10.8% vs 54.3%, OR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.17, P<0.00001). Among the GBC patients with PBM, associated congenital dilatation of the common bile duct was present with a higher incidence ranging from 52.2% to 85.7%, and 70.0%-85.7% of them belonged to the P-C type of PBM (the main pancreatic duct enters the common bile duct). No substantial heterogeneity was found and no evidence of publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS: PBM is a high-risk factor for developing GBC, especially the P-C type of PBM without congenital dilatation of the common bile duct. To prevent GBC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is highly recommended for PBM patients without congenital dilatation of the common bile duct, especially relatively young female patients without gallstones.

Extended lymphadenectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: What it will bring?

Lymph node dissection is always a hot issue in radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). There are still controversies regarding whether some lymph nodes should be dissected, of which the para-aortic lymph nodes are the most controversial. This review synthesized findings in the literature using the PubMed database of articles in the English language published between 1990 and 2019 on the effectiveness of extended lymphadenectomy including para-aortic lymph nodes dissection in radical resection of HCCA. Hepatobiliary surgeons have basically achieved a consensus that enough lymph nodes should be obtained to accurately stage HCCA. Only a very small number of studies have focused on the effectiveness of extended lymphadenectomy including para-aortic nodes dissection on HCCA. They reported that extended lymphadenectomy can bring some survival benefits for patients with potential para-aortic lymph node metastasis and more lymph nodes can be obtained to make the patient's tumor staging more accurate without increasing the related complications. Extended lymphadenectomy should not be adopted for HCCA patients with intraoperatively confirmed distant lymph node metastases. For these patients, radical resection combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be a better choice. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical study of regional lymphotomy and extended lymphadenectomy in HCCA should be conducted to guide clinical practice. A standardized extended lymphadenectomy may help to more accurately stage HCCA. Future studies are required to further assess whether extended lymphadenectomy can improve long-term survival in negative celiac, superior mesenteric, and para-aortic lymph node diseases.

Repair of a common bile duct defect with a decellularized ureteral graft.

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of repairing a common bile duct defect with a decellularized ureteral graft in a porcine model. METHODS: Eighteen pigs were randomly divided into three groups. An approximately 1 cm segment of the common bile duct was excised from all the pigs. The defect was repaired using a 2 cm long decellularized ureteral graft over a T-tube (T-tube group, n = 6) or a silicone stent (stent group, n = 6). Six pigs underwent bile duct reconstruction with a graft alone (stentless group). The surviving animals were euthanized at 3 mo. Specimens of the common bile ducts were obtained for histological analysis. RESULTS: The animals in the T-tube and stent groups survived until sacrifice. The blood test results were normal in both groups. The histology results showed a biliary epithelial layer covering the neo-bile duct. In contrast, all the animals in the stentless group died due to biliary peritonitis and cholangitis within two months post-surgery. Neither biliary epithelial cells nor accessory glands were observed at the graft sites in the stentless group. CONCLUSION: Repair of a common bile duct defect with a decellularized ureteral graft appears to be feasible. A T-tube or intraluminal stent was necessary to reduce postoperative complications.

Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis mimicking gallbladder carcinoma: An analysis of 42 cases.

AIM: To review and evaluate the diagnostic dilemma of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) clinically. METHODS: From July 2008 to June 2014, a total of 142 cases of pathologically diagnosed XGC were reviewed at our hospital, among which 42 were misdiagnosed as gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) based on preoperative radiographs and/or intra-operative findings. The clinical characteristics, preoperative imaging, intra-operative findings, frozen section (FS) analysis and surgical procedure data of these patients were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The most common clinical syndrome in these 42 patients was chronic cholecystitis, followed by acute cholecystitis. Seven (17%) cases presented with mild jaundice without choledocholithiasis. Thirty-five (83%) cases presented with heterogeneous enhancement within thickened gallbladder walls on imaging, and 29 (69%) cases presented with abnormal enhancement in hepatic parenchyma neighboring the gallbladder, which indicated hepatic infiltration. Intra-operatively, adhesions to adjacent organs were observed in 40 (95.2%) cases, including the duodenum, colon and stomach. Thirty cases underwent FS analysis and the remainder did not. The accuracy rate of FS was 93%, and that of surgeon's macroscopic diagnosis was 50%. Six cases were misidentified as GBC by surgeon's macroscopic examination and underwent aggressive surgical treatment. No statistical difference was encountered in the incidence of postoperative complications between total cholecystectomy and subtotal cholecystectomy groups (21% vs 20%, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Neither clinical manifestations and laboratory tests nor radiological methods provide a practical and effective standard in the differential diagnosis between XGC and GBC.