Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 213
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 200(3): 239-249, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180492

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: DESTROY-4 (DOSE-ESCALATION STUDY OF STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY) was a Phase I trial aimed to evaluate the safety and the feasibility of escalating doses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) on MRI-defined Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion (DIL) in low- and intermediate-risk pCa patients using a simultaneous integrated boost-volumetric arc therapy (SIB-VMAT) technique. METHODS: Eligible patients included those with low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma (NCCN risk classes) and an International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) ≤ 15. No restriction about DIL and prostate volumes was set. Pretreatment preparation required an enema and the placement of intraprostatic gold fiducials. SBRT was delivered in five consecutive daily fractions. For the first three patients, the DIL radiation dose was set at 8 Gy per fraction up to a total dose of 40 Gy (PTV1) and was gradually increased in succeeding cohorts to total doses of 42.5 Gy, 45.0 Gy, 47.5 Gy, and finally, 50.0 Gy, while keeping the prescription of 35 Gy/7 Gy per fraction for the entire prostate gland. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or worse gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurring within 90 days of follow-up (Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events scale 4.0). Patients completed quality-of-life questionnaires at defined intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 75 (range, 58-89) years were enrolled. The median follow-up was 26.3 months (8.9-84 months). 66.7% of patients were classified as intermediate-risk groups, while the others were low-risk groups, according to the NCCN guidelines. Enrolled patients were treated as follows: 8 patients (40 Gy), 5 patients (42.5 Gy), 4 patients (45 Gy), 4 patients (47.5 Gy), and 3 patients (50 Gy). No severe acute toxicities were observed. G1 and G2 acute GU toxicities occurred in 4 (16%) and 3 patients (12.5%), respectively. Two patients (8.3%) and 3 patients (12.5%) experienced G1 and G2 GI toxicities, respectively. Since no DLTs were observed, 50 Gy in five fractions was considered the MTD. The median nadir PSA was 0.20 ng/mL. A slight improvement in QoL values was registered after the treatment. CONCLUSION: This trial confirms the feasibility and safety of a total SIB-VMAT dose of 35 Gy on the whole gland and 50 Gy on DIL in 5 fractions daily administered in a well-selected low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma population. A phase II study is ongoing to confirm the tolerability of the schedule and assess the efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Calidad de Vida , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 184: 16-23, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38271773

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We present a large real-world multicentric dataset of ovarian, uterine and cervical oligometastatic lesions treated with SBRT exploring efficacy and clinical outcomes. In addition, an exploratory machine learning analysis was performed. METHODS: A pooled analysis of gynecological oligometastases in terms of efficacy and clinical outcomes as well an exploratory machine learning model to predict the CR to SBRT were carried out. The CR rate following radiotherapy (RT) was the study main endpoint. The secondary endpoints included the 2-year actuarial LC, DMFS, PFS, and OS. RESULTS: 501 patients from 21 radiation oncology institutions with 846 gynecological metastases were analyzed, mainly ovarian (53.1%) and uterine metastases(32.1%).Multiple fraction radiotherapy was used in 762 metastases(90.1%).The most frequent schedule was 24 Gy in 3 fractions(13.4%). CR was observed in 538(63.7%) lesions. The Machine learning analysis showed a poor ability to find covariates strong enough to predict CR in the whole series. Analyzing them separately, in uterine cancer, if RT dose≥78.3Gy, the CR probability was 75.4%; if volume was <13.7 cc, the CR probability became 85.1%. In ovarian cancer, if the lesion was a lymph node, the CR probability was 71.4%; if volume was <17 cc, the CR probability rose to 78.4%. No covariate predicted the CR for cervical lesions. The overall 2-year actuarial LC was 79.2%, however it was 91.5% for CR and 52.5% for not CR lesions(p < 0.001). The overall 2-year DMFS, PFS and OS rate were 27.3%, 24.8% and 71.0%, with significant differences between CR and not CR. CONCLUSIONS: CR was substantially associated to patient outcomes in our series of gynecological cancer oligometastatic lesions. The ability to predict a CR through artificial intelligence could also drive treatment choices in the context of personalized oncology.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiocirugia/métodos , Anciano , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología , Neoplasias Uterinas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Aprendizaje Automático , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/radioterapia , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/patología , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/radioterapia , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Cancer Invest ; 41(9): 774-780, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37812173

RESUMEN

AIMS: This narrative review seeks to identify the SINS score application in the radiation oncology field. METHODS: This literature review was performed searching papers on MEDLINE published from January 2010 to August 2022. RESULTS: In terms of vertebral painful lesions and RT symptomatic responses, the SINS score could be an interesting aid in order to choose the right therapeutic approach. Lesions with higher level of instability, and therefore higher SINS score, could did not find any significant benefit from radiation therapy which is more effective on the tumor-related pain component. For SINS as a predictor of adverse event after RT or its changes after RT, we obtained contrasting results. CONCLUSIONS: The reported few experiences showed ambiguous conclusions. Further prospective studies are needed.


Asunto(s)
Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/patología , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/patología , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/radioterapia , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 199(7): 676-685, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37256303

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a key treatment modality for lung cancer patients. This study aims to develop a machine learning-based prediction model of complete response for lung oligometastatic cancer patients undergoing SBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT images of 80 pulmonary oligometastases from 56 patients treated with SBRT were analyzed. The gross tumor volumes (GTV) were contoured on CT images. Patients that achieved complete response (CR) at 4 months were defined as responders. For each GTV, 107 radiomic features were extracted using the Pyradiomics software. The concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) between the region of interest (ROI)-based radiomics features obtained by the two segmentations were calculated. Pairwise feature interdependencies were evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The association of clinical variables and radiomics features with CR was evaluated with univariate logistic regression. Two supervised machine learning models, the logistic regression (LR) and the classification and regression tree analysis (CART), were trained to predict CR. The models were cross-validated using a five-fold cross-validation. The performance of models was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and class-specific accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-measure evaluation metrics. RESULTS: Complete response was associated with four radiomics features, namely the surface to volume ratio (SVR; p = 0.003), the skewness (Skew; p = 0.027), the correlation (Corr; p = 0.024), and the grey normalized level uniformity (GNLU; p = 0.015). No significant relationship between clinical parameters and CR was found. In the validation set, the developed LR and CART machine learning models had an accuracy, precision, and recall of 0.644 and 0.750, 0.644 and 0.651, and 0.635 and 0.754, respectively. The area under the curve for CR prediction was 0.707 and 0.753 for the LR and CART models, respectively. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates that radiomics features obtained from pretreatment CT could predict complete response of lung oligometastases following SBRT.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Pulmón/patología , Curva ROC , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
5.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ; 50(2): 572-580, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36127416

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) rate of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after adaptive high-dose neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) based on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18 F-FDG-PET/CT). METHODS: The primary endpoint was the pCR rate. Secondary endpoints were the predictive value of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT on pathological response and acute and late toxicity. All patients performed 18 F-FDG-PET/CT at baseline (PET0) and after 2 weeks during CRT (PET1). The metabolic PET parameters were calculated both at the PET0 and PET1. The total CRT dose was 45 Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes and 50 Gy to the primary tumor, corresponding mesorectum, and to metastatic lymph nodes. Furthermore, a sequential boost was delivered to a biological target volume defined by PET1 with an additional dose of 5 Gy in 2 fractions. Capecitabine (825 mg/m2 twice daily orally) was prescribed for the entire treatment duration. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (13 males, 5 females; median age 55 years [range, 41-77 years]) were enrolled in the trial. Patients underwent surgical resection at 8-9 weeks after the end of neoadjuvant CRT. No patient showed grade > 1 acute radiation-induced toxicity. Seven patients (38.8%) had TRG = 0 (complete regression), 5 (27.0%) showed TRG = 2, and 6 (33.0%) had TRG = 3. Based on the TRG results, patients were classified in two groups: TRG = 0 (pCR) and TRG = 1, 2, 3 (non pCR). Accepting p < 0.05 as the level of significance, at the Kruskal-Wallis test, the medians of baseline-MTV, interim-SUVmax, interim-SUVmean, interim-MTV, interim-TLG, and the MTV reduction were significantly different between the two groups. 18 F-FDG-PET/CT was able to predict the pCR in 77.8% of cases through compared evaluation of both baseline PET/CT and interim PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that a dose escalation on a reduced target in the final phase of CRT is well tolerated and able to provide a high pCR rate.


Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Neoplasias del Recto , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Radiofármacos , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 24(6): e13922, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36852489

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and stability of left breast positioning during spirometer-guided deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy using an optical surface imaging system (AlignRT). The AlignRT optical tracking system was used to monitor five left-sided breast cancer patients treated using the Active Breathing Coordinator spirometer with DIBH technique. Treatment plans were created using an automated hybrid-VMAT technique on DIBH CTs. A prescribed dose of 60 Gy to the tumor bed and 50 Gy to the breast in 25 fractions was planned. During each treatment session, the antero-posterior (VRT), superior-inferior (LNG), and lateral (LAT) motion of patients was continuously recorded by AlignRT. The intra-breath-hold stability and the intra- and inter-fraction reproducibility were analyzed for all breath-holds and treatment fractions. The dosimetric impact of the residual motion during DIBH was evaluated from the isocenter shifts amplitudes obtained from the 50%, 90%, and 100% cumulative distribution functions of intra-fractional reproducibility. The positional variations of 590 breath-holds as measured by AlignRT were evaluated. The mean intra-breath-hold stability during DIBH was 1.0 ± 0.4 mm, 2.1 ± 1.9 mm, and 0.7 ± 0.5 mm in the VRT, LNG, and LAT directions, with a maximal value of 8.8 mm in LNG direction. Similarly, the mean intra-breath-hold reproducibility was 1.4 ± 0.8 mm, 1.7 ± 1.0 mm, and 0.8 ± 0.5 mm in the VRT, LNG, and LAT directions, with a maximal value of 4.1 mm in LNG direction. Inter-fractional reproducibility showed better reliability, with difference in breathing levels in all fractions of 0.3 mm on average. Based on tolerance limits corresponding to the 90% cumulative distribution level, gating window widths of 1 mm, 2 mm, and 5 mm in the LAT, VRT, and LNG directions were considered an appropriate choice. In conclusion, despite the use of a dedicated spirometer at constant tidal volume, a non-negligible variability of the breast surface position has been reported during breath-holds. The real-time monitoring of breast surface using surface-guided optical technology is strongly recommended.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales , Humanos , Femenino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Respiración , Contencion de la Respiración , Mama , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Mama Unilaterales/radioterapia , Corazón , Órganos en Riesgo
7.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 198(3): 254-267, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34767044

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To develop an automated treatment planning approach for whole breast irradiation with simultaneous integrated boost using an automated hybrid VMAT class solution (HVMAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with left breast cancer received 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to the whole breast and an additional simultaneous 10 Gy (2.4 Gy/fraction) to the tumor cavity. Ipsilateral lung, heart, and contralateral breast were contoured as main organs-at-risk. HVMAT plans were inversely optimized by combining two open fields with a VMAT semi-arc beam. Open fields were setup to include the whole breast with a 2 cm flash region and to carry 80% of beams weight. HVMAT plans were compared with three tangential techniques: conventional wedged-field tangential plans (SWF), field-in-field forward planned tangential plans (FiF), and hybrid-IMRT plans (HMRT). Dosimetric differences among the plans were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. Dose accuracy was validated using the PTW Octavius-4D phantom together with the 1500 2D-array. RESULTS: No significant differences were found among the four techniques for both targets coverage. HVMAT plans showed consistently better PTVs dose contrast, conformity, and homogeneity (p < 0.001 for all metrics) and statistically significant reduction of high-dose breast irradiation. V55 and V60 decreased by 30.4, 26.1, and 20.8% (p < 0.05) and 12.3, 9.9, and 6.0% (p < 0.05) for SWF, FIF, and HMRT, respectively. Pretreatment dose verification reported a gamma pass-rate greater than the acceptance threshold of 95% for all HVMAT plans. In addition, HVMAT reduced the time for full planning optimization to about 20 min. CONCLUSIONS: HVMAT plans resulted in superior target dose conformity and homogeneity compared to other tangential techniques. Due to fast planning time HVMAT can be applied for all patients, minimizing the impact on human or departmental resources.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos
8.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 32(7): 939-943, 2022 07 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34155084

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has shown promising results in the clinical setting of oligometastatic, persistent, or recurrent disease in several malignancies including ovarian cancer. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The MITO-RT3/RAD trial is a prospective, multicenter phase II study aimed at identifying potential predictors of response and clinical outcome after SBRT treatment. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Radiotherapy delivered by pre-defined SBRT treatment schedules and shared constraints could improve the rate of complete response. TRIAL DESIGN: All patients accrued will be treated with a radiotherapy dose in the range of 30-50 Gy by 1, 3, or 5 SBRT daily fractions to all sites of active metastatic disease according to diagnostic imaging. Schedules of treatment and dose prescription have been established before considering target sites and healthy organ dose constraints. Follow-up and monitoring of side effects will be carried out every 3 months for the first year with imaging and clinical evalutation, and every 4 months within the second year; thereafter, surveillance will be carried out every 6 months. The best response on a per lesion basis will be evaluated by computed tomographic (CT) scan, positron emission tomography/CT, or magnetic resonance imaging in case of brain lesions, every 3 months. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: The study includes patients with oligometastatic, persistent, or recurrent ovarian cancer for which salvage surgery or other local therapies are not feasible due to any relative contra-indication to further systemic therapy because of serious co-morbidities, previous severe toxicity, unavailability of potentially active systemic therapy, or patient refusal. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary endpoint of the study is the clinical complete response rate to SBRT by imaging on a per lesion basis. SAMPLE SIZE: Approximately 205 lesions will be treated (90 lymph nodes and 115 parenchyma lesions). ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Fifty-two centers have expressed their intention to participate. Enrollment should be completed by March 2023 and analysis will be completed in September 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04593381.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Radiocirugia , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ováricas/etiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/radioterapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos
9.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 32(6): 732-739, 2022 06 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35193941

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzes the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy in a large cohort of patients with oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: A standardized data collection from several radiotherapy centers that treated patients by stereotactic body radiotherapy between March 2006 and February 2021 was set up. Clinical and stereotactic body radiotherapy parameters were collected. Objective response rate was defined as a composite of complete and partial response, while clinical benefit included objective response rate plus stable disease. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scales were used to grade toxicities. The primary endpoints were the rate of complete response to stereotactic body radiotherapy, and the 2 year actuarial local control rate on a 'per lesion' basis. The secondary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival, as well as toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients with oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer bearing 125 lesions treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy at 15 different centers were selected for analysis. Of the sites of metastatic disease, lymph node metastases were most common (55.2%), followed by parenchyma lesions (44.8%). Median total dose was 35 Gy (range 10-60), in five fractions (range 1-10), with a median dose/fraction of 7 Gy (range 4-26). Complete, partial, and stable response were found in 73 (58.4%), 29 (23.2%), and 16 (12.8%) lesions, respectively, reaching 94.4% of the clinical benefit rate. Forty-six (55.4%) patients had a complete response. Patients achieving complete response on a 'per lesion' basis experienced a 2 year actuarial local control rate of 89.0% versus 22.1% in lesions not achieving complete response (p<0.001). The 2 year actuarial progression-free survival rate was 42.5% in patients with complete response versus 7.8% in patients with partial response or stable or progressive disease (p=0.001). The 2 year actuarial overall survival rate was 68.9% in patients with complete response versus 44.3% in patients with partial response or stable or progressive disease (p=0.015). Fifteen patients (18.1%) had mild acute toxicity, totaling 29 side events. Late toxicity was documented in four patients (4.8%) totaling seven adverse events. CONCLUSION: Our analysis confirmed the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in oligometastatic/persistent/recurrent cervical cancer patients. The low toxicity profile encourages the wider use of stereotactic body radiotherapy in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Mangifera , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/etiología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia
10.
Radiol Med ; 127(7): 743-753, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35680773

RESUMEN

PURPOSES: Radiomics is a quantitative method able to analyze a high-throughput extraction of minable imaging features. Herein, we aim to develop a CT angiography-based radiomics analysis and machine learning model for carotid plaques to discriminate vulnerable from no vulnerable plaques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with carotid atherosclerosis were enrolled in this pilot study. At surgery, a binary classification of plaques was adopted ("hard" vs "soft"). Feature extraction was performed using the R software package Moddicom. Pairwise feature interdependencies were evaluated using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. A univariate analysis was performed to assess the association between each feature and the plaque classification and chose top-ranked features. The feature predictive value was investigated using binary logistic regression. A stepwise backward elimination procedure was performed to minimize the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The final significant features were used to build the models for binary classification of carotid plaques, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and classification and regression tree analysis (CART). All models were cross-validated using fivefold cross validation. Class-specific accuracy, precision, recall and F-measure evaluation metrics were used to quantify classifier output quality. RESULTS: A total of 230 radiomics features were extracted from each plaque. Pairwise Spearman correlation between features reported a high level of correlations, with more than 80% correlating with at least one other feature at |ρ|> 0.8. After a stepwise backward elimination procedure, the entropy and volume features were found to be the most significantly associated with the two plaque groups (p < 0.001), with AUCs of 0.92 and 0.96, respectively. The best performance was registered by the SVM classifier with the RBF kernel, with accuracy, precision, recall and F-score equal to 86.7, 92.9, 81.3 and 86.7%, respectively. The CART classification tree model for the entropy and volume features model achieved 86.7% well-classified plaques and an AUC of 0.987. CONCLUSION: This pilot study highlighted the potential of CTA-based radiomics and machine learning to discriminate plaque composition. This new approach has the potential to provide a reliable method to improve risk stratification in patients with carotid atherosclerosis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas , Placa Aterosclerótica , Algoritmos , Arterias Carótidas , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Placa Aterosclerótica/diagnóstico por imagen
11.
Radiol Med ; 126(12): 1619-1656, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570309

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems worldwide over the last few months, and it continues to do so. Although some restrictions are being removed, it is not certain when the pandemic is going to be definitively over. Pandemics can be seen as a highly complex logistic scenario. From this perspective, some of the indications provided for palliative radiotherapy (PRT) during the COVID-19 pandemic could be maintained in the future in settings that limit the possibility of patients achieving symptom relief by radiotherapy. This paper has two aims: (1) to provide a summary of the indications for PRT during the COVID-19 pandemic; since some indications can differ slightly, and to avoid any possible contradictions, an expert panel composed of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) and the Palliative Care and Supportive Therapies Working Group (AIRO-palliative) voted by consensus on the summary; (2) to introduce a clinical care model for PRT [endorsed by AIRO and by a spontaneous Italian collaborative network for PRT named "La Rete del Sollievo" ("The Net of Relief")]. The proposed model, denoted "No cOmpRoMise on quality of life by pALliative radiotherapy" (NORMALITY), is based on an AIRO-palliative consensus-based list of clinical indications for PRT and on practical suggestions regarding the management of patients potentially suitable for PRT but dealing with highly complex logistics scenarios (similar to the ongoing logistics limits due to COVID-19). MATERIAL AND METHODS: First, a summary of the available literature guidelines for PRT published during the COVID-19 pandemic was prepared. A systematic literature search based on the PRISMA approach was performed to retrieve the available literature reporting guideline indications fully or partially focused on PRT. Tables reporting each addressed clinical presentation and respective literature indications were prepared and distributed into two main groups: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. These summaries were voted in by consensus by selected members of the AIRO and AIRO-palliative panels. Second, based on the summary for palliative indications during the COVID-19 pandemic, a clinical care model to facilitate recruitment and delivery of PRT to patients in complex logistic scenarios was proposed. The summary tables were critically integrated and shuffled according to clinical presentations and then voted on in a second consensus round. Along with the adapted guideline indications, some methods of performing the first triage of patients and facilitating a teleconsultation preliminary to the first in-person visit were developed. RESULTS: After the revision of 161 documents, 13 papers were selected for analysis. From the papers, 19 clinical presentation items were collected; in total, 61 question items were extracted and voted on (i.e., for each presentation, more than one indication was provided from the literature). Two tables summarizing the PRT indications during the COVID-19 pandemic available from the literature (PRT COVID-19 summary tables) were developed: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. The consensus of the vote by the AIRO panel for the PRT COVID-19 summary was reached. The PRT COVID-19 summary tables for palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were adapted for clinical presentations possibly associated with patients in complex clinical scenarios other than the COVID-19 pandemic. The two new indication tables (i.e., "Normality model of PRT indications") for both palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were voted on in a second consensus round. The consensus rate was reached and strong. Written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) were also developed, both in English and in Italian, to evaluate the patients for possible indications for PRT before scheduling clinical visits. CONCLUSION: We provide a comprehensive summary of the literature guideline indications for PRT during COVID-19 pandemic. We also propose a clinical care model including clinical indications and written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) to evaluate the patients for indications of PRT before scheduling clinical visits. The normality model could facilitate the provision of PRT to patients in future complex logistic scenarios.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Oncología por Radiación/métodos , Consenso , Humanos , Italia , Pandemias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas
12.
Oncologist ; 25(2): e311-e320, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32043791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported improvement of outcomes (progression-free survival, overall survival, and prolongation of androgen deprivation treatment-free survival) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in non-small cell lung cancer and prostate cancer. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study (MITO RT-01) was to define activity and safety of SBRT in a very large, real-world data set of patients with metastatic, persistent, and recurrent ovarian cancer (MPR-OC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The endpoints of the study were the rate of complete response (CR) to SBRT and the 24-month actuarial local control (LC) rate on "per-lesion" basis. The secondary endpoints were acute and late toxicities and the 24-month actuarial late toxicity-free survival. Objective response rate (ORR) included CR and partial response (PR). Clinical benefit (CB) included ORR and stable disease (SD). Toxicity was evaluated by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scales, according to center policy. Logistic and Cox regression were used for the uni- and multivariate analysis of factors predicting clinical CR and actuarial outcomes. RESULTS: CR, PR, and SD were observed in 291 (65.2%), 106 (23.8%), and 33 (7.4%) lesions, giving a rate of CB of 96.4%. Patient aged ≤60 years, planning target volume (PTV) ≤18 cm3 , lymph node disease, and biologically effective dose α/ß10 > 70 Gy were associated with higher chance of CR in the multivariate analysis. With a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 3-120), the 24-month actuarial LC rate was 81.9%. Achievement of CR and total dose >25 Gy were associated with better LC rate in the multivariate analysis. Mild toxicity was experienced in 54 (20.7%) patients; of 63 side effects, 48 were grade 1, and 15 were grade 2. The 24-month late toxicity-free survival rate was 95.1%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the activity and safety of SBRT in patients with MPR-OC and identifies clinical and treatment parameters able to predict CR and LC rate. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study aimed to define activity and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in a very large, real life data set of patients with metastatic, persistent, recurrent ovarian cancer (MPR-OC). Patient age <60 years, PTV <18 cm3 , lymph node disease, and biologically effective dose α/ß10 >70 Gy were associated with higher chance of complete response (CR). Achievement of CR and total dose >25 Gy were associated with better local control (LC) rate. Mild toxicity was experienced in 20.7% of patients. In conclusion, this study confirms the activity and safety of SBRT in MPR-OC patients and identifies clinical and treatment parameters able to predict CR and LC rate.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mangifera , Neoplasias Ováricas , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radiocirugia , Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/radioterapia , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 90, 2020 Feb 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32013912

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that radiotherapy (RT) techniques delivering radiations to larger volumes (IMRT, VMAT) are potentially associated with a higher risk of second primary tumors. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of RT technique (3D-CRT vs IMRT/VMAT) on the incidence of second tumors in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: A retrospective study on 2526 previously irradiated PCa patients was performed. Patients were treated with 3D-CRT (21.3%), IMRT (68.1%), or VMAT (10.6%). Second tumors incidence was analysed in 3 categories: pelvic, pelvic and abdominal, and "any site". The correlation with RT technique was analysed using log-rank test and Cox's proportional hazard method. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 72 months (range: 9-185), 92 (3.6%) cases of second tumors were recorded with 48 months (range: 9-152) median interval from RT. Actuarial 10-year second tumor free survival (STFS) was 87.3%. Ten-year STFS in patients treated with 3D-CRT and IMRT/VMAT was 85.8 and 84.5%, respectively (p: .627). A significantly higher 10-year cumulative incidence of second tumors in the pelvis was registered in patients treated with IMRT/VMAT compared to 3D-CRT (10.7% vs 6.0%; p: .033). The lower incidence of second pelvic cancers in patients treated with 3D-CRT was confirmed at multivariable analysis (HR: 2.42, 95%CI: 1.07-5.47, p: .034). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of second pelvic tumors after RT of PCa showed a significant correlation with treatment technique. Further analyses in larger series with prolonged follow-up are needed to confirm these results.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/etiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Radioterapia Conformacional/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 30(7): 917-919, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32448805

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread to many countries and has been declared a global health emergency. Our center is located in the south of Italy where the infection rates were low and the clusters of COVID-19 positive patients were small and inhomogeneous. The aim of this short report is to share our experience as a starting point for the management of the steady state of the pandemic. METHODS: The safety of the patients and department staff required a strict plan to minimize the risk of infection between operators whose absence would have made it impossible to carry out the radiotherapy treatments. The head of the radiotherapy unit and members of the Hospital Crisis Unit have put in place a series of measures to manage the emergency. RESULTS: A "clean" team has been established whose members are kept out of the radiotherapy unit for 2 weeks on rotation. Several separate work areas have been made in order to reduce direct contact between the staff. Each staff member has to wear protective equipment if close contact with patients is required. Before confirming a radiotherapy consult or a follow-up visit, telephone clinical and epidemiological screening is performed by nurses through a questionnaire regarding the presence of respiratory symptoms or eventual social contacts with COVID-19 positive people. Once the patients arrive in the hospital, a triage point at the entrance to the hospital performs a second screening and a temperature check. CONCLUSIONS: This management experience of a radiotherapy unit in Southern Italy could serve as a useful example for the future. In fact, in the steady state of infection many centers may face epidemiologically contagious numbers similar to those that we currently have in our region. These numbers require the maintenance of alert and precautionary measures which in our case seem to have worked.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente/prevención & control , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Servicio de Oncología en Hospital/organización & administración , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Italia , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Oncología por Radiación/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Triaje
15.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 21(11): 48-57, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33063456

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of automated stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy (SBRT-VMAT) planning using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) approach as a dose escalation strategy for SBRT in pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Twelve patients with pancreatic cancer were retrospectively replanned. Dose prescription was 30 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) and was escalated up to 50 Gy to the boost target volume (BTV) using a SIB technique in 5 fractions. All plans were generated by Pinnacle3 Autoplanning using 6MV dual-arc VMAT technique for flattened (FF) and flattening filter-free beams (FFF). An overlap volume (OLV) between the PRV duodenum and the PTV was defined to correlate with the ability to boost the BTV. Dosimetric metrics for BTV and PTV coverage, maximal doses for serial OARs, integral dose, conformation numbers, and dose contrast indexes were used to analyze the dosimetric results. Dose accuracy was validated using the PTW Octavius-4D phantom together with the 1500 2D-array. Differences between FF and FFF plans were quantified using the Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank. RESULTS: Full prescription doses to the 95% of PTV and BTV can be delivered to patients with no OLV. BTV mean dose was >90% of the prescribed doses for all patients at all dose levels. Compared to FF plans, FFF plans showed significant reduced integral doses, larger number of MUs, and reduced beam-on-times up to 51% for the highest dose level. Despite plan complexity, pre-treatment verification reported a gamma pass-rate greater than the acceptance threshold of 95% for all FF and FFF plans for 3%-2 mm criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The SIB-SBRT strategy with Autoplanning was dosimetrically feasible. Ablative doses up to 50 Gy in 5 fractions can be delivered to the BTV for almost all patients respecting all the normal tissue constraints. A prospective clinical trial based on SBRT strategy using SIB-VMAT technique with FFF beams seems to be justified.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Radiocirugia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 569, 2019 Jun 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31185957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of radiation dose on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective analysis on 514 patients with PDAC (T1-4; N0-1; M0) treated with surgical resection with macroscopically negative margins (R0-1) followed by adjuvant CRT was performed. Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on radiotherapy doses (group 1: < 45 Gy, group 2: ≥ 45 and < 50 Gy, group 3: ≥ 50 and < 55 Gy, group 4: ≥ 55 Gy). Adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed to 141 patients. Survival functions were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared through the log-rank test. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 35 months (range: 3-120 months). At univariate analysis, a worse OS was recorded in patients with higher preoperative Ca 19.9 levels (≥ 90 U/ml; p < 0.001), higher tumor grade (G3-4, p = 0.004), R1 resection (p = 0.004), higher pT stage (pT3-4, p = 0.002) and positive nodes (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients receiving increasing doses of CRT showed a significantly improved OS. In groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, median OS was 13.0 months, 21.0 months, 22.0 months, and 28.0 months, respectively (p = 0.004). The significant impact of higher dose was confirmed by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing doses of CRT seems to favorably impact on OS in adjuvant setting. The conflicting results of randomized trials on adjuvant CRT in PDAC could be due to < 45 Gy dose generally used.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antígeno CA-19-9/sangre , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Clasificación del Tumor , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral
17.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 20(3): 37-44, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30790439

RESUMEN

We evaluated an EPID-based in-vivo dosimetry (IVD) method for the dose verification and the treatment reproducibility of lung SBRT-VMAT treatments in clinical routine. Ten patients with lung metastases treated with Elekta VMAT technique were enrolled. All patients were irradiated in five consecutive fractions, with total doses of 50 Gy. Set-up was carried out with the Elekta stereotactic body frame. Eight patients were simulated and treated using the Active Breath Control (ABC) system, a spirometer enabling patients to maintain a breath-hold at a predetermined lung volume. Two patients were simulated and treated in free-breathing using an abdominal compressor. IVD was performed using the SOFTDISO software. IVD tests were evaluated by means of (a) ratio R between daily in-vivo isocenter dose and planned dose and (b) γ-analysis between EPID integral portal images in terms of percentage of points with γ-value smaller than one (γ% ) and mean γ-values (γmean ) using a 3%(global)/3 mm criteria. Alert criteria of ±5% for R ratio, γ%  < 90%, and γmean  > 0.67 were chosen. 50 transit EPID images were acquired. For the patients treated with ABC spirometer, the results reported a high level of accuracy in dose delivery with 100% of tests within ±5%. The γ-analysis showed a mean value of γmean equal to 0.21 (range: 0.04-0.56) and a mean γ% equal to 96.9 (range: 78-100). Relevant discrepancies were observed only for the two patients treated without ABC, mainly due to a blurring dose effect due to residual respiratory motion. Our method provided a fast and accurate procedure in clinical routine for verifying delivered dose as well as for detecting errors.


Asunto(s)
Contencion de la Respiración , Electrónica/instrumentación , Dosimetría in Vivo/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Dosificación Radioterapéutica
18.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 194(9): 843-854, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29802435

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the quality of treatment plans of spinal radiosurgery derived from different planning and delivery systems. The comparisons include robotic delivery and intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) approaches. Multiple centers with equal systems were used to reduce a bias based on individual's planning abilities. The study used a series of three complex spine lesions to maximize the difference in plan quality among the various approaches. METHODS: Internationally recognized experts in the field of treatment planning and spinal radiosurgery from 12 centers with various treatment planning systems participated. For a complex spinal lesion, the results were compared against a previously published benchmark plan derived for CyberKnife radiosurgery (CKRS) using circular cones only. For two additional cases, one with multiple small lesions infiltrating three vertebrae and a single vertebra lesion treated with integrated boost, the results were compared against a benchmark plan generated using a best practice guideline for CKRS. All plans were rated based on a previously established ranking system. RESULTS: All 12 centers could reach equality (n = 4) or outperform (n = 8) the benchmark plan. For the multiple lesions and the single vertebra lesion plan only 5 and 3 of the 12 centers, respectively, reached equality or outperformed the best practice benchmark plan. However, the absolute differences in target and critical structure dosimetry were small and strongly planner-dependent rather than system-dependent. Overall, gantry-based IMAT with simple planning techniques (two coplanar arcs) produced faster treatments and significantly outperformed static gantry intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and multileaf collimator (MLC) or non-MLC CKRS treatment plan quality regardless of the system (mean rank out of 4 was 1.2 vs. 3.1, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: High plan quality for complex spinal radiosurgery was achieved among all systems and all participating centers in this planning challenge. This study concludes that simple IMAT techniques can generate significantly better plan quality compared to previous established CKRS benchmarks.


Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Radiocirugia/métodos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas , Anciano , Algoritmos , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Órganos en Riesgo , Radiocirugia/instrumentación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/instrumentación , Reirradiación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/instrumentación , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía
19.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 19(6): 35-43, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30220111

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the feasibility to plan and deliver highly heterogeneous doses to symptomatic large tumors using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) during a short course palliative accelerated radiotherapy. METHODS: A patient with a large symptomatic chordoma infiltrating the right gluteal region was selected. A modified SIB treatment was implemented to irradiate the central volume of the tumor (boost target volume, BTV) up to 10 Gy/fraction in a dose escalation trial while maintaining the remaining tumor volume (planning target volume, PTV) and the surrounding healthy tissues within 5 Gy/fraction in twice daily fractions for two consecutive days. Four SIB plans were generated in the dual-arc modality; a basal dose of 20 Gy was prescribed to the PTV, while the BTV was boosted up to 40 Gy. For comparison purposes, plans obtained with a sequential boost (SEQ plans) were also generated. All plans were optimized to deliver at least 95% of the prescription dose to the targets. Dose contrast index (DCI), conformity index (CI), integral dose (ID), and the irradiated body volumes at 5, 10, and 20 Gy were evaluated. RESULTS: At equal targets coverage, SIB plans provided major improvement in DCI, CI, and ID with respect to SEQ plans. When BTV dose escalated up to 200% of PTV prescription, DCI resulted in 66% for SIB plans and 37% for SEQ plans; the ID increase was only 11% for SIB plans (vs 27% for SEQ plans) and the increase in healthy tissues receiving more than 5, 10, and 20 Gy was less than 2%. Pretreatment dose verification reported a γ-value passing rate greater than 95% with 3%(global)-2 mm. CONCLUSION: A modified SIB technique is dosimetrically feasible for large tumors, where doses higher than the tolerance dose of healthy tissues are necessary to increase the therapeutic gain.


Asunto(s)
Cordoma/radioterapia , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Pronóstico , Radiometría/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos
20.
Future Oncol ; 12(6): 779-87, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26829128

RESUMEN

AIMS: Low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) can increase biological efficacy of chemotherapy. This Phase II trial evaluates LDRT plus FOLFIRI-bevacizumab (FOLFIRI-B) in metastatic colorectal cancer. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: raising the clinical complete response rate from 5 to 25%. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: toxicity, progression-free survival. Patients underwent 12 FOLFIRI-B cycles plus two daily LDRT fractions (20 cGy/6 h interval) on each cycle. Statistical analysis was planned on 18 patients. RESULTS: Results on 18 patients are reported. Specifically considering irradiated sites: 15/18 patients had a partial (11/18) or complete (4/18) response. Among 11 partial responders, three became a pathological CR after surgery. Grade 3-4 toxicity was recorded in two patients (11.1%). At median follow-up of 30 months (range: 8-50), 7/18 patients progressed in irradiated sites. CONCLUSION: Seven out of 18 patients (38.9%) had clinical or pathological CR in lesions treated with LDRT. Further studies on this newer treatment modality seem justified.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA